L. Scholten
Please Note
22 records found
1
Perceptions of uncertainty on the science-policy interface
Examining a case of dutch environmental policy assessment
Policy analysis can provide valuable information to understand what policy options are effective in complex policy problems, taking into account the uncertainty of human behaviour, economic development, and even weather changes. Previous studies have shown however that the applicability and relevance of uncertainty communication has been limited, specifically for policy-makers.
The case studied is the perception of uncertainty by researchers and policy officers that produce and use the Climate and EnergyOutlook in theNetherlands, which presents projections of emissions and energy use with an uncertainty bandwidth.
A conceptual framework was developed to capture how uncertainty is understood in scientific literature: Framing, Characterisation, Impact, and methods of Dealing with uncertainty. Using an adapted mental model method, 9 researchers and 6 policy officers were interviewed, and their perceptions qualitatively coded (deductive and inductive) and compared.
It is concluded that two distinct perspectives were indicated on each aspect of uncertainty (definition, characterisation, and interpretation), shaped by values and institutional context. The differences were just more nuanced than a split between the participant groups. Probability statements helped align interpretation, but this may risk neglecting other important (qualitative) aspects of uncertainty. As uncertainty is also used strategically, there is a limitation to how much researchers can influence the impact of uncertainty information.
The observations help clarify the difference in uncertainty perception experienced on the science-policy interface, how they effect communication and policy-making, and suggest ways to improve alignment. Though this case study focuses on a specific presentation of uncertainty in projections of greenhousegas emissions, the findings offer a new perspective on uncertainty perception in policy analysis. ...
Policy analysis can provide valuable information to understand what policy options are effective in complex policy problems, taking into account the uncertainty of human behaviour, economic development, and even weather changes. Previous studies have shown however that the applicability and relevance of uncertainty communication has been limited, specifically for policy-makers.
The case studied is the perception of uncertainty by researchers and policy officers that produce and use the Climate and EnergyOutlook in theNetherlands, which presents projections of emissions and energy use with an uncertainty bandwidth.
A conceptual framework was developed to capture how uncertainty is understood in scientific literature: Framing, Characterisation, Impact, and methods of Dealing with uncertainty. Using an adapted mental model method, 9 researchers and 6 policy officers were interviewed, and their perceptions qualitatively coded (deductive and inductive) and compared.
It is concluded that two distinct perspectives were indicated on each aspect of uncertainty (definition, characterisation, and interpretation), shaped by values and institutional context. The differences were just more nuanced than a split between the participant groups. Probability statements helped align interpretation, but this may risk neglecting other important (qualitative) aspects of uncertainty. As uncertainty is also used strategically, there is a limitation to how much researchers can influence the impact of uncertainty information.
The observations help clarify the difference in uncertainty perception experienced on the science-policy interface, how they effect communication and policy-making, and suggest ways to improve alignment. Though this case study focuses on a specific presentation of uncertainty in projections of greenhousegas emissions, the findings offer a new perspective on uncertainty perception in policy analysis.
On the governance of green and atmospheric water
Exploring policy, institutional and discursive conditions for green and atmospheric water governance across the Amazon and Plata basins
This research assesses the potential impact of the proposed household-level policy measures using a model with a bottom-up demand component combined with a higher-level supply component. It applies the methodology of Exploratory System Dynamics Modelling and Analysis. An approach to execute a scenario-based exploration under deep uncertainty, simulating the combined effects of demographic dynamics, increased periods of drought, and economic growth in twelve potential future scenarios. As each of the ten drinking water companies operates within their own demographic and geographical context, they all face their own challenges, and different results are generated.
These results show that in none of the simulated scenarios for any of the drinking water companies, household demand actually falls to the policy target of 100 lpppd by 2035. Instead, demand only decreases to around 120 lpppd in 2035, with slight variations between regions and exogenous factors.
However, that decrease persists and reaches 110 lpppd by 2050. Regarding the supply side of the drinking water distribution system, total household and industrial demand actually increases significantly in most scenarios up to 2030 due to population and economic growth. Regional variation further highlights that some water companies may encounter local shortages, even if national demand remains within its supply limits. A key outcome of this research is the demonstration of a policy-focused modelling framework that policy makers and researchers can reuse and extend.
These findings show that the current mix of policy interventions is unlikely to be sufficient to meet the policy objective set for the conservation of drinking water. Nevertheless, demand management is one element of several in drinking water management. The simulations also show that when drinking water companies are successful in developing additional fresh water sources the challenges of increasing drinking water demand could be met.
However, more impactful policy interventions could be made still if decisive action is taken in both the implementation and development of further demand management strategies. There remains a lot to gain by further exploring the limits and opportunities of the Dutch drinking water distribution system to support the implementation of more robust and future-proof policies. ...
This research assesses the potential impact of the proposed household-level policy measures using a model with a bottom-up demand component combined with a higher-level supply component. It applies the methodology of Exploratory System Dynamics Modelling and Analysis. An approach to execute a scenario-based exploration under deep uncertainty, simulating the combined effects of demographic dynamics, increased periods of drought, and economic growth in twelve potential future scenarios. As each of the ten drinking water companies operates within their own demographic and geographical context, they all face their own challenges, and different results are generated.
These results show that in none of the simulated scenarios for any of the drinking water companies, household demand actually falls to the policy target of 100 lpppd by 2035. Instead, demand only decreases to around 120 lpppd in 2035, with slight variations between regions and exogenous factors.
However, that decrease persists and reaches 110 lpppd by 2050. Regarding the supply side of the drinking water distribution system, total household and industrial demand actually increases significantly in most scenarios up to 2030 due to population and economic growth. Regional variation further highlights that some water companies may encounter local shortages, even if national demand remains within its supply limits. A key outcome of this research is the demonstration of a policy-focused modelling framework that policy makers and researchers can reuse and extend.
These findings show that the current mix of policy interventions is unlikely to be sufficient to meet the policy objective set for the conservation of drinking water. Nevertheless, demand management is one element of several in drinking water management. The simulations also show that when drinking water companies are successful in developing additional fresh water sources the challenges of increasing drinking water demand could be met.
However, more impactful policy interventions could be made still if decisive action is taken in both the implementation and development of further demand management strategies. There remains a lot to gain by further exploring the limits and opportunities of the Dutch drinking water distribution system to support the implementation of more robust and future-proof policies.
Using Discourse Network Analysis to Study the Politics of Policy Implementation
The Environment and Planning Act in the Netherlands
The study employs a discourse analysis approach, a means to studying public discourse where policy actors engage in discourse within the public sphere to convey their ideas about a given policy to the general public. The main discursive unit is the storyline, which is a shared interpretation of the policy employed by actors in their public claims.
Hence, the overarching research question is as follows:
What does the public discourse surrounding the Environment and Planning Act (EPA) in the Netherlands reveal about its policy implementation?
Data was collected from the public discourse surrounding EPA between its legislative inception in 2011 and its formal introduction in 2024. Four prominent Dutch newspapers—NRC, De Volkskrant, Friesch Dagblad, and Leidsch Dagblad—served as data sources.
The research utilises the Discourse Network Analysis methodology, which combines various content and network analyses to reveal changing descriptive and structured patterns of the public discourse.
First, the content analysis is used to characterise the nature of public discourse and identify critical factors that influence policy implementation. Second, the analysis of the actor and storyline congruence network captures coalition structures and the discursive context, respectively; it is used to explain how and why the public discourse evolves with respect to key events in media and the policy process. Third, a “meso-level” network analysis of actor’s positions within the actor congruence network is used to describe their responses to the shifting public discourse through changes in positions within the network.
Three key findings that correspond to the three analyses are obtained. Firstly, public discourse surrounding EPA is characterised as highly disputative, characterised by varying types of disagreements on different policy issues and limitations in cross-actor engagement. Secondly, the study identifies a challenge in balancing the need for policy adjustments with the urgency of implementing them. This struggle can lead to difficulties in integrating ideas from stakeholders into policy formulation and development, which may hinder the overall progress of policy implementation. Lastly, the research suggests how politics is consequential to the policy implementation of EPA. This phenomenon is captured from the defensives of implementers to emerging political pressure on implementation—their original involvement in a broad range of policy issues has shifted to one that primarily defends their responsibilities. It is believed that implementers' critical role in influencing policy from the bottom-up is diminished.
The thesis contributes significantly to understanding policy implementation, highlighting various factors, challenges, and potential threats affecting EPA's implementation. While these findings may not directly aid EPA, they provide valuable guidance when developing similar complex policies in the Netherlands. Policy recommendations were also proposed to identify broad areas of improvement, such as planning the policy process to integrate ideas more effectively and providing more resources to implementers.
Additionally, the research makes a methodological contribution by demonstrating how discourse network analysis can be applied in implementation research. Various extensions and variations are highlighted, which were found to be useful—namely, the novel use of the storyline congruence network to study the changes in the discursive context within a rapidly evolving political process. Future research could explore the potential of discourse network analysis in studying the politics of policy implementation.
...
The study employs a discourse analysis approach, a means to studying public discourse where policy actors engage in discourse within the public sphere to convey their ideas about a given policy to the general public. The main discursive unit is the storyline, which is a shared interpretation of the policy employed by actors in their public claims.
Hence, the overarching research question is as follows:
What does the public discourse surrounding the Environment and Planning Act (EPA) in the Netherlands reveal about its policy implementation?
Data was collected from the public discourse surrounding EPA between its legislative inception in 2011 and its formal introduction in 2024. Four prominent Dutch newspapers—NRC, De Volkskrant, Friesch Dagblad, and Leidsch Dagblad—served as data sources.
The research utilises the Discourse Network Analysis methodology, which combines various content and network analyses to reveal changing descriptive and structured patterns of the public discourse.
First, the content analysis is used to characterise the nature of public discourse and identify critical factors that influence policy implementation. Second, the analysis of the actor and storyline congruence network captures coalition structures and the discursive context, respectively; it is used to explain how and why the public discourse evolves with respect to key events in media and the policy process. Third, a “meso-level” network analysis of actor’s positions within the actor congruence network is used to describe their responses to the shifting public discourse through changes in positions within the network.
Three key findings that correspond to the three analyses are obtained. Firstly, public discourse surrounding EPA is characterised as highly disputative, characterised by varying types of disagreements on different policy issues and limitations in cross-actor engagement. Secondly, the study identifies a challenge in balancing the need for policy adjustments with the urgency of implementing them. This struggle can lead to difficulties in integrating ideas from stakeholders into policy formulation and development, which may hinder the overall progress of policy implementation. Lastly, the research suggests how politics is consequential to the policy implementation of EPA. This phenomenon is captured from the defensives of implementers to emerging political pressure on implementation—their original involvement in a broad range of policy issues has shifted to one that primarily defends their responsibilities. It is believed that implementers' critical role in influencing policy from the bottom-up is diminished.
The thesis contributes significantly to understanding policy implementation, highlighting various factors, challenges, and potential threats affecting EPA's implementation. While these findings may not directly aid EPA, they provide valuable guidance when developing similar complex policies in the Netherlands. Policy recommendations were also proposed to identify broad areas of improvement, such as planning the policy process to integrate ideas more effectively and providing more resources to implementers.
Additionally, the research makes a methodological contribution by demonstrating how discourse network analysis can be applied in implementation research. Various extensions and variations are highlighted, which were found to be useful—namely, the novel use of the storyline congruence network to study the changes in the discursive context within a rapidly evolving political process. Future research could explore the potential of discourse network analysis in studying the politics of policy implementation.
Stimulating Circular Design in Wastewater Engineering
Formulating Interventions via Behavioural Insights
The research employs a qualitative research method, including a literature review, informal conversations, and semi-structured to open interviews with employees from the wastewater department of Royal HaskoningDHV. The collected data was analysed using thematic double coding, comprising an inductive explorative approach, and a deductive approach based on the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF). The BCW framework was applied to identify behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and interventions that stimulate engineers to make more circular design choices in every phase of the project by considering and selecting materials and design choices that are reducing, reusable, recyclable, and demountable.
Key barriers to the adoption of circular design practices include limited knowledge, unclear principles, insufficient evidence of technical functionality, reluctance from clients, a preference for traditional design approaches, and budget constraints. On the other hand, facilitators include circularity workshops, partial integration into design processes, management ambition, and existing sustainability initiatives. Active client support and dedicated time for circular design are essential.
The BCW approach identified 43 behaviour change techniques beneficial for promoting circular design, from which a balanced selection addressing capability (knowledge and skills), opportunity (design routines and tools), and motivation (confidence in circular designs) is recommended. The recommended interventions for the specific case study are (i) comprehensive training sessions and educative materials on circular design, (ii) establishing clear, achievable circular design goals, (iii) a focus on projects with clients committed to circular design, (iv) establishing a helpdesk or expert team for practical and social support, (v) incorporating circular prompts and cues into project planning, and (vi) monitoring progress while showcasing successes and providing feedback. Although tailored to Royal HaskoningDHV, these interventions can serve as a guideline for other firms, with necessary adjustments for different contexts and client relationships.
The study highlights the significance of targeted, practical interventions and raises new questions about the balance between sustainable and functional requirements, re-evaluating comfort and budgetary requirements and the need for further development of practical tools and guidelines.
...
The research employs a qualitative research method, including a literature review, informal conversations, and semi-structured to open interviews with employees from the wastewater department of Royal HaskoningDHV. The collected data was analysed using thematic double coding, comprising an inductive explorative approach, and a deductive approach based on the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF). The BCW framework was applied to identify behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and interventions that stimulate engineers to make more circular design choices in every phase of the project by considering and selecting materials and design choices that are reducing, reusable, recyclable, and demountable.
Key barriers to the adoption of circular design practices include limited knowledge, unclear principles, insufficient evidence of technical functionality, reluctance from clients, a preference for traditional design approaches, and budget constraints. On the other hand, facilitators include circularity workshops, partial integration into design processes, management ambition, and existing sustainability initiatives. Active client support and dedicated time for circular design are essential.
The BCW approach identified 43 behaviour change techniques beneficial for promoting circular design, from which a balanced selection addressing capability (knowledge and skills), opportunity (design routines and tools), and motivation (confidence in circular designs) is recommended. The recommended interventions for the specific case study are (i) comprehensive training sessions and educative materials on circular design, (ii) establishing clear, achievable circular design goals, (iii) a focus on projects with clients committed to circular design, (iv) establishing a helpdesk or expert team for practical and social support, (v) incorporating circular prompts and cues into project planning, and (vi) monitoring progress while showcasing successes and providing feedback. Although tailored to Royal HaskoningDHV, these interventions can serve as a guideline for other firms, with necessary adjustments for different contexts and client relationships.
The study highlights the significance of targeted, practical interventions and raises new questions about the balance between sustainable and functional requirements, re-evaluating comfort and budgetary requirements and the need for further development of practical tools and guidelines.
Stakeholder research CoVE Water SA
CoVE Water SA the umbrella for all stakeholders
To answer this research question, several important stakeholders were interviewed. Subsequently, the interviews were analysed thematically in order to extract the most important themes and quotes, PI grids were created to assess power and interest dynamics among stakeholders, and a Social Network Analysis was conducted to understand the CoVE Water SA network and potential clusters.
The research findings have unveiled key aspects for enhancing the effectiveness of CoVE Water SA. The current network in the water sector has a low density, implying that many collaborations are lacking. This leads to a high degree of interdependence within the network, resulting in a non dynamic system. The lack of collaborations, such as connections with TVET colleges, schools, farmers and local communities, results in a lack of knowledge, funding and connection to the labour market. Governmental stakeholders, like DWS, EWSeta, and BGCMA, have been identified as influential players with extensive networks and important resources, Local Authorities and Research Organizations also play important roles. Universities exhibit substantial international links, making them crucial contributors. These stakeholders have the potential to provide knowledge, collaboration, and power. These are valuable insights for CoVE Water SA, fostering network growth and effectiveness in the water sector.
Furthermore, six key themes have been derived from the conducted interviews, addressing the needs of stakeholders and where CoVE can make a valuable contribution.
These themes include raising awareness, reducing the skills gap in the water sector, fostering international collaborations, mitigating the labour shortage in the water sector, improving education material and establishing desired collaborations. For each theme, the interviewed stakeholders have presented their views and numerous suggestions on how CoVE Water SA can assist in addressing these issues. Additionally, stakeholders have also mentioned possible failures of CoVE Water SA, which can aid in preventing any shortcomings of the platform. Furthermore, stakeholders mentioned ongoing initiatives related to the six themes, through which they can contribute to the platform.
From the Thematic Analysis, PI Grids and the SNA, a set of actions have emerged that are essential for enhancing the effectiveness of CoVE Water SA. These actions revolve around expanding and enhancing the network, organising activities and contributing to educational improvement. In terms of broadening and strengthening the network, the platform should focus on enhancing the collaborations among educational groups, building stronger relations with international institutions in Europe and Africa, involving TVETs and schools within the water network, improving stakeholder involvement and encouraging the involvement of Local Communities to increase awareness and knowledge about water issues. Furthermore, CoVE Water SA should play a role in organising activities to raise awareness of Water Resource Management. Additionally, it should assist in improving curricula, supporting students’ preparation for the workforce and making the education more practical instead of only theoretical. CoVE Water SA should also provide training and learning resources as well as comprehensive courses.
However, this study recognizes several limitations that should be considered in future research and when implementing recommendations for CoVE Water SA. These limitations encompass factors like a limited scope due to resource and time constraints, minimal varied interviewee responses, and potential biases in responses. Addressing these limitations will be crucial in guiding future research and actions for CoVE Water SA.
...
To answer this research question, several important stakeholders were interviewed. Subsequently, the interviews were analysed thematically in order to extract the most important themes and quotes, PI grids were created to assess power and interest dynamics among stakeholders, and a Social Network Analysis was conducted to understand the CoVE Water SA network and potential clusters.
The research findings have unveiled key aspects for enhancing the effectiveness of CoVE Water SA. The current network in the water sector has a low density, implying that many collaborations are lacking. This leads to a high degree of interdependence within the network, resulting in a non dynamic system. The lack of collaborations, such as connections with TVET colleges, schools, farmers and local communities, results in a lack of knowledge, funding and connection to the labour market. Governmental stakeholders, like DWS, EWSeta, and BGCMA, have been identified as influential players with extensive networks and important resources, Local Authorities and Research Organizations also play important roles. Universities exhibit substantial international links, making them crucial contributors. These stakeholders have the potential to provide knowledge, collaboration, and power. These are valuable insights for CoVE Water SA, fostering network growth and effectiveness in the water sector.
Furthermore, six key themes have been derived from the conducted interviews, addressing the needs of stakeholders and where CoVE can make a valuable contribution.
These themes include raising awareness, reducing the skills gap in the water sector, fostering international collaborations, mitigating the labour shortage in the water sector, improving education material and establishing desired collaborations. For each theme, the interviewed stakeholders have presented their views and numerous suggestions on how CoVE Water SA can assist in addressing these issues. Additionally, stakeholders have also mentioned possible failures of CoVE Water SA, which can aid in preventing any shortcomings of the platform. Furthermore, stakeholders mentioned ongoing initiatives related to the six themes, through which they can contribute to the platform.
From the Thematic Analysis, PI Grids and the SNA, a set of actions have emerged that are essential for enhancing the effectiveness of CoVE Water SA. These actions revolve around expanding and enhancing the network, organising activities and contributing to educational improvement. In terms of broadening and strengthening the network, the platform should focus on enhancing the collaborations among educational groups, building stronger relations with international institutions in Europe and Africa, involving TVETs and schools within the water network, improving stakeholder involvement and encouraging the involvement of Local Communities to increase awareness and knowledge about water issues. Furthermore, CoVE Water SA should play a role in organising activities to raise awareness of Water Resource Management. Additionally, it should assist in improving curricula, supporting students’ preparation for the workforce and making the education more practical instead of only theoretical. CoVE Water SA should also provide training and learning resources as well as comprehensive courses.
However, this study recognizes several limitations that should be considered in future research and when implementing recommendations for CoVE Water SA. These limitations encompass factors like a limited scope due to resource and time constraints, minimal varied interviewee responses, and potential biases in responses. Addressing these limitations will be crucial in guiding future research and actions for CoVE Water SA.
The following paper will address this research gap by investigating a case study of water governance in Yangon, Myanmar. In February 2021, the Myanmar military staged an unexpected takeover of the government which has led to frequent clashes between the de facto authorities and the resistance movement. Within this context, the UN-Habitat office in Myanmar is in the process of establishing water distribution systems. These systems will provide clean water to inhabitants of informal settlements as a part of the COVID-WASH project. This project is an emergency response project designed to reduce the spread of COVID-19. When implementing projects in communities, UN-Habitat uses a participatory methodology called the People’s Process. The People’s Process includes the creation of Community Development Committees (CDCs) which, in the COVID-WASH project, will manage the water distribution systems. However, it is unclear how the conflict setting impacts the People’s Process and whether it is able to establish water governance systems that will be able to sustainably supply clean water to the informal settlement residents.
The research question is thus, “Does the People’s Process contribute to creating sustainable water governance structures in the current context of Yangon’s informal settlements, and if so, in what ways?” The following sub questions are used to answer the main research question: (1) What best practices exist for creating community-led sustainable water governance structures? (2) How does UN-Habitat operationalize the People's Process for water governance in Yangon's informal settlements? (3) In what ways does the People's Process compare to best practices for creating sustainable water governance and why? (4) In what ways does the conflict setting affect the ability of the Peoples' Process to create sustainable water governance and why?
Sub question one is answered through a literature review which investigates relevant fields such as participatory processes, governance of common pool resources, collaborative governance, and water governance. Literature on contextual factors relevant to the situation in Myanmar are also discussed. The results of the literature review are then used to create a theoretical framework for assessing UN-Habitat’s water governance structures. The resulting framework is grounded in a realist review which investigates how and why systems work the way they do. The following sub questions are answered with data from interviews. Nine interviews were conducted with UN-Habitat staff, members of CDC from similar projects, and one representative from the NGO WaterAid. Transcripts of the interviews were coded for analysis.
To answer sub question two, an outline of the People’s Process as used to implement the COVID-WASH project is presented and compared to other outlines of the People’s Process. Sub question three is then answered by investigating where UN-Habitat’s process aligns with the theoretical framework and where and why it does not. An actor analysis is another key result of this research. The discussion then expands on the results in order to answer the main research question, as well as sub question four.
Ultimately, the People's Process emerges as a powerful participatory model that fosters community ownership and engagement. The CDCs follow a well structured and functional governance framework. Given the 5-10 year lifecycle of the distribution systems, the governance structures appear to be somewhat sustainable within limitations. However due to a lack of clear cut parameters for sustainability, it is difficult to assess to what degree these structures are sustainable. Two points stand out from the research which may serve as areas for improvement. First, CDCs face difficulties in incentivizing community members to fill vacant positions. Second, financial constraints limit the CDCs' ability to undertake substantial improvements beyond routine O&M. It was additionally found that the conflict setting has a greater impact on UN-Habitat’s processes than on the CDC’s themselves. For the CDCs, the conflict setting primarily serves to exacerbate existing problems. As such, it may be more productive to search for ways to improve the resilience of the governance structures as a means of ensuring they are sustainable in the face of shocks to the system.
For UN-Habitat, recommendations therefore include considering how collaborative governance may be used to enhance the resilience of the systems by sharing the governance responsibilities of the CDCs among multiple actors. Additionally, greater reflection on what outcomes are sufficiently sustainable and how those can be empirically monitored and evaluated would allow for a better judgment on where improvements to the water governance structures are needed. Recommendations for future research include adding aspects of causality to the theoretical framework in order to identify which elements are directly linked to sustainability as an outcome. Additionally, further investigation into how community-led, multi-actor systems operate in a variety of conflict settings could be useful in refining the conclusions of this research. ...
The following paper will address this research gap by investigating a case study of water governance in Yangon, Myanmar. In February 2021, the Myanmar military staged an unexpected takeover of the government which has led to frequent clashes between the de facto authorities and the resistance movement. Within this context, the UN-Habitat office in Myanmar is in the process of establishing water distribution systems. These systems will provide clean water to inhabitants of informal settlements as a part of the COVID-WASH project. This project is an emergency response project designed to reduce the spread of COVID-19. When implementing projects in communities, UN-Habitat uses a participatory methodology called the People’s Process. The People’s Process includes the creation of Community Development Committees (CDCs) which, in the COVID-WASH project, will manage the water distribution systems. However, it is unclear how the conflict setting impacts the People’s Process and whether it is able to establish water governance systems that will be able to sustainably supply clean water to the informal settlement residents.
The research question is thus, “Does the People’s Process contribute to creating sustainable water governance structures in the current context of Yangon’s informal settlements, and if so, in what ways?” The following sub questions are used to answer the main research question: (1) What best practices exist for creating community-led sustainable water governance structures? (2) How does UN-Habitat operationalize the People's Process for water governance in Yangon's informal settlements? (3) In what ways does the People's Process compare to best practices for creating sustainable water governance and why? (4) In what ways does the conflict setting affect the ability of the Peoples' Process to create sustainable water governance and why?
Sub question one is answered through a literature review which investigates relevant fields such as participatory processes, governance of common pool resources, collaborative governance, and water governance. Literature on contextual factors relevant to the situation in Myanmar are also discussed. The results of the literature review are then used to create a theoretical framework for assessing UN-Habitat’s water governance structures. The resulting framework is grounded in a realist review which investigates how and why systems work the way they do. The following sub questions are answered with data from interviews. Nine interviews were conducted with UN-Habitat staff, members of CDC from similar projects, and one representative from the NGO WaterAid. Transcripts of the interviews were coded for analysis.
To answer sub question two, an outline of the People’s Process as used to implement the COVID-WASH project is presented and compared to other outlines of the People’s Process. Sub question three is then answered by investigating where UN-Habitat’s process aligns with the theoretical framework and where and why it does not. An actor analysis is another key result of this research. The discussion then expands on the results in order to answer the main research question, as well as sub question four.
Ultimately, the People's Process emerges as a powerful participatory model that fosters community ownership and engagement. The CDCs follow a well structured and functional governance framework. Given the 5-10 year lifecycle of the distribution systems, the governance structures appear to be somewhat sustainable within limitations. However due to a lack of clear cut parameters for sustainability, it is difficult to assess to what degree these structures are sustainable. Two points stand out from the research which may serve as areas for improvement. First, CDCs face difficulties in incentivizing community members to fill vacant positions. Second, financial constraints limit the CDCs' ability to undertake substantial improvements beyond routine O&M. It was additionally found that the conflict setting has a greater impact on UN-Habitat’s processes than on the CDC’s themselves. For the CDCs, the conflict setting primarily serves to exacerbate existing problems. As such, it may be more productive to search for ways to improve the resilience of the governance structures as a means of ensuring they are sustainable in the face of shocks to the system.
For UN-Habitat, recommendations therefore include considering how collaborative governance may be used to enhance the resilience of the systems by sharing the governance responsibilities of the CDCs among multiple actors. Additionally, greater reflection on what outcomes are sufficiently sustainable and how those can be empirically monitored and evaluated would allow for a better judgment on where improvements to the water governance structures are needed. Recommendations for future research include adding aspects of causality to the theoretical framework in order to identify which elements are directly linked to sustainability as an outcome. Additionally, further investigation into how community-led, multi-actor systems operate in a variety of conflict settings could be useful in refining the conclusions of this research.
Why corporates join the Science Based Targets initiative
A mixed-method study on the Fortune 500
With their step-wise process to science-based target commitment, development, and validation, the SBTi promises to prevent ”the worst effects of climate change”. To track the progression of this hopeful promise, a handful of studies have been conducted on the SBTi’s emission mitigation. However, the literature on the SBTi has remained inextensive. Furthermore, why corporates participate in the initiative was unaddressed. This thesis work is pioneering in the sense that it creates a novel, important, and relevant contribution to fulfilling this knowledge gap, by identifying determining factors for participation in the SBTi. Thereby, assessing associations be- tween firm characteristics and SBTi participation, in addition to whether and how these firm characteristics and several motives, reasons, and drivers cause a corporate to participate.
To this end, we have constructed a mixed-method study with a sequential explanatory design that entailed econometric statistical analysis and interviews. The group of corporates selected for the study was the Fortune 500 of the year 2015, which marks the start of the SBTi. We conclude that this research design is a good fit for the type of study which aims to find relations between firm characteristics, motives, reasons, drivers, and SBTi membership, or climate action in general. Mostly because our approach allowed for a more comprehensive picture of relevant factors to participate in the SBTi, compared to extant literature that is often lacking on detailed information due to exploratory designs that assess association rather than causation. We, therefore, want to shed light on the added value of semi-structured interviews in this work and potential future work, despite some of our main limitations of data availability, relatively small sample sizes, and selection bias.
We found that determining factors for corporates to participate in the SBTi relate to the concepts of Legitimacy, Market Success, Social Insurance and Organizational Culture. The latter added an angle that did not seem covered by the concepts derived from previous studies, while this concept became one of the most influential but controversial in management and organization studies. Our findings show that the pressure of stakeholders such as investors, competitors, the U.S. government, employees, end-consumers, and purchasers is an important determinant for corporates to participate; whereby we have shown that joining the SBTi is unexpectedly mainly driven by purchasers rather than end-consumers in the U.S. at this point. In addition, competitive pressures cause a company to join since corporates want to maintain their front-running position, find peer benchmarking important, and are experiencing peer pressure within their sector. Furthermore, a corporate’s perception of internal and external leadership is important in deciding to join the SBTi. In particular, a firm’s strategy and CEO determine whether the corporate wants to be a leader by joining the SBTi or not. On top of that, we found that the presence of a sustainability committee increases the likeliness of a firm becoming a SBTi member since it connects sustainability expertise in the organization that is needed to feed top management so that sustainability decisions can be made.
Interestingly, contrary to our expectations, our results show that corporates in the energy sector are not the most likely to join the SBTi. Albeit those companies are facing impressive stakeholder pressures, they often choose to lobby against future policies rather than set science-based targets. Moreover, we expect conservative corporate culture and the maturity of a sustainability program to influence the decision to join the SBTi. To specify, we believe that conservative corporates, possibly with a mature sustainability program, tend to stick to their system-centric targets and management processes rather than participating in the SBTi.
Overall, our pioneering research outcomes contribute to the inextensive body of academic literature on the SBTi, and it enriches the extant literature on ICIs participation, voluntary initiative participation, and corporate climate action in general. Moreover, the implications of this research are important to policymakers, government, as well as corporates, and the SBTi, in terms of responding to the determinants for SBTi participation. Especially because it is expected that the number of SBTi members will exponentially grow soon, thereby further enhancing the initiative’s prominent character. In addition, we argue that SBTi membership is and will not be a form of corporate greenwashing. We also think that SBTi members will environmentally and financially perform better in the long term, due to continuously aligned targets with science, and growing pressure and recognition of the SBTi by stakeholders.
Our study implies that the SBTi will most likely see a pattern of early adopters, the frontrunners; and late adopters, the followers or the firms that experience difficulties with emission identification. However, one should also be aware that there will be a group of outliers, identified as the corporates that will not voluntarily participate in this initiative, or corporate climate action in general. Yet, it requires global collaboration of the entire corporate landscape to close the emission gap. Therefore, our findings are valuable in the sense that they can aid different stakeholders to develop more effective strategies for encouraging businesses to develop a sustainability agenda. Thereby, understanding what motivates corporates to take climate action is important for policymakers, since the effectiveness of policies also depends in large part on how firms will respond to them.
To reach the tipping point in which companies cannot deny joining the SBTi, we recommend the SBTi to focus on targeting new sectors, firms with conservative corporate cultures, and mature sustainability programs. As well as responding to this expected growth within their own organization and establishing a network of experts and corporates which aids in scope 3 identification. In turn, we advise corporates to join forces that support emission identification and disclosure in comprehensible language. Furthermore, our results encourage corporates to establish an organizational structure that enhances collaborative action and sustainable decision-making, for instance with a sustainability committee and dedicated leadership. Additionally, purchasing companies should use their power to trigger a cascade of science-based targets amongst the supply chain. Moreover, corporates should always lobby for science-based climate policies, even when forms of voluntary climate action are already present. It is thereby up to the government to engage with corporate communities that promote climate policy formation, formulate policies on compulsory emission identification, and join forces with the SBTi to promote the advantages of standardized science-based targets by understanding what truly drives corporates to take voluntary climate action. Following our work, there is abundant room for formulating more detailed policies, investigating additional external pressures that affect corporates to join, and zooming in on each individual sector to account for existing sector differences. ...
With their step-wise process to science-based target commitment, development, and validation, the SBTi promises to prevent ”the worst effects of climate change”. To track the progression of this hopeful promise, a handful of studies have been conducted on the SBTi’s emission mitigation. However, the literature on the SBTi has remained inextensive. Furthermore, why corporates participate in the initiative was unaddressed. This thesis work is pioneering in the sense that it creates a novel, important, and relevant contribution to fulfilling this knowledge gap, by identifying determining factors for participation in the SBTi. Thereby, assessing associations be- tween firm characteristics and SBTi participation, in addition to whether and how these firm characteristics and several motives, reasons, and drivers cause a corporate to participate.
To this end, we have constructed a mixed-method study with a sequential explanatory design that entailed econometric statistical analysis and interviews. The group of corporates selected for the study was the Fortune 500 of the year 2015, which marks the start of the SBTi. We conclude that this research design is a good fit for the type of study which aims to find relations between firm characteristics, motives, reasons, drivers, and SBTi membership, or climate action in general. Mostly because our approach allowed for a more comprehensive picture of relevant factors to participate in the SBTi, compared to extant literature that is often lacking on detailed information due to exploratory designs that assess association rather than causation. We, therefore, want to shed light on the added value of semi-structured interviews in this work and potential future work, despite some of our main limitations of data availability, relatively small sample sizes, and selection bias.
We found that determining factors for corporates to participate in the SBTi relate to the concepts of Legitimacy, Market Success, Social Insurance and Organizational Culture. The latter added an angle that did not seem covered by the concepts derived from previous studies, while this concept became one of the most influential but controversial in management and organization studies. Our findings show that the pressure of stakeholders such as investors, competitors, the U.S. government, employees, end-consumers, and purchasers is an important determinant for corporates to participate; whereby we have shown that joining the SBTi is unexpectedly mainly driven by purchasers rather than end-consumers in the U.S. at this point. In addition, competitive pressures cause a company to join since corporates want to maintain their front-running position, find peer benchmarking important, and are experiencing peer pressure within their sector. Furthermore, a corporate’s perception of internal and external leadership is important in deciding to join the SBTi. In particular, a firm’s strategy and CEO determine whether the corporate wants to be a leader by joining the SBTi or not. On top of that, we found that the presence of a sustainability committee increases the likeliness of a firm becoming a SBTi member since it connects sustainability expertise in the organization that is needed to feed top management so that sustainability decisions can be made.
Interestingly, contrary to our expectations, our results show that corporates in the energy sector are not the most likely to join the SBTi. Albeit those companies are facing impressive stakeholder pressures, they often choose to lobby against future policies rather than set science-based targets. Moreover, we expect conservative corporate culture and the maturity of a sustainability program to influence the decision to join the SBTi. To specify, we believe that conservative corporates, possibly with a mature sustainability program, tend to stick to their system-centric targets and management processes rather than participating in the SBTi.
Overall, our pioneering research outcomes contribute to the inextensive body of academic literature on the SBTi, and it enriches the extant literature on ICIs participation, voluntary initiative participation, and corporate climate action in general. Moreover, the implications of this research are important to policymakers, government, as well as corporates, and the SBTi, in terms of responding to the determinants for SBTi participation. Especially because it is expected that the number of SBTi members will exponentially grow soon, thereby further enhancing the initiative’s prominent character. In addition, we argue that SBTi membership is and will not be a form of corporate greenwashing. We also think that SBTi members will environmentally and financially perform better in the long term, due to continuously aligned targets with science, and growing pressure and recognition of the SBTi by stakeholders.
Our study implies that the SBTi will most likely see a pattern of early adopters, the frontrunners; and late adopters, the followers or the firms that experience difficulties with emission identification. However, one should also be aware that there will be a group of outliers, identified as the corporates that will not voluntarily participate in this initiative, or corporate climate action in general. Yet, it requires global collaboration of the entire corporate landscape to close the emission gap. Therefore, our findings are valuable in the sense that they can aid different stakeholders to develop more effective strategies for encouraging businesses to develop a sustainability agenda. Thereby, understanding what motivates corporates to take climate action is important for policymakers, since the effectiveness of policies also depends in large part on how firms will respond to them.
To reach the tipping point in which companies cannot deny joining the SBTi, we recommend the SBTi to focus on targeting new sectors, firms with conservative corporate cultures, and mature sustainability programs. As well as responding to this expected growth within their own organization and establishing a network of experts and corporates which aids in scope 3 identification. In turn, we advise corporates to join forces that support emission identification and disclosure in comprehensible language. Furthermore, our results encourage corporates to establish an organizational structure that enhances collaborative action and sustainable decision-making, for instance with a sustainability committee and dedicated leadership. Additionally, purchasing companies should use their power to trigger a cascade of science-based targets amongst the supply chain. Moreover, corporates should always lobby for science-based climate policies, even when forms of voluntary climate action are already present. It is thereby up to the government to engage with corporate communities that promote climate policy formation, formulate policies on compulsory emission identification, and join forces with the SBTi to promote the advantages of standardized science-based targets by understanding what truly drives corporates to take voluntary climate action. Following our work, there is abundant room for formulating more detailed policies, investigating additional external pressures that affect corporates to join, and zooming in on each individual sector to account for existing sector differences.
Increasing the resilience of urban areas to extreme precipitation: Are the residents ready?
The receptivity for effective rainproof measures on private terrain in the neighbourhood De Baarsjes, Amsterdam
Application of business intelligence as decision support systems in asset management of water connections
Case study in the Netherlands, in collaboration with water company “Evides”
1.Rapid urbanization
2.Fragmentation of government entities
3.Sewer infrastructure
4.Feacal sludge management
5.Treated water reuse
6.Citizen group involvement The study shows that CWIS principles have a significant relevance for solving urban sanitation issues which were identified through the system levers. In addition to solving urban sanitation issues which centres on public health matters, the study also shows that there is also an environmental case for CWIS by arresting waterbody pollution through the identified pollution pathways. Findings from this research can help to improve decision making in terms of urban sanitation by paying close attention to the cause-effect relationships between variables in the urban sanitation sphere and improve waterbody health in their cities. ...
1.Rapid urbanization
2.Fragmentation of government entities
3.Sewer infrastructure
4.Feacal sludge management
5.Treated water reuse
6.Citizen group involvement The study shows that CWIS principles have a significant relevance for solving urban sanitation issues which were identified through the system levers. In addition to solving urban sanitation issues which centres on public health matters, the study also shows that there is also an environmental case for CWIS by arresting waterbody pollution through the identified pollution pathways. Findings from this research can help to improve decision making in terms of urban sanitation by paying close attention to the cause-effect relationships between variables in the urban sanitation sphere and improve waterbody health in their cities.
The generic procedural tool was tested in a case-study in south-western Uganda by applying a portfolio decision analysis model. Local and global data were combined with stakeholder preferences to predict the performance of diverse sets of alternatives. The latter were generated according to different combinations of numbers of refugees, hosting locations and percentage of water extracted from surface water, groundwater and rain water. To identify efficient portfolios, we used the Robust Portfolio Modelling - Decisions software. Results showed that overlooked solutions outperforms over the current allocation strategy. In specific, the scatter of newly arrived refugees showed the highest scores on availability of water, socio-economic costs and host communities' advantages. The proposed framework provides also options for the optimal repartition of the future water extraction among available water sources, aiming to avoid their depletion while preserving sustainable costs of the water services.
...
The generic procedural tool was tested in a case-study in south-western Uganda by applying a portfolio decision analysis model. Local and global data were combined with stakeholder preferences to predict the performance of diverse sets of alternatives. The latter were generated according to different combinations of numbers of refugees, hosting locations and percentage of water extracted from surface water, groundwater and rain water. To identify efficient portfolios, we used the Robust Portfolio Modelling - Decisions software. Results showed that overlooked solutions outperforms over the current allocation strategy. In specific, the scatter of newly arrived refugees showed the highest scores on availability of water, socio-economic costs and host communities' advantages. The proposed framework provides also options for the optimal repartition of the future water extraction among available water sources, aiming to avoid their depletion while preserving sustainable costs of the water services.