O.E. Scharenborg
Please Note
43 records found
1
The experiments use D3CODE, which combines repeated individual offensiveness annotations with annotator-level scores on six moral foundations. Five deterministic renderings of each profile—natural language, categorical, numeric, ordinal, and top-k—are compared with a no-profile, unpersonalized reference. Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct is used as the primary model; Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct provide within-family and cross-family robustness comparisons. The models are evaluated in zero-shot prompting and in three same-annotator few-shot settings with k = 3 examples selected randomly, by semantic retrieval, or by diversity. Evaluation combines Accuracy, Macro-F1, paired McNemar comparisons, and an instance-level cross-representation decision-disagreement diagnostic.
The zero-shot condition exhibits the largest spread in aggregate performance across profile representations and cross-representation disagreement above 20% for each selected model. Same-annotator few-shot context is associated with lower disagreement, although profile representations continue to change individual predictions. Retrieval-based prompting produces the strongest Macro-F1 across the selected models and the lowest disagreement in most sub-categories for the primary model. No representation performs consistently best across every tested model, setting, and metric. Instead, the results show that profile representation and demonstration selection are consequential parts of the experimental treatment and should be reported, controlled, and evaluated in personalized, value-conditioned judgement prediction.
...
The experiments use D3CODE, which combines repeated individual offensiveness annotations with annotator-level scores on six moral foundations. Five deterministic renderings of each profile—natural language, categorical, numeric, ordinal, and top-k—are compared with a no-profile, unpersonalized reference. Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct is used as the primary model; Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct provide within-family and cross-family robustness comparisons. The models are evaluated in zero-shot prompting and in three same-annotator few-shot settings with k = 3 examples selected randomly, by semantic retrieval, or by diversity. Evaluation combines Accuracy, Macro-F1, paired McNemar comparisons, and an instance-level cross-representation decision-disagreement diagnostic.
The zero-shot condition exhibits the largest spread in aggregate performance across profile representations and cross-representation disagreement above 20% for each selected model. Same-annotator few-shot context is associated with lower disagreement, although profile representations continue to change individual predictions. Retrieval-based prompting produces the strongest Macro-F1 across the selected models and the lowest disagreement in most sub-categories for the primary model. No representation performs consistently best across every tested model, setting, and metric. Instead, the results show that profile representation and demonstration selection are consequential parts of the experimental treatment and should be reported, controlled, and evaluated in personalized, value-conditioned judgement prediction.
This thesis investigates whether MoE delivers that promise on dysarthric ASR, using the FastConformer-CTC Large encoder fine-tuned per fold on the TORGO and UASpeech corpora across 41 leave-one-speaker-out folds. Three research questions are addressed: how standard sparsely-gated MoE compares to a fine-tuned dense baseline (RQ1); what specialization the trained experts develop (RQ2); and whether either training-time supervision or inference-time router steering can push the model toward useful specialization (RQ3).
The answer to all three questions is negative. Five standard MoE configurations match but do not beat the fine-tuned dense baseline, and a parameter-equal follow-up shows that at equal feed-forward capacity, the MoE structure is actively worse than dense by up to 2.89 pp. The trained experts develop genuine functional specialization, but the axis of specialization is encoder depth, not speaker group or phonetic content: different layers prefer different expert pairs, and within any layer, routing is roughly content-independent and group-independent. Training-time supervision toward group-aware specialization collapses at inference, as the depth-based organization overrides the supervised partition. Inference-time router steering produces real per-speaker improvements under post-hoc selection of the bias strength, but neither of two deployment-realistic mechanisms for choosing that bias recovers the gain.
The MoE structure on this task does meaningful work, but not the work the task needs: it organizes the encoder’s computation along an axis the dense baseline already covers through its per-layer feed-forward weights. Routing-input variants, cross-architecture replication, and continual-learning extensions are flagged as the most direct follow-ups. ...
This thesis investigates whether MoE delivers that promise on dysarthric ASR, using the FastConformer-CTC Large encoder fine-tuned per fold on the TORGO and UASpeech corpora across 41 leave-one-speaker-out folds. Three research questions are addressed: how standard sparsely-gated MoE compares to a fine-tuned dense baseline (RQ1); what specialization the trained experts develop (RQ2); and whether either training-time supervision or inference-time router steering can push the model toward useful specialization (RQ3).
The answer to all three questions is negative. Five standard MoE configurations match but do not beat the fine-tuned dense baseline, and a parameter-equal follow-up shows that at equal feed-forward capacity, the MoE structure is actively worse than dense by up to 2.89 pp. The trained experts develop genuine functional specialization, but the axis of specialization is encoder depth, not speaker group or phonetic content: different layers prefer different expert pairs, and within any layer, routing is roughly content-independent and group-independent. Training-time supervision toward group-aware specialization collapses at inference, as the depth-based organization overrides the supervised partition. Inference-time router steering produces real per-speaker improvements under post-hoc selection of the bias strength, but neither of two deployment-realistic mechanisms for choosing that bias recovers the gain.
The MoE structure on this task does meaningful work, but not the work the task needs: it organizes the encoder’s computation along an axis the dense baseline already covers through its per-layer feed-forward weights. Routing-input variants, cross-architecture replication, and continual-learning extensions are flagged as the most direct follow-ups.
Improving Automatic Speech Recognition for Dutch Children with Developmental Language Disorder
Traditional Digital Signal Processing Techniques for Data Augmentation
A series of transformation methods targeting pitch, vocal tract characteristics, spectral properties, and prosodic patterns are implemented and combined into multiple transformation pipelines. The resulting synthetic speech is evaluated through ASR fine-tuning experiments using Whisper-large-v3 and Word Error Rate (WER), as well as an objective speech-quality assessment using Automatic Mean Opinion Score (AMOS) prediction.
The results show that the synthetic child-like speech can indeed improve ASR performance when used as augmentation data. The best-performing configuration combines a targeted subset of mild and moderate hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric speakers with a prosody-enhanced transformation pipeline, and achieved a WER of 29.00\%, outperforming both the zero-shot Whisper-large-v3 baseline (46.48\%) and a CHILDES-only fine-tuning baseline (31.57\%).
The findings further indicate that source-speaker similarity is more important than dataset size and that conservative prosodic modifications contribute meaningfully to the usefulness of synthetic speech data for ASR fine-tuning. Overall, the results demonstrate that carefully selected dysarthric speech combined with interpretable DSP transformations can provide valuable augmentation data for Dutch children with DLD. ...
A series of transformation methods targeting pitch, vocal tract characteristics, spectral properties, and prosodic patterns are implemented and combined into multiple transformation pipelines. The resulting synthetic speech is evaluated through ASR fine-tuning experiments using Whisper-large-v3 and Word Error Rate (WER), as well as an objective speech-quality assessment using Automatic Mean Opinion Score (AMOS) prediction.
The results show that the synthetic child-like speech can indeed improve ASR performance when used as augmentation data. The best-performing configuration combines a targeted subset of mild and moderate hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric speakers with a prosody-enhanced transformation pipeline, and achieved a WER of 29.00\%, outperforming both the zero-shot Whisper-large-v3 baseline (46.48\%) and a CHILDES-only fine-tuning baseline (31.57\%).
The findings further indicate that source-speaker similarity is more important than dataset size and that conservative prosodic modifications contribute meaningfully to the usefulness of synthetic speech data for ASR fine-tuning. Overall, the results demonstrate that carefully selected dysarthric speech combined with interpretable DSP transformations can provide valuable augmentation data for Dutch children with DLD.
Utterance Length and ASR Performance Disparities
Native and Non-Native Dutch-Speaking Children in Read and Human-Machine Interaction Speech
but its performance is often worse for children and non-native speakers. This study
examines whether utterance length helps explain the higher word error rates observed for non-native Dutch-speaking children compared with native Dutch-speaking children, and whether this relationship differs between read speech and human-machine interaction (HMI) speech. Using 42,415 utterances from 188 child speakers in the Dutch Jasmin corpus and ASR outputs from Google Chirp 2 and Whisper-large-v3, the analysis compares word error rates by utterance length, measures native/non-native performance gaps, standardizes both speaker groups to the same length distribution, and estimates uncertainty with speaker-level bootstrap resampling. The results show that shorter utterances have higher error rates for both groups, speech types, and systems. Utterance length explains a measurable part of the read-speech disparity, because the gap decreases with length and is reduced after length standardization. However, a substantial gap remains. For HMI speech, the evidence is less consistent. Overall, utterance length affects how ASR disparities are measured, but it does not fully explain the disadvantage for non-native child speech. ...
but its performance is often worse for children and non-native speakers. This study
examines whether utterance length helps explain the higher word error rates observed for non-native Dutch-speaking children compared with native Dutch-speaking children, and whether this relationship differs between read speech and human-machine interaction (HMI) speech. Using 42,415 utterances from 188 child speakers in the Dutch Jasmin corpus and ASR outputs from Google Chirp 2 and Whisper-large-v3, the analysis compares word error rates by utterance length, measures native/non-native performance gaps, standardizes both speaker groups to the same length distribution, and estimates uncertainty with speaker-level bootstrap resampling. The results show that shorter utterances have higher error rates for both groups, speech types, and systems. Utterance length explains a measurable part of the read-speech disparity, because the gap decreases with length and is reduced after length standardization. However, a substantial gap remains. For HMI speech, the evidence is less consistent. Overall, utterance length affects how ASR disparities are measured, but it does not fully explain the disadvantage for non-native child speech.
Towards Emotionally and Motivationally Aware Intelligent Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
A PRISMA Systematic Literature Review
Surveying the Usage of Learning-Related Information in Adaptation for Intelligent Systems
A Systematic Literature Review
Decoding Legislative Discourse: Transformer-Based Topic Modeling of U.S. Congressional Hearings
A Comparative Analysis of Standard and Zero-Shot BERTopic
Automating Key-Point Analysis with LLMs
Argument-to-Key-Point Mapping
Usage of Attention in Adaptation of Intelligent Systems
A systematic literature review
We enhance the existing S2VT model by modifying its temporal attention mechanism to improve the recognition of visual surroundings, addressing the unique challenges visually impaired individuals face.
This research explores critical questions surrounding the model's sensitivity to actions, the readability of generated captions, and methods for latency reduction. To evaluate the model's effectiveness, we implement readability metrics—an approach not previously utilized in video captioning assessments. Our findings contribute to enhancing accessibility and independence for visually impaired individuals through advanced video captioning solutions. ...
We enhance the existing S2VT model by modifying its temporal attention mechanism to improve the recognition of visual surroundings, addressing the unique challenges visually impaired individuals face.
This research explores critical questions surrounding the model's sensitivity to actions, the readability of generated captions, and methods for latency reduction. To evaluate the model's effectiveness, we implement readability metrics—an approach not previously utilized in video captioning assessments. Our findings contribute to enhancing accessibility and independence for visually impaired individuals through advanced video captioning solutions.
We propose a moral sentence embedding space, which can encompass moral differences, through the state-of-the-art Contrastive Learning framework. We evaluate the moral embedding space both intrinsically and extrinsically via three tasks: classification, moral similarity, and visual analysis. We show that our moral embedding space understands the characteristics of each moral value. Our results also highlight that moral rhetoric is seldom explicit in the text, emphasizing the necessity of additional information such as moral labels. ...
We propose a moral sentence embedding space, which can encompass moral differences, through the state-of-the-art Contrastive Learning framework. We evaluate the moral embedding space both intrinsically and extrinsically via three tasks: classification, moral similarity, and visual analysis. We show that our moral embedding space understands the characteristics of each moral value. Our results also highlight that moral rhetoric is seldom explicit in the text, emphasizing the necessity of additional information such as moral labels.
Perceptions of Artificial Social Agents
The cultural similarities and differences between Dutch and Chinese speakers in their perception of artificial social agents
...
Low complexity crosstalk cancellation algorithm for consumer audio systems
Optimizing crosstalk cancellation from a human sound perception perspective