E.H.M. Geurts
Please Note
24 records found
1
Effective municipal support for sustainable energy renovations
A study into municipal incentives and barrier perceived by homeowner associations
Municipal strategies should focus on hands-on facilitation alongside information-sharing, such as one-stop desks, process coaches, adaptable templates, phased financing, and demonstrator projects. The thesis advocates viewing incentives as integrated systems, rather than isolated tools and offers targeted recommendations for focusing on personal assistance, simplifying institutional procedures between incentives, and facilitating governance for smaller or volunteer-run homeowner associations. Overall, the study provides actionable mechanisms and policy-relevant insights to enhance collective renovation efforts.
...
Municipal strategies should focus on hands-on facilitation alongside information-sharing, such as one-stop desks, process coaches, adaptable templates, phased financing, and demonstrator projects. The thesis advocates viewing incentives as integrated systems, rather than isolated tools and offers targeted recommendations for focusing on personal assistance, simplifying institutional procedures between incentives, and facilitating governance for smaller or volunteer-run homeowner associations. Overall, the study provides actionable mechanisms and policy-relevant insights to enhance collective renovation efforts.
A steppingstone towards homeownership?
Understanding intermediate tenures and Its Impact on first-time buyers ability to enter the Dutch Housing Market
This study examines how ownership, financial, and risk-allocation features embedded within Dutch intermediate tenure mechanisms influence transitions towards first-time homeownership. The research focuses on three contemporary Dutch mechanisms: SteenvlinderINC, Duokoop, and Welvoort. A qualitative multiple-case study approach was applied, combining document analysis with semi-structured interviews involving providers and a housing market expert.
Building on an analytical framework derived from international literature on intermediate housing tenures, ownership structures, affordability, and housing market risks, the study first identifies and compares the key design characteristics of the selected mechanisms. Subsequently, these characteristics are analysed to determine which design features facilitate or constrain progression towards homeownership. Finally, a scenario-based financial analysis was conducted to assess the extent to which the mechanisms function as stepping stones to full homeownership under varying housing market conditions and household income trajectories.
The findings demonstrate that all three mechanisms seek to improve access to homeownership by reducing upfront affordability constraints, yet they employ fundamentally different strategies. SteenvlinderINC combines phased ownership with self-build participation and a fixed purchase price, Duokoop separates land and property ownership through a split-financing model that enables households to benefit from property value appreciation, and Welvoort applies a rental-first pathway combined with a value-sharing arrangement. The scenario analysis reveals that the effectiveness of these mechanisms is highly dependent on the interaction between housing market developments, household income growth, and risk-allocation structures.
The study contributes to the academic literature on intermediate housing tenures by providing a comparative analysis of contemporary Dutch mechanisms and by demonstrating how ownership, financial, and risk-allocation features jointly shape homeownership trajectories. The findings offer insights for housing providers, households, policymakers, and market actors seeking to expand affordable pathways towards homeownership and to enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of intermediate tenures as stepping stones towards full homeownership in increasingly constrained housing markets.
...
This study examines how ownership, financial, and risk-allocation features embedded within Dutch intermediate tenure mechanisms influence transitions towards first-time homeownership. The research focuses on three contemporary Dutch mechanisms: SteenvlinderINC, Duokoop, and Welvoort. A qualitative multiple-case study approach was applied, combining document analysis with semi-structured interviews involving providers and a housing market expert.
Building on an analytical framework derived from international literature on intermediate housing tenures, ownership structures, affordability, and housing market risks, the study first identifies and compares the key design characteristics of the selected mechanisms. Subsequently, these characteristics are analysed to determine which design features facilitate or constrain progression towards homeownership. Finally, a scenario-based financial analysis was conducted to assess the extent to which the mechanisms function as stepping stones to full homeownership under varying housing market conditions and household income trajectories.
The findings demonstrate that all three mechanisms seek to improve access to homeownership by reducing upfront affordability constraints, yet they employ fundamentally different strategies. SteenvlinderINC combines phased ownership with self-build participation and a fixed purchase price, Duokoop separates land and property ownership through a split-financing model that enables households to benefit from property value appreciation, and Welvoort applies a rental-first pathway combined with a value-sharing arrangement. The scenario analysis reveals that the effectiveness of these mechanisms is highly dependent on the interaction between housing market developments, household income growth, and risk-allocation structures.
The study contributes to the academic literature on intermediate housing tenures by providing a comparative analysis of contemporary Dutch mechanisms and by demonstrating how ownership, financial, and risk-allocation features jointly shape homeownership trajectories. The findings offer insights for housing providers, households, policymakers, and market actors seeking to expand affordable pathways towards homeownership and to enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of intermediate tenures as stepping stones towards full homeownership in increasingly constrained housing markets.
Between plans and practice
Exploring how participation practices relate to evolving public space use under conditions of uncertainty in mixed-use urban development
The study adopts a qualitative multiple case study approach, focusing on the redevelopment of Kronenburg in Amstelveen and the Marineterrein in Amsterdam, both cases are in the planning phase and are moving into the development phase. Both cases represent mixed-use urban developments characterised by uncertainty, temporality and changing public space dynamics. The research combines document analysis, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and street interviews with users of public space. Through qualitative content analysis and cross-case comparison, the research analyses how participation is organised, which users are represented and how participation related to everyday spatial practices and evolving development conditions
The findings demonstrate that participation practices are strongly influenced by the uncertain and evolving nature of mixed-use urban development. In Kronenburg, participation mainly operated in institutional and regulatory constraints, resulting in participation processes that were largely consultative and focused on existing stakeholders. Future users, particularly temporary and short-stay residents, remained difficult to represent, causing a structural mismatch between planned futures and current lived realities. In contrast, the Marineterrein demonstrated a more adaptive and iterative development approach where temporary use and experimentation actively informed participation and spatial decision-making. Here, informal practices such as swimming and recreational use became influential in shaping future planning discussions and public space ambitions.
Across both cases, the research reveals that participation primarily captures partial and time-bound representation of public space use. Participation processes tend to favour organised and currently present actors, while future users and evolving forms of use remain difficult to incorporate. At the same time, the findings show that adaptive and continuous participation approaches can create stronger alignment between planning processes and everyday spatial practices. The study therefore argues that participation in mixed-use urban development should not only be approached as a procedural planning tool, but also an ongoing and adaptive process capable of responding to uncertainty, temporality and evolving patterns of public space use over time.
...
The study adopts a qualitative multiple case study approach, focusing on the redevelopment of Kronenburg in Amstelveen and the Marineterrein in Amsterdam, both cases are in the planning phase and are moving into the development phase. Both cases represent mixed-use urban developments characterised by uncertainty, temporality and changing public space dynamics. The research combines document analysis, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and street interviews with users of public space. Through qualitative content analysis and cross-case comparison, the research analyses how participation is organised, which users are represented and how participation related to everyday spatial practices and evolving development conditions
The findings demonstrate that participation practices are strongly influenced by the uncertain and evolving nature of mixed-use urban development. In Kronenburg, participation mainly operated in institutional and regulatory constraints, resulting in participation processes that were largely consultative and focused on existing stakeholders. Future users, particularly temporary and short-stay residents, remained difficult to represent, causing a structural mismatch between planned futures and current lived realities. In contrast, the Marineterrein demonstrated a more adaptive and iterative development approach where temporary use and experimentation actively informed participation and spatial decision-making. Here, informal practices such as swimming and recreational use became influential in shaping future planning discussions and public space ambitions.
Across both cases, the research reveals that participation primarily captures partial and time-bound representation of public space use. Participation processes tend to favour organised and currently present actors, while future users and evolving forms of use remain difficult to incorporate. At the same time, the findings show that adaptive and continuous participation approaches can create stronger alignment between planning processes and everyday spatial practices. The study therefore argues that participation in mixed-use urban development should not only be approached as a procedural planning tool, but also an ongoing and adaptive process capable of responding to uncertainty, temporality and evolving patterns of public space use over time.
Price for Protection
How accessible are Policy-backed Adaptation Finance Instruments?
The research adopts a qualitative, case study approach, examining three analytically distinct dimensions of access. Eligibility, affordability, and attainability are examined against the socioeconomic and housing conditions of Bloemhof homeowners. The findings show that residents face simultaneous obstacles across all three dimensions. Many fall outside eligibility thresholds or sit at the margin of creditworthiness; the loan mechanism provides insufficient financial relief, given the disproportionately high cost-to-value ratio in the neighbourhood. Lastly, the procedural demands of the instrument are most onerous for the households least equipped to navigate them.
The thesis concludes that the FDF does not contain an embedded exclusionary intent, but that its calibration, centred on repayments and individual asset value, does not mitigate the inequalities it is intended to address. A more equitable instrument would lend against demonstrated need rather than asset value. It could operate at the scale of the physical problem and carry more of the navigational and financial burden institutionally, rather than assigning it to the household. ...
The research adopts a qualitative, case study approach, examining three analytically distinct dimensions of access. Eligibility, affordability, and attainability are examined against the socioeconomic and housing conditions of Bloemhof homeowners. The findings show that residents face simultaneous obstacles across all three dimensions. Many fall outside eligibility thresholds or sit at the margin of creditworthiness; the loan mechanism provides insufficient financial relief, given the disproportionately high cost-to-value ratio in the neighbourhood. Lastly, the procedural demands of the instrument are most onerous for the households least equipped to navigate them.
The thesis concludes that the FDF does not contain an embedded exclusionary intent, but that its calibration, centred on repayments and individual asset value, does not mitigate the inequalities it is intended to address. A more equitable instrument would lend against demonstrated need rather than asset value. It could operate at the scale of the physical problem and carry more of the navigational and financial burden institutionally, rather than assigning it to the household.
Investing in Social Impact
How Social Impact Investment Funds create social impact through placemaking projects: the Dutch case of Stadmakersfonds
Using the Dutch Stadmakersfonds (SMF) as the central case in an embedded single-case study, two supported placemaking initiatives (Huis Miereveld and Roodnoot) are analysed to understand how financial instruments, governance structures, and local ecosystems shape impact creation. As a hybrid fund, SMF functions as a mechanism to activate both public and private capital for the public purpose of generating social impact.
A qualitative multi-method design was applied, including document analysis, semi-structured interviews with ecosystem and project actors, and Capability Approach-based reflective conversations with beneficiaries. This last method is grounded in Sen and Nussbaum’s Capability Approach. The conversations assess experienced outcomes rather than organisational outputs, enabling systematic inclusion of beneficiary perspectives in impact evaluation.
The findings show that SMF generates social impact not merely through subordinated and patient capital, but through embedded non-financial support such as strategic guidance, mission safeguarding, and ecosystem building. These relational functions strengthen organisational resilience and stabilise socially programmed real estate. The fund’s additionality lies in both financial risk absorption and institutional capacity building that enables social entrepreneurs to execute their social programmes.
Impact pathways differ substantially between projects: Huis Miereveld demonstrates neighbourhood-level capability enhancement, whereas Roodnoot’s social impact is more internally oriented. The study further reveals a mismatch between output-driven measurement tools and beneficiaries’ lived experiences.
Although socially effective, SMF is not yet structurally financially independent. Its reliance on public funding and the limited revenue generated through a revolving loan model make it difficult to sustainably finance the relational and advisory functions that are central to its impact creation. This highlights the need for hybrid financial models that structurally recognise and fund both capital provision and non-financial support. ...
Using the Dutch Stadmakersfonds (SMF) as the central case in an embedded single-case study, two supported placemaking initiatives (Huis Miereveld and Roodnoot) are analysed to understand how financial instruments, governance structures, and local ecosystems shape impact creation. As a hybrid fund, SMF functions as a mechanism to activate both public and private capital for the public purpose of generating social impact.
A qualitative multi-method design was applied, including document analysis, semi-structured interviews with ecosystem and project actors, and Capability Approach-based reflective conversations with beneficiaries. This last method is grounded in Sen and Nussbaum’s Capability Approach. The conversations assess experienced outcomes rather than organisational outputs, enabling systematic inclusion of beneficiary perspectives in impact evaluation.
The findings show that SMF generates social impact not merely through subordinated and patient capital, but through embedded non-financial support such as strategic guidance, mission safeguarding, and ecosystem building. These relational functions strengthen organisational resilience and stabilise socially programmed real estate. The fund’s additionality lies in both financial risk absorption and institutional capacity building that enables social entrepreneurs to execute their social programmes.
Impact pathways differ substantially between projects: Huis Miereveld demonstrates neighbourhood-level capability enhancement, whereas Roodnoot’s social impact is more internally oriented. The study further reveals a mismatch between output-driven measurement tools and beneficiaries’ lived experiences.
Although socially effective, SMF is not yet structurally financially independent. Its reliance on public funding and the limited revenue generated through a revolving loan model make it difficult to sustainably finance the relational and advisory functions that are central to its impact creation. This highlights the need for hybrid financial models that structurally recognise and fund both capital provision and non-financial support.
Making Integrated Value visible in Urban Regeneration
Strategies to improve early-stage decision making in Dutch Urban Regeneration
Drawing on academic literature and interviews with municipal officials, developers, and housing association representatives, the study analyses stakeholder priorities, alignment requirements under the Omgevingswet, and the institutional conditions under which value trade-offs are negotiated and justified. Using a design science research approach, an Integrated Value Creation Framework was developed to complement financial feasibility analysis. The framework operationalises non-financial values through indicators, a participation influence log and a trade-off ledger, enabling these values to be linked to early design and investment choices in a more efficient way.
The research findings reveal that value trade-offs become more manageable and accountable when they are made explicit, recorded, and revisited as part of formal early-stage decision-making, rather than remaining suggestive. The study concludes by discussing how these values can be made more visible and influential in Dutch urban regeneration initiatives, and by offering recommendations for improving early-stage decision-making practices. ...
Drawing on academic literature and interviews with municipal officials, developers, and housing association representatives, the study analyses stakeholder priorities, alignment requirements under the Omgevingswet, and the institutional conditions under which value trade-offs are negotiated and justified. Using a design science research approach, an Integrated Value Creation Framework was developed to complement financial feasibility analysis. The framework operationalises non-financial values through indicators, a participation influence log and a trade-off ledger, enabling these values to be linked to early design and investment choices in a more efficient way.
The research findings reveal that value trade-offs become more manageable and accountable when they are made explicit, recorded, and revisited as part of formal early-stage decision-making, rather than remaining suggestive. The study concludes by discussing how these values can be made more visible and influential in Dutch urban regeneration initiatives, and by offering recommendations for improving early-stage decision-making practices.
Bridging a Path to Social Value
Strategies to Improve End-user Well-being in Housing
Beyond the Blueprint
Harnessing Lived Experience in citizen participation processes to advance gender mainstreaming and address the spatial inequalities of the Gendered City
...
Bridging the Heat Gap
Enhancing Collaborative Governance for Urban Heat Island Adaptation in Jakarta’s Informal Settlements
Despite this progress, many climate change efforts in Indonesia still focus on large-scale infrastructure or attempts to mitigate the regular natural disasters. Meanwhile, local-scale adaptation, particularly in the area of housing and settlements, has received less attention. This is a critical issue in informal settlements, where residents face greater challenges in dealing with climate impacts. Therefore, more focus is needed on adaptation strategies that consider these vulnerable areas and everyday living conditions.
In this context, collaboration between different actors, such as government institutions, communities, and other organizations, is important. Climate change impacts numerous aspects of life, and solutions necessitate joint efforts from multiple sectors. Working together can help strengthen responses and make adaptation more effective, especially at the scale of neighbourhoods and households where the effects are directly felt.
This research explores how collaborative action can support climate change adaptation in Jakarta’s informal settlements. A qualitative approach is used, including case studies and interviews with involved actors. By applying the collaborative governance framework, the study aims to understand the current implementation of adaptation efforts and identify areas for improvement in future practices. ...
Despite this progress, many climate change efforts in Indonesia still focus on large-scale infrastructure or attempts to mitigate the regular natural disasters. Meanwhile, local-scale adaptation, particularly in the area of housing and settlements, has received less attention. This is a critical issue in informal settlements, where residents face greater challenges in dealing with climate impacts. Therefore, more focus is needed on adaptation strategies that consider these vulnerable areas and everyday living conditions.
In this context, collaboration between different actors, such as government institutions, communities, and other organizations, is important. Climate change impacts numerous aspects of life, and solutions necessitate joint efforts from multiple sectors. Working together can help strengthen responses and make adaptation more effective, especially at the scale of neighbourhoods and households where the effects are directly felt.
This research explores how collaborative action can support climate change adaptation in Jakarta’s informal settlements. A qualitative approach is used, including case studies and interviews with involved actors. By applying the collaborative governance framework, the study aims to understand the current implementation of adaptation efforts and identify areas for improvement in future practices.
Enabling environment for participative urban regeneration in the Chinese context
From multi-case study of micro-regeneration projects in Shanghai
From Shelter to Strength
Assessing the Impact of Dutch Housing Policies on Status Holders' Social Integration
This thesis investigates the impact of Dutch housing policies on the social integration of status holders, focusing on how housing allocation systems, spatial dispersal policies, and municipal decision-making processes influence social integration outcomes. Through a combination of literature reviews, case studies in Utrecht and Westland, and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, the research provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and strategies associated with housing refugees.
The study reveals that Dutch housing policies prioritize status holders through centralized allocation systems, quota-based distribution, and collaborative initiatives aimed at increasing affordable housing and community integration. Spatial dispersal policies, designed to prevent segregation and promote diversity, present challenges related to individual preferences and potential isolation. Municipal decision-making is influenced by factors such as social housing scarcity, community resistance, and the need for greater input from status holders.
Social integration is found to be closely linked to housing's connection to employment, education, health, and community support. The research highlights the importance of place attachment, access to (familiar) amenities, and public transportation in facilitating integration. Additionally, the role of community attitudes and political environments significantly impacts the social integration process.
The findings underscore the need for flexible and informed housing policies that balance practical considerations with the well-being of migrants. Recommendations for future research include exploring community-based support initiatives, understanding local residents' perceptions of refugees, and utilizing AI algorithms to improve housing placement decisions. The study contributes to the broader discourse on refugee integration and offers insights for policymakers, housing authorities, and community stakeholders. It seeks to offer valuable insights into the dynamics shaping inclusive communities and resilient cities in the Netherlands and beyond. ...
This thesis investigates the impact of Dutch housing policies on the social integration of status holders, focusing on how housing allocation systems, spatial dispersal policies, and municipal decision-making processes influence social integration outcomes. Through a combination of literature reviews, case studies in Utrecht and Westland, and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, the research provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and strategies associated with housing refugees.
The study reveals that Dutch housing policies prioritize status holders through centralized allocation systems, quota-based distribution, and collaborative initiatives aimed at increasing affordable housing and community integration. Spatial dispersal policies, designed to prevent segregation and promote diversity, present challenges related to individual preferences and potential isolation. Municipal decision-making is influenced by factors such as social housing scarcity, community resistance, and the need for greater input from status holders.
Social integration is found to be closely linked to housing's connection to employment, education, health, and community support. The research highlights the importance of place attachment, access to (familiar) amenities, and public transportation in facilitating integration. Additionally, the role of community attitudes and political environments significantly impacts the social integration process.
The findings underscore the need for flexible and informed housing policies that balance practical considerations with the well-being of migrants. Recommendations for future research include exploring community-based support initiatives, understanding local residents' perceptions of refugees, and utilizing AI algorithms to improve housing placement decisions. The study contributes to the broader discourse on refugee integration and offers insights for policymakers, housing authorities, and community stakeholders. It seeks to offer valuable insights into the dynamics shaping inclusive communities and resilient cities in the Netherlands and beyond.
...
Navigating Risk to Resilience
Examining the impact of water risks on the investment decision-making process in polder-area development projects in the Netherlands
Accessibility enhancement by the 15-minute city in Amsterdam Nieuw-West
To what extent is the 15-minute city concept able to enhance social sustainability?
Alternatives for first-time buyers
A study on the barriers and enablers of alternative purchase instruments to increase the accessibility of first-time buyers to the Dutch housing market
The accessibility of first-time buyers to the owner-occupied housing market is highly relevant to the functioning of the housing market as whole, since it stimulates the housing market flow. Additionally, the inaccessibility to the owner-occupied market results in households not being able to build equity through homeownership, stimulating a prosperity gap. Although studies have researched the position of first-time buyers on the housing market, as well as provided a comparison between several alternative purchase instruments, there is a lack of research on how these instruments enhance the accessibility of first-time buyers to the housing market and which factors form a barrier in this enhancement. Therefore, this research identifies the factors limiting the access of first-time buyers to the housing market, and establishes through a comparative study the enablers and barriers of four alternative purchase instruments in the Netherlands with regard to enhancing the increase in the accessibility. The identified barriers are transformed into suggestions for alterations of the alternative purchase instruments to increase the impact they have on enhancing the accessibility of first-time buyers to the market. Literature study on first-time buyers, their limitations, and alternative purchase instruments in the Netherlands was complemented with interviews, providing several perspectives on the alternative purchase instruments. The main limitation of first-time buyers in acquiring homeownership is their limited financing capacity. The group of first-time buyers with an income between €40.000 and €60.000 (equal to 1 –1,5 modal income) experience the greatest limitations since their income is too high to be eligible for social rent, but too low to get access to enough financial resources to purchase a property on the owner-occupied housing market. The analysis of the empirical data shows that on the small scale that the instruments are currently deployed in, they are successful in increasing the accessibility of first-time buyers to the housing market since they lower the necessary funding capacity. However, the deployment capacity of the instruments is being influenced by external factors, limiting the ability to increase the deployment capacity of the instruments and therefore the impact on the increase of accessibility of first-time buyers. By making a purchase instrument individual bound instead of property bound, the deployment capacity is no longer dependent on the supply side of the housing market. This also lowers the desire to apply an instrument to the same property for multiple households, allowing households to pay off the instrument’s rights and acquire the bare property rights. Finally, the division of financial benefits should be in equilibrium, meaning that the financial benefits should be high enough on the supplier’s side for the instrument to be viable, but also on the user’s side since financing capacity is the main problem these instruments try to tackle.
...
The accessibility of first-time buyers to the owner-occupied housing market is highly relevant to the functioning of the housing market as whole, since it stimulates the housing market flow. Additionally, the inaccessibility to the owner-occupied market results in households not being able to build equity through homeownership, stimulating a prosperity gap. Although studies have researched the position of first-time buyers on the housing market, as well as provided a comparison between several alternative purchase instruments, there is a lack of research on how these instruments enhance the accessibility of first-time buyers to the housing market and which factors form a barrier in this enhancement. Therefore, this research identifies the factors limiting the access of first-time buyers to the housing market, and establishes through a comparative study the enablers and barriers of four alternative purchase instruments in the Netherlands with regard to enhancing the increase in the accessibility. The identified barriers are transformed into suggestions for alterations of the alternative purchase instruments to increase the impact they have on enhancing the accessibility of first-time buyers to the market. Literature study on first-time buyers, their limitations, and alternative purchase instruments in the Netherlands was complemented with interviews, providing several perspectives on the alternative purchase instruments. The main limitation of first-time buyers in acquiring homeownership is their limited financing capacity. The group of first-time buyers with an income between €40.000 and €60.000 (equal to 1 –1,5 modal income) experience the greatest limitations since their income is too high to be eligible for social rent, but too low to get access to enough financial resources to purchase a property on the owner-occupied housing market. The analysis of the empirical data shows that on the small scale that the instruments are currently deployed in, they are successful in increasing the accessibility of first-time buyers to the housing market since they lower the necessary funding capacity. However, the deployment capacity of the instruments is being influenced by external factors, limiting the ability to increase the deployment capacity of the instruments and therefore the impact on the increase of accessibility of first-time buyers. By making a purchase instrument individual bound instead of property bound, the deployment capacity is no longer dependent on the supply side of the housing market. This also lowers the desire to apply an instrument to the same property for multiple households, allowing households to pay off the instrument’s rights and acquire the bare property rights. Finally, the division of financial benefits should be in equilibrium, meaning that the financial benefits should be high enough on the supplier’s side for the instrument to be viable, but also on the user’s side since financing capacity is the main problem these instruments try to tackle.
Formalisation, then what?
Exploring the impacts of the process on recipient households in Albania
The data analysis utilized Excel for the survey data and ATLAS.ti for interview transcripts, employing both deductive and inductive coding techniques. The findings reveal that the obtaining of ownership certificates had limited overall impact on the access to livelihood assets amongst recipient households. While there were some enhancements in financial capital for a few participants, the changes were not present in the rest of the sample population. Moreover, for those few participants that observed any changes following formalisation, the possession of other assets and skills prior to the process, played a significant role in their ability to capitalise on the legal status of their properties. This thesis highlights the importance of considering multiple dimensions of well-being, and accounting for the local socio-economic contexts, to fully understand the impact of formalisation on recipient households. It emphasizes the need for further research into gentrification and formalisation, the need for longitudinal and comparative studies, as well as further academic research into policy measures that can address the broader socio-economic challenges concerning formalisation. Lastly, the findings can inform future initiatives aimed at promoting sustainable development and inclusive urbanisation in Albania and similar contexts. ...
The data analysis utilized Excel for the survey data and ATLAS.ti for interview transcripts, employing both deductive and inductive coding techniques. The findings reveal that the obtaining of ownership certificates had limited overall impact on the access to livelihood assets amongst recipient households. While there were some enhancements in financial capital for a few participants, the changes were not present in the rest of the sample population. Moreover, for those few participants that observed any changes following formalisation, the possession of other assets and skills prior to the process, played a significant role in their ability to capitalise on the legal status of their properties. This thesis highlights the importance of considering multiple dimensions of well-being, and accounting for the local socio-economic contexts, to fully understand the impact of formalisation on recipient households. It emphasizes the need for further research into gentrification and formalisation, the need for longitudinal and comparative studies, as well as further academic research into policy measures that can address the broader socio-economic challenges concerning formalisation. Lastly, the findings can inform future initiatives aimed at promoting sustainable development and inclusive urbanisation in Albania and similar contexts.
Backing Incremental Housing
The Role of Social Enterprises assisting Incremental Housing
Mechanisms to Housing Rights implementation in Barcelona
Balancing act between private landlords and low-income tenants
mechanism that allows indirect investment to come to the city and higher tax collection that is reflected in the infrastructure of the city. On the other, big private landlords such as opportunistic private equity funds are responsible for managing the properties and, therefore, responsible for the conditions of the tenants. Which, in recent years, have been affected the adequacy of the house. In this way, the question that will guide this research arises, what are the challenges between real estate management models and securing housing rights for low-income tenants in Barcelona? Articles, policy documents, and annual reports will be investigated to explore the investment practices of different companies (to be defined). To establish a complete view of the local investment practices of the SOCIMIs studied. The research will be divided in three sections fallowing the logic of the research questions. ...
mechanism that allows indirect investment to come to the city and higher tax collection that is reflected in the infrastructure of the city. On the other, big private landlords such as opportunistic private equity funds are responsible for managing the properties and, therefore, responsible for the conditions of the tenants. Which, in recent years, have been affected the adequacy of the house. In this way, the question that will guide this research arises, what are the challenges between real estate management models and securing housing rights for low-income tenants in Barcelona? Articles, policy documents, and annual reports will be investigated to explore the investment practices of different companies (to be defined). To establish a complete view of the local investment practices of the SOCIMIs studied. The research will be divided in three sections fallowing the logic of the research questions.
Quantifying investment risks
Forecasting delivery time of new-build projects of Dutch housing associations
The aim of the research is to explore how new build plans can be made more realistic by accurately predicting the delivery time of investment forecasts. The study results in the identification of risks that lead to delay of new build investment plans and their subsequent indicators. The risks include long permit procedures, long land acquisition processes or lack of land positions to build, long tendering procedures, contractor related delays, rise in construction costs and lack of capacity at municipal level in dealing with development projects. The indicators of risks which statistically significantly predicted project time are construction costs, change in input price index of material and labour costs as of date when decision was made to tender, municipal location, and type of construction i.e., on empty ground or existing site that needs demolition. The project indicators can be used by HA's to accurately predict project time via stochastic decision tree models (SDTA) that rely on multiple linear regression (MLR) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). Supervisory bodies can also use these to gauge realism of new build investment forecast.
...
The aim of the research is to explore how new build plans can be made more realistic by accurately predicting the delivery time of investment forecasts. The study results in the identification of risks that lead to delay of new build investment plans and their subsequent indicators. The risks include long permit procedures, long land acquisition processes or lack of land positions to build, long tendering procedures, contractor related delays, rise in construction costs and lack of capacity at municipal level in dealing with development projects. The indicators of risks which statistically significantly predicted project time are construction costs, change in input price index of material and labour costs as of date when decision was made to tender, municipal location, and type of construction i.e., on empty ground or existing site that needs demolition. The project indicators can be used by HA's to accurately predict project time via stochastic decision tree models (SDTA) that rely on multiple linear regression (MLR) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). Supervisory bodies can also use these to gauge realism of new build investment forecast.
Community Participation and Empowerment in Informal Settlement Upgrading
A Case Study in Monterrey, Mexico
was collected through document analysis of socio-urban diagnostics and planning instruments of the case study, as well as interviews and focus groups with public, private, civil society, and expert groups. Through the review of planning documents, analysis of stakeholder relations, and power dynamics, seven factors are identified and presented, namely the Planning Process and Policy, Transparency and Reliability, Networks and Support, Leadership, Stakeholder Collaboration, Community Collectivity, and Contextual Implications. In addition, contributions of this research, recommendation for further research, and a reflection on the topic and process are presented. ...
was collected through document analysis of socio-urban diagnostics and planning instruments of the case study, as well as interviews and focus groups with public, private, civil society, and expert groups. Through the review of planning documents, analysis of stakeholder relations, and power dynamics, seven factors are identified and presented, namely the Planning Process and Policy, Transparency and Reliability, Networks and Support, Leadership, Stakeholder Collaboration, Community Collectivity, and Contextual Implications. In addition, contributions of this research, recommendation for further research, and a reflection on the topic and process are presented.