D.S. Draganov
Please Note
21 records found
1
Advanced seismic monitoring tools for monitoring Dutch geothermal systems
Addressing event detection in noisy environments, hypocenter inversion, velocity-model validation, experimental network design, and correction of clock errors
In Chapter 2, we introduce a seismic monitoring workflow to detect and characterise low-magnitude seismic events in noisy environments. We incorporate uncertainties from the open-access regional seismic velocity model into the hypocentre estimations. We apply the workflow to the recorded data from a temporary passive network deployed around the Kwintsheul geothermal operation in South Holland, where one low-magnitude seismic event had previously been reported. The network is located in a high-noise environment, characteristic of most geothermal operations in the Netherlands. Despite the high noise levels, we identify five additional low-magnitude seismic events that occurred close to a local fault and the injection well. These are the first events ever recorded in the region. However, large hypocentre uncertainties—due to limitations in the seismic velocity model and sparse azimuthal coverage—prevent a clear interpretation of the underlying processes. From these two limiting factors, only the velocity model can be refined after an event has been recorded. However, refining the available seismic velocity model implies significant costs, as active seismic sources are usually used.
In Chapter 3, we introduce a workflow for validating the seismic velocity model based on body-wave seismic interferometry as a cost-effective alternative. Our workflow is motivated by the possibility of retrieving virtual-offset reflection responses when seismic energy arrives with near-vertical incidence to the receivers. We apply our workflow using the low-magnitude seismic events that we detected. We find that the P-wave velocity model effectively explains the observed retrieved reflections at shallow depths. In contrast, the available S-wave models do not match the data. We conclude that the P-wave model is reliable for hypocentre studies, but that the S-wave model requires refinement.
In Chapter 4, we address how the network geometry influences the detectability and hypocentre resolution of seismic events and implement a workflow for designing seismic networks. In our workflow, we integrate open-access subsurface information to generate a synthetic earthquake catalogue using knowledge of faults and areas of expected higher seismicity risk. We then apply a non-linear design strategy and a global search algorithm to ensure approximately optimal configurations. Finally, we validate the network designs through synthetic hypocentre inversions. We identify the Dutch North Sea as the area in most need of seismic receivers, due to (i) upcoming carbon capture and storage (CCS) initiatives, (ii) the lowest existing network coverage, and (iii) the potential future use of existing oil-and-gas infrastructure for offshore geothermal-energy developments. We apply our workflow to the K-14 offshore field, where carbon capture and storage is planned. The results show that the optimised networks provide sufficient azimuthal coverage and location accuracy, even under simplified assumptions. This workflow can guide the design of cost effective networks in both onshore and offshore environments.
In Chapter 5, we focus on accurate time synchronization of seismic networks. We introduce a data-driven method to detect and correct clock errors using the time-symmetry of ambient-noise correlations. We apply our method to the IMAGE network in Reykjanes, Iceland, deployed to monitor offshore geothermal activity. Offshore geothermal-energy operations introduce additional challenges due to the need for ocean-bottom seismometers (OBS), which lack direct access to GNSS signals, leading to clock-drift errors that affect event timing and localisation. We show that most OBS in the network experienced clock drift, and some had large initial time offsets. We provide an open-source Python package (OCloC) that implements this method, enabling better timing accuracy and improved hypocentre estimation in future offshore monitoring, which can be applied in future offshore geothermal energy and the upcoming carbon capture and storage operations in the Dutch North Sea.
Together, in this thesis we introduce new or adapted workflows to tackle specific limitations in current low-magnitude seismic monitoring practices. By addressing these challenges, this thesis advances the capabilities of seismic monitoring in both onshore and offshore settings. By improving detection, location, velocity model validation, network design, and timing correction, this thesis contributes to the development of robust and cost effective seismic monitoring systems. These tools support operators and regulators in making informed decisions for the safe and sustainable scaling of geothermal energy and carbon storage in the Netherlands and beyond.
...
In Chapter 2, we introduce a seismic monitoring workflow to detect and characterise low-magnitude seismic events in noisy environments. We incorporate uncertainties from the open-access regional seismic velocity model into the hypocentre estimations. We apply the workflow to the recorded data from a temporary passive network deployed around the Kwintsheul geothermal operation in South Holland, where one low-magnitude seismic event had previously been reported. The network is located in a high-noise environment, characteristic of most geothermal operations in the Netherlands. Despite the high noise levels, we identify five additional low-magnitude seismic events that occurred close to a local fault and the injection well. These are the first events ever recorded in the region. However, large hypocentre uncertainties—due to limitations in the seismic velocity model and sparse azimuthal coverage—prevent a clear interpretation of the underlying processes. From these two limiting factors, only the velocity model can be refined after an event has been recorded. However, refining the available seismic velocity model implies significant costs, as active seismic sources are usually used.
In Chapter 3, we introduce a workflow for validating the seismic velocity model based on body-wave seismic interferometry as a cost-effective alternative. Our workflow is motivated by the possibility of retrieving virtual-offset reflection responses when seismic energy arrives with near-vertical incidence to the receivers. We apply our workflow using the low-magnitude seismic events that we detected. We find that the P-wave velocity model effectively explains the observed retrieved reflections at shallow depths. In contrast, the available S-wave models do not match the data. We conclude that the P-wave model is reliable for hypocentre studies, but that the S-wave model requires refinement.
In Chapter 4, we address how the network geometry influences the detectability and hypocentre resolution of seismic events and implement a workflow for designing seismic networks. In our workflow, we integrate open-access subsurface information to generate a synthetic earthquake catalogue using knowledge of faults and areas of expected higher seismicity risk. We then apply a non-linear design strategy and a global search algorithm to ensure approximately optimal configurations. Finally, we validate the network designs through synthetic hypocentre inversions. We identify the Dutch North Sea as the area in most need of seismic receivers, due to (i) upcoming carbon capture and storage (CCS) initiatives, (ii) the lowest existing network coverage, and (iii) the potential future use of existing oil-and-gas infrastructure for offshore geothermal-energy developments. We apply our workflow to the K-14 offshore field, where carbon capture and storage is planned. The results show that the optimised networks provide sufficient azimuthal coverage and location accuracy, even under simplified assumptions. This workflow can guide the design of cost effective networks in both onshore and offshore environments.
In Chapter 5, we focus on accurate time synchronization of seismic networks. We introduce a data-driven method to detect and correct clock errors using the time-symmetry of ambient-noise correlations. We apply our method to the IMAGE network in Reykjanes, Iceland, deployed to monitor offshore geothermal activity. Offshore geothermal-energy operations introduce additional challenges due to the need for ocean-bottom seismometers (OBS), which lack direct access to GNSS signals, leading to clock-drift errors that affect event timing and localisation. We show that most OBS in the network experienced clock drift, and some had large initial time offsets. We provide an open-source Python package (OCloC) that implements this method, enabling better timing accuracy and improved hypocentre estimation in future offshore monitoring, which can be applied in future offshore geothermal energy and the upcoming carbon capture and storage operations in the Dutch North Sea.
Together, in this thesis we introduce new or adapted workflows to tackle specific limitations in current low-magnitude seismic monitoring practices. By addressing these challenges, this thesis advances the capabilities of seismic monitoring in both onshore and offshore settings. By improving detection, location, velocity model validation, network design, and timing correction, this thesis contributes to the development of robust and cost effective seismic monitoring systems. These tools support operators and regulators in making informed decisions for the safe and sustainable scaling of geothermal energy and carbon storage in the Netherlands and beyond.
Towards improved seismic methods for investigating the offshore shallow subsurface
From inversion and imaging methods to acquisition hardware development
Characterization of mine tailings using seismic ambient-noise methods
A case study of the Bäckegruvan tailings in central Sweden
Additionally, we employ 3C beamforming to characterize the ambient-noise wavefield, with the aim of supporting HVSR curve interpretation. However, the results of the 3C beamforming prove unreliable, which we attribute primarily to the array's suboptimal geometry - specifically, its sparse station spacing and highly anisotropic wavenumber resolution.
We estimate the thickness of tailings at each station by combining the fundamental site frequency with a constant S-wave velocity. We then interpolate these individual measurements to construct a three-dimensional model of the tailings-bedrock interface, from which we derive the total volume of the tailings deposit. To assess the reliability of our model, we compare the interpolated depths with findings from a recent investigation in the same region, which utilized geoelectrics and electromagnetic geophysical methods. Comparing the results, we find strong concordance between the two approaches.
Our case study highlights the HVSR method’s potential as a cost-effective, fast, and robust approach for obtaining a preliminary estimate of mine-tailings depth. ...
Additionally, we employ 3C beamforming to characterize the ambient-noise wavefield, with the aim of supporting HVSR curve interpretation. However, the results of the 3C beamforming prove unreliable, which we attribute primarily to the array's suboptimal geometry - specifically, its sparse station spacing and highly anisotropic wavenumber resolution.
We estimate the thickness of tailings at each station by combining the fundamental site frequency with a constant S-wave velocity. We then interpolate these individual measurements to construct a three-dimensional model of the tailings-bedrock interface, from which we derive the total volume of the tailings deposit. To assess the reliability of our model, we compare the interpolated depths with findings from a recent investigation in the same region, which utilized geoelectrics and electromagnetic geophysical methods. Comparing the results, we find strong concordance between the two approaches.
Our case study highlights the HVSR method’s potential as a cost-effective, fast, and robust approach for obtaining a preliminary estimate of mine-tailings depth.
Navigating the Depths: Pioneering water depth measurements through distributed acoustic sensing
A new method for monitoring the water-mud interface and water column height using passive noise and fibre optical cables
Presently, common methods for nautical-depth monitoring rely heavily on acoustic echo sounders, rooted in dated methodologies with limited innovation over nearly a century. Acoustic echo sounders measure the two-way travel time of sound pulses, assuming a known propagation velocity of the acoustic energy. However, accurately approximating the pressure-wave velocity in shallow marine environments poses challenges due to variations in temperature and salinity among different water layers, leading to depth measurement inaccuracies. Furthermore, this method is limited by vessel availability and requires access to quay walls, often occupied by loading or unloading ships.... ...
Presently, common methods for nautical-depth monitoring rely heavily on acoustic echo sounders, rooted in dated methodologies with limited innovation over nearly a century. Acoustic echo sounders measure the two-way travel time of sound pulses, assuming a known propagation velocity of the acoustic energy. However, accurately approximating the pressure-wave velocity in shallow marine environments poses challenges due to variations in temperature and salinity among different water layers, leading to depth measurement inaccuracies. Furthermore, this method is limited by vessel availability and requires access to quay walls, often occupied by loading or unloading ships....
...
In this thesis, we aim to develop seismic data-driven methods for layer-specific imaging and monitoring, with a primary focus on advancing the technique of ghost-reflection retrieval using seismic interferometry (SI) and showing how the Marchenko method could be used with land seismic data.
SI often involves the cross-correlation of seismic observations at different receiver locations and the consecutive summation over the available sources, allowing the retrieval of new seismic responses from virtual sources located at the receiver positions. When using sources and receivers only at the surface, the virtual-source gathers retrieved by SI contain not only pseudo-physical reflections but also ghost (non-physical) reflections. These ghost reflections result mainly from the cross-correlation (CC) or auto-correlation (AC) of primary reflections from two different depths, representing reflections from inside specific subsurface layer(s), as measured with a virtual ghost source and a virtual ghost receiver positioned directly on top of the specific layer(s). Consequently, the ghost reflections can provide information about the specific layer(s) without the effects of the overburden and underburden layers.
We first explore the use of ghost reflections for layer-specific characterisation of the shallow subsurface using SI by AC, utilising numerically modelled data for a layered subsurface model down to 30 m depth, incorporating a lateral change in velocity, a velocity gradient with depth, a thickness change, and a velocity change in the target layer. Additionally, we present the first application of ghost reflections to shallow subsurface field data. Ghost reflections typically exhibit similar characteristics to other reflection events, appear close to or interfere with other events with only slight temporal differences. This makes their identification a significant challenge. To address this, we eliminate surface-related multiples and demonstrate how specific ghost reflections can be more efficiently retrieved by muting undesired reflections in the dataset before applying SI.
To extend the application of ghost reflections to deep structures, we focus on the feasibility of monitoring pore-pressure changes in the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands. We utilise numerical modelling to simulate scalar reflection data, deploying sources and receivers at the surface. We conduct an ultrasonic transmission laboratory experiment to measure S-wave velocities at different pore pressures. This data is used to create subsurface models, which are then utilized to simulate scalar reflection seismic data for monitoring purposes. We retrieve zero-offset ghost reflections by applying SI by AC to the modelled datasets. We then use a correlation operator to determine time differences between a baseline survey and monitoring surveys. Additionally, we investigate the effects of the sources and receivers' geometry and spacing, as well as the number of virtual sources and receivers, on retrieving ghost reflections with high interpretability and resolution. Besides observing time shifts in the ghost reflections, we also explore the feasibility of using the amplitude of ghost reflections for reservoir monitoring.
Having clear reflections from both the top and bottom of the specific layer(s) is crucial for retrieving ghost reflections, which can be challenging when using land seismic datasets due to the usual presence of strong surface waves. Conventionally, surface waves are suppressed during data processing using frequency-offset, frequency-wavenumber, or bandpass filters. However, these approaches can prove ineffective when the surface waves are scattered and/or overlap with the frequency regions of the reflected body waves that we intend to preserve. To overcome some of these challenges, we show the efficacy of the interferometric surface-wave suppression using a 2D seismic reflection dataset from Scheemda, Groningen province, the Netherlands. Interferometric surface-wave suppression can be used to effectively suppress surface waves by applying SI to first estimate the surface waves and second followed by their adaptive subtraction from the original data. We propose to apply these two steps recursively, i.e., several times, which yields better results than a single application in terms of clearer and more continuous reflections. This technique can function as a standalone technique or as part of a pre-processing flow.
When applying the seismic reflection method for monitoring purposes, specific reflections, e.g., from the top and bottom of the reservoir, are of interest. The reflections from both the top and bottom of the specific layer(s) can also be distorted by other events from the surrounding layers. To eliminate such distortions, the Marchenko-redatuming method was introduced. Several Marchenko-redatuming methods have been applied successfully to marine field data. We demonstrate, for the first time, the application of the Marchenko-based isolation technique to field land seismic data to isolate the target response by removing the overburden and underburden. Land data are intrinsically elastic, known for dominant surface waves and a low signal-to-noise ratio, posing a challenge for the Marchenko method, which requires high-quality reflection data. After we carefully apply several pre-processing steps, including recursive interferometric surface-wave suppression, we apply the Marchenko method twice: first, to remove the overburden effects by choosing a focal depth of 30 m, and then to remove the underburden effects by choosing a focal depth of 270 m. This process generates a new reflection response from the target area, providing clearer subsurface responses. The Marchenko method is particularly beneficial for data-driven techniques such as ghost-reflection retrieval, seismic imaging, and time-lapse studies using land seismic datasets. ...
In this thesis, we aim to develop seismic data-driven methods for layer-specific imaging and monitoring, with a primary focus on advancing the technique of ghost-reflection retrieval using seismic interferometry (SI) and showing how the Marchenko method could be used with land seismic data.
SI often involves the cross-correlation of seismic observations at different receiver locations and the consecutive summation over the available sources, allowing the retrieval of new seismic responses from virtual sources located at the receiver positions. When using sources and receivers only at the surface, the virtual-source gathers retrieved by SI contain not only pseudo-physical reflections but also ghost (non-physical) reflections. These ghost reflections result mainly from the cross-correlation (CC) or auto-correlation (AC) of primary reflections from two different depths, representing reflections from inside specific subsurface layer(s), as measured with a virtual ghost source and a virtual ghost receiver positioned directly on top of the specific layer(s). Consequently, the ghost reflections can provide information about the specific layer(s) without the effects of the overburden and underburden layers.
We first explore the use of ghost reflections for layer-specific characterisation of the shallow subsurface using SI by AC, utilising numerically modelled data for a layered subsurface model down to 30 m depth, incorporating a lateral change in velocity, a velocity gradient with depth, a thickness change, and a velocity change in the target layer. Additionally, we present the first application of ghost reflections to shallow subsurface field data. Ghost reflections typically exhibit similar characteristics to other reflection events, appear close to or interfere with other events with only slight temporal differences. This makes their identification a significant challenge. To address this, we eliminate surface-related multiples and demonstrate how specific ghost reflections can be more efficiently retrieved by muting undesired reflections in the dataset before applying SI.
To extend the application of ghost reflections to deep structures, we focus on the feasibility of monitoring pore-pressure changes in the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands. We utilise numerical modelling to simulate scalar reflection data, deploying sources and receivers at the surface. We conduct an ultrasonic transmission laboratory experiment to measure S-wave velocities at different pore pressures. This data is used to create subsurface models, which are then utilized to simulate scalar reflection seismic data for monitoring purposes. We retrieve zero-offset ghost reflections by applying SI by AC to the modelled datasets. We then use a correlation operator to determine time differences between a baseline survey and monitoring surveys. Additionally, we investigate the effects of the sources and receivers' geometry and spacing, as well as the number of virtual sources and receivers, on retrieving ghost reflections with high interpretability and resolution. Besides observing time shifts in the ghost reflections, we also explore the feasibility of using the amplitude of ghost reflections for reservoir monitoring.
Having clear reflections from both the top and bottom of the specific layer(s) is crucial for retrieving ghost reflections, which can be challenging when using land seismic datasets due to the usual presence of strong surface waves. Conventionally, surface waves are suppressed during data processing using frequency-offset, frequency-wavenumber, or bandpass filters. However, these approaches can prove ineffective when the surface waves are scattered and/or overlap with the frequency regions of the reflected body waves that we intend to preserve. To overcome some of these challenges, we show the efficacy of the interferometric surface-wave suppression using a 2D seismic reflection dataset from Scheemda, Groningen province, the Netherlands. Interferometric surface-wave suppression can be used to effectively suppress surface waves by applying SI to first estimate the surface waves and second followed by their adaptive subtraction from the original data. We propose to apply these two steps recursively, i.e., several times, which yields better results than a single application in terms of clearer and more continuous reflections. This technique can function as a standalone technique or as part of a pre-processing flow.
When applying the seismic reflection method for monitoring purposes, specific reflections, e.g., from the top and bottom of the reservoir, are of interest. The reflections from both the top and bottom of the specific layer(s) can also be distorted by other events from the surrounding layers. To eliminate such distortions, the Marchenko-redatuming method was introduced. Several Marchenko-redatuming methods have been applied successfully to marine field data. We demonstrate, for the first time, the application of the Marchenko-based isolation technique to field land seismic data to isolate the target response by removing the overburden and underburden. Land data are intrinsically elastic, known for dominant surface waves and a low signal-to-noise ratio, posing a challenge for the Marchenko method, which requires high-quality reflection data. After we carefully apply several pre-processing steps, including recursive interferometric surface-wave suppression, we apply the Marchenko method twice: first, to remove the overburden effects by choosing a focal depth of 30 m, and then to remove the underburden effects by choosing a focal depth of 270 m. This process generates a new reflection response from the target area, providing clearer subsurface responses. The Marchenko method is particularly beneficial for data-driven techniques such as ghost-reflection retrieval, seismic imaging, and time-lapse studies using land seismic datasets.
We process this passive data with seismic interferometry. For this, an illumination analysis is performed to filter noise panels that are dominated by surface-wave noise and to keep panels dominated by body-wave noise. Afterwards, panels with near-vertical events are autocorrelated to retrieve a zero-offset section. The full set of selected panels is crosscorrelated to retrieve virtual shot records. These are processed with a simple reflection seismological processing workflow to obtain a stacked section.
The results show that the autocorrelated zero-offset sections appear more noisy, but are characterised by higher frequencies, while the crosscorrelated stacked sections are characterised by a lower-frequency content and contain more dipping reflectors. The major, horizontal reflectors correspond between the two types of sections.
A rudimentary interpretation of reflectors is done, based on the two types of sections and compared with a local geological model. This shows that the major lithological differences and the base of the Hengill volcano can be distinguished in the interpreted section. ...
We process this passive data with seismic interferometry. For this, an illumination analysis is performed to filter noise panels that are dominated by surface-wave noise and to keep panels dominated by body-wave noise. Afterwards, panels with near-vertical events are autocorrelated to retrieve a zero-offset section. The full set of selected panels is crosscorrelated to retrieve virtual shot records. These are processed with a simple reflection seismological processing workflow to obtain a stacked section.
The results show that the autocorrelated zero-offset sections appear more noisy, but are characterised by higher frequencies, while the crosscorrelated stacked sections are characterised by a lower-frequency content and contain more dipping reflectors. The major, horizontal reflectors correspond between the two types of sections.
A rudimentary interpretation of reflectors is done, based on the two types of sections and compared with a local geological model. This shows that the major lithological differences and the base of the Hengill volcano can be distinguished in the interpreted section.
In common-offset radargrams characteristic burial anomalies take on many forms, appearing as disruptions to existing features (direct-wave arrivals and soil horizons) and as isolated reflection events (hyperbolic events and burial length horizontal anomalies). In timeslices, burials are characterized by high or low amplitude rectangular anomalies. When used in conjunction, radargrams and timeslices produced characteristic responses regardless of survey grid orientation, consistent with the locations of the burials. Increased soil moisture at the site improved the detectability of burials and the 250 MHz antenna was found to be superior to the 500 MHz antenna in obtaining a characteristic burial response, though both were successful to a large extent. EI and AS processing techniques were successful in removing direct-wave contributions in radargrams, though detectability was not significantly improved when compared to raw data. Overall, the three burials were detected using GPR to various extents, and in future work thorough historical data in addition to zero-measurements should be obtained for all burials in order to investigate the source of these differences. GCM surveys conducted in this work were largely unsuccessful in detecting simulated clandestine burials due to significant conductive noise sources (metal fence, sensors, etc.) and the limited conductivity contrast in the soil. Low conductivity zones were detected over some burials using HCP at an intercoil spacing of 1.18 m, however, confidence in the validity of these responses is low due to the dominating noise sources. ...
In common-offset radargrams characteristic burial anomalies take on many forms, appearing as disruptions to existing features (direct-wave arrivals and soil horizons) and as isolated reflection events (hyperbolic events and burial length horizontal anomalies). In timeslices, burials are characterized by high or low amplitude rectangular anomalies. When used in conjunction, radargrams and timeslices produced characteristic responses regardless of survey grid orientation, consistent with the locations of the burials. Increased soil moisture at the site improved the detectability of burials and the 250 MHz antenna was found to be superior to the 500 MHz antenna in obtaining a characteristic burial response, though both were successful to a large extent. EI and AS processing techniques were successful in removing direct-wave contributions in radargrams, though detectability was not significantly improved when compared to raw data. Overall, the three burials were detected using GPR to various extents, and in future work thorough historical data in addition to zero-measurements should be obtained for all burials in order to investigate the source of these differences. GCM surveys conducted in this work were largely unsuccessful in detecting simulated clandestine burials due to significant conductive noise sources (metal fence, sensors, etc.) and the limited conductivity contrast in the soil. Low conductivity zones were detected over some burials using HCP at an intercoil spacing of 1.18 m, however, confidence in the validity of these responses is low due to the dominating noise sources.
Two suitable geophysical methods are the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and seismic techniques with a focus on reflection measurements. For the GPR specifically, we choose a Common Offset Survey, which can map reflections from the subsurface. For the seismic techniques, we choose a line array measurement, among others. We use the GPR to estimate the buried rock contour of the keystone Sl2 of megalith D14, which is a bearing stone formerly supporting capstone D9. We perform several reflection tests on various rocks unrelated to D14 using different seismic sources and receivers to estimate the reflection depths. We follow a proposed approach for both methods.
To evaluate the GPR data from the field, we assume a simplified GPR with zero-dimensional antennas (GPR point model). Subsequently, we develop two mathematical models (GPR point-to-GEO and GEO-to-GPR point model), based on this conceptual model in order to I) calculate the (buried) rock surfaces from field data and II) model field data from estimated buried rock contours.
We first perform the Common Offset Survey on a non-buried boulder on the campus of the TU Delft to evaluate the accuracy of the developed GPR point-to-GEO model and to optimise the second survey on keystone Sl2. We first perform the seismic reflection measurements on several rock samples to determine the best seismic source. Finally, we perform a line array measurement on a cylindrical basalt column using 300 kHz transducers.
We calculate rock contour coordinates from the GPR data and these show a reasonable fit with the contour of the TU Delft boulder, with an accuracy of 5-10 cm. For the keystone Sl2, the maximum burial depth is determined to be 80 cm at the southern side. The bottom of the keystone is sloping downward starting from ground level at the northern side. The southern, eastern and western rock faces are steep, almost vertical, which is confirmed by historic photographs. However, the calculated (buried) rock surface coordinates consist of an incoherent set of coordinates with locally a lack of data or blind-spots. Estimating a coherent buried rock contour, therefore, requires shortcuts and a decrease of accuracy is to be expected especially for rock surfaces near blind-spots in the GPR data. Furthermore, the identification of relevant reflection surfaces is rather subjective and combined with blind spots in the acquired GPR data, this can lead to wrongful interpretations of the buried rock contour.
The seismic reflection measurements we perform give clear reflections for the 300 kHz transducers on rocks of limited size with simple geometries. However, the transducers should first be applied on rocks with increasingly more complex geometries before being applied in the field. The accuracy in the order of 1 cm can be considered promising, but its applicability for complex geometries and reflection depths larger than 0.5 m remains unknown. ...
Two suitable geophysical methods are the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and seismic techniques with a focus on reflection measurements. For the GPR specifically, we choose a Common Offset Survey, which can map reflections from the subsurface. For the seismic techniques, we choose a line array measurement, among others. We use the GPR to estimate the buried rock contour of the keystone Sl2 of megalith D14, which is a bearing stone formerly supporting capstone D9. We perform several reflection tests on various rocks unrelated to D14 using different seismic sources and receivers to estimate the reflection depths. We follow a proposed approach for both methods.
To evaluate the GPR data from the field, we assume a simplified GPR with zero-dimensional antennas (GPR point model). Subsequently, we develop two mathematical models (GPR point-to-GEO and GEO-to-GPR point model), based on this conceptual model in order to I) calculate the (buried) rock surfaces from field data and II) model field data from estimated buried rock contours.
We first perform the Common Offset Survey on a non-buried boulder on the campus of the TU Delft to evaluate the accuracy of the developed GPR point-to-GEO model and to optimise the second survey on keystone Sl2. We first perform the seismic reflection measurements on several rock samples to determine the best seismic source. Finally, we perform a line array measurement on a cylindrical basalt column using 300 kHz transducers.
We calculate rock contour coordinates from the GPR data and these show a reasonable fit with the contour of the TU Delft boulder, with an accuracy of 5-10 cm. For the keystone Sl2, the maximum burial depth is determined to be 80 cm at the southern side. The bottom of the keystone is sloping downward starting from ground level at the northern side. The southern, eastern and western rock faces are steep, almost vertical, which is confirmed by historic photographs. However, the calculated (buried) rock surface coordinates consist of an incoherent set of coordinates with locally a lack of data or blind-spots. Estimating a coherent buried rock contour, therefore, requires shortcuts and a decrease of accuracy is to be expected especially for rock surfaces near blind-spots in the GPR data. Furthermore, the identification of relevant reflection surfaces is rather subjective and combined with blind spots in the acquired GPR data, this can lead to wrongful interpretations of the buried rock contour.
The seismic reflection measurements we perform give clear reflections for the 300 kHz transducers on rocks of limited size with simple geometries. However, the transducers should first be applied on rocks with increasingly more complex geometries before being applied in the field. The accuracy in the order of 1 cm can be considered promising, but its applicability for complex geometries and reflection depths larger than 0.5 m remains unknown.
Seismic analysis of fluid mud
Detection of shear parameters in fluid mud and the relation between seismic velocities and yield stresses