W.K. Korthals Altes
Please Note
18 records found
1
Governance and planning in student housing development
An analysis of municipal steering capacity in dutch student cities
This thesis will investigate how governance methods (soft tools) and planning approaches (hard tools) impact the success of the delivery of student housing in Dutch student cities. It will do so through a qualitative comparative case study by analysing two distinct Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA) projects (the Pauwmolen project in Delft and the High Five project in Utrecht) that represent different markets but share very different institutional approaches to and rates of construction completion.
Using the framework of an Institutional Steering Chain with a focus on network governance theory and a synthesis of Buitelaar & de Kam’s (2009) success framework, the analysis was conducted in three stages. The lens for this analysis is transferable to other areas of student housing but is not limited to only these areas. The triangulation of data used for the analysis involved elements of policy, planning, and semi-structured interviews (with municipal stakeholders, developers, and student union representatives).
The findings from the analysis indicate that Delft is operating within a facilitative land-based regime consisting of fragmented instruments and no common Normative Vision (for how to achieve student housing success). The result is a mixed outcome for student housing; quantitative goals for delivery have been accomplished, however, qualitative expectations — with respect to the provision of shared housing, tenancies longer than 12 months, and affordability of student housing − have not been fulfilled.
Conversely, Utrecht has developed a layered instrument architecture to guide development through multi-party covenants, conditional zoning regulations, and the creation of a ground lease (to manage efficiency pressures while maintaining other binding commitments associated with the delivery of student housing). The result has been an effectiveness ratio that suggests a high projected level of effectiveness for student housing within a framework of conventional governance and planning methods.
In conclusion, the research indicates that an effective student housing delivery system under extreme market pressure requires the development of layered and redundant governance and planning mechanisms, as well as a combination of proactive legitimacy, ownership of land by public authorities, and the use of conditional legal instruments. The research recommends that Delft establish a multi-party covenant, create a layered governance and planning framework, and work together to conduct national advocacy.
...
This thesis will investigate how governance methods (soft tools) and planning approaches (hard tools) impact the success of the delivery of student housing in Dutch student cities. It will do so through a qualitative comparative case study by analysing two distinct Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA) projects (the Pauwmolen project in Delft and the High Five project in Utrecht) that represent different markets but share very different institutional approaches to and rates of construction completion.
Using the framework of an Institutional Steering Chain with a focus on network governance theory and a synthesis of Buitelaar & de Kam’s (2009) success framework, the analysis was conducted in three stages. The lens for this analysis is transferable to other areas of student housing but is not limited to only these areas. The triangulation of data used for the analysis involved elements of policy, planning, and semi-structured interviews (with municipal stakeholders, developers, and student union representatives).
The findings from the analysis indicate that Delft is operating within a facilitative land-based regime consisting of fragmented instruments and no common Normative Vision (for how to achieve student housing success). The result is a mixed outcome for student housing; quantitative goals for delivery have been accomplished, however, qualitative expectations — with respect to the provision of shared housing, tenancies longer than 12 months, and affordability of student housing − have not been fulfilled.
Conversely, Utrecht has developed a layered instrument architecture to guide development through multi-party covenants, conditional zoning regulations, and the creation of a ground lease (to manage efficiency pressures while maintaining other binding commitments associated with the delivery of student housing). The result has been an effectiveness ratio that suggests a high projected level of effectiveness for student housing within a framework of conventional governance and planning methods.
In conclusion, the research indicates that an effective student housing delivery system under extreme market pressure requires the development of layered and redundant governance and planning mechanisms, as well as a combination of proactive legitimacy, ownership of land by public authorities, and the use of conditional legal instruments. The research recommends that Delft establish a multi-party covenant, create a layered governance and planning framework, and work together to conduct national advocacy.
The Municipal Pre-Emption Right and Housing Development
An Evaluation of the Municipal Pre-Emption Right as a Land Assembling Strategy for Housing
Food for Thought
Understanding the Impact of Rural Food Shop Closures and Strategies for Preventing Inequality in Food Access
Energy Hubs in Area Development Projects
A Multi-Case Study of Implementation Barriers and Enablers under Grid Congestion in the Netherlands
The study is grounded in the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, which conceptualizes EHubs as niche innovations navigating within and against the dominant energy regime amid broader pressures such as climate policy and infrastructure limitations. Methodologically, a qualitative multiple-case study was conducted on three Dutch pilot projects: Merwedekanaalzone, Schoonschip, and Republica. These pilots were used to examine EHub configurations in practice. Data was collected through desk research and semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, including technical experts, policy advisors, and distribution system operators.
A cross-case thematic analysis revealed several recurring factors that can facilitate or hinder EHub implementation. Key enablers included early involvement of technical specialists in the planning process, regulatory flexibility (for instance, through experimental energy regulations), availability of public funding, and strong governance arrangements. Conversely, common barriers were a lack of technical standardization, fragmented institutional responsibilities, persistent legal uncertainties (since current regulations do not fully accommodate EHubs), and high financial risks due to unproven business models. Overall, the findings indicate that while EHubs hold transformative potential for sustainable urban development under grid constraints, scaling them from isolated pilots to mainstream solutions will require systemic support. Aligning policy frameworks, ensuring regulatory flexibility, and providing robust financial mechanisms will be essential to integrate these decentralized solutions into the mainstream energy system and build environemnt. ...
The study is grounded in the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, which conceptualizes EHubs as niche innovations navigating within and against the dominant energy regime amid broader pressures such as climate policy and infrastructure limitations. Methodologically, a qualitative multiple-case study was conducted on three Dutch pilot projects: Merwedekanaalzone, Schoonschip, and Republica. These pilots were used to examine EHub configurations in practice. Data was collected through desk research and semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, including technical experts, policy advisors, and distribution system operators.
A cross-case thematic analysis revealed several recurring factors that can facilitate or hinder EHub implementation. Key enablers included early involvement of technical specialists in the planning process, regulatory flexibility (for instance, through experimental energy regulations), availability of public funding, and strong governance arrangements. Conversely, common barriers were a lack of technical standardization, fragmented institutional responsibilities, persistent legal uncertainties (since current regulations do not fully accommodate EHubs), and high financial risks due to unproven business models. Overall, the findings indicate that while EHubs hold transformative potential for sustainable urban development under grid constraints, scaling them from isolated pilots to mainstream solutions will require systemic support. Aligning policy frameworks, ensuring regulatory flexibility, and providing robust financial mechanisms will be essential to integrate these decentralized solutions into the mainstream energy system and build environemnt.
Scenario thinking for strategic urban development
How public value conflicts are mitigated in municipal strategic urban development processes
By answering the main research question, this research developed a framework for implementing strategic scenarios, which are grounded in the theories from Börjeson et al. (2006) (scenario definitions) and Lindgren & Bandhold (2009) (scenario formulation). The data analysis reveals key gaps where scenario thinking could improve the strategic urban development process. These gaps include the lack of clear scenario definitions and a focus on short-term outcomes over long-term strategic thinking. These gaps highlight the need for clearer frameworks and more inclusive decision-making processes, especially for a politically sensitive project like Feyenoord City.
The case study demonstrated that scenario thinking could enhance adaptability, mitigate risks, and address community opposition and regulatory complexities. The research concludes with a proposal to integrate strategic scenario thinking into Rotterdam’s urban planning process, emphasizing iterative reflection and improving stakeholder collaboration to manage political sensitivities and uncertainties, offering a replicable model for other cities. ...
By answering the main research question, this research developed a framework for implementing strategic scenarios, which are grounded in the theories from Börjeson et al. (2006) (scenario definitions) and Lindgren & Bandhold (2009) (scenario formulation). The data analysis reveals key gaps where scenario thinking could improve the strategic urban development process. These gaps include the lack of clear scenario definitions and a focus on short-term outcomes over long-term strategic thinking. These gaps highlight the need for clearer frameworks and more inclusive decision-making processes, especially for a politically sensitive project like Feyenoord City.
The case study demonstrated that scenario thinking could enhance adaptability, mitigate risks, and address community opposition and regulatory complexities. The research concludes with a proposal to integrate strategic scenario thinking into Rotterdam’s urban planning process, emphasizing iterative reflection and improving stakeholder collaboration to manage political sensitivities and uncertainties, offering a replicable model for other cities.
Challenging the regime: neo-rural farmers as actors of change in food systems
A case study of Cabranes, Asturias
Rural futures for young adults
Rural development and regeneration in the Netherlands
However, amidst these prospects lies a challenge: the political landscape, where urban interests often overshadow rural needs. Shedding light on these dynamics and navigating its complexities, this research aims to empower rural communities. It suggests how to pave the way towards better policies for rural municipalities in the Netherlands. Where young adults can build their rural futures. ...
However, amidst these prospects lies a challenge: the political landscape, where urban interests often overshadow rural needs. Shedding light on these dynamics and navigating its complexities, this research aims to empower rural communities. It suggests how to pave the way towards better policies for rural municipalities in the Netherlands. Where young adults can build their rural futures.
Transformation of office parks into mixed-use
An exploration from the perspective of landowners
TAKE [A] PART
Urban Design of Physical Public Spaces from a Social Perspective
The influence of municipal spatial visions on developers’ investments in urban area development
Case study research into the decision-making process of developers regarding participation in urban area development in the Netherlands
The objective of this research is to examine the influence of municipal spatial vision documents on the decision-making process of developers to participate in urban area developments. For this research a literature and case study as well as an expert meeting were used. With the case study methodology four urban area developments in the Netherlands were studied and included a desk research regarding the vision documents published and interviews with developers regarding their views of these documents and their reasons to invest. The results from the case studies were analysed and validated through an expert meeting.
Main results:
This research concluded that spatial policy documents play a crucial role in the urban development process since they create a first framework for the development. However, it was also noted that these documents can be unrealistic and fail to effectively persuade developers due to not considering the financial aspect of the development. It was furthermore concluded that these documents are important for the decision-making process of developers, as it is political statement from the municipality that it endorses housing development in a certain area. Developers furthermore look for clues in vision documents on what could be built since this greatly determines their development business case. However, such clues are of lacking in these documents and are therefore described by developers as vague. Furthermore, developers desire a balance of flexibility and certainty in spatial vision documents and the area development process. The internal decision-making process of developers regarding participation in an area development consists of creating a business case and conducting a risk analysis of the development, which are combined into an investment proposal. The decision whether to invest is not solely based on the business case being profitable and line with the internal goals of the developer, but also on having the 'belief' the development can be realised, which is based on the risk analysis as well as the developer's (gut) feeling about the development.
Main conclusion and recommendations:
Based on this research, it can be concluded that ultimately many factors influence the decision-making process of developers. Spatial vision documents contribute to this decision, but there is no direct cause-effect since other factors are also in play. Crucial are the shaping factors indicating what could be built that can be derived from the spatial vision document. Moreover, capacity building factors related to the reputation of and relationship with the municipality play a crucial role. These factors influence the 'belief' of a developer for successful area development. Additionally, factors related to developers' internal goals and modus operandi have a crucial impact on their decision of where to invest. It can be concluded that it is crucial that parties collaborate early in the process, that their relationship is good and, importantly, that there is mutual trust.
Summarising, spatial vision documents, shaping instruments and capacity building tools are an important influence on the decision-making process of developers, but internal and external factors play an at least equally important role.
...
The objective of this research is to examine the influence of municipal spatial vision documents on the decision-making process of developers to participate in urban area developments. For this research a literature and case study as well as an expert meeting were used. With the case study methodology four urban area developments in the Netherlands were studied and included a desk research regarding the vision documents published and interviews with developers regarding their views of these documents and their reasons to invest. The results from the case studies were analysed and validated through an expert meeting.
Main results:
This research concluded that spatial policy documents play a crucial role in the urban development process since they create a first framework for the development. However, it was also noted that these documents can be unrealistic and fail to effectively persuade developers due to not considering the financial aspect of the development. It was furthermore concluded that these documents are important for the decision-making process of developers, as it is political statement from the municipality that it endorses housing development in a certain area. Developers furthermore look for clues in vision documents on what could be built since this greatly determines their development business case. However, such clues are of lacking in these documents and are therefore described by developers as vague. Furthermore, developers desire a balance of flexibility and certainty in spatial vision documents and the area development process. The internal decision-making process of developers regarding participation in an area development consists of creating a business case and conducting a risk analysis of the development, which are combined into an investment proposal. The decision whether to invest is not solely based on the business case being profitable and line with the internal goals of the developer, but also on having the 'belief' the development can be realised, which is based on the risk analysis as well as the developer's (gut) feeling about the development.
Main conclusion and recommendations:
Based on this research, it can be concluded that ultimately many factors influence the decision-making process of developers. Spatial vision documents contribute to this decision, but there is no direct cause-effect since other factors are also in play. Crucial are the shaping factors indicating what could be built that can be derived from the spatial vision document. Moreover, capacity building factors related to the reputation of and relationship with the municipality play a crucial role. These factors influence the 'belief' of a developer for successful area development. Additionally, factors related to developers' internal goals and modus operandi have a crucial impact on their decision of where to invest. It can be concluded that it is crucial that parties collaborate early in the process, that their relationship is good and, importantly, that there is mutual trust.
Summarising, spatial vision documents, shaping instruments and capacity building tools are an important influence on the decision-making process of developers, but internal and external factors play an at least equally important role.
The Use of Financial Contributions in Practice
An explorative study analysing the implementation of negotiable developer obligations in the Netherlands
Large-scale building age classification for urban energy demand estimation
Geo and satellite data for building age identification
Future for Church Buildings
An Analysis based on Stakeholder Perspectives
Critical Success Factors to the Inclusion of Climate Considerations in Dutch Road Planning
A Comparative Case Study
Planning with self-organised initiatives
From fragmentation to resilience
CPC and affordable private rental housing
An explorative study of collaboration between parties