A.C. Smit
Please Note
17 records found
1
AI and the Transformation of Security Triage:
Evaluation, Trust, and Adaptation in Open Source Software Maintenance
This study investigates how AI-assisted security reports affect OSS maintainers and triage practices through twenty semi-structured interviews analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Five themes emerged: a temporal shift in report quality, an evaluation crisis and adaptive response, asymmetric cost distribution, strain on the expertise pipeline and ecosystem viability concerns.
Maintainers independently converged on reproducibility as the signal AI cannot fake, began scrutinizing reporter identity alongside report content and deployed AI-assisted pre-triage while preserving human final judgment. Five practical recommendations are offered which are grounded in practices maintainers had already developed independently. ...
This study investigates how AI-assisted security reports affect OSS maintainers and triage practices through twenty semi-structured interviews analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Five themes emerged: a temporal shift in report quality, an evaluation crisis and adaptive response, asymmetric cost distribution, strain on the expertise pipeline and ecosystem viability concerns.
Maintainers independently converged on reproducibility as the signal AI cannot fake, began scrutinizing reporter identity alongside report content and deployed AI-assisted pre-triage while preserving human final judgment. Five practical recommendations are offered which are grounded in practices maintainers had already developed independently.
The Coherence Paradox
Balancing Exploitation and Exploration in MedTech
This thesis studies two features of a firm's accumulated knowledge base. The first is breadth, defined as the number of distinct technical fields in which a firm operates. The second is coherence, which describes how closely related those fields are. The thesis tests the proposed coherence paradox: that the relatedness supporting efficient refinement may simultaneously limit exploration because genuinely novel knowledge often emerges from combining distant fields. Under this view, breadth and coherence would push firms toward different innovation strategies.
The argument is tested using a large sample of medical technology (MedTech) firms and their patents between 2007 and 2022. This setting allows both breadth and coherence to be measured directly and followed over time. Knowledge depreciation is incorporated through rolling time windows, and additional analyses using longer lags confirm that the findings are robust to this choice. Exploration is measured using three complementary indicators because no single measure captures the concept completely.
The results do not support the coherence paradox. Firms with broader knowledge bases perform more exploitation while also showing higher levels of exploration on the measures that capture movement toward distant or external knowledge. Only one exploration measure, the number of entirely new technology classes entered, declines slightly for firms already active in many classes, reflecting the simple fact that fewer unexplored classes remain available. The two measures capturing movement toward distant or external knowledge both indicate that broader knowledge bases stimulate exploration, and this relationship is strongest among the largest firms.
For managers, the findings suggest that a broad and coherent technological knowledge base supports both exploitation and exploration simultaneously. Firms can therefore strengthen existing capabilities while expanding into new technological areas. The results suggest that firms should broaden their knowledge bases by adding related technical fields rather than deliberately diversifying into unrelated ones. Because knowledge accumulation through patenting takes place over several years, such expansion should be viewed as a long-term investment. Firms can also assess their growth potential by comparing their technological footprint with that of close competitors.
For research, this study shifts part of the explanation for how firms balance exploitation and exploration from organizational design toward the structure of their accumulated knowledge. The findings indicate that knowledge structure shapes a firm's overall innovation capacity without forcing a trade-off between refinement and search. The study also demonstrates that conclusions about exploration depend on how exploration is measured, since available indicators capture different aspects of novelty. Finally, the reported relationships describe associations over time rather than causal effects, and the findings should be interpreted accordingly. ...
This thesis studies two features of a firm's accumulated knowledge base. The first is breadth, defined as the number of distinct technical fields in which a firm operates. The second is coherence, which describes how closely related those fields are. The thesis tests the proposed coherence paradox: that the relatedness supporting efficient refinement may simultaneously limit exploration because genuinely novel knowledge often emerges from combining distant fields. Under this view, breadth and coherence would push firms toward different innovation strategies.
The argument is tested using a large sample of medical technology (MedTech) firms and their patents between 2007 and 2022. This setting allows both breadth and coherence to be measured directly and followed over time. Knowledge depreciation is incorporated through rolling time windows, and additional analyses using longer lags confirm that the findings are robust to this choice. Exploration is measured using three complementary indicators because no single measure captures the concept completely.
The results do not support the coherence paradox. Firms with broader knowledge bases perform more exploitation while also showing higher levels of exploration on the measures that capture movement toward distant or external knowledge. Only one exploration measure, the number of entirely new technology classes entered, declines slightly for firms already active in many classes, reflecting the simple fact that fewer unexplored classes remain available. The two measures capturing movement toward distant or external knowledge both indicate that broader knowledge bases stimulate exploration, and this relationship is strongest among the largest firms.
For managers, the findings suggest that a broad and coherent technological knowledge base supports both exploitation and exploration simultaneously. Firms can therefore strengthen existing capabilities while expanding into new technological areas. The results suggest that firms should broaden their knowledge bases by adding related technical fields rather than deliberately diversifying into unrelated ones. Because knowledge accumulation through patenting takes place over several years, such expansion should be viewed as a long-term investment. Firms can also assess their growth potential by comparing their technological footprint with that of close competitors.
For research, this study shifts part of the explanation for how firms balance exploitation and exploration from organizational design toward the structure of their accumulated knowledge. The findings indicate that knowledge structure shapes a firm's overall innovation capacity without forcing a trade-off between refinement and search. The study also demonstrates that conclusions about exploration depend on how exploration is measured, since available indicators capture different aspects of novelty. Finally, the reported relationships describe associations over time rather than causal effects, and the findings should be interpreted accordingly.
Uncertainty and Coordination in Maritime Energy Transitions
How Fuel-Specific Uncertainties Shape Coordination in Port Infrastructure Projects
The global maritime and inland shipping sectors face intense regulatory and market pressure to decarbonize, driven by the European Union’s mandate to slash maritime greenhouse gas intensity by 80% by 2050. As a result, alternative marine fuels, such as methanol and ammonia, are seen as emerging alternatives to replace traditional fossil-heavy bunker fuels. However, establishing the supporting infrastructure to enable the bunkering of these fuels presents a fundamental coordination challenge. These large-scale investments are interdependent; they must be committed before technologies are proven, markets are formed, or regulations are finalized. Therefore, they are subject to hesitation on the part of possible risk-averse actors, resulting in a delay in the deployment of such key projects. This thesis aims to investigate how variations in technological, market, and regulatory uncertainty influence the governance of alternative marine fuel bunkering infrastructure. It explores how coordination configurations respond to the specific uncertainty profile associated with a particular fuel pathway. A comparative qualitative case study design approach was considered. Two pilot demonstration projects located in the same Amsterdam–Rotterdam–Antwerp (ARA) port area were examined as cases. These include methanol bunkering at the Port of Antwerp-Bruges under the FASTWATER project, and ammonia bunkering at the Port of Rotterdam under the MAGPIE Demonstrator 4 initiative. In contrast to many studies examining cases across multiple institutions, regions, or geographic settings, this research focused on two cases sharing the same institutional and regional context but differing in terms of fuel type. This allows the effect of a particular fuel’s uncertainty profile on its respective coordination arrangement to be isolated. Data collection comprised semi-structured interviews with project participants and domain experts, supplemented by project consortium deliverables. The material was analyzed abductively in ATLAS.ti, utilizing a framework-derived codebook iteratively refined by emergent data. The findings reveal that because both methanol and ammonia are mature industrial molecules, the critical uncertainty lay not in chemical viability but in the composition of technological, market, and regulatory risks: Methanol (regulation-led): The dominant constraint was the time-consuming process of obtaining an exemption for methanol under an inland navigation standard that did not contain any references to methanol, which caused a sequential cascade of regulatory obstacles to arise with each subsequent engineering modification. Market risk was significantly reduced due to ownership of the vessel by the port authority. Ammonia (standards-and-liability-led): There existed neither a ship-to-ship bunkering standard nor a liability framework for allocation at the time of the project. Moreover, there existed an unresolvable chicken-and-egg situation between producers, charterers, and off-takers regarding the timing of commitments due to each party waiting for one or more of the other parties to make a move first. As a consequence of these two distinct uncertainty profiles, contrasting structures of governance were created. Methanol (lead organisation): The port established internal coordination by combining operational, regulatory, and coordinative functions into one entity facing outward toward external regulators. Ammonia (NAO): The port served as a neutral facilitator within a Network Administrative Organization (NAO), facilitating communication among independent organisations through personal trust. Nevertheless, this model proved limited when a receiving vessel refused participation due to the absence of a defined instrument to assume open-ended liability. The findings suggest that it is the composition of uncertainty, rather than its magnitude, that influences how infrastructure coordination is established. While regulatory risks may be centralized, procedural in nature, and thus able to be addressed by a single capable public actor, decentralized market and liability risks necessitate network brokerage, a form of governance structure that is inherently fragile until standardized frameworks for liability and standards mature. ...
The global maritime and inland shipping sectors face intense regulatory and market pressure to decarbonize, driven by the European Union’s mandate to slash maritime greenhouse gas intensity by 80% by 2050. As a result, alternative marine fuels, such as methanol and ammonia, are seen as emerging alternatives to replace traditional fossil-heavy bunker fuels. However, establishing the supporting infrastructure to enable the bunkering of these fuels presents a fundamental coordination challenge. These large-scale investments are interdependent; they must be committed before technologies are proven, markets are formed, or regulations are finalized.
Therefore, they are subject to hesitation on the part of possible risk-averse actors, resulting in a delay in the deployment of such key projects. This thesis aims to investigate how variations in technological, market, and regulatory uncertainty influence the governance of alternative marine fuel bunkering infrastructure. It explores how coordination configurations respond to the specific uncertainty profile associated with a particular fuel pathway.
A comparative qualitative case study design approach was considered. Two pilot demonstration projects located in the same Amsterdam–Rotterdam–Antwerp (ARA) port area were examined as cases. These include methanol bunkering at the Port of Antwerp-Bruges under the FASTWATER project, and ammonia bunkering at the Port of Rotterdam under the MAGPIE Demonstrator 4 initiative.
In contrast to many studies examining cases across multiple institutions, regions, or geographic settings, this research focused on two cases sharing the same institutional and regional context but differing in terms of fuel type. This allows the effect of a particular fuel’s uncertainty profile on its respective coordination arrangement to be isolated. Data collection comprised semi-structured interviews with project participants and domain experts, supplemented by project consortium deliverables. The material was analyzed abductively in ATLAS.ti, utilizing a framework-derived codebook iteratively refined by emergent data.
The findings reveal that because both methanol and ammonia are mature industrial molecules, the critical uncertainty lay not in chemical viability but in the composition of technological, market, and regulatory risks:
Methanol (regulation-led): The dominant constraint was the time-consuming process of obtaining an exemption for methanol under an inland navigation standard that did not contain any references to methanol, which caused a sequential cascade of regulatory obstacles to arise with each subsequent engineering modification. Market risk was significantly reduced due to ownership of the vessel by the port authority. Ammonia (standards-and-liability-led): There existed neither a ship-to-ship bunkering standard nor a liability framework for allocation at the time of the project. Moreover, there existed an unresolvable chicken-and-egg situation between producers, charterers, and off-takers regarding the timing of commitments due to each party waiting for one or more of the other parties to make a move first.As a consequence of these two distinct uncertainty profiles, contrasting structures of governance were created.
Methanol (lead organisation): The port established internal coordination by combining operational, regulatory, and coordinative functions into one entity facing outward toward external regulators. Ammonia (NAO): The port served as a neutral facilitator within a Network Administrative Organization (NAO), facilitating communication among independent organisations through personal trust. Nevertheless, this model proved limited when a receiving vessel refused participation due to the absence of a defined instrument to assume open-ended liability.The findings suggest that it is the composition of uncertainty, rather than its magnitude, that influences how infrastructure coordination is established. While regulatory risks may be centralized, procedural in nature, and thus able to be addressed by a single capable public actor, decentralized market and liability risks necessitate network brokerage, a form of governance structure that is inherently fragile until standardized frameworks for liability and standards mature.
Vulnerability Disclosure Programs
A Multiple Case Study on the Factors Influencing Vendors’ Decision on Adopting Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure Programs
Using a multiple case study approach and guided by the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and Stakeholder Theory, this study examines how technological readiness, organizational culture, and environmental pressures affect the adoption of CVD programs. The analysis is based on 15 semi-structured interviews with security professionals from vendors with and without CVD programs.
The findings reveal that successful CVD adoption is often driven by strong internal capabilities, openness to transparency, support from leadership, and external regulatory pressure. In contrast, barriers include resource limitations, reputational concerns, and unclear internal processes. The study highlights the importance of third-party platforms, legal guidance, and a tailored approach that aligns with the organization's risk profile and industry context.
This research contributes to the academic literature by shifting attention from post-adoption practices to the decision-making processes leading to adoption. It provides actionable recommendations for vendors and stakeholders to improve vulnerability management and increase preparedness in an increasingly complex digital environment. ...
Using a multiple case study approach and guided by the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and Stakeholder Theory, this study examines how technological readiness, organizational culture, and environmental pressures affect the adoption of CVD programs. The analysis is based on 15 semi-structured interviews with security professionals from vendors with and without CVD programs.
The findings reveal that successful CVD adoption is often driven by strong internal capabilities, openness to transparency, support from leadership, and external regulatory pressure. In contrast, barriers include resource limitations, reputational concerns, and unclear internal processes. The study highlights the importance of third-party platforms, legal guidance, and a tailored approach that aligns with the organization's risk profile and industry context.
This research contributes to the academic literature by shifting attention from post-adoption practices to the decision-making processes leading to adoption. It provides actionable recommendations for vendors and stakeholders to improve vulnerability management and increase preparedness in an increasingly complex digital environment.
Expert-Enriched Predictive Modeling for Engine Test Cell Outcomes in Low-Data MRO Settings
A Scenario-Based Study of Expert Knowledge Integration and Data Quality Impact
This thesis explores the development and possible implementation of a predictive model that assesses the risk of engine rejection during test cell acceptance runs at an aviation Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) facility. Engine test runs are costly, resource-intensive, and critical for quality assurance, but occasional failures lead to significant delays, rework, and planning disruptions. Early identification of engines at high risk of rejection could enable proactive planning and improve operational efficiency.
The study focuses on the challenges of predictive modeling under real-world constraints: a small, imbalanced dataset and limited failure labels. To overcome these limitations, the research integrates domain expert knowledge at multiple stages of the modeling pipeline, including feature selection, data curation, and the specification of Bayesian priors. A hybrid methodology combining CRISP-DM and the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) guides the iterative model development, evaluation, and implementation process.
Various modeling techniques were explored, including logistic regression, random forests, and Bayesian logistic regression with informative priors. The study compares conventional ML models with an expert-informed alternative under different performance objectives. These different performance objectives are prioritizing recall to support early intervention, and later precision to support robust planning. Model evaluation was performed through 5-fold cross-validation.
Results show that expert knowledge significantly improves both the quality of input data and the relevance of engineered features. While Bayesian priors didn’t really contribute to performance, the most impactful improvements stemmed from expert-driven data cleaning and categorical encoding. However, model interpretability remained limited: although rejections could be predicted, the model could not reliably indicate why they occurred.
Consequently, the model’s use case was reframed from an initial ’proactive technical intervention’ to ’planning support’. Under a precision-tuned configuration, the model achieved 50% precision in flagging high-risk engines. Because 87% of rejections were associated with long turnaround delays, each high-precision flag became a useful proxy for high-impact disruptions. This insight provides valuable input for planners seeking to reduce schedule volatility.
The study contributes to literature on expert-informed learning by highlighting how domain expertise can improve data quality, and not just simple model design, in low-data environments. It also offers an empirical evaluation of how different types of expert input affect predictive performance. Practically, the study provides a roadmap for applying expert-informed modeling in safety-critical, data-constrained MRO settings.
Recommendations for future research include validating the approach on other engine types, improving expert elicitation methods by reducing the subjective nature, exploring scalable data curation (e.g., via automation or LLMs), and developing interpretable models that can suggest targeted maintenance actions. ...
This thesis explores the development and possible implementation of a predictive model that assesses the risk of engine rejection during test cell acceptance runs at an aviation Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) facility. Engine test runs are costly, resource-intensive, and critical for quality assurance, but occasional failures lead to significant delays, rework, and planning disruptions. Early identification of engines at high risk of rejection could enable proactive planning and improve operational efficiency.
The study focuses on the challenges of predictive modeling under real-world constraints: a small, imbalanced dataset and limited failure labels. To overcome these limitations, the research integrates domain expert knowledge at multiple stages of the modeling pipeline, including feature selection, data curation, and the specification of Bayesian priors. A hybrid methodology combining CRISP-DM and the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) guides the iterative model development, evaluation, and implementation process.
Various modeling techniques were explored, including logistic regression, random forests, and Bayesian logistic regression with informative priors. The study compares conventional ML models with an expert-informed alternative under different performance objectives. These different performance objectives are prioritizing recall to support early intervention, and later precision to support robust planning. Model evaluation was performed through 5-fold cross-validation.
Results show that expert knowledge significantly improves both the quality of input data and the relevance of engineered features. While Bayesian priors didn’t really contribute to performance, the most impactful improvements stemmed from expert-driven data cleaning and categorical encoding. However, model interpretability remained limited: although rejections could be predicted, the model could not reliably indicate why they occurred.
Consequently, the model’s use case was reframed from an initial ’proactive technical intervention’ to ’planning support’. Under a precision-tuned configuration, the model achieved 50% precision in flagging high-risk engines. Because 87% of rejections were associated with long turnaround delays, each high-precision flag became a useful proxy for high-impact disruptions. This insight provides valuable input for planners seeking to reduce schedule volatility.
The study contributes to literature on expert-informed learning by highlighting how domain expertise can improve data quality, and not just simple model design, in low-data environments. It also offers an empirical evaluation of how different types of expert input affect predictive performance. Practically, the study provides a roadmap for applying expert-informed modeling in safety-critical, data-constrained MRO settings.
Recommendations for future research include validating the approach on other engine types, improving expert elicitation methods by reducing the subjective nature, exploring scalable data curation (e.g., via automation or LLMs), and developing interpretable models that can suggest targeted maintenance actions.
Prediction of urban noise levels
A machine learning approach combining street view images with field sound sampling
Tested across several Dutch cities, the models produce consistent, street-level predictions, enabling high-resolution \emph{diagnostic noise maps} for both LAeq and Loudness. Building on these maps, the thesis introduces a policy translation framework aligned with the Dutch \emph{Omgevingswet} and the EU Environmental Noise Directive (END). This framework includes: (i) identifying noise “hotspots” using both absolute thresholds (from WHO guidelines) and relative, within-city rankings; (ii) diagnosing the main visual features driving noise levels, using local model explanations; (iii) selecting targeted interventions—such as traffic flow adjustments, façade and surface treatments, and nature-based solutions—supported by documented mechanisms and measurable indicators; and (iv) establishing an update loop for periodic review as new imagery and measurements become available. An illustrative micro-case demonstrates how this process turns model outputs into actionable planning decisions and performance metrics.
The study's contributions are threefold: (1) an end-to-end, interpretable pipeline linking SVI and acoustics; (2) a dual-metric evaluation (LAeq and Zwicker Loudness) that combines legal compliance with a perception-based perspective; and (3) a concrete, regulator-aligned pathway from predictions and explanations to policy action. Limitations include the sample size relative to feature dimensionality, the absence of direct GIS or morphological data integration, and the geographic focus on Dutch cities. These factors point to future work involving larger and longitudinal datasets, multi-sensor/GIS integration, and transfer learning for broader applicability, while encouraging cautious, phased adoption in real-world planning. ...
Tested across several Dutch cities, the models produce consistent, street-level predictions, enabling high-resolution \emph{diagnostic noise maps} for both LAeq and Loudness. Building on these maps, the thesis introduces a policy translation framework aligned with the Dutch \emph{Omgevingswet} and the EU Environmental Noise Directive (END). This framework includes: (i) identifying noise “hotspots” using both absolute thresholds (from WHO guidelines) and relative, within-city rankings; (ii) diagnosing the main visual features driving noise levels, using local model explanations; (iii) selecting targeted interventions—such as traffic flow adjustments, façade and surface treatments, and nature-based solutions—supported by documented mechanisms and measurable indicators; and (iv) establishing an update loop for periodic review as new imagery and measurements become available. An illustrative micro-case demonstrates how this process turns model outputs into actionable planning decisions and performance metrics.
The study's contributions are threefold: (1) an end-to-end, interpretable pipeline linking SVI and acoustics; (2) a dual-metric evaluation (LAeq and Zwicker Loudness) that combines legal compliance with a perception-based perspective; and (3) a concrete, regulator-aligned pathway from predictions and explanations to policy action. Limitations include the sample size relative to feature dimensionality, the absence of direct GIS or morphological data integration, and the geographic focus on Dutch cities. These factors point to future work involving larger and longitudinal datasets, multi-sensor/GIS integration, and transfer learning for broader applicability, while encouraging cautious, phased adoption in real-world planning.
Adoption factors of frugal health innovations
A closer look into enablers and barriers of frugal health innovation adoption
To guide the research, the first sub-research question “What theoretical framework is most appropriate to describe adoption of frugal health innovations?” was asked. Answering this question ensured a departing point for the theoretical understanding of frugal health innovation adoption. Secondary data from the literature was retrieved through a literature review, from which it followed that nine theoretical perspectives have been used to study the adoption of non-health-related frugal innovations. By comparing the theoretical perspectives against the context of frugal health innovations, it followed that the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 is the most appropriate theoretical perspective to study the adoption of frugal health innovations.
To further guide the research, the second sub-research question “What empirical evidence exists, that can give information on factors affecting the adoption of frugal health innovations?” was asked. Answering this sub-research question allowed to synthesize empirical evidence in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 framework to arrive at a conceptual framework for the adoption of frugal health innovations. Secondary data from the literature was retrieved through a literature study, and the empirical evidence was put in the context of frugal health innovations. From this, it followed that the possibility to experiment with the innovation (Trialability), the innovation- fit with the customers’ lifestyle (Lifestyle Compatibility), the availability of required knowledge to use the innovation (Consumer Literacy), the trust toward the provider of the innovation (Trust), the technical performance of the innovation (Performance Expectancy), the ease-of-use of the innovation (Effort Expectancy), the degree of social pressure to use the innovation (Social Influence), the price of the innovation (Price Value), and the degree of resource- and infrastructural constraints impeding the use of the innovation (Facilitating Conditions) facilitate the intention to adopt frugal health innovations (Behavioural Intention). Interestingly, the synthesis revealed that Price Value, Facilitating Conditions, and Trust also act as a barrier in case they are not properly addressed by the frugal health innovation.
Ultimately, the conceptual framework was empirically validated in the context of frugal health innovations through semi-structured interviews with four frugal health innovation developers. Because developers were surveyed, in contrast to consumers by the studies from the literature review, the adoption, and not consumer-central behavioural intention to adopt, was studied. To increase the possibility of adoption, results suggest that trust between the developer and consumer should be established (Trust), the innovation should align with the preferences of the consumer (Lifestyle Compatibility), the innovation should be designed so that it is easy to use and install (Effort Expectancy), and the innovation should be priced appropriately to ensure affordability whilst maintaining a positive perceived price- quality relationship (Price Value). Further, results suggest that it is imperative to understand the context of the addressed health-related issues, as the performance of the frugal innovation must be superior to traditional health innovations if the latter shows poor performance or side effects, or can be inferior if they are used indicatively where the traditional innovation is used confirmatively (Performance Expectancy). Understanding the context is also of importance to determine whether the use of the frugal health innovation is not impeded by the lack of resources and/or infrastructure, or, appropriately addresses their absence, thereby providing a market opportunity (Facilitating Conditions). Additionally, results suggest that the severity of the health problem (Problem Severity) also affect the adoption, whilst only relevant in case frugal health innovations are sold to governmental organizations. All in all, this exploratory research provides a first conceptual framework to study the adoption of frugal health innovations and opens up the debate on what is required for their adoption. Developers are advised to tailor frugal health innovations according to the principles observed in this research study, as doing so likely enhances the probability of adoption. However, considering the lack of a consumer-perspective in this research study, a logical next step is to further gather empirical findings on frugal health innovation adoption using the developed conceptual framework, to ensure a more robust image of the factors affecting the adoption of frugal health innovations. ...
To guide the research, the first sub-research question “What theoretical framework is most appropriate to describe adoption of frugal health innovations?” was asked. Answering this question ensured a departing point for the theoretical understanding of frugal health innovation adoption. Secondary data from the literature was retrieved through a literature review, from which it followed that nine theoretical perspectives have been used to study the adoption of non-health-related frugal innovations. By comparing the theoretical perspectives against the context of frugal health innovations, it followed that the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 is the most appropriate theoretical perspective to study the adoption of frugal health innovations.
To further guide the research, the second sub-research question “What empirical evidence exists, that can give information on factors affecting the adoption of frugal health innovations?” was asked. Answering this sub-research question allowed to synthesize empirical evidence in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 framework to arrive at a conceptual framework for the adoption of frugal health innovations. Secondary data from the literature was retrieved through a literature study, and the empirical evidence was put in the context of frugal health innovations. From this, it followed that the possibility to experiment with the innovation (Trialability), the innovation- fit with the customers’ lifestyle (Lifestyle Compatibility), the availability of required knowledge to use the innovation (Consumer Literacy), the trust toward the provider of the innovation (Trust), the technical performance of the innovation (Performance Expectancy), the ease-of-use of the innovation (Effort Expectancy), the degree of social pressure to use the innovation (Social Influence), the price of the innovation (Price Value), and the degree of resource- and infrastructural constraints impeding the use of the innovation (Facilitating Conditions) facilitate the intention to adopt frugal health innovations (Behavioural Intention). Interestingly, the synthesis revealed that Price Value, Facilitating Conditions, and Trust also act as a barrier in case they are not properly addressed by the frugal health innovation.
Ultimately, the conceptual framework was empirically validated in the context of frugal health innovations through semi-structured interviews with four frugal health innovation developers. Because developers were surveyed, in contrast to consumers by the studies from the literature review, the adoption, and not consumer-central behavioural intention to adopt, was studied. To increase the possibility of adoption, results suggest that trust between the developer and consumer should be established (Trust), the innovation should align with the preferences of the consumer (Lifestyle Compatibility), the innovation should be designed so that it is easy to use and install (Effort Expectancy), and the innovation should be priced appropriately to ensure affordability whilst maintaining a positive perceived price- quality relationship (Price Value). Further, results suggest that it is imperative to understand the context of the addressed health-related issues, as the performance of the frugal innovation must be superior to traditional health innovations if the latter shows poor performance or side effects, or can be inferior if they are used indicatively where the traditional innovation is used confirmatively (Performance Expectancy). Understanding the context is also of importance to determine whether the use of the frugal health innovation is not impeded by the lack of resources and/or infrastructure, or, appropriately addresses their absence, thereby providing a market opportunity (Facilitating Conditions). Additionally, results suggest that the severity of the health problem (Problem Severity) also affect the adoption, whilst only relevant in case frugal health innovations are sold to governmental organizations. All in all, this exploratory research provides a first conceptual framework to study the adoption of frugal health innovations and opens up the debate on what is required for their adoption. Developers are advised to tailor frugal health innovations according to the principles observed in this research study, as doing so likely enhances the probability of adoption. However, considering the lack of a consumer-perspective in this research study, a logical next step is to further gather empirical findings on frugal health innovation adoption using the developed conceptual framework, to ensure a more robust image of the factors affecting the adoption of frugal health innovations.
Generative AI in Professional Services: Adoption and Shifting Work Practices
Evidence from a Big Four Firm
The research shows that LLMs are transforming consulting workflows from “creator to curator” ways of working; consultants increasingly start with AI-generated drafts and focus on refinement and contextualization. While productivity and output quality improve, workload remains high as cognitive effort of consultants and managers appear to shift to reviewing and verifying outputs. This redefines professional identity and expertise, emphasizing judgment, prompting skill, and ethical evaluation. Ultimately, the study concludes that generative AI is not replacing consultants but augmenting their capabilities. Successful integration requires trust, training, and responsible governance, marking the beginning of a new phase in knowledge- intensive work where human insight and AI collaboration coexist. ...
The research shows that LLMs are transforming consulting workflows from “creator to curator” ways of working; consultants increasingly start with AI-generated drafts and focus on refinement and contextualization. While productivity and output quality improve, workload remains high as cognitive effort of consultants and managers appear to shift to reviewing and verifying outputs. This redefines professional identity and expertise, emphasizing judgment, prompting skill, and ethical evaluation. Ultimately, the study concludes that generative AI is not replacing consultants but augmenting their capabilities. Successful integration requires trust, training, and responsible governance, marking the beginning of a new phase in knowledge- intensive work where human insight and AI collaboration coexist.
...
Any delay in shipping defective parts or products to their suppliers extends the time required to perform necessary actions such as repairs or quality checks. These delays result in downtime and can halt the manufacturing operations of high-tech companies until the corrected parts are received back and reintegrated into the production process.
To achieve these objectives, it is essential to have a robust standardized information-sharing and communication process flow throughout the organization. This will ensure timely and accurate management of these defective parts as requested by various stakeholders within high-tech companies. The unavailability of such a process flow leads to significant delays and operational inefficiencies, undermining the company's ability to respond quickly to critical situations and maintain consistent manufacturing outputs.
Stakeholders throughout the organization, responsible for the supply and demand planning of critical and low-inventory parts, initiate requests to the Reverse Logistics Team for shipping defective parts to the supplier when they are deemed as unserviceable or incorrectly received and there is no new inventory to replace them. For the Reverse Logistics Team to achieve timely shipments, they require access to relevant information that is timely, accurate, and centralized through a platform or interface that offers transparency, traceability, and accountability. This system must also be scalable to accommodate an increasing volume of requests in the foreseeable future.
Due to the lack of a standardized process flow, stakeholders currently employ fragmented and inconsistent methods for communicating and sharing information about defective parts with the Reverse Logistics team. These methods are highly unreliable and risky, lacking traceability and visibility in a centralized interface where all incoming and processed requests can be monitored. The existing methods need continuous monitoring by the RL team to ensure they do not miss any requests. Furthermore,
when these existing communication practices are deployed, necessary preliminary steps required before sending requests to the Reverse Logistics team get bypassed, creating bottlenecks and hindering their ability to efficiently manage and expedite the shipment of defective parts. Therefore, the necessity of developing and integrating a standardized process with an advanced Information System like ERP, and adopting it organization-wide, will significantly streamline the defect-handling process. This strategic integration enhances transparency, traceability, and accountability, ensuring that requests from various stakeholders to ship defective parts from high-tech companies to suppliers are managed efficiently and effectively. The Reverse Logistics Team is pivotal in ensuring that these defective parts are promptly shipped to suppliers upon notification.
The literature underscores the necessity for a process flow that expedites the shipment of unserviceable and incorrectly received parts to suppliers for necessary corrective actions. It highlights a notable deficiency in the standardization and formalization of process flows within Reverse Logistics.
This leads to the research question of the thesis which is How can high-tech companies standardize their information-sharing and communication processes to effectively manage high-impact issues in reverse logistics? To address this research question, the research methodology used in this research draws on the Information Systems Research Framework, integrating aspects of people, organization, and technology, both current and prospective. A comprehensive qualitative analysis was conducted, involving 22 semi-structured interviews for thematic analysis complemented by document analysis to delve into the challenges and impacts arising from the absence of standardized information-sharing and communication processes. Utilizing the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this research explores the technological, organizational, and external environmental contexts that influence technology adoption, specifically Information Systems in an organization. Additionally, it incorporates business process management and standardization theories to elucidate the standardization of business processes and the role of information systems therein. This provides foundational insights for developing an Information Systems based process flow, while also emphasizing the importance of change management theories and models for ensuring its successful adoption. This comprehensive approach facilitates a deep understanding of the factors necessary for successfully developing and adopting information systems as a standard process flow within high-tech companies to manage high-impact issues.
This rigorous qualitative analysis based on the literature framework and theories reveals that high-tech companies seeking to develop and standardize their information-sharing and communication processes to manage issues related to the shipment of unserviceable and incorrect parts in Reverse Logistics require a comprehensive approach. This approach incorporates technological, organizational, and environmental factors that significantly influence the development and successful adoption of such standardized process flows.
This research, therefore, by studying the challenges and impacts resulting from the lack of a standardized information sharing and communication process flow identifies key technological, organizational, and external environmental factors, along with their inter-dependencies, that influence the development and successful adoption of such an Information System-based standardized process flow. A framework called IS-PSF is developed which consists of these factors and inter-dependencies identified which are further spread across the phase of change management (transition from an existing state which in this case is the unavailability to the future state which is post-adoption of the to be Information System based process flow). The research methodology employed to develop the IS-PSF framework is distinctive, integrating the TOE framework with theories of business process standardization and change management models.
There are many relevant academic and practical insights derived from this research. The research demonstrated that while documentation of agreed procedures, rules, and guidelines can contribute to standardization, true standardization is unachievable without the integration of information systems alongside these formalization efforts based on the nature of the business processes used. The research highlighted that high-tech companies should deploy a proactive strategy for understanding the need for standardization by monitoring the performance of the business processes using performance indicators or metrics. The research showcased that having a robust and matured IT infrastructure alone is not sufficient but the role of human factors and how the stakeholders make sense of a technology (information systems in this case) are crucial for selecting an appropriate IS on which the standardized process can be developed and successfully adopted.
The research highlights the role of effective change management communication and strategy is vital to ensure a successful transition from the existing non-standardized fragmented information-sharing and communication practices to the standardized Information System process flow. An effective change management strategy decides whether the change management will be successful or a failure. The research also points out the importance of periodic reviews of the process flow by the process owners for continuous improvements. The research highlights that at times, owing to customer requirements, market volatility, environmental regulations, and the aim to set industry standards, high-tech companies standardize their processes in Reverse logistics.
From a practical perspective, the framework developed in the research helps managers make informed decisions on technology investments and change management strategies, allowing for seamless adoption of new systems across organizational boundaries. The study's practical application of the conceptual framework bridges the gap between theory and practice, providing actionable insights for improving process performance and stakeholder satisfaction in high-tech industries.
Overall, this study contributes to the development and successful adoption of an Information Systems Standard Process Flow. This framework is designed to efficiently and effectively manage issues related to unserviceable and incorrectly received parts, aiming to expedite their shipment to suppliers for necessary actions. The goal is to minimize delays in the process flow through the development and successful implementation of a standardized information system-based process flow. ...
Any delay in shipping defective parts or products to their suppliers extends the time required to perform necessary actions such as repairs or quality checks. These delays result in downtime and can halt the manufacturing operations of high-tech companies until the corrected parts are received back and reintegrated into the production process.
To achieve these objectives, it is essential to have a robust standardized information-sharing and communication process flow throughout the organization. This will ensure timely and accurate management of these defective parts as requested by various stakeholders within high-tech companies. The unavailability of such a process flow leads to significant delays and operational inefficiencies, undermining the company's ability to respond quickly to critical situations and maintain consistent manufacturing outputs.
Stakeholders throughout the organization, responsible for the supply and demand planning of critical and low-inventory parts, initiate requests to the Reverse Logistics Team for shipping defective parts to the supplier when they are deemed as unserviceable or incorrectly received and there is no new inventory to replace them. For the Reverse Logistics Team to achieve timely shipments, they require access to relevant information that is timely, accurate, and centralized through a platform or interface that offers transparency, traceability, and accountability. This system must also be scalable to accommodate an increasing volume of requests in the foreseeable future.
Due to the lack of a standardized process flow, stakeholders currently employ fragmented and inconsistent methods for communicating and sharing information about defective parts with the Reverse Logistics team. These methods are highly unreliable and risky, lacking traceability and visibility in a centralized interface where all incoming and processed requests can be monitored. The existing methods need continuous monitoring by the RL team to ensure they do not miss any requests. Furthermore,
when these existing communication practices are deployed, necessary preliminary steps required before sending requests to the Reverse Logistics team get bypassed, creating bottlenecks and hindering their ability to efficiently manage and expedite the shipment of defective parts. Therefore, the necessity of developing and integrating a standardized process with an advanced Information System like ERP, and adopting it organization-wide, will significantly streamline the defect-handling process. This strategic integration enhances transparency, traceability, and accountability, ensuring that requests from various stakeholders to ship defective parts from high-tech companies to suppliers are managed efficiently and effectively. The Reverse Logistics Team is pivotal in ensuring that these defective parts are promptly shipped to suppliers upon notification.
The literature underscores the necessity for a process flow that expedites the shipment of unserviceable and incorrectly received parts to suppliers for necessary corrective actions. It highlights a notable deficiency in the standardization and formalization of process flows within Reverse Logistics.
This leads to the research question of the thesis which is How can high-tech companies standardize their information-sharing and communication processes to effectively manage high-impact issues in reverse logistics? To address this research question, the research methodology used in this research draws on the Information Systems Research Framework, integrating aspects of people, organization, and technology, both current and prospective. A comprehensive qualitative analysis was conducted, involving 22 semi-structured interviews for thematic analysis complemented by document analysis to delve into the challenges and impacts arising from the absence of standardized information-sharing and communication processes. Utilizing the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this research explores the technological, organizational, and external environmental contexts that influence technology adoption, specifically Information Systems in an organization. Additionally, it incorporates business process management and standardization theories to elucidate the standardization of business processes and the role of information systems therein. This provides foundational insights for developing an Information Systems based process flow, while also emphasizing the importance of change management theories and models for ensuring its successful adoption. This comprehensive approach facilitates a deep understanding of the factors necessary for successfully developing and adopting information systems as a standard process flow within high-tech companies to manage high-impact issues.
This rigorous qualitative analysis based on the literature framework and theories reveals that high-tech companies seeking to develop and standardize their information-sharing and communication processes to manage issues related to the shipment of unserviceable and incorrect parts in Reverse Logistics require a comprehensive approach. This approach incorporates technological, organizational, and environmental factors that significantly influence the development and successful adoption of such standardized process flows.
This research, therefore, by studying the challenges and impacts resulting from the lack of a standardized information sharing and communication process flow identifies key technological, organizational, and external environmental factors, along with their inter-dependencies, that influence the development and successful adoption of such an Information System-based standardized process flow. A framework called IS-PSF is developed which consists of these factors and inter-dependencies identified which are further spread across the phase of change management (transition from an existing state which in this case is the unavailability to the future state which is post-adoption of the to be Information System based process flow). The research methodology employed to develop the IS-PSF framework is distinctive, integrating the TOE framework with theories of business process standardization and change management models.
There are many relevant academic and practical insights derived from this research. The research demonstrated that while documentation of agreed procedures, rules, and guidelines can contribute to standardization, true standardization is unachievable without the integration of information systems alongside these formalization efforts based on the nature of the business processes used. The research highlighted that high-tech companies should deploy a proactive strategy for understanding the need for standardization by monitoring the performance of the business processes using performance indicators or metrics. The research showcased that having a robust and matured IT infrastructure alone is not sufficient but the role of human factors and how the stakeholders make sense of a technology (information systems in this case) are crucial for selecting an appropriate IS on which the standardized process can be developed and successfully adopted.
The research highlights the role of effective change management communication and strategy is vital to ensure a successful transition from the existing non-standardized fragmented information-sharing and communication practices to the standardized Information System process flow. An effective change management strategy decides whether the change management will be successful or a failure. The research also points out the importance of periodic reviews of the process flow by the process owners for continuous improvements. The research highlights that at times, owing to customer requirements, market volatility, environmental regulations, and the aim to set industry standards, high-tech companies standardize their processes in Reverse logistics.
From a practical perspective, the framework developed in the research helps managers make informed decisions on technology investments and change management strategies, allowing for seamless adoption of new systems across organizational boundaries. The study's practical application of the conceptual framework bridges the gap between theory and practice, providing actionable insights for improving process performance and stakeholder satisfaction in high-tech industries.
Overall, this study contributes to the development and successful adoption of an Information Systems Standard Process Flow. This framework is designed to efficiently and effectively manage issues related to unserviceable and incorrectly received parts, aiming to expedite their shipment to suppliers for necessary actions. The goal is to minimize delays in the process flow through the development and successful implementation of a standardized information system-based process flow.
Navigating the waters of innovation over time
An empirical study into the evaluation of existing innovative Interorganisational Partnerships within the maritime sector
Analyzing and addressing value conflicts in the adoption of hazardous chemicals in the energy transition
A methodological exploration of combining systems thinking and value-driven methods in the design of energy systems
The methodological framework was evaluated by conducting a case study on the adoption process of ammonia in the Dutch energy transition. To inform the empirical investigation, 11 expert interviews with policy advisors, industry players and research experts provided in-depth information about the values and value conflicts at play. However, it was noted that the broad nature of the interview questions limited the ability to derive specific technical design requirements, suggesting that future studies should adapt the interview questions to focus on particular parts of the socio-technical system if desired. In the empirical investigation phase, value hierarchies were constructed from the value level to the norm level, which provided useful for identifying value conflicts. The results of the empirical investigation revealed seven major values which play a role in the adoption process of ammonia in the Dutch energy transition being: efficiency (of both spatial planning and the energy transition in general), competitiveness, cooperation, safety and health, environmental sustainability, transparency, and (procedural and distributive) justice. The values identified in this study were found to be comparable with those found in related works on the adoption of technologies like nuclear
energy and wind turbines. Seven value conflicts were identified by comparing the norms related to each value and the framework was used to address and classify them. This allowed to derive policy implications.
There is a need for more transparent communication with the public about the energy transition, available technology alternatives to reach net-zero, the associated risks of those alternatives, and the ethical dilemmas that the government is facing. It was established that local communities are willing to bear risks if the government clearly states what the ethical dilemmas are in the energy transition and the choices made in these dilemmas. This vision can build social acceptance from the industry and local communities and address the identified value conflicts between safety and health, justice, and efficiency. In this vision, the government should also address their standpoint on the ethical desirability of adopting certain chemicals in the energy transition. Therefore, it is necessary that the government
has specified the intended use-cases for chemicals like green ammonia. This clarity can help address value conflicts related to competitiveness and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, it is important that the government keeps fostering a strong collaboration between industry and government. This is especially important when adopting chemicals that are new and where the government possesses limited expertise on. As the industry could possess the necessary technical expertise, the government could set regulatory boundaries upon collaboration with industry, enhancing regulatory preparedness. Moreover, to ensure that imported ammonia is produced green, certification standards should be put in place. These interventions could address the identified value conflict between environmental sustainability and competitiveness, fostering the social acceptance of ammonia adoption. ...
The methodological framework was evaluated by conducting a case study on the adoption process of ammonia in the Dutch energy transition. To inform the empirical investigation, 11 expert interviews with policy advisors, industry players and research experts provided in-depth information about the values and value conflicts at play. However, it was noted that the broad nature of the interview questions limited the ability to derive specific technical design requirements, suggesting that future studies should adapt the interview questions to focus on particular parts of the socio-technical system if desired. In the empirical investigation phase, value hierarchies were constructed from the value level to the norm level, which provided useful for identifying value conflicts. The results of the empirical investigation revealed seven major values which play a role in the adoption process of ammonia in the Dutch energy transition being: efficiency (of both spatial planning and the energy transition in general), competitiveness, cooperation, safety and health, environmental sustainability, transparency, and (procedural and distributive) justice. The values identified in this study were found to be comparable with those found in related works on the adoption of technologies like nuclear
energy and wind turbines. Seven value conflicts were identified by comparing the norms related to each value and the framework was used to address and classify them. This allowed to derive policy implications.
There is a need for more transparent communication with the public about the energy transition, available technology alternatives to reach net-zero, the associated risks of those alternatives, and the ethical dilemmas that the government is facing. It was established that local communities are willing to bear risks if the government clearly states what the ethical dilemmas are in the energy transition and the choices made in these dilemmas. This vision can build social acceptance from the industry and local communities and address the identified value conflicts between safety and health, justice, and efficiency. In this vision, the government should also address their standpoint on the ethical desirability of adopting certain chemicals in the energy transition. Therefore, it is necessary that the government
has specified the intended use-cases for chemicals like green ammonia. This clarity can help address value conflicts related to competitiveness and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, it is important that the government keeps fostering a strong collaboration between industry and government. This is especially important when adopting chemicals that are new and where the government possesses limited expertise on. As the industry could possess the necessary technical expertise, the government could set regulatory boundaries upon collaboration with industry, enhancing regulatory preparedness. Moreover, to ensure that imported ammonia is produced green, certification standards should be put in place. These interventions could address the identified value conflict between environmental sustainability and competitiveness, fostering the social acceptance of ammonia adoption.
The objective of this research is to build a model to estimate the average influence of digitalization on the success of a startup in all phases during their lifecycle among other established factors, according to their own input. Moreover, this research will investigate the current use of digitalization at industrial startups and how digitalization can help industrial startups to accelerate their innovations. Additionally, this will result in a few examples of how digitalization is used today at startups and a number of recommendations for further research.
This research focuses on industrial startups that are located in the Netherlands, because the Netherlands is a leading high tech country with a world class technical university and science hub and for the reason that similar research has been done in several other countries, only no research has been found on the impact of digitalization (on industrial startups) in the Netherlands. This research will answer the following main research question and sub-questions:
Main RQ: How can digitalization help industrial startups to accelerate their innovations?
SQ1. What are the obstacles that industrial startups in the Netherlands run into during the startup and transition phase?
SQ2. How do startups evaluate their digitalization strategy?
Employees from eight startups have been interviewed during qualitative exploratory expert interviews. These eight startups are divided in two groups. The first group will entail five startups that are currently in the early stage startup phase and the second group will entail three startups that are currently in the scale up phase. During the analysis of the data, the startups (and their data) in the first group are compared with each other. After this, the startups (and their data) in the second group are compared with each other and at last, (the startups in) both groups are compared with each other.
The different obstacles from startups resulted from different research methods. The obstacles that were found during a literature review are: a lack of funds, lack of market need, lack of experience, bad management, premature scaling and a strong competition. From the interview with the investment director of YES!Delft the following obstacles resulted: lack of long term vision, producing everything in-house, going to the market too late, not separating main and side issues & not clearing obstacles in the near future before they run into them. The startups came up with some similar obstacles, but also different ones, like finding (new) people, sales and/or customer acquisition, cybersecurity, lack of funds, big geographical distances, strict/heavy legislation, finding suitable (scalable) software programs, maintaining high quality standards, long negotiation times with customers and decisions of widening/narrowing the product portfolio.
All startups stated that digitalization is very important (one even called it a key success factor), however only three startups could give some kind of definition of what it is exactly and only two startups have a digital roadmap. Even though several startups stated that they would recommend to other startups to start as early as possible with digitalization, they all stated that digitalization is the least important in the first two phases of a startup compared to the last two phases.
The examples of applications that startups mentioned, range from the more simple examples like online meetings and 3D modelling software, to the more advance examples like an ERP system, MES system, machine learning models and newly created API’s. With the help of these applications of digitalization, startups can save time and money in the long run.
During this research it became clear that digitalization can accelerate the innovations of industrial startups, but it is not the most important factor and cannot carry a startup on its own. Digitalization is a tool to get somewhere and not a goal on itself.
The contribution of this research to the literature is a conceptual model that has been used during this research to measure the influence of digitalization (among other variables) on the success of industrial startups in the Netherlands. The practical contribution of this research for startups is to create awareness among startups about the influence of digitalization, the fact that startups can read about the obstacles that they could encounter and some possible solutions for these obstacles as well. Companies that offer applications of digitalization can use this research as orientation for the creation of tailormade digitalization solutions for startups.
Recommendations for further research are: to dive deeper into the phenomenon digitalization, to investigate why some startups say that digitalization needs to be used early, but then contradict themselves with filling in the conceptual model, the influence of digitalization at startups in other sectors and the influence of digitalization among larger corporations.
...
The objective of this research is to build a model to estimate the average influence of digitalization on the success of a startup in all phases during their lifecycle among other established factors, according to their own input. Moreover, this research will investigate the current use of digitalization at industrial startups and how digitalization can help industrial startups to accelerate their innovations. Additionally, this will result in a few examples of how digitalization is used today at startups and a number of recommendations for further research.
This research focuses on industrial startups that are located in the Netherlands, because the Netherlands is a leading high tech country with a world class technical university and science hub and for the reason that similar research has been done in several other countries, only no research has been found on the impact of digitalization (on industrial startups) in the Netherlands. This research will answer the following main research question and sub-questions:
Main RQ: How can digitalization help industrial startups to accelerate their innovations?
SQ1. What are the obstacles that industrial startups in the Netherlands run into during the startup and transition phase?
SQ2. How do startups evaluate their digitalization strategy?
Employees from eight startups have been interviewed during qualitative exploratory expert interviews. These eight startups are divided in two groups. The first group will entail five startups that are currently in the early stage startup phase and the second group will entail three startups that are currently in the scale up phase. During the analysis of the data, the startups (and their data) in the first group are compared with each other. After this, the startups (and their data) in the second group are compared with each other and at last, (the startups in) both groups are compared with each other.
The different obstacles from startups resulted from different research methods. The obstacles that were found during a literature review are: a lack of funds, lack of market need, lack of experience, bad management, premature scaling and a strong competition. From the interview with the investment director of YES!Delft the following obstacles resulted: lack of long term vision, producing everything in-house, going to the market too late, not separating main and side issues & not clearing obstacles in the near future before they run into them. The startups came up with some similar obstacles, but also different ones, like finding (new) people, sales and/or customer acquisition, cybersecurity, lack of funds, big geographical distances, strict/heavy legislation, finding suitable (scalable) software programs, maintaining high quality standards, long negotiation times with customers and decisions of widening/narrowing the product portfolio.
All startups stated that digitalization is very important (one even called it a key success factor), however only three startups could give some kind of definition of what it is exactly and only two startups have a digital roadmap. Even though several startups stated that they would recommend to other startups to start as early as possible with digitalization, they all stated that digitalization is the least important in the first two phases of a startup compared to the last two phases.
The examples of applications that startups mentioned, range from the more simple examples like online meetings and 3D modelling software, to the more advance examples like an ERP system, MES system, machine learning models and newly created API’s. With the help of these applications of digitalization, startups can save time and money in the long run.
During this research it became clear that digitalization can accelerate the innovations of industrial startups, but it is not the most important factor and cannot carry a startup on its own. Digitalization is a tool to get somewhere and not a goal on itself.
The contribution of this research to the literature is a conceptual model that has been used during this research to measure the influence of digitalization (among other variables) on the success of industrial startups in the Netherlands. The practical contribution of this research for startups is to create awareness among startups about the influence of digitalization, the fact that startups can read about the obstacles that they could encounter and some possible solutions for these obstacles as well. Companies that offer applications of digitalization can use this research as orientation for the creation of tailormade digitalization solutions for startups.
Recommendations for further research are: to dive deeper into the phenomenon digitalization, to investigate why some startups say that digitalization needs to be used early, but then contradict themselves with filling in the conceptual model, the influence of digitalization at startups in other sectors and the influence of digitalization among larger corporations.
Mapping social context of sustainable attitudes using stakeholder analysis with discourse analysis
Investigating the maritime sector in order to provide knowledge about future technological pathways
With a basis of Q-methodology, a list of statements was created that, based on Dryzek’s discourse theory, is then used to judge the respondents on their environmental beliefs. Also the sustainability reports of selected companies where investigated. It was possible to identify the main themes that could count on agreement/disagreement and controversy. Nature and the existence of limits to our activities where rated highly, while the way to solve it remained controversial. People are more imaginative than their company’s current policies indicate. People see the limitations to the systems that surround them. The willingness of the employees is there, or there is a lack between the strategy of the board and the values of the employees. Further action is required to bridge the gap.
It is indeed possible to asses different stakeholders and firms on their discourses and the research shows two methods to do it. The set up of the interview and the statements proved to be able to provide information about the environmentalism of the stakeholder. This information gives an insight into the social context of environmentalism and brought forward interesting observations about the willingness of the employees and the stance of the companies. The reports indicate a gap between what is needed (and wanted) and what is currently being done. The companies should be more radical and imaginative in both their vision and their solutions, instead of focussing on the solutions alone. Vision is often omitted from the reports, an important oversight.
Overarching vision and motivation can be uncovered but the specific points of departure for technological advancement remain hidden. The thesis brings a contribution to investigations on stakeholder alignment in the clean shipping sector and uncovers some important issues. The firms specific operating context remains to be investigated with more detail, as to properly find the barriers that hold back solving wicked problems. However a good effort is made to indicate the grounds for disputes from the actors.
...
With a basis of Q-methodology, a list of statements was created that, based on Dryzek’s discourse theory, is then used to judge the respondents on their environmental beliefs. Also the sustainability reports of selected companies where investigated. It was possible to identify the main themes that could count on agreement/disagreement and controversy. Nature and the existence of limits to our activities where rated highly, while the way to solve it remained controversial. People are more imaginative than their company’s current policies indicate. People see the limitations to the systems that surround them. The willingness of the employees is there, or there is a lack between the strategy of the board and the values of the employees. Further action is required to bridge the gap.
It is indeed possible to asses different stakeholders and firms on their discourses and the research shows two methods to do it. The set up of the interview and the statements proved to be able to provide information about the environmentalism of the stakeholder. This information gives an insight into the social context of environmentalism and brought forward interesting observations about the willingness of the employees and the stance of the companies. The reports indicate a gap between what is needed (and wanted) and what is currently being done. The companies should be more radical and imaginative in both their vision and their solutions, instead of focussing on the solutions alone. Vision is often omitted from the reports, an important oversight.
Overarching vision and motivation can be uncovered but the specific points of departure for technological advancement remain hidden. The thesis brings a contribution to investigations on stakeholder alignment in the clean shipping sector and uncovers some important issues. The firms specific operating context remains to be investigated with more detail, as to properly find the barriers that hold back solving wicked problems. However a good effort is made to indicate the grounds for disputes from the actors.