M.M. van Paassen
Please Note
71 records found
1
Control-oriented models were developed using Multi-level Flow Modelling, Finite State Machine, and subsystem physical models, which were validated against experimental data in Simulink. Based on these models, subsystem controllers were designed to operate under the supervisory Finite State Machine automatic controller. The simulation results verify the defined control safety and reliability requirements, demonstrating that the multi-level control methodology is robust in automating the startup and shutdown operations, highlighting the use case in future aircraft fuel-cell propulsion systems.
...
Control-oriented models were developed using Multi-level Flow Modelling, Finite State Machine, and subsystem physical models, which were validated against experimental data in Simulink. Based on these models, subsystem controllers were designed to operate under the supervisory Finite State Machine automatic controller. The simulation results verify the defined control safety and reliability requirements, demonstrating that the multi-level control methodology is robust in automating the startup and shutdown operations, highlighting the use case in future aircraft fuel-cell propulsion systems.
Evaluation of a Haptic Stick Implementation for Enhanced Attitude Control of the Aerial Refueling Boom
Effects of Continuous Haptic Feedback on Operator Performance and Control Workload
A Monte Carlo simulation framework was used to simulate a compensatory manual control task under varying conditions, including remnant noise (Pn) and dynamic transitions in system parameters. Stability and convergence rates of delay estimates were analyzed for different window sizes (Ws). Results show that the correlation between Ws and convergence time was linear and remained unaffected by remnant noise, demonstrating that window size is the primary determinant of responsiveness. Larger Ws improved stability but introduced tracking delays, whereas smaller Ws allowed for faster adaptation to dynamic changes at the cost of increased sensitivity to noise.
The comparative analysis between the configurations revealed a strong dependence of delay estimation accuracy on the precision of the natural frequency estimate of the neuromuscular system (NMS). The natural frequency estimation directly influences HO dynamic response modeling, and inaccuracies in this parameter propagate through the recursive identification process, affecting the reliability of delay estimates.
These findings underscore the critical role of window size and natural frequency estimation in determining the accuracy and stability of effective time delay estimation through AMS. This study provides a foundation for refining AMS to better balance stability and responsiveness in estimating time-varying HO dynamics. Such advancements can facilitate more accurate modeling of time-varying HO behavior, deepen understanding of HO adaptation, and contribute to the advancement of adaptive support systems. ...
A Monte Carlo simulation framework was used to simulate a compensatory manual control task under varying conditions, including remnant noise (Pn) and dynamic transitions in system parameters. Stability and convergence rates of delay estimates were analyzed for different window sizes (Ws). Results show that the correlation between Ws and convergence time was linear and remained unaffected by remnant noise, demonstrating that window size is the primary determinant of responsiveness. Larger Ws improved stability but introduced tracking delays, whereas smaller Ws allowed for faster adaptation to dynamic changes at the cost of increased sensitivity to noise.
The comparative analysis between the configurations revealed a strong dependence of delay estimation accuracy on the precision of the natural frequency estimate of the neuromuscular system (NMS). The natural frequency estimation directly influences HO dynamic response modeling, and inaccuracies in this parameter propagate through the recursive identification process, affecting the reliability of delay estimates.
These findings underscore the critical role of window size and natural frequency estimation in determining the accuracy and stability of effective time delay estimation through AMS. This study provides a foundation for refining AMS to better balance stability and responsiveness in estimating time-varying HO dynamics. Such advancements can facilitate more accurate modeling of time-varying HO behavior, deepen understanding of HO adaptation, and contribute to the advancement of adaptive support systems.
RCO presents an opportunity to critically reassess automation on the flight deck by redefining the role of the pilot. Many researchers agree that the pilot remains the ultimate decision-maker and is responsible for ensuring the safety and success of the flight operation. The pilot’s role will encompass flight planning, communication, and surveillance, while system management tasks are considered suitable candidates for automation. However, automating system management may lead to diminished system state awareness, potentially compromising flight plan management performance. Consequently, additional support is needed to keep the pilot actively engaged with flight plan management tasks.
In addition to addressing the potential adverse effects of automating system tasks, the current support for flight plan management requires already a significant improvement. A key challenge in handling non-normals lies in assessing and integrating disturbances into the flight plan. Pilots must gather, combine, and analyze environmental and system information. This information is often fragmented across multiple sources and requires decryption to become actionable. This process heavily relies on the pilot’s initiative and experience, increasing the risk of unconsidered impacts.
This study examined the impact of elevating the Level of Automation (LOA) for system and flight plan management functions. A proposed concept elevated the LOA of the system management support, specifically the action execution stage from a stepby- step action support to a system that autonomously performs a sequence of actions after human activation. In flight plan management, the information acquisition and analysis stages were highly automated, with the goal of reducing workload while enhancing decision-making performance…
...
RCO presents an opportunity to critically reassess automation on the flight deck by redefining the role of the pilot. Many researchers agree that the pilot remains the ultimate decision-maker and is responsible for ensuring the safety and success of the flight operation. The pilot’s role will encompass flight planning, communication, and surveillance, while system management tasks are considered suitable candidates for automation. However, automating system management may lead to diminished system state awareness, potentially compromising flight plan management performance. Consequently, additional support is needed to keep the pilot actively engaged with flight plan management tasks.
In addition to addressing the potential adverse effects of automating system tasks, the current support for flight plan management requires already a significant improvement. A key challenge in handling non-normals lies in assessing and integrating disturbances into the flight plan. Pilots must gather, combine, and analyze environmental and system information. This information is often fragmented across multiple sources and requires decryption to become actionable. This process heavily relies on the pilot’s initiative and experience, increasing the risk of unconsidered impacts.
This study examined the impact of elevating the Level of Automation (LOA) for system and flight plan management functions. A proposed concept elevated the LOA of the system management support, specifically the action execution stage from a stepby- step action support to a system that autonomously performs a sequence of actions after human activation. In flight plan management, the information acquisition and analysis stages were highly automated, with the goal of reducing workload while enhancing decision-making performance…
Grounded in cognitive models, real-world incident analyses, and robust psychometric methods, the Startle and Surprise Inventories (Startle-I; Surprise-I) and Visual Analogue Scales (Startle-VAS; Surprise-VAS) are introduced and evaluated. Results from multi-phase studies involving field experts and professional pilots, provide strong evidence of validity and reliability.
The findings offer a scientifically validated framework for assessing pilots’ responses to unexpected events, with broad implications for human factors research, evidence-based training, and safety-critical operations. ...
Grounded in cognitive models, real-world incident analyses, and robust psychometric methods, the Startle and Surprise Inventories (Startle-I; Surprise-I) and Visual Analogue Scales (Startle-VAS; Surprise-VAS) are introduced and evaluated. Results from multi-phase studies involving field experts and professional pilots, provide strong evidence of validity and reliability.
The findings offer a scientifically validated framework for assessing pilots’ responses to unexpected events, with broad implications for human factors research, evidence-based training, and safety-critical operations.
Interface design for sustainable aviation
Functional Visualizations of a Hydrogen-Electric Aircraft Propulsion System for Supporting Pilot Decision-Making
Modelling of Hydrogen Electric Propulsion System for Future Regional Aircraft
A study on Bombardier Dash 8-Q300 Aircraft during Go-Around Manoeuvre
Pilot's Detection of Change in Aircraft Dynamics
An Open-Loop Stability Model For Varying Display Types and Transition Rates
Supporting Trajectory Based Operations in Aerodrome Control
Supporting the Timing of the Take-off Clearance
...
Improving Bank Angle Representation on the Primary Flight Display Using Static Monocular Depth Cues
Evaluating the effect of static monocular depth cues on attitude indicator interpretation using misleading motion cues
The modified version of the AI was compared to a baseline AI in a two-part flight simulator experiment where pilot reaction time and error rate, severity, and duration were measured. The first part induced the leans illusion making use of physiological adaptation to roll angle, distraction, and surprise. The second part simulated the leans illusion by simply rolling the simulator to the left or right. A group of 25 experienced commercial airline pilots performed a roll-to-level task in a moving-base simulator, which also provided spatially disorienting motion cues, using both the baseline and modified versions of the AI. While the modified
display had a lower error rate in the motion-opposite scenario when using the novel method (4.91% compared to 6.07%), no significant difference was found between the error rate of the two displays. The only significant difference was found in the reaction time, where the modified AI caused an increase in reaction time. The error rates and reaction times of the first part of the experiment did not match previous research. The novel disorientation method seemed to work best in a surprise scenario. While no significant differences were found between the modified AI and the baseline AI, it is still recommended to continue testing the modified AI with a new experiment setup, especially analyzing its effect in more extreme attitudes. ...
The modified version of the AI was compared to a baseline AI in a two-part flight simulator experiment where pilot reaction time and error rate, severity, and duration were measured. The first part induced the leans illusion making use of physiological adaptation to roll angle, distraction, and surprise. The second part simulated the leans illusion by simply rolling the simulator to the left or right. A group of 25 experienced commercial airline pilots performed a roll-to-level task in a moving-base simulator, which also provided spatially disorienting motion cues, using both the baseline and modified versions of the AI. While the modified
display had a lower error rate in the motion-opposite scenario when using the novel method (4.91% compared to 6.07%), no significant difference was found between the error rate of the two displays. The only significant difference was found in the reaction time, where the modified AI caused an increase in reaction time. The error rates and reaction times of the first part of the experiment did not match previous research. The novel disorientation method seemed to work best in a surprise scenario. While no significant differences were found between the modified AI and the baseline AI, it is still recommended to continue testing the modified AI with a new experiment setup, especially analyzing its effect in more extreme attitudes.