E.J.L. Chappin
Please Note
44 records found
1
...
Dynamics of Charging
Scaling up public charging infrastructure in uncertain times
”How can public EV charging infrastructure in residential areas be scaled-up?”
The study contains five chapters to answer this question. Four of these chapters include studies that were published in journals and conference proceedings. The research approach consists of literature studies, data analysis, policy analysis,multiple criteria analysis, and agent-based modeling. The individual studies all contribute to understanding different parts of the charging system. The following paragraphs summarize each of the five studies. ...
”How can public EV charging infrastructure in residential areas be scaled-up?”
The study contains five chapters to answer this question. Four of these chapters include studies that were published in journals and conference proceedings. The research approach consists of literature studies, data analysis, policy analysis,multiple criteria analysis, and agent-based modeling. The individual studies all contribute to understanding different parts of the charging system. The following paragraphs summarize each of the five studies.
However, the rapid adoption of solar PV presents several challenges for policymakers, particularly at the municipal level. These challenges include grid integration, financing, and ensuring equitable access to solar technology. Addressing these issues requires a deep understanding of the factors influencing solar PV adoption and the dynamics at play within different municipalities. Inverse modelling presents a methodology to explore these complexities. This technique involves working backwards from observed outcomes to identify and understand the underlying processes and parameters that generated those results. The application of inverse modelling is, however, very novel. Therefore, this thesis aims to lay the groundwork for future applications of inverse modelling by exploring the factors that influence solar PV adoption in Dutch municipalities. To achieve this goal, the following research question has been formulated:
How can inverse modelling contribute to uncovering plausible explanations for residential solar PV adoption dynamics in Dutch municipalities?
The study employs inverse modelling combined with agent-based modelling to analyse adoption patterns across different municipalities, utilising Random Search and Bayesian Search algorithms. Findings indicate that social factors are often more influential than economic incentives in driving solar PV adoption, emphasising the role of community engagement and peer effects.
These insights underscore the potential of inverse modelling to reveal the complex interplay of factors influencing solar PV adoption. This study demonstrates that inverse modelling can effectively identify patterns and key determinants within municipal data. The research suggests that future efforts should refine this approach, considering multiple agent-based models and alternative methodologies to enhance robustness and accuracy, paving the way for more comprehensive and accurate research in the future.
In conclusion, inverse modelling provides a powerful tool for uncovering the dynamics of solar PV adoption in Dutch municipalities by providing a systematic approach to understanding the underlying factors of the system and its intentions. Through IM, the key determinants that drive solar PV adoption can be inferred by analysing observed patterns and behaviours within the municipalities. This approach is additionally powerful because it does not rely solely on pre-existing theories or assumptions, as with forward modelling. Instead, it derives insights directly from the data.
...
However, the rapid adoption of solar PV presents several challenges for policymakers, particularly at the municipal level. These challenges include grid integration, financing, and ensuring equitable access to solar technology. Addressing these issues requires a deep understanding of the factors influencing solar PV adoption and the dynamics at play within different municipalities. Inverse modelling presents a methodology to explore these complexities. This technique involves working backwards from observed outcomes to identify and understand the underlying processes and parameters that generated those results. The application of inverse modelling is, however, very novel. Therefore, this thesis aims to lay the groundwork for future applications of inverse modelling by exploring the factors that influence solar PV adoption in Dutch municipalities. To achieve this goal, the following research question has been formulated:
How can inverse modelling contribute to uncovering plausible explanations for residential solar PV adoption dynamics in Dutch municipalities?
The study employs inverse modelling combined with agent-based modelling to analyse adoption patterns across different municipalities, utilising Random Search and Bayesian Search algorithms. Findings indicate that social factors are often more influential than economic incentives in driving solar PV adoption, emphasising the role of community engagement and peer effects.
These insights underscore the potential of inverse modelling to reveal the complex interplay of factors influencing solar PV adoption. This study demonstrates that inverse modelling can effectively identify patterns and key determinants within municipal data. The research suggests that future efforts should refine this approach, considering multiple agent-based models and alternative methodologies to enhance robustness and accuracy, paving the way for more comprehensive and accurate research in the future.
In conclusion, inverse modelling provides a powerful tool for uncovering the dynamics of solar PV adoption in Dutch municipalities by providing a systematic approach to understanding the underlying factors of the system and its intentions. Through IM, the key determinants that drive solar PV adoption can be inferred by analysing observed patterns and behaviours within the municipalities. This approach is additionally powerful because it does not rely solely on pre-existing theories or assumptions, as with forward modelling. Instead, it derives insights directly from the data.
Modelling White Hydrogen
Analysing EU hydrogen policy under deep uncertainty
The empirical research in this dissertation demonstrates that a governance design should focus on enabling households to achieve energy cost savings, convincing them to participate by safeguarding their control needs and keeping them involved by limiting their operational burden. These priorities speak for virtual power plants as consumer governance design. If intermediaries could anticipate latent, upcoming household needs in the design, make tradeoffs transparent for households, and create dedicated points for decision-making, then they would support households in making more informed decisions and taking on an active role in the energy system. ...
The empirical research in this dissertation demonstrates that a governance design should focus on enabling households to achieve energy cost savings, convincing them to participate by safeguarding their control needs and keeping them involved by limiting their operational burden. These priorities speak for virtual power plants as consumer governance design. If intermediaries could anticipate latent, upcoming household needs in the design, make tradeoffs transparent for households, and create dedicated points for decision-making, then they would support households in making more informed decisions and taking on an active role in the energy system.
STRAMSA: Systematic Techno-economic RAMS Analysis Approach for Hydrogen Refueling Stations
The Case Study: Total Energies Breda Hydrogen Refueling Station
Thus, there is a need to comprehend the potential areas of development within a high-risk prototype environment by harnessing the company’s extensive 40 years of experience in Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Safety (RAMS) analysis. This need entails conducting a comprehensive and systematic RAMS analysis specifically tailored to the unique challenges and requirements of hydrogen refueling stations. However, a notable gap exists in the existing literature, as there is a lack of established guidelines or published research that specifically addresses the intricacies of RAMS analysis for the stations. This knowledge gap poses a significant burden in effectively assessing and mitigating risks, ensuring optimal performance, and fostering the safe and reliable operation of hydrogen refueling infrastructure. In order to address this critical knowledge gap, the main research question has been formulated as follows:
Research Question – Main: How can a systematic RAMS study-based approach be developed to improve the availability of hydrogen refueling stations by leveraging conventional RAMS methodological frameworks?
An extensive literature study was conducted to address the main research question. The aim of that part was to gather insights and identify best practices from existing research from other industries. As a result of the literature study, a Systematic Techno-Economic RAMS Analysis (STRAMSA) framework was developed. The STRAMSA framework introduces significant contributions to RAMS analysis for hydrogen refueling stations. It integrates system engineering, RAMS analysis, and techno-economic analysis to maximize the availability of system design. The framework establishes a strong link between RAMS analysis and techno-economic evaluation, facilitating informed decision-making by considering financial aspects. In techno economic analysis, it incorporates novel elements such as inflation, learning-by doing effect (in terms of market growth), and deflation rates for hydrogen. Moreover, the framework separates maintenance costs from operational costs to facilitate targeted improvements for the operation. This part also quantifies safety by assessing risks in monetary terms for accidents/fatality occurrence. Lastly, its iterative nature allows continuous improvement and adjustment throughout the design and operation process. Overall, the STRAMSA framework provides a comprehensive approach for analyzing the reliability, availability, maintainability, and safety aspects of systems.
To evaluate the applicability and effectiveness of the STRAMSA framework, the Total Energies Breda Hydrogen Refueling Station was selected as a case study. The steps outlined in the framework were applied to this specific station. Throughout the process, an iterative approach was adopted, allowing for adjustments to the framework as necessary.
After applying the STRAMSA framework to the Breda Hydrogen Refueling Station, the Net Present Value (NPV) was calculated as 1,815,202.69 €. The analysis also revealed the uncertainty of attaining a positive NPV, with a 11.18%. Further investigation into the sources of uncertainty identified market-related parameters as the dominant contributors to the variance. Specifically, parameters such as ”Market Growth Rate,” ”Hydrogen Price,” and ”Hydrogen Sale” significantly influenced the uncertainty surrounding the NPV. These findings underscore the importance of a coordinated policy approach that encourages investments in both the hydrogen market and hydrogen infrastructure. Such an approach is crucial for the rapid adoption of hydrogen technology and the development of a robust hydrogen economy. In addition to market parameters, from the operational perspective, the dispenser is identified as a decisive contributor to the uncertainty that requires closer examination.
As a further theoretical research, exploration the applicability of the STRAMSA framework for multi-case studies can be conducted. Initially, the framework can be applied to hydrogen refueling stations as a potential case study, but its feasibility can also be assessed for other industries. Furthermore, the impact of a design configuration change can be evaluated for the case at stake. One potential modification to consider is the addition of a supplementary High-Pressure (HP) compressor, as this particular component has been identified as the least reliable subsystem based on the RAMS analysis. Conducting such assessments can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and adaptability of the STRAMSA framework in different scenarios and improve the design of hydrogen refueling stations.
...
Thus, there is a need to comprehend the potential areas of development within a high-risk prototype environment by harnessing the company’s extensive 40 years of experience in Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Safety (RAMS) analysis. This need entails conducting a comprehensive and systematic RAMS analysis specifically tailored to the unique challenges and requirements of hydrogen refueling stations. However, a notable gap exists in the existing literature, as there is a lack of established guidelines or published research that specifically addresses the intricacies of RAMS analysis for the stations. This knowledge gap poses a significant burden in effectively assessing and mitigating risks, ensuring optimal performance, and fostering the safe and reliable operation of hydrogen refueling infrastructure. In order to address this critical knowledge gap, the main research question has been formulated as follows:
Research Question – Main: How can a systematic RAMS study-based approach be developed to improve the availability of hydrogen refueling stations by leveraging conventional RAMS methodological frameworks?
An extensive literature study was conducted to address the main research question. The aim of that part was to gather insights and identify best practices from existing research from other industries. As a result of the literature study, a Systematic Techno-Economic RAMS Analysis (STRAMSA) framework was developed. The STRAMSA framework introduces significant contributions to RAMS analysis for hydrogen refueling stations. It integrates system engineering, RAMS analysis, and techno-economic analysis to maximize the availability of system design. The framework establishes a strong link between RAMS analysis and techno-economic evaluation, facilitating informed decision-making by considering financial aspects. In techno economic analysis, it incorporates novel elements such as inflation, learning-by doing effect (in terms of market growth), and deflation rates for hydrogen. Moreover, the framework separates maintenance costs from operational costs to facilitate targeted improvements for the operation. This part also quantifies safety by assessing risks in monetary terms for accidents/fatality occurrence. Lastly, its iterative nature allows continuous improvement and adjustment throughout the design and operation process. Overall, the STRAMSA framework provides a comprehensive approach for analyzing the reliability, availability, maintainability, and safety aspects of systems.
To evaluate the applicability and effectiveness of the STRAMSA framework, the Total Energies Breda Hydrogen Refueling Station was selected as a case study. The steps outlined in the framework were applied to this specific station. Throughout the process, an iterative approach was adopted, allowing for adjustments to the framework as necessary.
After applying the STRAMSA framework to the Breda Hydrogen Refueling Station, the Net Present Value (NPV) was calculated as 1,815,202.69 €. The analysis also revealed the uncertainty of attaining a positive NPV, with a 11.18%. Further investigation into the sources of uncertainty identified market-related parameters as the dominant contributors to the variance. Specifically, parameters such as ”Market Growth Rate,” ”Hydrogen Price,” and ”Hydrogen Sale” significantly influenced the uncertainty surrounding the NPV. These findings underscore the importance of a coordinated policy approach that encourages investments in both the hydrogen market and hydrogen infrastructure. Such an approach is crucial for the rapid adoption of hydrogen technology and the development of a robust hydrogen economy. In addition to market parameters, from the operational perspective, the dispenser is identified as a decisive contributor to the uncertainty that requires closer examination.
As a further theoretical research, exploration the applicability of the STRAMSA framework for multi-case studies can be conducted. Initially, the framework can be applied to hydrogen refueling stations as a potential case study, but its feasibility can also be assessed for other industries. Furthermore, the impact of a design configuration change can be evaluated for the case at stake. One potential modification to consider is the addition of a supplementary High-Pressure (HP) compressor, as this particular component has been identified as the least reliable subsystem based on the RAMS analysis. Conducting such assessments can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and adaptability of the STRAMSA framework in different scenarios and improve the design of hydrogen refueling stations.
The effect of contract attributes on the willingness to participate in V2G contracts for EV and non-EV drivers in the Netherlands
A Discrete Choice Modelling Research
The data collected was analyzed using a Multinomial Logit model (MNL) to estimate the utility function of the V2G contracts and to identify the most important attributes for the respondents. In addition, an estimation could be made of the preference for a V2G contract over no contract at all. The results showed that, surprisingly, the attribute remuneration had a relatively low importance coefficient and did not have a significant impact on the perceived utility of the respondents. On the other hand, it could be shown that consumers perceive different utility during weekdays and weekends, preferring more flexibility in the weekends. Guaranteed minimum driving range turned out to be the most important contract attribute.
The results show that there is a relatively high willingness to participate in V2G contracts among both EV drivers and potential future EV drivers. The results can be used by policymakers and aggregator companies to design V2G contracts more effectively and to promote the adoption of EVs in a more sustainable way, enhancing the energy transition. According to this study, the V2G system is profitable for the aggregator for various scenarios and appears promising. Some application possibilities are suggested in this research, from which it can be concluded that satisfaction can be achieved for all stakeholders involved. ...
The data collected was analyzed using a Multinomial Logit model (MNL) to estimate the utility function of the V2G contracts and to identify the most important attributes for the respondents. In addition, an estimation could be made of the preference for a V2G contract over no contract at all. The results showed that, surprisingly, the attribute remuneration had a relatively low importance coefficient and did not have a significant impact on the perceived utility of the respondents. On the other hand, it could be shown that consumers perceive different utility during weekdays and weekends, preferring more flexibility in the weekends. Guaranteed minimum driving range turned out to be the most important contract attribute.
The results show that there is a relatively high willingness to participate in V2G contracts among both EV drivers and potential future EV drivers. The results can be used by policymakers and aggregator companies to design V2G contracts more effectively and to promote the adoption of EVs in a more sustainable way, enhancing the energy transition. According to this study, the V2G system is profitable for the aggregator for various scenarios and appears promising. Some application possibilities are suggested in this research, from which it can be concluded that satisfaction can be achieved for all stakeholders involved.
Closing the carbon cycle: Active Carbonation technology for concrete production as possible sequestration method
A TIS analysis on the Dutch concrete system
Finding values in green hydrogen using topic modelling
Building a framework for explorative modelling
Technology adoption at the PoR chlorine cluster
A study on the effect of market & behavioural barriers on technology adoption at the Port of Rotterdam chlorine cluster
In order for the Netherlands
to reach CO2 neutrality by 2050, large investments in zero emission
technologies are needed. These investments would comprise out of renewable
energy generation, higher energy efficiency alternatives and electrification of
end uses. Although climate mitigation has become an ever growing societal
concern since the ratification of "het klimaatakkoord", progress in
the industrial sector has been seriously lagging in the Netherlands. In 2021
the reduction of CO2 emissions in the Netherlands stagnated and the emissions
of the industrial sector actually slightly rose. So too in the Port of
Rotterdam, where the chlorine cluster is not showing any significant CO2
reductions. There are several potential explanations why there is a gap between
what should be invested and what actually is invested. They define the gap as,
’the apparent reality that some technologies that would pay off for adopters
are, nevertheless, not adopted’. So, why do decision makers under invest in
zero emission technologies? The explanations of fall into two broad categories:
•Market barriers
•Behavioural barriers
Following the problem situation, this thesis
focused on researching to what extent market & behavioural barriers
contribute to the investment gap in the Port of Rotterdam Chlorine cluster, by
incorporating both market and behavioural barriers in a quantitative investment
model. The incorporation of these barriers in the model result in a range of
investment types, some of them non-optimal and varying in perspectives on
valuing the future. By simulating technology adoption under the assumption of
this range of varying configurations of market and behavioural barriers, it is
possible to determine the effect of those two categories of barriers on
technology adoption at the PoR chlorine cluster. The obtained insights of this
research feed into the larger study of quantitative decision models for the
industrial sector. Where the following main research question is answered:
What is the effect of market and behavioural
barriers on zero emission technology adoption at the PoR chlorine cluster?
To answer the main research question, the model
represents the PoR chlorine cluster on a highly detailed level and bases it's
technical system's configuration on a thorough plant-process-product &
zero-emission technology inventarisation. These two inventarisations give the
current and possible future configuration of the PoR chlorine cluster's
technical system. Consequently, this makes it possible to explicitly model the
technology stock at the chlorine cluster and determine technology adoption on
an asset level. The market & behavioural barriers are represented by 8
evaluation types. These evaluation types represent 8 varying configurations of
the market & behavioural barriers. Consequently, a scenario analysis was
conducted with the model.
The scenario analysis resulted in transition
pathways, total CO2 emissions and total cash flows between 2022-2050. The model
results show that the incorporation of market and behavioural barriers lead to
postponed adoption of zero emission technology adoption. This is reflected by
the lower number of years that these alternatives are installed between 2022
and 2050. The lower adoption lead to an increase of 288% total CO2 emissions
between 2022-2050, compared to the optimal solution. Underneath, the key
findings from the model results are presented…
...
In order for the Netherlands
to reach CO2 neutrality by 2050, large investments in zero emission
technologies are needed. These investments would comprise out of renewable
energy generation, higher energy efficiency alternatives and electrification of
end uses. Although climate mitigation has become an ever growing societal
concern since the ratification of "het klimaatakkoord", progress in
the industrial sector has been seriously lagging in the Netherlands. In 2021
the reduction of CO2 emissions in the Netherlands stagnated and the emissions
of the industrial sector actually slightly rose. So too in the Port of
Rotterdam, where the chlorine cluster is not showing any significant CO2
reductions. There are several potential explanations why there is a gap between
what should be invested and what actually is invested. They define the gap as,
’the apparent reality that some technologies that would pay off for adopters
are, nevertheless, not adopted’. So, why do decision makers under invest in
zero emission technologies? The explanations of fall into two broad categories:
•Market barriers
•Behavioural barriers
Following the problem situation, this thesis
focused on researching to what extent market & behavioural barriers
contribute to the investment gap in the Port of Rotterdam Chlorine cluster, by
incorporating both market and behavioural barriers in a quantitative investment
model. The incorporation of these barriers in the model result in a range of
investment types, some of them non-optimal and varying in perspectives on
valuing the future. By simulating technology adoption under the assumption of
this range of varying configurations of market and behavioural barriers, it is
possible to determine the effect of those two categories of barriers on
technology adoption at the PoR chlorine cluster. The obtained insights of this
research feed into the larger study of quantitative decision models for the
industrial sector. Where the following main research question is answered:
What is the effect of market and behavioural
barriers on zero emission technology adoption at the PoR chlorine cluster?
To answer the main research question, the model
represents the PoR chlorine cluster on a highly detailed level and bases it's
technical system's configuration on a thorough plant-process-product &
zero-emission technology inventarisation. These two inventarisations give the
current and possible future configuration of the PoR chlorine cluster's
technical system. Consequently, this makes it possible to explicitly model the
technology stock at the chlorine cluster and determine technology adoption on
an asset level. The market & behavioural barriers are represented by 8
evaluation types. These evaluation types represent 8 varying configurations of
the market & behavioural barriers. Consequently, a scenario analysis was
conducted with the model.
The scenario analysis resulted in transition
pathways, total CO2 emissions and total cash flows between 2022-2050. The model
results show that the incorporation of market and behavioural barriers lead to
postponed adoption of zero emission technology adoption. This is reflected by
the lower number of years that these alternatives are installed between 2022
and 2050. The lower adoption lead to an increase of 288% total CO2 emissions
between 2022-2050, compared to the optimal solution. Underneath, the key
findings from the model results are presented…
In order to truly understand the process of commercializing fusion energy, the barriers need to be known and understood so that these can be addressed specifically, and the process can be accelerated. Adding to that is, that there are also numerous different technical approaches to fusion, each with their own characteristics. However, currently comprehensive knowledge of these barriers is missing. Information is highly scattered as it is focusses on specific topics of fusion development, mostly the scientific or technical barriers. Adding to that is that most information is on separate technologies or specific experiments. As a result, there is a severe lack of knowledge: it is unknown what all the barriers towards commercialization are, how these barriers differ in severity and how they differ amongst the numerous fusion technologies. In an attempt to tackle this knowledge gap and enable a better understanding of the fusion development, the objective of this research was to develop a comprehensive list of barriers and subsequently study and assess this list for the different approaches to fusion with the intention of increasing the understanding of the pathway for commercialization of fusion energy.
Before starting this endeavour, a conceptual analysis was performed to define the concepts “barrier” and “commercialization”. Using these definitions an extensive literature study was performed, alongside 23 semi-structured interviews with almost all the leading fusion institutes and companies. Using predefined selection criteria to deal with the vast amounts of information, a list of fifteen relevant barriers was identified. The barriers described in literature were complemented and extended by empirical experiences and practical examples obtained in the interviews, resulting in a manageable but comprehensive list of fusion barriers towards commercialization, including several barriers that have received very little attention to date.
In an attempt to gain further insight into these barriers and research how these are different for the various approaches to fusion, a methodology was developed to assess the barriers in a standardized way. Based on the principles of the Y-factor method developed by (Chappin et al., 2020), a customized framework was developed for the commercialization of fusion energy technologies. Each barrier was concisely described and subsequently the identified barriers were organized into five categories: Technology, Operation, Cost & Financing, Governance and Engineering. The framework assesses the barriers on a tripartite scale, scoring a value of 0 indicating no barrier, 1; indicating a potential barrier and 2; indicating a significant barrier. For every barrier the scoring criteria were detailed to allow for accurate scoring.
The five most developed and pursued technical approaches to fusion (Tokamak, Spherical Tokamak, Stellarator, Field Reversed Configuration and Inertial Confinement Fusion) were assessed using the designed framework. This was done by three sperate expert interviews. These respondents were selected because they all had high expertise of both fusion energy and experience within the fusion industry and hence contribute to the validity of the research. Analysis of the results lead to numerous interesting findings
• Barriers generally apply to all technologies: Although the difference between the fusion technologies were identified and acknowledged by the various respondents, this did not result in notable differences in the scoring of these technologies. Instead, most barriers apply in a similar severity for all technologies.
• Experts disagree on fundamental barriers: Two of the respondents disagreed strongly on the scoring of several barriers, such as “Plasma physics”, “Radiation shielding” and “Energy production”. The fact that these respondents both have a PHD in plasma physics, demonstrates the uncertainty of fusion development and underlines the complexity and difficulty of predicting the pathway of fusion technologies. In this particular case the differences mostly originated from the reasoning of the respondents; one argued more from a theoretical point of view while the other purely looked at results to date, exposing that the framework can be interpreted differently by different respondents.
• Barriers have a strong time element: The abovementioned disagreements can be partially explained by time. The application of the framework exposed that nearly all barriers are characterized by a strong time dependency and that the barrier value is heavily dependent on the timeframe it is evaluated in. Fusion technology is still under development and while an active effort was made to describe the scoring criteria as closely as possible during the synthesis of the framework, the time dependency and the interpretability that comes with it could not be eliminated
• Hierarchy within barriers: The application of the framework also exposed a certain degree of hierarchy within the barriers and found that there was an order of urgency within the barrier categories. A clear and logical pathway could be observed; firstly the “Technology” barriers must be resolved, afterwards the category of “Operation” barriers become most urgent and finally the “Engineering” category. This was substantiated by the scores as these categories received the highest scores. The remaining categories “Governance” and “Cost & Financing” are present throughout the entire innovation pathway.
All in all, the research has three main contributions. The first contribution is the identification of a comprehensive list of fifteen barriers that is validated by experts, can be used to assess all fusion technologies and captures the complete commercialization pathway. Secondly, the developed framework is the first tool that can be used to uniformly assess these barriers and compare them amongst different technologies. Finally, application of the framework increased understanding of the time-dependency and hierarchy of the barriers. Despite the limited value of the quantitative output, the qualitative findings have certainly increased understanding of the barriers and complexity of fusion energy development and showed that the use of the method can enable insightful discussions.
It should be noted that in spite of continuous attempts at safeguarding the validity of the research, there are a number of limitations that should be taken into account when interpreting the research and its results. The development of the scoring criteria is subjective and can be interpreted differently by different respondents, despite the effort to formulate these with a high accuracy and clarity. Simultaneously, because the barrier definitions and scoring criteria are newly designed, these are also constrained by the perception and interpretation of the researcher. Lastly it is important to note that the application of the designed framework was limited to only 3 respondents and the outcomes are therefore based on a small sample size. The overall results of applying and scoring the framework is greatly determined by the individual views and can’t be generalized.
...
In order to truly understand the process of commercializing fusion energy, the barriers need to be known and understood so that these can be addressed specifically, and the process can be accelerated. Adding to that is, that there are also numerous different technical approaches to fusion, each with their own characteristics. However, currently comprehensive knowledge of these barriers is missing. Information is highly scattered as it is focusses on specific topics of fusion development, mostly the scientific or technical barriers. Adding to that is that most information is on separate technologies or specific experiments. As a result, there is a severe lack of knowledge: it is unknown what all the barriers towards commercialization are, how these barriers differ in severity and how they differ amongst the numerous fusion technologies. In an attempt to tackle this knowledge gap and enable a better understanding of the fusion development, the objective of this research was to develop a comprehensive list of barriers and subsequently study and assess this list for the different approaches to fusion with the intention of increasing the understanding of the pathway for commercialization of fusion energy.
Before starting this endeavour, a conceptual analysis was performed to define the concepts “barrier” and “commercialization”. Using these definitions an extensive literature study was performed, alongside 23 semi-structured interviews with almost all the leading fusion institutes and companies. Using predefined selection criteria to deal with the vast amounts of information, a list of fifteen relevant barriers was identified. The barriers described in literature were complemented and extended by empirical experiences and practical examples obtained in the interviews, resulting in a manageable but comprehensive list of fusion barriers towards commercialization, including several barriers that have received very little attention to date.
In an attempt to gain further insight into these barriers and research how these are different for the various approaches to fusion, a methodology was developed to assess the barriers in a standardized way. Based on the principles of the Y-factor method developed by (Chappin et al., 2020), a customized framework was developed for the commercialization of fusion energy technologies. Each barrier was concisely described and subsequently the identified barriers were organized into five categories: Technology, Operation, Cost & Financing, Governance and Engineering. The framework assesses the barriers on a tripartite scale, scoring a value of 0 indicating no barrier, 1; indicating a potential barrier and 2; indicating a significant barrier. For every barrier the scoring criteria were detailed to allow for accurate scoring.
The five most developed and pursued technical approaches to fusion (Tokamak, Spherical Tokamak, Stellarator, Field Reversed Configuration and Inertial Confinement Fusion) were assessed using the designed framework. This was done by three sperate expert interviews. These respondents were selected because they all had high expertise of both fusion energy and experience within the fusion industry and hence contribute to the validity of the research. Analysis of the results lead to numerous interesting findings
• Barriers generally apply to all technologies: Although the difference between the fusion technologies were identified and acknowledged by the various respondents, this did not result in notable differences in the scoring of these technologies. Instead, most barriers apply in a similar severity for all technologies.
• Experts disagree on fundamental barriers: Two of the respondents disagreed strongly on the scoring of several barriers, such as “Plasma physics”, “Radiation shielding” and “Energy production”. The fact that these respondents both have a PHD in plasma physics, demonstrates the uncertainty of fusion development and underlines the complexity and difficulty of predicting the pathway of fusion technologies. In this particular case the differences mostly originated from the reasoning of the respondents; one argued more from a theoretical point of view while the other purely looked at results to date, exposing that the framework can be interpreted differently by different respondents.
• Barriers have a strong time element: The abovementioned disagreements can be partially explained by time. The application of the framework exposed that nearly all barriers are characterized by a strong time dependency and that the barrier value is heavily dependent on the timeframe it is evaluated in. Fusion technology is still under development and while an active effort was made to describe the scoring criteria as closely as possible during the synthesis of the framework, the time dependency and the interpretability that comes with it could not be eliminated
• Hierarchy within barriers: The application of the framework also exposed a certain degree of hierarchy within the barriers and found that there was an order of urgency within the barrier categories. A clear and logical pathway could be observed; firstly the “Technology” barriers must be resolved, afterwards the category of “Operation” barriers become most urgent and finally the “Engineering” category. This was substantiated by the scores as these categories received the highest scores. The remaining categories “Governance” and “Cost & Financing” are present throughout the entire innovation pathway.
All in all, the research has three main contributions. The first contribution is the identification of a comprehensive list of fifteen barriers that is validated by experts, can be used to assess all fusion technologies and captures the complete commercialization pathway. Secondly, the developed framework is the first tool that can be used to uniformly assess these barriers and compare them amongst different technologies. Finally, application of the framework increased understanding of the time-dependency and hierarchy of the barriers. Despite the limited value of the quantitative output, the qualitative findings have certainly increased understanding of the barriers and complexity of fusion energy development and showed that the use of the method can enable insightful discussions.
It should be noted that in spite of continuous attempts at safeguarding the validity of the research, there are a number of limitations that should be taken into account when interpreting the research and its results. The development of the scoring criteria is subjective and can be interpreted differently by different respondents, despite the effort to formulate these with a high accuracy and clarity. Simultaneously, because the barrier definitions and scoring criteria are newly designed, these are also constrained by the perception and interpretation of the researcher. Lastly it is important to note that the application of the designed framework was limited to only 3 respondents and the outcomes are therefore based on a small sample size. The overall results of applying and scoring the framework is greatly determined by the individual views and can’t be generalized.
Materializing the Demand Response Potential from Heat Pumps in the Netherlands in 2050
Investigating the Role of Consumer Behavior
The extent to which heat pumps could contribute to providing this demand response is not only dependent on the technical demand-response characteristics of the heat pumps. Rather, it is determined by both the willingness of households to adopt the heat pump and the way users react to the proposed control strategy. Using econometric techniques, the master thesis research project quantifies these behavioral dimensions into a model estimating the electrical flexibility heat pumps will be able to either require or provide in the Netherlands in 2050. In the research, several consumer typologies are defined distinguishing between consumer user groups and consumer adoption groups. The research finds that an additional 1.6 GW of flexibility can be provided by heat pumps in 2050 should policy be developed that targets consumer adoption behavior. Consumer user behavior has less of an influence on the average demand response potential of heat pumps, however could be an area of focus should a frequent demand response be desired. ...
The extent to which heat pumps could contribute to providing this demand response is not only dependent on the technical demand-response characteristics of the heat pumps. Rather, it is determined by both the willingness of households to adopt the heat pump and the way users react to the proposed control strategy. Using econometric techniques, the master thesis research project quantifies these behavioral dimensions into a model estimating the electrical flexibility heat pumps will be able to either require or provide in the Netherlands in 2050. In the research, several consumer typologies are defined distinguishing between consumer user groups and consumer adoption groups. The research finds that an additional 1.6 GW of flexibility can be provided by heat pumps in 2050 should policy be developed that targets consumer adoption behavior. Consumer user behavior has less of an influence on the average demand response potential of heat pumps, however could be an area of focus should a frequent demand response be desired.
Investigating uncertainty in the heating transition
A Sensitivity Analysis case study of the CEGOIA model
Dutch energy consumer preferences for the adoption of sustainable residential heating technologies
A context-dependent stated choice experiment to measure consumer behaviour within future scenarios of the Dutch energy transition
Downscaling Integrated Assessment Models for Energy Transition Policy Support
Exploring Trade-offs and Limitations
The district heating concept are explained by investigating the technical, economic, environmental, and institutional concepts. District heating markets of the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark were compared, based on the type of markets (regulated or deregulated), the pricing structures, the degree of market opening, and the ownership structure. Next, a system engineering approach was developed to find and test opportunities to integrate data center waste heat into the district heating network of Amsterdam. The approach could offer support in the feasibility phase before making development decisions for a district heating network case. The network layered approach that was applied for the case of Amsterdam was used as the starting point for a pilot project in Amsterdam, modeled in the simulation tool EnergyPRO
The investigation into possible integration opportunities has resulted in a two-step approach: Creating a theoretical understanding of the district heating system for a specific case, and also looking into a practical case study by using a simulation tool. The decision-making and waste heat integration will simply not be ready in a day. Still, a clear vision of the functionality and interdependencies of all system components support steps towards successful integration.
...
The district heating concept are explained by investigating the technical, economic, environmental, and institutional concepts. District heating markets of the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark were compared, based on the type of markets (regulated or deregulated), the pricing structures, the degree of market opening, and the ownership structure. Next, a system engineering approach was developed to find and test opportunities to integrate data center waste heat into the district heating network of Amsterdam. The approach could offer support in the feasibility phase before making development decisions for a district heating network case. The network layered approach that was applied for the case of Amsterdam was used as the starting point for a pilot project in Amsterdam, modeled in the simulation tool EnergyPRO
The investigation into possible integration opportunities has resulted in a two-step approach: Creating a theoretical understanding of the district heating system for a specific case, and also looking into a practical case study by using a simulation tool. The decision-making and waste heat integration will simply not be ready in a day. Still, a clear vision of the functionality and interdependencies of all system components support steps towards successful integration.
Uncertainty in Long-Term Grid Planning
Approaching Transmission Expansion Planning through the Framework of Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty
Facilitating standardization in corporate greenhouse gas accounting
Identifying success-determining factors that can be influenced in the process of creating a standardized corporate greenhouse gas accounting methodology