MS
M.J. Schuurman
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
9 records found
1
Bachelor thesis
(2023)
-
S.I.G. Christiaen, M. Dobrovinski, G.P.A. Groeneveld, S.N.K.Q. Hammond, C. Harleman, E. Katis, B. Pakbeşe, K. Parameswaran, I.R.V. Sewbalak, F.L.Y. The, M.J. Schuurman, C.D. Rans, J.A. van 't Hoff, A. Giri Ajay
The Flying-V (FV) represents a novel aircraft configuration that integrates the cabin and two half-wings into a V-shaped structure, promising increased aerodynamic efficiency and an estimated 20% reduction in fuel consumption. Unlike conventional aircraft or other blended wing-body designs, the FV can be scaled to generate a family of aircraft models, which enhances its commercial viability. However, the V-shaped cabin introduces significant eccentricity in the fuselage section, creating unique challenges for crashworthiness.
Aircraft crashworthiness refers to the capability of the airframe to protect occupants during an impact. Regulatory standards for large passenger aircraft (CS-25) require verification of four key criteria: maintaining a survivable volume for occupants, limiting accelerations and loads, retaining items of mass, and preserving occupant egress paths. Historical accident data highlight the importance of these criteria: between 2011 and 2020, 54% of fatal crashes occurred during landing or final approach, accounting for roughly 40% of casualties, emphasizing the vulnerability during these phases. Typically, crashworthiness is assessed via drop tests on a representative fuselage section, focusing on loads and accelerations transmitted to occupants.
To understand how fuselage ovalization and the vertical position of the floor structure affect crash performance, parametric studies were conducted on a conventional aircraft, the Fokker F-28. A parametric CAD model of the F-28’s fuselage section was created and linked to a finite element model (FEM) in Abaqus. Virtual drop tests were performed at 9.1 m/s to evaluate occupant accelerations, dynamic response index, and energy absorption. Ovalization studies varied the fuselage eccentricity from 0 (circular) to 0.75 (approximating the FV’s eccentricity), while floor beam height was varied in 50 mm increments. Results indicated that increasing fuselage eccentricity and floor height generally led to higher occupant accelerations due to reduced crushable volume and shorter impact durations.
For the FV, a preliminary FEM was constructed using previous structural optimization results, which assumed constant frame height and thickness. Four crash concepts were assessed: two conventional designs with four and six floor struts and two unconventional designs featuring vertical crushable elements. The unconventional concepts failed to absorb sufficient energy, leading to high occupant accelerations due to the absence of plastic hinges in the frames. The six-strut conventional concept was overly stiff, also increasing occupant accelerations. The four-strut conventional concept appeared most promising but did not achieve full crashworthiness in this initial study.
Overall, the research shows that the FV’s eccentric fuselage presents unique crashworthiness challenges. Future work should focus on coupled static-dynamic optimization, incorporating both quasi-static operational loads and crashworthiness criteria. This approach will allow designers to iteratively adjust structural parameters such as frame height, thickness, and floor beam placement to improve energy absorption while maintaining stiffness for operational loads. Developing crashworthy designs early in the preliminary design phase is essential to ensure occupant safety without compromising the aerodynamic benefits of the FV configuration. ...
Aircraft crashworthiness refers to the capability of the airframe to protect occupants during an impact. Regulatory standards for large passenger aircraft (CS-25) require verification of four key criteria: maintaining a survivable volume for occupants, limiting accelerations and loads, retaining items of mass, and preserving occupant egress paths. Historical accident data highlight the importance of these criteria: between 2011 and 2020, 54% of fatal crashes occurred during landing or final approach, accounting for roughly 40% of casualties, emphasizing the vulnerability during these phases. Typically, crashworthiness is assessed via drop tests on a representative fuselage section, focusing on loads and accelerations transmitted to occupants.
To understand how fuselage ovalization and the vertical position of the floor structure affect crash performance, parametric studies were conducted on a conventional aircraft, the Fokker F-28. A parametric CAD model of the F-28’s fuselage section was created and linked to a finite element model (FEM) in Abaqus. Virtual drop tests were performed at 9.1 m/s to evaluate occupant accelerations, dynamic response index, and energy absorption. Ovalization studies varied the fuselage eccentricity from 0 (circular) to 0.75 (approximating the FV’s eccentricity), while floor beam height was varied in 50 mm increments. Results indicated that increasing fuselage eccentricity and floor height generally led to higher occupant accelerations due to reduced crushable volume and shorter impact durations.
For the FV, a preliminary FEM was constructed using previous structural optimization results, which assumed constant frame height and thickness. Four crash concepts were assessed: two conventional designs with four and six floor struts and two unconventional designs featuring vertical crushable elements. The unconventional concepts failed to absorb sufficient energy, leading to high occupant accelerations due to the absence of plastic hinges in the frames. The six-strut conventional concept was overly stiff, also increasing occupant accelerations. The four-strut conventional concept appeared most promising but did not achieve full crashworthiness in this initial study.
Overall, the research shows that the FV’s eccentric fuselage presents unique crashworthiness challenges. Future work should focus on coupled static-dynamic optimization, incorporating both quasi-static operational loads and crashworthiness criteria. This approach will allow designers to iteratively adjust structural parameters such as frame height, thickness, and floor beam placement to improve energy absorption while maintaining stiffness for operational loads. Developing crashworthy designs early in the preliminary design phase is essential to ensure occupant safety without compromising the aerodynamic benefits of the FV configuration. ...
The Flying-V (FV) represents a novel aircraft configuration that integrates the cabin and two half-wings into a V-shaped structure, promising increased aerodynamic efficiency and an estimated 20% reduction in fuel consumption. Unlike conventional aircraft or other blended wing-body designs, the FV can be scaled to generate a family of aircraft models, which enhances its commercial viability. However, the V-shaped cabin introduces significant eccentricity in the fuselage section, creating unique challenges for crashworthiness.
Aircraft crashworthiness refers to the capability of the airframe to protect occupants during an impact. Regulatory standards for large passenger aircraft (CS-25) require verification of four key criteria: maintaining a survivable volume for occupants, limiting accelerations and loads, retaining items of mass, and preserving occupant egress paths. Historical accident data highlight the importance of these criteria: between 2011 and 2020, 54% of fatal crashes occurred during landing or final approach, accounting for roughly 40% of casualties, emphasizing the vulnerability during these phases. Typically, crashworthiness is assessed via drop tests on a representative fuselage section, focusing on loads and accelerations transmitted to occupants.
To understand how fuselage ovalization and the vertical position of the floor structure affect crash performance, parametric studies were conducted on a conventional aircraft, the Fokker F-28. A parametric CAD model of the F-28’s fuselage section was created and linked to a finite element model (FEM) in Abaqus. Virtual drop tests were performed at 9.1 m/s to evaluate occupant accelerations, dynamic response index, and energy absorption. Ovalization studies varied the fuselage eccentricity from 0 (circular) to 0.75 (approximating the FV’s eccentricity), while floor beam height was varied in 50 mm increments. Results indicated that increasing fuselage eccentricity and floor height generally led to higher occupant accelerations due to reduced crushable volume and shorter impact durations.
For the FV, a preliminary FEM was constructed using previous structural optimization results, which assumed constant frame height and thickness. Four crash concepts were assessed: two conventional designs with four and six floor struts and two unconventional designs featuring vertical crushable elements. The unconventional concepts failed to absorb sufficient energy, leading to high occupant accelerations due to the absence of plastic hinges in the frames. The six-strut conventional concept was overly stiff, also increasing occupant accelerations. The four-strut conventional concept appeared most promising but did not achieve full crashworthiness in this initial study.
Overall, the research shows that the FV’s eccentric fuselage presents unique crashworthiness challenges. Future work should focus on coupled static-dynamic optimization, incorporating both quasi-static operational loads and crashworthiness criteria. This approach will allow designers to iteratively adjust structural parameters such as frame height, thickness, and floor beam placement to improve energy absorption while maintaining stiffness for operational loads. Developing crashworthy designs early in the preliminary design phase is essential to ensure occupant safety without compromising the aerodynamic benefits of the FV configuration.
Aircraft crashworthiness refers to the capability of the airframe to protect occupants during an impact. Regulatory standards for large passenger aircraft (CS-25) require verification of four key criteria: maintaining a survivable volume for occupants, limiting accelerations and loads, retaining items of mass, and preserving occupant egress paths. Historical accident data highlight the importance of these criteria: between 2011 and 2020, 54% of fatal crashes occurred during landing or final approach, accounting for roughly 40% of casualties, emphasizing the vulnerability during these phases. Typically, crashworthiness is assessed via drop tests on a representative fuselage section, focusing on loads and accelerations transmitted to occupants.
To understand how fuselage ovalization and the vertical position of the floor structure affect crash performance, parametric studies were conducted on a conventional aircraft, the Fokker F-28. A parametric CAD model of the F-28’s fuselage section was created and linked to a finite element model (FEM) in Abaqus. Virtual drop tests were performed at 9.1 m/s to evaluate occupant accelerations, dynamic response index, and energy absorption. Ovalization studies varied the fuselage eccentricity from 0 (circular) to 0.75 (approximating the FV’s eccentricity), while floor beam height was varied in 50 mm increments. Results indicated that increasing fuselage eccentricity and floor height generally led to higher occupant accelerations due to reduced crushable volume and shorter impact durations.
For the FV, a preliminary FEM was constructed using previous structural optimization results, which assumed constant frame height and thickness. Four crash concepts were assessed: two conventional designs with four and six floor struts and two unconventional designs featuring vertical crushable elements. The unconventional concepts failed to absorb sufficient energy, leading to high occupant accelerations due to the absence of plastic hinges in the frames. The six-strut conventional concept was overly stiff, also increasing occupant accelerations. The four-strut conventional concept appeared most promising but did not achieve full crashworthiness in this initial study.
Overall, the research shows that the FV’s eccentric fuselage presents unique crashworthiness challenges. Future work should focus on coupled static-dynamic optimization, incorporating both quasi-static operational loads and crashworthiness criteria. This approach will allow designers to iteratively adjust structural parameters such as frame height, thickness, and floor beam placement to improve energy absorption while maintaining stiffness for operational loads. Developing crashworthy designs early in the preliminary design phase is essential to ensure occupant safety without compromising the aerodynamic benefits of the FV configuration.
Sustainability and Circularity Challenges in Aerospace Engineering Education
For the sustainability transition
The aerospace industry and TU Delft have set stringent climate goals for themselves and with each passing year, these goals seem all the more implausible. While sustainability in the aerospace industry is envisioned as futuristic, circular, net-zero aircraft, the change rarely comes from the grassroots. Although these technological solutions are undoubtedly our liberators from long-term climate change, there is relatively less focus on the education of engineers who grow up to design these machines. This thesis follows a bottom-up approach which can stimulate pro-environmental attitudes among future aerospace engineers to give ourselves a fighting chance to mitigate climate change.
...
The aerospace industry and TU Delft have set stringent climate goals for themselves and with each passing year, these goals seem all the more implausible. While sustainability in the aerospace industry is envisioned as futuristic, circular, net-zero aircraft, the change rarely comes from the grassroots. Although these technological solutions are undoubtedly our liberators from long-term climate change, there is relatively less focus on the education of engineers who grow up to design these machines. This thesis follows a bottom-up approach which can stimulate pro-environmental attitudes among future aerospace engineers to give ourselves a fighting chance to mitigate climate change.
SPEAR
Sailplane Pioneering Emissio-free Aerial Recreation
Bachelor thesis
(2022)
-
P.N. Albert, S.L.J. de Vries, D.A. Hartong, J.P.Q. Hoyng, A.C. van den Heiligenberg, Jesse van der Toorn, W.R. Verbeek, M.M. Doole, M.J. Schuurman, J.A. Melkert, J.A.P. Leijtens
Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) is an emerging technology that is now gaining traction around the world. UAS operations are expected to be integrated into very-low-level rural and urban airspace via the enabling of the novel concept of unmanned traffic system (UTM). For such operations to become a reality, one of the major challenges that needs to be overcome is the assessment and, subsequently, mitigation of safety risk posed to third parties on the ground.
Third parties on the ground refer to people or pedestrians that resides within the area of operation but are not involved with the operation. To assess this risk, an approach called third-party risk (TPR) assessment has been developed in many research. Prediction of TPR of UAS operations will allow operators, authorities and stakeholders make well-informed decision on the deployment of UAS operations. If the TPR risk level of the designed operational concept exceeds the acceptable risk level, then risk mitigation can then be applied.
In a typical TPR model, one of the important sub-models is the collision consequence model used to predict probability of fatality (PoF) of human subjected to UAS collision. This sub-component requires a good understanding of human fatality due to inflicted injury by UAS collision which is, at this time of writing, still under-studied.
This thesis addresses the key component of the TPR framework that is the quantification of UAS collision consequence on human on the ground. The central aim of this thesis is to develop a quantitative, model-based collision consequence model of UAS collision on human. To achieve this main aim, a series of interrelated research studies was performed in a systematic way. ...
Third parties on the ground refer to people or pedestrians that resides within the area of operation but are not involved with the operation. To assess this risk, an approach called third-party risk (TPR) assessment has been developed in many research. Prediction of TPR of UAS operations will allow operators, authorities and stakeholders make well-informed decision on the deployment of UAS operations. If the TPR risk level of the designed operational concept exceeds the acceptable risk level, then risk mitigation can then be applied.
In a typical TPR model, one of the important sub-models is the collision consequence model used to predict probability of fatality (PoF) of human subjected to UAS collision. This sub-component requires a good understanding of human fatality due to inflicted injury by UAS collision which is, at this time of writing, still under-studied.
This thesis addresses the key component of the TPR framework that is the quantification of UAS collision consequence on human on the ground. The central aim of this thesis is to develop a quantitative, model-based collision consequence model of UAS collision on human. To achieve this main aim, a series of interrelated research studies was performed in a systematic way. ...
Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) is an emerging technology that is now gaining traction around the world. UAS operations are expected to be integrated into very-low-level rural and urban airspace via the enabling of the novel concept of unmanned traffic system (UTM). For such operations to become a reality, one of the major challenges that needs to be overcome is the assessment and, subsequently, mitigation of safety risk posed to third parties on the ground.
Third parties on the ground refer to people or pedestrians that resides within the area of operation but are not involved with the operation. To assess this risk, an approach called third-party risk (TPR) assessment has been developed in many research. Prediction of TPR of UAS operations will allow operators, authorities and stakeholders make well-informed decision on the deployment of UAS operations. If the TPR risk level of the designed operational concept exceeds the acceptable risk level, then risk mitigation can then be applied.
In a typical TPR model, one of the important sub-models is the collision consequence model used to predict probability of fatality (PoF) of human subjected to UAS collision. This sub-component requires a good understanding of human fatality due to inflicted injury by UAS collision which is, at this time of writing, still under-studied.
This thesis addresses the key component of the TPR framework that is the quantification of UAS collision consequence on human on the ground. The central aim of this thesis is to develop a quantitative, model-based collision consequence model of UAS collision on human. To achieve this main aim, a series of interrelated research studies was performed in a systematic way.
Third parties on the ground refer to people or pedestrians that resides within the area of operation but are not involved with the operation. To assess this risk, an approach called third-party risk (TPR) assessment has been developed in many research. Prediction of TPR of UAS operations will allow operators, authorities and stakeholders make well-informed decision on the deployment of UAS operations. If the TPR risk level of the designed operational concept exceeds the acceptable risk level, then risk mitigation can then be applied.
In a typical TPR model, one of the important sub-models is the collision consequence model used to predict probability of fatality (PoF) of human subjected to UAS collision. This sub-component requires a good understanding of human fatality due to inflicted injury by UAS collision which is, at this time of writing, still under-studied.
This thesis addresses the key component of the TPR framework that is the quantification of UAS collision consequence on human on the ground. The central aim of this thesis is to develop a quantitative, model-based collision consequence model of UAS collision on human. To achieve this main aim, a series of interrelated research studies was performed in a systematic way.
Due to an exponential growth in the number of shipments of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), the amount of these devices operating in the sky has increased remarkably over the last few years. This led to an increasing number of proximity incidents with manned aircraft. Since these devices share certain airspace with rotorcraft, the question arises how much damage a helicopter could sustain after an impact with a UAS. Within this thesis, a risk assessment was completed initially to determine which collision in terms of type of UAS and helicopter impact location poses the highest risk to the operator of the helicopter. Subsequently a validated model of a DJI Phantom III was developed and impacted onto a rotorcraft windshield in explicit Finite Element software. The sustained damage was compared with a simulated bird strike event to determine whether the prevailing certification requirements would suffice to guarantee safety of the crew.
...
Due to an exponential growth in the number of shipments of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), the amount of these devices operating in the sky has increased remarkably over the last few years. This led to an increasing number of proximity incidents with manned aircraft. Since these devices share certain airspace with rotorcraft, the question arises how much damage a helicopter could sustain after an impact with a UAS. Within this thesis, a risk assessment was completed initially to determine which collision in terms of type of UAS and helicopter impact location poses the highest risk to the operator of the helicopter. Subsequently a validated model of a DJI Phantom III was developed and impacted onto a rotorcraft windshield in explicit Finite Element software. The sustained damage was compared with a simulated bird strike event to determine whether the prevailing certification requirements would suffice to guarantee safety of the crew.
Master thesis
(2019)
-
Régis van der Sommen, Alexei Sharpanskykh, Stef Janssen, Richard Curran, Alexander Dilweg, Michiel Schuurman
Using a data-driven approach, a heterogeneous populated agent-based model of an airport security checkpoint is calibrated and validated. It is found that average performance using the model can be replicated to a sufficient degree. The heterogenous population could become useful when different passenger fractions - with different performance per passenger type - are analysed for different security checkpoint configurations. Furthermore, time-dependent agent performance could improve the models validity.
...
Using a data-driven approach, a heterogeneous populated agent-based model of an airport security checkpoint is calibrated and validated. It is found that average performance using the model can be replicated to a sufficient degree. The heterogenous population could become useful when different passenger fractions - with different performance per passenger type - are analysed for different security checkpoint configurations. Furthermore, time-dependent agent performance could improve the models validity.
Bachelor thesis
(2019)
-
Patricia Apostol, K.A. ter Beek, W.A.A. Chalabi, L.H. van Dam, B.G. Eikelenboom, M. Koster, M.A. van Löben Sels, G.P. van der Velde, L.R. de Waal, L.C. Wijn, C.D. Rans, M.J. Schuurman, D. van Baelen
Bachelor thesis
(2016)
-
T.J. Asijee, C.A. Blauw, Michiel Desmedt, J. Driezen, B. von den Hoff, C.C. Petersen, F.S. Straver, N.D.K. Sutopo, D.C. Wijnker, R.A.A. Willemsen, C.D. Rans, M.J. Schuurman, B.D.W. Remes