The Netherlands are prone to flooding, with 30% of the country lying below sea level. To protect its densely populated and economically important coastal zone, Rijkswaterstaat (RWS) applies a maintenance strategy based on regular sand nourishments. These nourishments involve the
...
The Netherlands are prone to flooding, with 30% of the country lying below sea level. To protect its densely populated and economically important coastal zone, Rijkswaterstaat (RWS) applies a maintenance strategy based on regular sand nourishments. These nourishments involve the placement of large volumes of sand, typically dredged from the North Sea seabed, to compensate for structural erosion. While this process is effective for maintaining coastal safety, it is resource-intensive and increasingly unsustainable in light of climate change, sea-level rise, and stricter environmental ambitions. With national coastal programmes such as Kustgenese 2.0 and the Dutch Coastline Challenge calling for more sustainable and adaptive maintenance strategies, complementary alternative concepts are under consideration. One such concept is sand recirculation: the artificial redistribution of sand within the coastal system, without the need for additional offshore extraction. Internationally, this principle is already applied through various forms such as sand bypass systems, which transport sediment along the natural littoral drift to counteract obstructions like jetties; sand backpass systems, which move sediment against the dominant transport direction to replenish eroding areas; and periodic dredging campaigns, where accumulated sediment is relocated within the same littoral cell. These systems respond to sediment imbalances caused by human interventions and offer a sustainable alternative in settings where offshore resources are limited or environmental impacts must be reduced. This thesis explores whether such a recirculation strategy can be a technically feasible addition to the nourishment policy at Maasvlakte 2. This protruding coastline, located on the western boundary of the port of Rotterdam, experiences a structural morphological imbalance: persistent erosion in the westfacing bend and visible accretion in the southern section (in the form of a spit), primarily due to strong gradients in alongshore sediment transport. Currently, large-scale nourishments from offshore sand sources are periodically used to reinforce the eroding zones. However, the simultaneous accumulation of sand in the south offers potential for a circular approach to sediment management. This study aims to evaluate whether this locally available sediment can be redistributed to erosion-prone areas through artificial means, thereby reducing the demand for traditional offshore sand sources. The research begins with a morphodynamic analysis of Maasvlakte 2, using various datasets including bathymetric surveys, coastal profile data, and shoreline extractions. Accretion and erosion patterns were quantified and compared to predictions made using the one-line ShorelineS model, which simulates coastal evolution based on alongshore transport driven by transformed offshore wave conditions. This comparison confirmed that the largest erosion hotspot coincides with the western bend of the coastline, while the southern section consistently accumulates sediment. An additional finding, which was not initially anticipated, is the identification of a secondary accretion hotspot that may serve as a viable source area for sand recirculation. This results in the presence of both a southern source (the spit) and a northern source, each subjected to distinctly different hydrodynamic conditions and therefore requiring a distinct approach to extract sediment from these respective hotspots. Annual redistribution volumes between 300,000 and 415,000 m³ were identified as potentially technically recoverable, equating to a reduction of approximately 42-59% in the need for offshore-originating sand nourishments. Several operational strategies were explored, including the use of trailing suction hopper dredgers (TSHDs), cutter suction dredgers (CSDs), and sand backpass systems, in which sediment is transported continuously through pipelines. For each strategy, design parameters such as dredging volume, frequency, location, and required vessel or system dimensions were assessed. A Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) was used to evaluate each option based on technical feasibility. The evaluation revealed that a TSHD is the most suitable option for the northern source, while a CSD is preferred for the southern source. This distinction arises from the deeper location and greater flexibility requirements in the north, which suit the mobile operation of a TSHD. In contrast, the southern site allows for more precise, ii iii stationary excavation nearshore, favouring a CSD in combination with barge transport. In a subsequent multi-criteria analysis that considered operational feasibility, costs, and other relevant factors, the TSHD and the sand backpass system emerged as the most favourable options for their respective locations. The greatest technical complexity lies in the redistribution of sediment within the western bend of Maasvlakte 2, where bi-directional sediment transport dominates. This area requires nourishments to be placed across a wide spatial range and over varying water depths, posing significant operational and morphological challenges for any recirculation strategy. Although the research is limited to a pre-feasibility level, the results indicate that artificial sand recirculation could reduce reliance on offshore resources while maintaining coastal safety at the Second Maasvlakte. However, legal and regulatory barriers remain, as current Dutch legislation restricts the reuse of dredged material in water depths smaller than 20 meters for nourishment purposes. Moreover, the influence of cross-shore processes and seasonal transport variability, especially under tidal forcing, remains uncertain and would require further investigation. This thesis concludes that sand recirculation at the Second Maasvlakte is potentially technically feasible under the studied conditions and has the potential to serve as a sustainable addition to the Dutch coastal maintenance strategy. Its implementation depends on careful system design, regulatory reform, and alignment with broader environmental goals. Further research is recommended to optimise operational parameters and develop integrated system concepts that satisfy the demands of both coastal managers and other stakeholders.