F. Messali
Please Note
22 records found
1
The assessment of the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry has been extensively studied at Delft University of Technology. Within the framework of a large-scale testing campaign, a quasi-static cyclic pushover test on a masonry assemblage was performed at the Stevin II laboratory of Delft University of Technology. This experimental campaign was designed to serve as a benchmark for both numerical and analytical models. The masonry assemblage, chosen to represent a typical terraced house built between 1960 and 1980 in the Groningen area, consists of calcium silicate masonry walls and concrete floors. Thereafter, finite element models were created to reproduce the experimental results. However, relying on a single configuration limits the study, and additional cases will be studied numerically in this work to explore a wider range of geometric variations. ...
The assessment of the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry has been extensively studied at Delft University of Technology. Within the framework of a large-scale testing campaign, a quasi-static cyclic pushover test on a masonry assemblage was performed at the Stevin II laboratory of Delft University of Technology. This experimental campaign was designed to serve as a benchmark for both numerical and analytical models. The masonry assemblage, chosen to represent a typical terraced house built between 1960 and 1980 in the Groningen area, consists of calcium silicate masonry walls and concrete floors. Thereafter, finite element models were created to reproduce the experimental results. However, relying on a single configuration limits the study, and additional cases will be studied numerically in this work to explore a wider range of geometric variations.
Structural assessment of inner-city quay walls’ capacity to resist multifunctional loads
FEM analysis of a traditional quay wall and a sheet pile wall to assess their capacity for current and future multifunctional loads
Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in Plaxis and DIANA, both models are analysed with different load cases and validated against analytical checks. The base case follows from the TAK (Dutch document, abbreviated as Toetsing Amsterdamse Kademuren (Ingenieursbureau Gemeente Amsterdam, 2023), which is a guide that provides information on how to structurally assess quay walls in FE software), standard, which applies a distributed downward load of 10 kN/m2 from 0.5 m up to 8 m from the waterside of the quay. Additional functionalities are then introduced to assess their impact on structural behaviour compared to the base case. This is done through imposing additional distributed loads of a tree, energy storage and steel panels to increase water retaining height or a combination of them on the structure. A simplified two-layered soil model, consisting of a clay layer over sand, is used to simulate ground conditions. Structural forces in terms of cross-sectional normal forces, shear forces and bending moments, as well as horizontal displacements are considered for the failure mechanisms.
Results indicate that the traditional timber-masonry quay wall exhibits higher stress concentrations in the timber piles, while the steel sheet pile wall is more susceptible to excessive horizontal displacements. It should be noted that the results are based on undeteriorated material properties; in reality, timber pile degradation and steel corrosion are common and can significantly reduce the structural performance of quay walls. Without proper in-situ measurements, the uncertainty in model predictions remains high. Adapting quay walls to additional loads from multifunctionalities requires careful reconsideration of material behaviour and structural limits, as strengthening might be required. While the steel sheet pile wall can be modified through stronger sections or higher-grade steel, reinforcement options for the traditional timber-masonry structure are more limited, involving adjustments in pile count, diameter, or masonry thickness. ...
Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in Plaxis and DIANA, both models are analysed with different load cases and validated against analytical checks. The base case follows from the TAK (Dutch document, abbreviated as Toetsing Amsterdamse Kademuren (Ingenieursbureau Gemeente Amsterdam, 2023), which is a guide that provides information on how to structurally assess quay walls in FE software), standard, which applies a distributed downward load of 10 kN/m2 from 0.5 m up to 8 m from the waterside of the quay. Additional functionalities are then introduced to assess their impact on structural behaviour compared to the base case. This is done through imposing additional distributed loads of a tree, energy storage and steel panels to increase water retaining height or a combination of them on the structure. A simplified two-layered soil model, consisting of a clay layer over sand, is used to simulate ground conditions. Structural forces in terms of cross-sectional normal forces, shear forces and bending moments, as well as horizontal displacements are considered for the failure mechanisms.
Results indicate that the traditional timber-masonry quay wall exhibits higher stress concentrations in the timber piles, while the steel sheet pile wall is more susceptible to excessive horizontal displacements. It should be noted that the results are based on undeteriorated material properties; in reality, timber pile degradation and steel corrosion are common and can significantly reduce the structural performance of quay walls. Without proper in-situ measurements, the uncertainty in model predictions remains high. Adapting quay walls to additional loads from multifunctionalities requires careful reconsideration of material behaviour and structural limits, as strengthening might be required. While the steel sheet pile wall can be modified through stronger sections or higher-grade steel, reinforcement options for the traditional timber-masonry structure are more limited, involving adjustments in pile count, diameter, or masonry thickness.
To address this gap, a series of three- and two-dimensional finite element models were developed in DIANA FEA, based on a full-scale experimental benchmark bridge tested in the United Kingdom. The modelling approach incorporated both linear and nonlinear material behaviors for masonry and backfill using the total strain crack and Mohr-Coulomb constitutive models, respectively. Interface elements were used to represent the contact and frictional interactions between materials, while soil-structure interaction effects were explicitly modelled. The study systematically examined the influence of spandrel walls and backfill confinement on the bridge’s global stiffness, load distribution, and ultimate capacity.
Model calibration was carried out using the mechanical properties and geometrical parameters provided by the benchmark test. The 3D nonlinear continuum model was validated against experimental results in terms of radial displacements, cracking, and collapse mechanisms. Comparative analyses between the 3D and 2D models demonstrate that the inclusion of spandrel walls in the 3D framework increases initial global stiffness by 30-36 % and peak-load capacity is increased by 50%. The 3D model accurately reproduced the load spreading through the backfill, the development of cracks, and the redistribution of stresses after cracking, but the 2D plane strain model was unable to capture effectively, which underestimated the capacity by 55%.
Overall, the findings confirm that nonlinear 3D continuum finite element modelling provides a more realistic representation of the structural response of masonry arch bridges. This modelling strategy not only improves predictive accuracy but also offers valuable insights for structural assessments. The outcomes of this research contribute to developing reliable evaluation methodologies and serve as a reference framework for future studies and engineering practice in the assessment of masonry arch structures. ...
To address this gap, a series of three- and two-dimensional finite element models were developed in DIANA FEA, based on a full-scale experimental benchmark bridge tested in the United Kingdom. The modelling approach incorporated both linear and nonlinear material behaviors for masonry and backfill using the total strain crack and Mohr-Coulomb constitutive models, respectively. Interface elements were used to represent the contact and frictional interactions between materials, while soil-structure interaction effects were explicitly modelled. The study systematically examined the influence of spandrel walls and backfill confinement on the bridge’s global stiffness, load distribution, and ultimate capacity.
Model calibration was carried out using the mechanical properties and geometrical parameters provided by the benchmark test. The 3D nonlinear continuum model was validated against experimental results in terms of radial displacements, cracking, and collapse mechanisms. Comparative analyses between the 3D and 2D models demonstrate that the inclusion of spandrel walls in the 3D framework increases initial global stiffness by 30-36 % and peak-load capacity is increased by 50%. The 3D model accurately reproduced the load spreading through the backfill, the development of cracks, and the redistribution of stresses after cracking, but the 2D plane strain model was unable to capture effectively, which underestimated the capacity by 55%.
Overall, the findings confirm that nonlinear 3D continuum finite element modelling provides a more realistic representation of the structural response of masonry arch bridges. This modelling strategy not only improves predictive accuracy but also offers valuable insights for structural assessments. The outcomes of this research contribute to developing reliable evaluation methodologies and serve as a reference framework for future studies and engineering practice in the assessment of masonry arch structures.
Reinforcement Alternatives for Timber–Concrete-Composite Floor Slabs
Structural evaluation and Sustainability Perspectives
The central research question is: “What are the mechanical and environmental implications of using a suitable alternative reinforcement method and material in timber-concrete-composite (TCC) floor systems, assessed against a case study?”
A standard floor element from the DPG Media building was selected as the case study. Eight reinforcement alternatives were evaluated through a multi-criteria analysis (MCA), considering parameters such as strength, ductility, sustainability, and buildability. The most promising option, loose basalt fibre reinforcement, was selected for further comparison against the original steel mesh-reinforced design.
In the MCA, each reinforcement alternative was scored from 0.0 to 100.0 per criterion, with scores linearly interpolated between the best and worst performers. To reflect the priorities of this study, environmental impact was weighted twice as heavily as performance capability, which itself was weighted four times more heavy than buildability and cost. The final weights assigned were: sustainability (0.5), performance capability (1.0), and buildability and cost (each 0.125). Performance capability included two equally weighted sub-criteria, ensuring it did not disproportionately influence the overall outcome. The total score for each alternative was calculated by multiplying the criterion weights with the respective scores and summing the results.
To test the robustness of the MCA outcome, a sensitivity analysis was performed on both the weighting scheme and scoring method. This confirmed that the selection of basalt fibre reinforcement remained consistently high across variations, reinforcing confidence in the methodology and its conclusions.
Numerical modelling was conducted to assess crack formation due to shrinkage (using LS-DYNA) and structural capacity under horizontal wind loading (using GSA Oasys) for the selected reinforcement alternative. LS-DYNA models were developed for three scenarios: non-reinforced, steel mesh-reinforced, and basalt fibre-reinforced slabs. A smeared cracking approach was used to estimate crack widths under expected shrinkage. The slab was supported with pinned edges and discrete spring elements representing the stiffness of notched connections with dowels. The steel mesh model was validated against the Eurocode analytical method, yielding a crack width of 0.19 mm, which complies with the Eurocode’s Serviceability Limit State (SLS) requirements of 0.40 mm. These limits are primarily based
on corrosion prevention. For basalt fibre, which is corrosion-resistant, a maximum crack width of 0.70 mm was adopted based on aesthetic considerations found in literature. The model results exceeded both analytical predictions and crack width limits:
• Non-reinforced slab: 0.95 mm
• Basalt fibre-reinforced slab: 0.96 mm
• Steel mesh-reinforced slab: 1.35 mm
A separate GSA model was developed to assess stress distribution in the top concrete layer of the TCC slab under horizontal loading, comparing standard steel mesh and basalt fibre reinforcement. For extra validation, the values are also compared to the values from the SCIA-model from the documentation of the original design. The unity check for steel mesh was 0.55 in the GSA model and 1.0 in the SCIA model. For basalt fibre, an additional safety factor was applied due to its brittle nature, resulting in unity checks of 0.31 (GSA) and 0.43 (SCIA). These results demonstrate the superior mechanical performance of basalt fibre, supporting the MCA-based material selection.
Environmental impact was assessed using a cradle-to-gate Global Warming Potential (GWP) analysis for life-cycle-stages A1-A3, based on available Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Fibre-based reinforcements showed significant reductions in carbon footprint when considering only the reinforcement material. However, for a fair comparison, both concrete and reinforcement must be considered. Since fibre-reinforced concrete typically requires a higher cement content per 𝑚3 of concrete than steel-reinforced concrete.
GWP values per square meter of TCC floor (reinforcement only):
• Steel mesh: 4.05 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
• Basalt fibre: 0.45 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
GWP values for combined concrete and reinforcement:
• Steel mesh: 16.93 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
• Basalt fibre: 17.40 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
Comparison of results for the GWP of only reinforcement and combination of reinforcement and concrete matrix emphasizes the importance of evaluating the entire concrete-reinforcement system. To refocus on the reinforcement material, a concrete mix using eco2cem, a lower GWP cement alternative, was studied. The adjusted GWP values are:
• Steel mesh with eco2cem: 11.26 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
• Basalt fibre with eco2cem: 11.43 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
The analysis revealed that fibre reinforcement, when applied with the same cross-sectional height as steel mesh, results in higher GWP values. However, using low-GWP concrete and considering potential design optimizations, such as reduced cross-sectional height due to the elimination of corrosion-sensitive steel and the associated need for concrete cover, could make basalt fibre a more attractive alternative.
An additional finding was the high GWP contribution of dowels, measured at 12.97 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2 . The high GWP value for the dowels is most likely due to the high-level of detail and intervention during the manufacturing, leading to a more energy intensive process.
The findings indicate that these two performance aspects are strongly interconnected, primarily through the concrete mixture rather than the reinforcement alone. Basalt fibre reinforcement relies on its bond with concrete for structural efficiency, while the environmental impact in terms of GWP is largely determined by cement content. Using conventional fibre quantities from literature led to an overdesigned structure with a GWP exceeding that of the reference DPG TCC floor. This demonstrates that optimizing the concrete mixture is essential for achieving both structural adequacy and sustainability, even when
reinforcement selection is the primary focus.
This research demonstrates that basalt fibres can meet structural performance requirements and improve the sustainability of TCC floor systems, particularly when focusing on the reinforcement material. It also underscores the necessity of evaluating all components of the system together. The developed MCA offers a framework for assessing novel reinforcement strategies in terms of both mechanical behaviour and environmental impact.
Recommendations for future research include:
• Expanding data on bio-based fibre-reinforced concrete.
• Experimental validation of fibre-reinforced concrete behaviour.
• Development of design codes for fibre reinforcement
• More comprehensive EPDs to support life cycle assessments of emerging materials
...
The central research question is: “What are the mechanical and environmental implications of using a suitable alternative reinforcement method and material in timber-concrete-composite (TCC) floor systems, assessed against a case study?”
A standard floor element from the DPG Media building was selected as the case study. Eight reinforcement alternatives were evaluated through a multi-criteria analysis (MCA), considering parameters such as strength, ductility, sustainability, and buildability. The most promising option, loose basalt fibre reinforcement, was selected for further comparison against the original steel mesh-reinforced design.
In the MCA, each reinforcement alternative was scored from 0.0 to 100.0 per criterion, with scores linearly interpolated between the best and worst performers. To reflect the priorities of this study, environmental impact was weighted twice as heavily as performance capability, which itself was weighted four times more heavy than buildability and cost. The final weights assigned were: sustainability (0.5), performance capability (1.0), and buildability and cost (each 0.125). Performance capability included two equally weighted sub-criteria, ensuring it did not disproportionately influence the overall outcome. The total score for each alternative was calculated by multiplying the criterion weights with the respective scores and summing the results.
To test the robustness of the MCA outcome, a sensitivity analysis was performed on both the weighting scheme and scoring method. This confirmed that the selection of basalt fibre reinforcement remained consistently high across variations, reinforcing confidence in the methodology and its conclusions.
Numerical modelling was conducted to assess crack formation due to shrinkage (using LS-DYNA) and structural capacity under horizontal wind loading (using GSA Oasys) for the selected reinforcement alternative. LS-DYNA models were developed for three scenarios: non-reinforced, steel mesh-reinforced, and basalt fibre-reinforced slabs. A smeared cracking approach was used to estimate crack widths under expected shrinkage. The slab was supported with pinned edges and discrete spring elements representing the stiffness of notched connections with dowels. The steel mesh model was validated against the Eurocode analytical method, yielding a crack width of 0.19 mm, which complies with the Eurocode’s Serviceability Limit State (SLS) requirements of 0.40 mm. These limits are primarily based
on corrosion prevention. For basalt fibre, which is corrosion-resistant, a maximum crack width of 0.70 mm was adopted based on aesthetic considerations found in literature. The model results exceeded both analytical predictions and crack width limits:
• Non-reinforced slab: 0.95 mm
• Basalt fibre-reinforced slab: 0.96 mm
• Steel mesh-reinforced slab: 1.35 mm
A separate GSA model was developed to assess stress distribution in the top concrete layer of the TCC slab under horizontal loading, comparing standard steel mesh and basalt fibre reinforcement. For extra validation, the values are also compared to the values from the SCIA-model from the documentation of the original design. The unity check for steel mesh was 0.55 in the GSA model and 1.0 in the SCIA model. For basalt fibre, an additional safety factor was applied due to its brittle nature, resulting in unity checks of 0.31 (GSA) and 0.43 (SCIA). These results demonstrate the superior mechanical performance of basalt fibre, supporting the MCA-based material selection.
Environmental impact was assessed using a cradle-to-gate Global Warming Potential (GWP) analysis for life-cycle-stages A1-A3, based on available Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Fibre-based reinforcements showed significant reductions in carbon footprint when considering only the reinforcement material. However, for a fair comparison, both concrete and reinforcement must be considered. Since fibre-reinforced concrete typically requires a higher cement content per 𝑚3 of concrete than steel-reinforced concrete.
GWP values per square meter of TCC floor (reinforcement only):
• Steel mesh: 4.05 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
• Basalt fibre: 0.45 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
GWP values for combined concrete and reinforcement:
• Steel mesh: 16.93 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
• Basalt fibre: 17.40 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
Comparison of results for the GWP of only reinforcement and combination of reinforcement and concrete matrix emphasizes the importance of evaluating the entire concrete-reinforcement system. To refocus on the reinforcement material, a concrete mix using eco2cem, a lower GWP cement alternative, was studied. The adjusted GWP values are:
• Steel mesh with eco2cem: 11.26 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
• Basalt fibre with eco2cem: 11.43 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2
The analysis revealed that fibre reinforcement, when applied with the same cross-sectional height as steel mesh, results in higher GWP values. However, using low-GWP concrete and considering potential design optimizations, such as reduced cross-sectional height due to the elimination of corrosion-sensitive steel and the associated need for concrete cover, could make basalt fibre a more attractive alternative.
An additional finding was the high GWP contribution of dowels, measured at 12.97 𝑘 𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑞/𝑚2 . The high GWP value for the dowels is most likely due to the high-level of detail and intervention during the manufacturing, leading to a more energy intensive process.
The findings indicate that these two performance aspects are strongly interconnected, primarily through the concrete mixture rather than the reinforcement alone. Basalt fibre reinforcement relies on its bond with concrete for structural efficiency, while the environmental impact in terms of GWP is largely determined by cement content. Using conventional fibre quantities from literature led to an overdesigned structure with a GWP exceeding that of the reference DPG TCC floor. This demonstrates that optimizing the concrete mixture is essential for achieving both structural adequacy and sustainability, even when
reinforcement selection is the primary focus.
This research demonstrates that basalt fibres can meet structural performance requirements and improve the sustainability of TCC floor systems, particularly when focusing on the reinforcement material. It also underscores the necessity of evaluating all components of the system together. The developed MCA offers a framework for assessing novel reinforcement strategies in terms of both mechanical behaviour and environmental impact.
Recommendations for future research include:
• Expanding data on bio-based fibre-reinforced concrete.
• Experimental validation of fibre-reinforced concrete behaviour.
• Development of design codes for fibre reinforcement
• More comprehensive EPDs to support life cycle assessments of emerging materials
In-plane pushover analysis of a quay wall with an uneven pile foundation
The case study of the Grimurgwal
A 2D model with a length of 22.5 meters in the longitudinal direction (along the length of the quay) wall is used in this research, to study the influence of the uneven pile foundation in the thickness of the wall. The quay wall’s out-of-plane behaviour is not considered. The masonry and timber floor are modelled with linear plane stress elements. An interface condition is used to model the interaction between masonry and the timber floor. The longitudinal support beams and kespen are modelled as one element. The piles are modelled as equivalent translational springs that are evenly distributed in the longitudinal direction. In the central area, one spring represents two piles in the cross-section, while the rest of the springs represent three piles. After the application of the deadweight of masonry and timber, a uniform distributed load was used on top of the model to cause settlement of the piles and wall. The dilatation joint was modelled with a nonlinear interface with a high dummy stiffness and no tension, and with a gap of one millimeter.
If the length of the section with two rows of piles is increased, the capacity of the wall reduces. The cracks at the bottom of the masonry, still do not increase significantly if the length of the length of the section with two rows of piles is increased, but it does take less load to generate the same cracks. The boundary conditions also play a large role in the distribution of forces, since it is seen that the piles near the dilatation joint are less critical than the piles near the constrained edge. In the end, this model does give information on how the forces in the piles distribute and how the piles settle, before both brittle and ductile failure of the piles occurs and cracking within the model. However, it should be kept in mind that the model that is considered is a 2D model, whereas the problem of a quay wall is a 3D problem, so the results are not expected to be accurate.
...
A 2D model with a length of 22.5 meters in the longitudinal direction (along the length of the quay) wall is used in this research, to study the influence of the uneven pile foundation in the thickness of the wall. The quay wall’s out-of-plane behaviour is not considered. The masonry and timber floor are modelled with linear plane stress elements. An interface condition is used to model the interaction between masonry and the timber floor. The longitudinal support beams and kespen are modelled as one element. The piles are modelled as equivalent translational springs that are evenly distributed in the longitudinal direction. In the central area, one spring represents two piles in the cross-section, while the rest of the springs represent three piles. After the application of the deadweight of masonry and timber, a uniform distributed load was used on top of the model to cause settlement of the piles and wall. The dilatation joint was modelled with a nonlinear interface with a high dummy stiffness and no tension, and with a gap of one millimeter.
If the length of the section with two rows of piles is increased, the capacity of the wall reduces. The cracks at the bottom of the masonry, still do not increase significantly if the length of the length of the section with two rows of piles is increased, but it does take less load to generate the same cracks. The boundary conditions also play a large role in the distribution of forces, since it is seen that the piles near the dilatation joint are less critical than the piles near the constrained edge. In the end, this model does give information on how the forces in the piles distribute and how the piles settle, before both brittle and ductile failure of the piles occurs and cracking within the model. However, it should be kept in mind that the model that is considered is a 2D model, whereas the problem of a quay wall is a 3D problem, so the results are not expected to be accurate.
The glass Sashimono joint
Designing a rigid and demountable connection for a portal frame
2050 (Rijksoverheid, 2016). In order for glass to contribute to this goal, elements have to be able to be reused or recycled, taking demountability into account during the design of a structure.
One way of creating such a demountable joint, is by making use of portal frames, which require a rigid connection between the columns and beams. Currently, this connection is designed using either mechanical connections or adhesives. Rigid mechanical connections are visually not aesthetically pleasing and cause impurities right at the points where stresses are highest. This makes the joint more sensitive to failure. Rigid adhesive connections are very prone to execution and design errors, and are uncertain regarding their long-term strength. Currently, there is no efficient way to properly remove adhesives, making them non-demountable joints. This research will therefore design a demountable and rigid joint using contact pressure, taking inspiration from traditional Japanese joinery. To develop this joint, first, theory is studied, followed by the design and lastly by experimental testing.
From literature, the Kanawa and Gooseneck joints are selected, because they have the capacity to take up both shear and a bending moment. These joints are then further optimized to determine the optimal geometry for a rigid glass joint. This means a geometry that minimizes tensile stresses in the glass, decreasing the chance an existing flaw will tear and cause the material to fail. This optimization is done using analytical and numerical analyses, followed by full-scale experiments. To determine the optimal force transfer the geometries were first schematized, and the relevant parameters were determined
for later variation. From hand calculations, it follows that the optimal geometry finds a balance between the stresses resulting from normal force and the stresses resulting from the eccentricity of the internal line of force.
Using a parametric Grasshopper model, the geometries are further optimized by varying dimensions and curvature. Several designs are imported into DIANA FEA and Abaqus to acquire numerical values for the expected stresses of these set parameters. The models are set up as two 2D glass panes with a polymer interlayer in between them. In DIANA FEA a lot of difficulties arose with the combination of complex geometry and multiple contact surfaces. Therefore all designs were mitigated to Abaqus, because this software is more suitable for complex contact surfaces. Comparing the heavily simplified hand
calculations to the FEA, there was a constant increase of peak stresses with a factor of 4.
The Gooseneck design was manufactured using a CNC milling machine and afterwards, its edge was polished, resulting in optimal edge quality. Due to the nature of the geometry, the Kanawa design had to be manufactured using a waterjet. There was a large difference between the accuracy of the two production methods, resulting in the Kanawa joint having a lot more space between the glass plates. This strongly influences the placement of the interlayer materials, but also the stiffness of the joint during the experiments.
Before these models could be validated using experiments, a suitable interlayer to place between the edges of the glass panes was researched. POM, PVC, Surlyn, PA6 and PU85 are deemed suitable and are examined. Eventually, only PU85 could be fitted between the glass panes, which seemed to have the least favourable mechanical properties. The angle of the geometry was too small for most materials to bend them into, even after heating the plastics. The other issue lay with the tight tolerances of the polished glass panes. These had to be additionally polished by hand and the PU85 was treated with
silicone spray, in order for the whole joint to fit. The disadvantage was that this manual polishing damaged the edge quality, increasing the probability of failure at a lower strength.
Experiments were then conducted to validate earlier analytical and numerical calculations, using full-scale single-pane annealed glass. The joints were tested in pure tension and a bending moment, using polarizing filters to visualize the stress trajectories. For the Gooseneck model, the stress trajectories and expected stiffness corresponded well with the models. The samples failed at an average force of 6.0 kN. The model predicted peak stresses of 300 N/mm2 and stiffness of 2.8 N/m at this point, the experiments displayed a stiffness of 3.0 N/m. This means the model turned out to be 5.7% less stiff than the
experiments.
The stress trajectories coincided less clearly with the model for the Kanawa tension model. The samples failed at an average force of 4.1 kN. The expected peak stresses at this point were 150 N/mm2 and the stiffness 0.73 N/m based on the model. The experiments showed a stiffness of 1.1 N/m. The model underestimates the stiffness of the experiments by 33%.
Interestingly, because the tolerances in the Kanawa joint were larger, there was more movement possible in this joint. This influenced the force transfer and therefore resulted in different peak stresses than expected. The Gooseneck model turned out to be almost 3 times as stiff as the Kanawa model. This has two likely reasons. First of all, the geometry of the Kanawa joint is not designed to take up pure tension in the direction that it was tested. Therefore, the geometry itself was a lot less stiff than that of the Gooseneck joint. Secondly, the tolerances were of large influence. Because the Kanawa samples were produced using a waterjet, with quite large tolerances, there was a lot of movement possible in the joint. This meant little force was necessary to displace the joint, resulting in a lower stiffness.
The Kanawa design was tested under a bending moment, because the force transfer is very different compared to pure tension for this design. The full beam had dimensions of 2400mmx 400mmx 10 mm. Locations of peak stresses were similar to the models. The samples failed at an average of 4.0 kN, which corresponds with a moment of 1.1 kNm. The force-displacement graph of the experiments was not linear, but showed varying stiffness with plateaus where the stiffness was around 0. Most likely, this was caused by a combination of the plastic deformation of the PU85 and movement and/or sliding in the
machine itself. It was attempted to calibrate the model to the experiments, by increasing the stiffness of the interlayer. This did not result in sufficient stiffness, which implies the stiffness originates from another element in the setup. The rotational stiffness was 611 kNm/rad, which is 9.1% of the stiffness compared to a solid beam of the same dimensions.
This means the designed joint is not fully rigid, but this exploratory study shows there is great potential for such a system. Further optimizing the geometry and finding a more suitable interlayer could result in a rigid and demountable glass joint, as part of a portal frame. ...
2050 (Rijksoverheid, 2016). In order for glass to contribute to this goal, elements have to be able to be reused or recycled, taking demountability into account during the design of a structure.
One way of creating such a demountable joint, is by making use of portal frames, which require a rigid connection between the columns and beams. Currently, this connection is designed using either mechanical connections or adhesives. Rigid mechanical connections are visually not aesthetically pleasing and cause impurities right at the points where stresses are highest. This makes the joint more sensitive to failure. Rigid adhesive connections are very prone to execution and design errors, and are uncertain regarding their long-term strength. Currently, there is no efficient way to properly remove adhesives, making them non-demountable joints. This research will therefore design a demountable and rigid joint using contact pressure, taking inspiration from traditional Japanese joinery. To develop this joint, first, theory is studied, followed by the design and lastly by experimental testing.
From literature, the Kanawa and Gooseneck joints are selected, because they have the capacity to take up both shear and a bending moment. These joints are then further optimized to determine the optimal geometry for a rigid glass joint. This means a geometry that minimizes tensile stresses in the glass, decreasing the chance an existing flaw will tear and cause the material to fail. This optimization is done using analytical and numerical analyses, followed by full-scale experiments. To determine the optimal force transfer the geometries were first schematized, and the relevant parameters were determined
for later variation. From hand calculations, it follows that the optimal geometry finds a balance between the stresses resulting from normal force and the stresses resulting from the eccentricity of the internal line of force.
Using a parametric Grasshopper model, the geometries are further optimized by varying dimensions and curvature. Several designs are imported into DIANA FEA and Abaqus to acquire numerical values for the expected stresses of these set parameters. The models are set up as two 2D glass panes with a polymer interlayer in between them. In DIANA FEA a lot of difficulties arose with the combination of complex geometry and multiple contact surfaces. Therefore all designs were mitigated to Abaqus, because this software is more suitable for complex contact surfaces. Comparing the heavily simplified hand
calculations to the FEA, there was a constant increase of peak stresses with a factor of 4.
The Gooseneck design was manufactured using a CNC milling machine and afterwards, its edge was polished, resulting in optimal edge quality. Due to the nature of the geometry, the Kanawa design had to be manufactured using a waterjet. There was a large difference between the accuracy of the two production methods, resulting in the Kanawa joint having a lot more space between the glass plates. This strongly influences the placement of the interlayer materials, but also the stiffness of the joint during the experiments.
Before these models could be validated using experiments, a suitable interlayer to place between the edges of the glass panes was researched. POM, PVC, Surlyn, PA6 and PU85 are deemed suitable and are examined. Eventually, only PU85 could be fitted between the glass panes, which seemed to have the least favourable mechanical properties. The angle of the geometry was too small for most materials to bend them into, even after heating the plastics. The other issue lay with the tight tolerances of the polished glass panes. These had to be additionally polished by hand and the PU85 was treated with
silicone spray, in order for the whole joint to fit. The disadvantage was that this manual polishing damaged the edge quality, increasing the probability of failure at a lower strength.
Experiments were then conducted to validate earlier analytical and numerical calculations, using full-scale single-pane annealed glass. The joints were tested in pure tension and a bending moment, using polarizing filters to visualize the stress trajectories. For the Gooseneck model, the stress trajectories and expected stiffness corresponded well with the models. The samples failed at an average force of 6.0 kN. The model predicted peak stresses of 300 N/mm2 and stiffness of 2.8 N/m at this point, the experiments displayed a stiffness of 3.0 N/m. This means the model turned out to be 5.7% less stiff than the
experiments.
The stress trajectories coincided less clearly with the model for the Kanawa tension model. The samples failed at an average force of 4.1 kN. The expected peak stresses at this point were 150 N/mm2 and the stiffness 0.73 N/m based on the model. The experiments showed a stiffness of 1.1 N/m. The model underestimates the stiffness of the experiments by 33%.
Interestingly, because the tolerances in the Kanawa joint were larger, there was more movement possible in this joint. This influenced the force transfer and therefore resulted in different peak stresses than expected. The Gooseneck model turned out to be almost 3 times as stiff as the Kanawa model. This has two likely reasons. First of all, the geometry of the Kanawa joint is not designed to take up pure tension in the direction that it was tested. Therefore, the geometry itself was a lot less stiff than that of the Gooseneck joint. Secondly, the tolerances were of large influence. Because the Kanawa samples were produced using a waterjet, with quite large tolerances, there was a lot of movement possible in the joint. This meant little force was necessary to displace the joint, resulting in a lower stiffness.
The Kanawa design was tested under a bending moment, because the force transfer is very different compared to pure tension for this design. The full beam had dimensions of 2400mmx 400mmx 10 mm. Locations of peak stresses were similar to the models. The samples failed at an average of 4.0 kN, which corresponds with a moment of 1.1 kNm. The force-displacement graph of the experiments was not linear, but showed varying stiffness with plateaus where the stiffness was around 0. Most likely, this was caused by a combination of the plastic deformation of the PU85 and movement and/or sliding in the
machine itself. It was attempted to calibrate the model to the experiments, by increasing the stiffness of the interlayer. This did not result in sufficient stiffness, which implies the stiffness originates from another element in the setup. The rotational stiffness was 611 kNm/rad, which is 9.1% of the stiffness compared to a solid beam of the same dimensions.
This means the designed joint is not fully rigid, but this exploratory study shows there is great potential for such a system. Further optimizing the geometry and finding a more suitable interlayer could result in a rigid and demountable glass joint, as part of a portal frame.
What is the role of constitutive models on simulating the structural behaviour of masonry arch bridges?
In order to formulate an answer to the question, the behaviour of masonry, masonry arch bridges and soils have been investigated first. The investigation shows which function each part of a masonry arch bridge fulfils and which failure modes are expected to occur. When a masonry arch bridge is loaded, the backfill spreads the load and transfers this to the masonry arch. Due to this load, the arch will deform. This deformation is, however, restricted by the backfill. This interaction between the backfill and the masonry arch makes the behaviour of these types of structures a complex structural-geotechnical problem.
For masonry arch bridges, the most common failure mode is the formation of a four hinge mechanism, therefore this study focusses on modelling the behaviour of the masonry arch. Alongside the behaviour of the materials, the development in numerical tools is investigated as well. Doing so, it can be determined what assumptions have been made in the past and what the shortcomings of the approaches are. With the combined knowledge, it is possible to select different material models that can be used for masonry arch bridges. Three different models were created, two macro models and a micro model. The two macro models are both total-strain based models, where one is described by an isotropic - and one with an anisotropic material model, the so called “Total strain crack” and “Engineering masonry” model, respectively. The macro models consider the masonry as a continuum, whereas the micro model distinguishes between units and joints.
To validate the numerical models, test results are needed. As the study focuses on modelling the masonry arch, the different models are first compared to the results of a test on just a masonry arch. The chosen test was performed at the University of Minho in Portugal; a masonry arch was created and, in a displacement control manner, loaded until failure. Prior to performing the tests, the materials were first tested and their properties accurately reported, which is very useful when making a numerical model. After creating and comparing the results of the models and tests, it was found that the Engineering masonry and micro model show a similar shape of the force-displacement curve, while the isotropic “total strain crack” model does not. The engineering masonry and micro model are able to show the brittle failure of the arch, which was also obtained with the tests. However, this failure occurred when only two hinges were formed, where, in the test, a four hinge mechanism was formed. The numerical results do show that cracks are starting to form, however, this does not mean that it also is a hinge. Besides that, the test results show that there is still some redistribution of forces after the peak load. This is not possible when four hinges are already formed. It is expected that the, by the researchers defined, hinges are not actually hinges, but, are the points where cracks start to form. Despite this difference in hinge formation, the resulting force-displacement curves of the models are very close to those of the tests, therefore it can be stated that the used models are suitable to represent the behaviour of masonry arches.
After validating the effectiveness of the masonry material models, the modelling of the problem was extended by adding backfill. Again test results were needed to determine whether the models are also suitable to simulate the extended problem. This test was performed at the University of Salford in the United Kingdom and has been used by Wittenveen+Bos to validate other numerical programs in the past. The bridge was tested in a specially designed chamber, in such a way that plain strain conditions hold, and the load was applied at quarter span in a displacement controlled manner. The results were obtained by loading the arch beyond the peak load, with the applied force being reduced while the displacement continued to increase, which was, according to the research, when a four hinge mechanism was formed.
A negative consequence of plain strain conditions is that the engineering masonry material model was not available to be used, therefore only the “total strain crack” model and the micro model were compared. The initial results of the numerical model resulted in local failure of the soil just below the point load, which did not occur in reality. In order to eliminate this local failure, a small area below the load had to be given linear elastic properties. Although this local failure now doesn’t happen, the results still show that plastic strains develop in the backfill, as well as cracks in the masonry arch. A parametric study was conducted to determine the sensitivity of the models to small changes in material properties. This study showed that the models are most sensitive to changes in soil properties, specifically the internal friction angle. For the micro model, it even appeared that only changes in the soil properties affect the behaviour of the structure, meaning that the sliding failure in the backfill is the governing failure mechanism. In the isotropic “total strain crack” model, a lower tensile strength caused the behaviour of the structure to change drastically. It is found that this is due to Poisson’s ratio and the isotropic nature of the material model. The compressive stresses cause small lateral strains which, due to Poisson’s ratio, cause longitudinal strains. Due to the isotropic nature of the material model, a low tensile strength is assigned in this longitudinal direction, causing the arch to form an unrealistic crack or failure pattern. While in reality the tensile strength in this longitudinal direction, the brick tensile strength, is larger compared to the assigned the brick-mortar bond strength.
Eventually, it could be concluded that it is possible to model the behaviour of masonry arch bridges with great detail. However, in this study the behaviour of the backfill governed the behaviour of the structure, making it difficult to state which modelling approach should be used for the masonry arch. What can be said, is that a micro modelling approach is currently preferred. The study shows that this model is capable of mimicking the behaviour of just a masonry arch, and is less sensitive to changes is masonry properties when backfill is added compared to the isotropic “total strain crack” material model. The anisotropic “engineering masonry” model would be a good alternative, but cannot be used in plain strain conditions, yet. Further research is needed to investigate other modelling options, as a three-dimensional model. However, to fully understand the behaviour, more tests are needed. These tests should not only be focussed on the behaviour of the arch, but also on the behaviour of the backfill; and these material properties should be tested and reported extensively.
...
What is the role of constitutive models on simulating the structural behaviour of masonry arch bridges?
In order to formulate an answer to the question, the behaviour of masonry, masonry arch bridges and soils have been investigated first. The investigation shows which function each part of a masonry arch bridge fulfils and which failure modes are expected to occur. When a masonry arch bridge is loaded, the backfill spreads the load and transfers this to the masonry arch. Due to this load, the arch will deform. This deformation is, however, restricted by the backfill. This interaction between the backfill and the masonry arch makes the behaviour of these types of structures a complex structural-geotechnical problem.
For masonry arch bridges, the most common failure mode is the formation of a four hinge mechanism, therefore this study focusses on modelling the behaviour of the masonry arch. Alongside the behaviour of the materials, the development in numerical tools is investigated as well. Doing so, it can be determined what assumptions have been made in the past and what the shortcomings of the approaches are. With the combined knowledge, it is possible to select different material models that can be used for masonry arch bridges. Three different models were created, two macro models and a micro model. The two macro models are both total-strain based models, where one is described by an isotropic - and one with an anisotropic material model, the so called “Total strain crack” and “Engineering masonry” model, respectively. The macro models consider the masonry as a continuum, whereas the micro model distinguishes between units and joints.
To validate the numerical models, test results are needed. As the study focuses on modelling the masonry arch, the different models are first compared to the results of a test on just a masonry arch. The chosen test was performed at the University of Minho in Portugal; a masonry arch was created and, in a displacement control manner, loaded until failure. Prior to performing the tests, the materials were first tested and their properties accurately reported, which is very useful when making a numerical model. After creating and comparing the results of the models and tests, it was found that the Engineering masonry and micro model show a similar shape of the force-displacement curve, while the isotropic “total strain crack” model does not. The engineering masonry and micro model are able to show the brittle failure of the arch, which was also obtained with the tests. However, this failure occurred when only two hinges were formed, where, in the test, a four hinge mechanism was formed. The numerical results do show that cracks are starting to form, however, this does not mean that it also is a hinge. Besides that, the test results show that there is still some redistribution of forces after the peak load. This is not possible when four hinges are already formed. It is expected that the, by the researchers defined, hinges are not actually hinges, but, are the points where cracks start to form. Despite this difference in hinge formation, the resulting force-displacement curves of the models are very close to those of the tests, therefore it can be stated that the used models are suitable to represent the behaviour of masonry arches.
After validating the effectiveness of the masonry material models, the modelling of the problem was extended by adding backfill. Again test results were needed to determine whether the models are also suitable to simulate the extended problem. This test was performed at the University of Salford in the United Kingdom and has been used by Wittenveen+Bos to validate other numerical programs in the past. The bridge was tested in a specially designed chamber, in such a way that plain strain conditions hold, and the load was applied at quarter span in a displacement controlled manner. The results were obtained by loading the arch beyond the peak load, with the applied force being reduced while the displacement continued to increase, which was, according to the research, when a four hinge mechanism was formed.
A negative consequence of plain strain conditions is that the engineering masonry material model was not available to be used, therefore only the “total strain crack” model and the micro model were compared. The initial results of the numerical model resulted in local failure of the soil just below the point load, which did not occur in reality. In order to eliminate this local failure, a small area below the load had to be given linear elastic properties. Although this local failure now doesn’t happen, the results still show that plastic strains develop in the backfill, as well as cracks in the masonry arch. A parametric study was conducted to determine the sensitivity of the models to small changes in material properties. This study showed that the models are most sensitive to changes in soil properties, specifically the internal friction angle. For the micro model, it even appeared that only changes in the soil properties affect the behaviour of the structure, meaning that the sliding failure in the backfill is the governing failure mechanism. In the isotropic “total strain crack” model, a lower tensile strength caused the behaviour of the structure to change drastically. It is found that this is due to Poisson’s ratio and the isotropic nature of the material model. The compressive stresses cause small lateral strains which, due to Poisson’s ratio, cause longitudinal strains. Due to the isotropic nature of the material model, a low tensile strength is assigned in this longitudinal direction, causing the arch to form an unrealistic crack or failure pattern. While in reality the tensile strength in this longitudinal direction, the brick tensile strength, is larger compared to the assigned the brick-mortar bond strength.
Eventually, it could be concluded that it is possible to model the behaviour of masonry arch bridges with great detail. However, in this study the behaviour of the backfill governed the behaviour of the structure, making it difficult to state which modelling approach should be used for the masonry arch. What can be said, is that a micro modelling approach is currently preferred. The study shows that this model is capable of mimicking the behaviour of just a masonry arch, and is less sensitive to changes is masonry properties when backfill is added compared to the isotropic “total strain crack” material model. The anisotropic “engineering masonry” model would be a good alternative, but cannot be used in plain strain conditions, yet. Further research is needed to investigate other modelling options, as a three-dimensional model. However, to fully understand the behaviour, more tests are needed. These tests should not only be focussed on the behaviour of the arch, but also on the behaviour of the backfill; and these material properties should be tested and reported extensively.
This work aims to quantify the improvement of the out-of-plane performance of masonry walls due to the presence of horizontal timber bands. Numerical analyses were conducted in DIANA FEA software starting from the few experimental results available in literature on this typology. These were used to calibrate the properties of masonry, which was represented as a homogeneous isotropic continuum, with nonlinearities considered by means of a total strain rotating crack model.
Firstly, a U-shaped masonry wall having the same geometry and boundary conditions as the experimental tests was simulated using 3D modelling approach. Non-linear static analyses were performed exploring two different strategies, with minor variations in analysis parameters. Very good agreement was obtained with the results from literature for both strategies with one able to simulate local cracks better, while the other was able to simulate global failure mechanism better. The calibrated numerical model was then employed to conduct sensitivity analyses for precompression load and aspect ratio.
Further refinements to the calibrated model were done. The influence of the frictional behaviour between timber and masonry was explored through discretely modelled interface elements. The timber-to-timber connection was modelled as a hinge. The improvement in the behaviour of the wall due to timber bands connected throughout the frontal wall was also evaluated.
Finally, the calibrated numerical model was employed for the pushover analysis of a full-scale structure representing the geometry of a typical Bhatar house. The results from the numerical analysis were used for seismic assessment using Capacity Spectrum Method. The assessment demonstrated the capability of a Bhatar structure to resist ground acceleration specified for the highest earthquake category defined by Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Contrarily, an unreinforced masonry structure did not possess the required ductility to resist such an earthquake.
Inclusion of timber bands at corners of a U-shaped masonry wall resulted in an increase of lateral resistance by 40%. Walls with timber bands connected throughout the front wall presented a further increase of 35% in the force capacity. The corresponding improvement in force capacity for a full-scale Bhatar house was even more remarkable at 109% compared to an identical unreinforced house. There was also a noticeable increase in the ductility.
This work constitutes a further step towards a better understanding of the behaviour of Himalayan masonry structures under earthquakes, promoting better seismic risk reduction strategies. This improved understanding into the role of timber in greater seismic resilience of masonry structures also informs better maintenance, conservation and preservation of heritage and historical masonry structures in the Himalayas. ...
This work aims to quantify the improvement of the out-of-plane performance of masonry walls due to the presence of horizontal timber bands. Numerical analyses were conducted in DIANA FEA software starting from the few experimental results available in literature on this typology. These were used to calibrate the properties of masonry, which was represented as a homogeneous isotropic continuum, with nonlinearities considered by means of a total strain rotating crack model.
Firstly, a U-shaped masonry wall having the same geometry and boundary conditions as the experimental tests was simulated using 3D modelling approach. Non-linear static analyses were performed exploring two different strategies, with minor variations in analysis parameters. Very good agreement was obtained with the results from literature for both strategies with one able to simulate local cracks better, while the other was able to simulate global failure mechanism better. The calibrated numerical model was then employed to conduct sensitivity analyses for precompression load and aspect ratio.
Further refinements to the calibrated model were done. The influence of the frictional behaviour between timber and masonry was explored through discretely modelled interface elements. The timber-to-timber connection was modelled as a hinge. The improvement in the behaviour of the wall due to timber bands connected throughout the frontal wall was also evaluated.
Finally, the calibrated numerical model was employed for the pushover analysis of a full-scale structure representing the geometry of a typical Bhatar house. The results from the numerical analysis were used for seismic assessment using Capacity Spectrum Method. The assessment demonstrated the capability of a Bhatar structure to resist ground acceleration specified for the highest earthquake category defined by Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Contrarily, an unreinforced masonry structure did not possess the required ductility to resist such an earthquake.
Inclusion of timber bands at corners of a U-shaped masonry wall resulted in an increase of lateral resistance by 40%. Walls with timber bands connected throughout the front wall presented a further increase of 35% in the force capacity. The corresponding improvement in force capacity for a full-scale Bhatar house was even more remarkable at 109% compared to an identical unreinforced house. There was also a noticeable increase in the ductility.
This work constitutes a further step towards a better understanding of the behaviour of Himalayan masonry structures under earthquakes, promoting better seismic risk reduction strategies. This improved understanding into the role of timber in greater seismic resilience of masonry structures also informs better maintenance, conservation and preservation of heritage and historical masonry structures in the Himalayas.
A Homogenized Model for the Nonlinear Behaviour of Masonry Under In-plane Loading
A Material Model Based on Coupling of Tension, Shear and Compressive Splitting
The effect of timber bands and columns on the seismic behaviour of rubble stone masonry
A numerical study on Nepal's proposition for reconstruction of residential buildings
It is therefore essential develop and use assessment methods that are on one end reliable and accurate, but on the other hand allow to perform a large number of assessments of the vulnerability of the buildings in a short time. In other words, the assessment of all the buildings requires a quick and reliable assessment method. Such an assessment method should offer a strong understanding of the occurring failure mechanism during an earthquake, an acceptable prediction of the ground acceleration at which the collapse of the building may occur (maximum base shear force) and the displacement capacity of unreinforced masonry (URM) building.
The NPR9998 recommends four seismic assessment approaches, which differ in complexity and assessment time needed to be performed. The most comprehensive and time-consuming assessment method is the NLTHA (nonlinear time history analysis), which includes both the dynamic and nonlinear effects. In practice, this method is used only in special cases, such as in the case of monumental buildings. A simpler approach is the NLPO (nonlinear pushover) analysis, which is static and considers the nonlinear properties of the structure. An NLPO is less time consuming than an NLTHA, even when the finite element method (FEM) is considered.
A more simplified approach is the Simple Lateral Mechanism Analysis (SLaMA). This method is a simplified mechanism-based analytical approach. If the SLaMA method predicts realistically conservative global capacities, it could serve as an effective alternative assessment method for URM buildings, and especially to the NLPO FEM analysis. This study focusses on the comparison between the SLaMA method and the NLPO FEM analysis. Therefore, this study aims to answer the following research question:
Could the SLaMA method be a realistically conservative and effective alternative to the NLPO FEM analysis in making a seismic assessment for two-storey unreinforced masonry buildings?
In conclusion, the SLaMA method could be a realistically conservative and effective alternative to the NLPO FEM analysis in predicting the maximum base shear force. The displacement capacity predicted using the SLaMA method is validated only for buildings with RC floors. This predicted SLaMA method was realistically conservative compared with the ultimate displacement achieved using the NLPO FEM analysis. The SLaMA method is overall suitable for obtaining a quick understanding of the behaviour of an URM building. However, it requires a proper evaluation of the analyses to identify properly the type and the location of the failure mechanisms. For this reason, this method could be valuable to be applied before using a more complex assessment method.
...
It is therefore essential develop and use assessment methods that are on one end reliable and accurate, but on the other hand allow to perform a large number of assessments of the vulnerability of the buildings in a short time. In other words, the assessment of all the buildings requires a quick and reliable assessment method. Such an assessment method should offer a strong understanding of the occurring failure mechanism during an earthquake, an acceptable prediction of the ground acceleration at which the collapse of the building may occur (maximum base shear force) and the displacement capacity of unreinforced masonry (URM) building.
The NPR9998 recommends four seismic assessment approaches, which differ in complexity and assessment time needed to be performed. The most comprehensive and time-consuming assessment method is the NLTHA (nonlinear time history analysis), which includes both the dynamic and nonlinear effects. In practice, this method is used only in special cases, such as in the case of monumental buildings. A simpler approach is the NLPO (nonlinear pushover) analysis, which is static and considers the nonlinear properties of the structure. An NLPO is less time consuming than an NLTHA, even when the finite element method (FEM) is considered.
A more simplified approach is the Simple Lateral Mechanism Analysis (SLaMA). This method is a simplified mechanism-based analytical approach. If the SLaMA method predicts realistically conservative global capacities, it could serve as an effective alternative assessment method for URM buildings, and especially to the NLPO FEM analysis. This study focusses on the comparison between the SLaMA method and the NLPO FEM analysis. Therefore, this study aims to answer the following research question:
Could the SLaMA method be a realistically conservative and effective alternative to the NLPO FEM analysis in making a seismic assessment for two-storey unreinforced masonry buildings?
In conclusion, the SLaMA method could be a realistically conservative and effective alternative to the NLPO FEM analysis in predicting the maximum base shear force. The displacement capacity predicted using the SLaMA method is validated only for buildings with RC floors. This predicted SLaMA method was realistically conservative compared with the ultimate displacement achieved using the NLPO FEM analysis. The SLaMA method is overall suitable for obtaining a quick understanding of the behaviour of an URM building. However, it requires a proper evaluation of the analyses to identify properly the type and the location of the failure mechanisms. For this reason, this method could be valuable to be applied before using a more complex assessment method.
This research aims to answer the following research question:
• How is the in-plane behaviour of single-storey URM wall facades affected in simplified calculation methods compared to FEM when geometrical irregularities are present?
The walls have been modelled in 2D with three different methods: FEM, EF and SLaMA. Material properties and modelling assumptions were maintained as consistent as possible within the three different methods. For researching the influence of the geometrical irregularities on the accuracy of EF and SLaMA when compared to FEM, the variation of geometrical irregularities, each quantified by an index value, have been studied. The influence of these indices on the accuracy of the calculation methods has been researched with a sensitivity analysis.
The objective has been pursued by looking into single-floor URM façades, and the conclusions of this research can be applied to this typology of walls in Groningen made of solid clay brick masonry (pre 1945). The study focuses specifically on the base shear capacity of the walls.
The differences observed when comparing the in-plane behaviour of a wall analysed with 3MURI and DIANA are not significantly affected by the presence of geometrical irregularities. The ratio between the base shear capacity computed with the two approaches and the predicted failure mechanisms remains consistent for all geometrical irregularities defined in this report.
Similarly, the differences observed when comparing the in-plane behaviour of a wall analysed with SLaMA and DIANA are not largely affected by the presence of geometrical irregularities, since the base shear computed according to SLaMA is consistently lower than that obtained with DIANA. However, the base shear capacity obtained with SLaMA showed large variations between 0.34 and 0.75 with respect to DIANA when implementing geometrical irregularities. The largest variation is obtained when more than a single pier is considered, due to the inability of SLaMA to define the re-distribution of the vertical axial forces in the piers, nor correct boundary conditions at the top of the piers since the constraining action of the spandrel appear underestimate. This affected also the prediction of the failure modes, which differed for the two methods. However, in most of cases flexural failure mode was obtained, and the study should be extended to consider also geometries and loading conditions that cause also the shear failure of the walls.
...
This research aims to answer the following research question:
• How is the in-plane behaviour of single-storey URM wall facades affected in simplified calculation methods compared to FEM when geometrical irregularities are present?
The walls have been modelled in 2D with three different methods: FEM, EF and SLaMA. Material properties and modelling assumptions were maintained as consistent as possible within the three different methods. For researching the influence of the geometrical irregularities on the accuracy of EF and SLaMA when compared to FEM, the variation of geometrical irregularities, each quantified by an index value, have been studied. The influence of these indices on the accuracy of the calculation methods has been researched with a sensitivity analysis.
The objective has been pursued by looking into single-floor URM façades, and the conclusions of this research can be applied to this typology of walls in Groningen made of solid clay brick masonry (pre 1945). The study focuses specifically on the base shear capacity of the walls.
The differences observed when comparing the in-plane behaviour of a wall analysed with 3MURI and DIANA are not significantly affected by the presence of geometrical irregularities. The ratio between the base shear capacity computed with the two approaches and the predicted failure mechanisms remains consistent for all geometrical irregularities defined in this report.
Similarly, the differences observed when comparing the in-plane behaviour of a wall analysed with SLaMA and DIANA are not largely affected by the presence of geometrical irregularities, since the base shear computed according to SLaMA is consistently lower than that obtained with DIANA. However, the base shear capacity obtained with SLaMA showed large variations between 0.34 and 0.75 with respect to DIANA when implementing geometrical irregularities. The largest variation is obtained when more than a single pier is considered, due to the inability of SLaMA to define the re-distribution of the vertical axial forces in the piers, nor correct boundary conditions at the top of the piers since the constraining action of the spandrel appear underestimate. This affected also the prediction of the failure modes, which differed for the two methods. However, in most of cases flexural failure mode was obtained, and the study should be extended to consider also geometries and loading conditions that cause also the shear failure of the walls.
measurements of concrete prisms. The theoretical framework presented in this thesis is based on the fact that the relative pore humidity is changing during drying. In a finite element model, the changing relative pore humidity (pore-RH) over time is calculated. Drying is caused by internal diffusion of moisture, which is driven by differences in concentration. The moisture flow is modelled using the transient heat equation. The resulting pore-RH values are used to determine the hydrostatic capillary pressure based on the equations of Kelvin and Laplace. The material response of cement paste subjected to the capillary pressure is calculated using Bentz law. At last, the models of Pickett and Neville are used to include the restraining effect of aggregates and determine the absolute deformation of concrete subjected to drying. The initial conditions of the material are determined based on HYMOSTRUC cement simulation and Powers’ volumetric model. The results of the presented theoretical framework are reasonable. Usage of the framework and the heat equation for modelling drying in FEM, proved to be successful. A significant uncertainty is found in the restraining effect of aggregates. The theoretical model is based on material modelling of drying cement paste. However, the deformation of concrete is only
16%~23% of the total deformation of cement paste. Recommended is to further research the (local) effect of aggregates on drying shrinkage. Drying shrinkage has been calculated according to the construction standards and compared to the measured drying shrinkage of the concrete prisms. From this, it can be concluded that calculations by structural engineers on drying shrinkage are preferably done according to the ‘Model code 2010’. ...
measurements of concrete prisms. The theoretical framework presented in this thesis is based on the fact that the relative pore humidity is changing during drying. In a finite element model, the changing relative pore humidity (pore-RH) over time is calculated. Drying is caused by internal diffusion of moisture, which is driven by differences in concentration. The moisture flow is modelled using the transient heat equation. The resulting pore-RH values are used to determine the hydrostatic capillary pressure based on the equations of Kelvin and Laplace. The material response of cement paste subjected to the capillary pressure is calculated using Bentz law. At last, the models of Pickett and Neville are used to include the restraining effect of aggregates and determine the absolute deformation of concrete subjected to drying. The initial conditions of the material are determined based on HYMOSTRUC cement simulation and Powers’ volumetric model. The results of the presented theoretical framework are reasonable. Usage of the framework and the heat equation for modelling drying in FEM, proved to be successful. A significant uncertainty is found in the restraining effect of aggregates. The theoretical model is based on material modelling of drying cement paste. However, the deformation of concrete is only
16%~23% of the total deformation of cement paste. Recommended is to further research the (local) effect of aggregates on drying shrinkage. Drying shrinkage has been calculated according to the construction standards and compared to the measured drying shrinkage of the concrete prisms. From this, it can be concluded that calculations by structural engineers on drying shrinkage are preferably done according to the ‘Model code 2010’.
So, this thesis proposes a sub-increment based iterative constitutive model for interface elements, based on Multi-surface Plasticity Criterion. This model aims to enhance the robustness and accuracy of the constitutive model used for micro modelling. It eliminates the conventional mapping-back process in elastoplastic constitutive models by introducing the ideas of sequential uni-axial loading algorithm and an extra damage iterative calculation algorithm. These algorithms are robust even when the stress state is at the corners of the yield surface. The model also introduces the concept of sub-increments to consider the path dependency in plastic process. All the formulations of this constitutive model are derived based on a simple mechanical model. Formulas and examples are provided for obtaining the input parameters from material tests. The proposed constitutive model is tested on a single integration point level and found to be stable and reliable. It is further applied on the component level, by modelling three masonry walls of different dimensions and boundary conditions, under cyclic loading. For the verification of these wall models, the numerical results are compared with the experimental results in terms of force-displacement curve and crack pattern. Finally, the thesis presents a brief study on parameter sensitivity to provide guidelines for the level of accuracy needed for each input parameter, in order to get satisfactory numerical results.
The constitutive model is found to be robust for all the wall analyses conducted, without encountering divergence. The comparison between numerical results and experimental results shows that this constitutive model can cover the majority of shear and flexural failure mechanisms and mimic the crack patterns well. It is capable of modelling shear failure with high accuracy. It can also model flexural failure well with a few parameters calibrated. The fact that the model is little sensitive to parameters that are hard to be measured from experiments, such as tensile strength and tensile fracture energy, ensures its feasibility in engineering practices.
...
So, this thesis proposes a sub-increment based iterative constitutive model for interface elements, based on Multi-surface Plasticity Criterion. This model aims to enhance the robustness and accuracy of the constitutive model used for micro modelling. It eliminates the conventional mapping-back process in elastoplastic constitutive models by introducing the ideas of sequential uni-axial loading algorithm and an extra damage iterative calculation algorithm. These algorithms are robust even when the stress state is at the corners of the yield surface. The model also introduces the concept of sub-increments to consider the path dependency in plastic process. All the formulations of this constitutive model are derived based on a simple mechanical model. Formulas and examples are provided for obtaining the input parameters from material tests. The proposed constitutive model is tested on a single integration point level and found to be stable and reliable. It is further applied on the component level, by modelling three masonry walls of different dimensions and boundary conditions, under cyclic loading. For the verification of these wall models, the numerical results are compared with the experimental results in terms of force-displacement curve and crack pattern. Finally, the thesis presents a brief study on parameter sensitivity to provide guidelines for the level of accuracy needed for each input parameter, in order to get satisfactory numerical results.
The constitutive model is found to be robust for all the wall analyses conducted, without encountering divergence. The comparison between numerical results and experimental results shows that this constitutive model can cover the majority of shear and flexural failure mechanisms and mimic the crack patterns well. It is capable of modelling shear failure with high accuracy. It can also model flexural failure well with a few parameters calibrated. The fact that the model is little sensitive to parameters that are hard to be measured from experiments, such as tensile strength and tensile fracture energy, ensures its feasibility in engineering practices.
A Hyperbolic model for Degradation in Tension mode-I Fracture of Masonry
Implementation and Validation in Engineering masonry model
repeated light man-made earthquakes caused by the extraction of gas in the north-eastern part
of The Netherlands has resulted in intense research to determine the exact process of crack
initiation and propagation. The historical masonry buildings and Dutch terraced houses in
Groningen are prone to light damages which become severe upon repeated lateral earthquake
loading. Although there are material models that describe the behavior of modern brick
masonry, they do not accurately represent the mechanical properties of 19th century clay brick
masonry. This led to a large-scale research into the mechanical behavior of un-reinforced
masonry and an orthotropic continuum macro-model called the Engineering Masonry Model
(EMM) was proposed. The existing tension constitutive model in EMM assumes a secant
unloading-reloading branch which does not consider the strength degradation of URM under
repeated loading. Since tension mode-I fracture results in cracking of URM, it is important
to study the effects of repeated loading on the propagation of the crack and its effects on the
capacity of the structure.
This thesis presents a degradation model to represent the strength deterioration of URM
observed during repeated loading. The constitutive model formulated in this thesis is based on
hyperbolic functions along with a secant slope for the unloading-reloading branch. To justify
the model assumptions, a single linear 4-node element is analysed with the new model and the
effect of varying different components of the constitutive equations is established. The window
bank spandrel sample modeled as a 4-point bending test is analysed using the new model for 10,
30 and 100 repetitions. It is shown that the hyperbolic model can predict accurately the stress
reduction within each repetition displacement set and also represent the crack width widening
and crack propagation accurately when compared to the experimental results. The new model
is tested on a wall with a window opening sample and the results closely matched that of the
experiment. Finally, recommendations are provided for further development of the hyperbolic
model and calibration of the material properties. ...
repeated light man-made earthquakes caused by the extraction of gas in the north-eastern part
of The Netherlands has resulted in intense research to determine the exact process of crack
initiation and propagation. The historical masonry buildings and Dutch terraced houses in
Groningen are prone to light damages which become severe upon repeated lateral earthquake
loading. Although there are material models that describe the behavior of modern brick
masonry, they do not accurately represent the mechanical properties of 19th century clay brick
masonry. This led to a large-scale research into the mechanical behavior of un-reinforced
masonry and an orthotropic continuum macro-model called the Engineering Masonry Model
(EMM) was proposed. The existing tension constitutive model in EMM assumes a secant
unloading-reloading branch which does not consider the strength degradation of URM under
repeated loading. Since tension mode-I fracture results in cracking of URM, it is important
to study the effects of repeated loading on the propagation of the crack and its effects on the
capacity of the structure.
This thesis presents a degradation model to represent the strength deterioration of URM
observed during repeated loading. The constitutive model formulated in this thesis is based on
hyperbolic functions along with a secant slope for the unloading-reloading branch. To justify
the model assumptions, a single linear 4-node element is analysed with the new model and the
effect of varying different components of the constitutive equations is established. The window
bank spandrel sample modeled as a 4-point bending test is analysed using the new model for 10,
30 and 100 repetitions. It is shown that the hyperbolic model can predict accurately the stress
reduction within each repetition displacement set and also represent the crack width widening
and crack propagation accurately when compared to the experimental results. The new model
is tested on a wall with a window opening sample and the results closely matched that of the
experiment. Finally, recommendations are provided for further development of the hyperbolic
model and calibration of the material properties.
The nonlinear pushover analyses reproduce the test results properly, showing similar maximum base shear forces and asymmetric capacity curves. In both experimental and numerical analyses, cracks start to form at the top and bottom of the masonry piers due to rocking mechanism and the failure of the structure is governed by damages of the wide piers. Moreover, a sensitivity study based on the monotonic pushover analysis shows that the post-peak behavior of the model is directly related to the masonry compressive strength. The incremental dynamic analysis provides similar base shear capacity and failure mechanisms as the nonlinear pushover analysis. However, the maximum displacement is smaller in both loading directions and a more distributed crack pattern is observed. Overall, for the studied masonry house, the pushover method is capable of properly estimating the base shear capacity but the deformation capacity might be overestimated. ...
The nonlinear pushover analyses reproduce the test results properly, showing similar maximum base shear forces and asymmetric capacity curves. In both experimental and numerical analyses, cracks start to form at the top and bottom of the masonry piers due to rocking mechanism and the failure of the structure is governed by damages of the wide piers. Moreover, a sensitivity study based on the monotonic pushover analysis shows that the post-peak behavior of the model is directly related to the masonry compressive strength. The incremental dynamic analysis provides similar base shear capacity and failure mechanisms as the nonlinear pushover analysis. However, the maximum displacement is smaller in both loading directions and a more distributed crack pattern is observed. Overall, for the studied masonry house, the pushover method is capable of properly estimating the base shear capacity but the deformation capacity might be overestimated.