M.G.C. Bosch-Rekveldt
Please Note
76 records found
1
Integral Project Management in the Future of the Infrastructure Sector
An exploratory research on the implementation of IPM in the context of asset management
The findings of the research uncovered that projects apply IPM differently in three dimensions. Projects adjust these three dimensions to fit IPM in the assignment and specifics of the project. Together the dimensions form a IPM cube that represents the area of possible IPM variations. The first dimension is the “structure to control the project” dimension and focuses on the hard team structure. Projects adjust the core team to bring in additional expertise and roles that are needed for the project. The second dimension is the “interconnectedness of the team” dimension and focuses on the way of working within the team. Teams have strict or loose application of IPM, meaning that some divide decisions while others strictly make all decision together. The third dimension is the “personal preference” dimension and focuses on the soft aspects of project management. Personalities and preferences determine if people can work together or which adjustments in the other dimensions are made.
There are possibilities for implementing this IPM cube in the asset management context. The research created an advice. Minor adjustments to the dimensions are necessary to implement the different focus, but the five disciplines also fit as a team in asset management. This means that the asset management team mirrors the project management team. The asset management team focuses on the long-term and creates the project for the project management team to realise. An information manager between the two teams ensures communication takes place and that information is shared correctly. Continuously evaluating and adjusting the three IPM dimensions ensures that IPM is optimally applied in asset management.
The research concludes with an advice that shows the possibilities of IPM in the asset management context. Further, it contributes to existing literature by providing an insight into the current practice of IPM. The research could be used as a foundation for future research on IPM.
...
The findings of the research uncovered that projects apply IPM differently in three dimensions. Projects adjust these three dimensions to fit IPM in the assignment and specifics of the project. Together the dimensions form a IPM cube that represents the area of possible IPM variations. The first dimension is the “structure to control the project” dimension and focuses on the hard team structure. Projects adjust the core team to bring in additional expertise and roles that are needed for the project. The second dimension is the “interconnectedness of the team” dimension and focuses on the way of working within the team. Teams have strict or loose application of IPM, meaning that some divide decisions while others strictly make all decision together. The third dimension is the “personal preference” dimension and focuses on the soft aspects of project management. Personalities and preferences determine if people can work together or which adjustments in the other dimensions are made.
There are possibilities for implementing this IPM cube in the asset management context. The research created an advice. Minor adjustments to the dimensions are necessary to implement the different focus, but the five disciplines also fit as a team in asset management. This means that the asset management team mirrors the project management team. The asset management team focuses on the long-term and creates the project for the project management team to realise. An information manager between the two teams ensures communication takes place and that information is shared correctly. Continuously evaluating and adjusting the three IPM dimensions ensures that IPM is optimally applied in asset management.
The research concludes with an advice that shows the possibilities of IPM in the asset management context. Further, it contributes to existing literature by providing an insight into the current practice of IPM. The research could be used as a foundation for future research on IPM.
In two projects two different perspectives were identified. Whilst in the third project, three perspectives emerged. In the two projects with two perspectives, the perspectives were split between on one hand participants that found more complexity from the experienced lack of trust and other relational sources, and on the other hand participants that found complexity stemming from project content. The perspectives in the third project were more nuanced. With one finding political influence and higher management more complex, one finding the number of subprojects and influence from external stakeholders complex, and a third finding technical and project environment elements more complex. Within this third project, the complexity from lack of trust was ranked lower. The project manager from that project expressed that they had put a lot of effort into creating and keeping trust throughout the project. It seems that putting high effort into elements that are ranked high in one or more of the perspectives could lower the perceived complexity of that element. But if this actually is the case, and if this can lead to better project results or collaboration needs to be researched further.
When looking at all projects at the same time, complexity experienced from the lack of trust was also prevalent in two of the three perspectives that emerged.
The research confirms that multiple, distinct perspectives exist within project teams, each reflecting a different understanding of which elements are most complex. These perspectives do not systematically align with project roles nor organisational boundaries. In one project, the perspective aligned more with IPM role, in one project results were similar between role and company, and in one project perspectives aligned more with organisation.
Identifying perspectives on project complexity through (for example) the Q-methodology, can be used to increase collaboration by enabling project professionals to understand each other better. This allows for perspective-taking, enhancing group performance through fostering cooperation and coordination.
Through the different perspectives on project complexity, different complexity elements emerge as adding the most complexity to the project. These emerging elements should be investigated within a team, by directing more attention to them. For example, by focussing on them more during risk analysis sessions. If everyone had thought the same about the complexity, these elements might not emerge and be overlooked. Thus, having different perspectives should be embraced.
The complexity of a project, and the perception thereof are not static, therefore identifying perspectives should be repeated. Over time the perspective of a person could drift away from what others think that person has as a perspective. By systematically repeating the exercise throughout a project lifecycle, (for example) before each project follow-up, helps project professionals to keep understanding each other, keeping perspective-taking possible. Whilst simultaneously identifying new emerging complexity elements that warrant investigation and attention. ...
In two projects two different perspectives were identified. Whilst in the third project, three perspectives emerged. In the two projects with two perspectives, the perspectives were split between on one hand participants that found more complexity from the experienced lack of trust and other relational sources, and on the other hand participants that found complexity stemming from project content. The perspectives in the third project were more nuanced. With one finding political influence and higher management more complex, one finding the number of subprojects and influence from external stakeholders complex, and a third finding technical and project environment elements more complex. Within this third project, the complexity from lack of trust was ranked lower. The project manager from that project expressed that they had put a lot of effort into creating and keeping trust throughout the project. It seems that putting high effort into elements that are ranked high in one or more of the perspectives could lower the perceived complexity of that element. But if this actually is the case, and if this can lead to better project results or collaboration needs to be researched further.
When looking at all projects at the same time, complexity experienced from the lack of trust was also prevalent in two of the three perspectives that emerged.
The research confirms that multiple, distinct perspectives exist within project teams, each reflecting a different understanding of which elements are most complex. These perspectives do not systematically align with project roles nor organisational boundaries. In one project, the perspective aligned more with IPM role, in one project results were similar between role and company, and in one project perspectives aligned more with organisation.
Identifying perspectives on project complexity through (for example) the Q-methodology, can be used to increase collaboration by enabling project professionals to understand each other better. This allows for perspective-taking, enhancing group performance through fostering cooperation and coordination.
Through the different perspectives on project complexity, different complexity elements emerge as adding the most complexity to the project. These emerging elements should be investigated within a team, by directing more attention to them. For example, by focussing on them more during risk analysis sessions. If everyone had thought the same about the complexity, these elements might not emerge and be overlooked. Thus, having different perspectives should be embraced.
The complexity of a project, and the perception thereof are not static, therefore identifying perspectives should be repeated. Over time the perspective of a person could drift away from what others think that person has as a perspective. By systematically repeating the exercise throughout a project lifecycle, (for example) before each project follow-up, helps project professionals to keep understanding each other, keeping perspective-taking possible. Whilst simultaneously identifying new emerging complexity elements that warrant investigation and attention.
The Usefulness of Knowledge Reuse Across Projects in a Project-Based Organisation
An exploratory research to identify whether, in what form and conditions knowledge reuse across projects in a project-based organisation could be useful
This study is an exploratory research on how knowledge reuse can be useful in practice within a PBO. The research included a literature review, exploratory interviews, a case study involving three projects of different sizes, and a focus group discussion. The literature identified six forms of knowledge reuse, which provided a foundation for analysing the reuse of knowledge in practice.
The findings show that knowledge reuse already occurs in practice, mainly on individual initiative, lacking a clear structure, and not incorporated into the project process. In practice, knowledge was primarily reused through adaptation, recontextualisation, reflection, and recombination. The need for comparable projects was identified as the most important condition to reusing knowledge, while project uniqueness limited direct reuse. Overall, knowledge reuse was found to improve project efficiency by saving time, avoiding reinventing the wheel, and preventing repeated mistakes. Based on these insights, a practical framework was developed and evaluated to stimulate the reuse of knowledge by incorporating reuse into the project process.
...
This study is an exploratory research on how knowledge reuse can be useful in practice within a PBO. The research included a literature review, exploratory interviews, a case study involving three projects of different sizes, and a focus group discussion. The literature identified six forms of knowledge reuse, which provided a foundation for analysing the reuse of knowledge in practice.
The findings show that knowledge reuse already occurs in practice, mainly on individual initiative, lacking a clear structure, and not incorporated into the project process. In practice, knowledge was primarily reused through adaptation, recontextualisation, reflection, and recombination. The need for comparable projects was identified as the most important condition to reusing knowledge, while project uniqueness limited direct reuse. Overall, knowledge reuse was found to improve project efficiency by saving time, avoiding reinventing the wheel, and preventing repeated mistakes. Based on these insights, a practical framework was developed and evaluated to stimulate the reuse of knowledge by incorporating reuse into the project process.
From Policy to Practice: Evaluating Mobility Hubs
Developing an ex-post evaluation method to assess the performance of urban mobility hubs in regard to their policy objectives
The study applies different methods, combining a literature review, policy analysis, expert interviews, and a case application. The literature review sets the theoretical foundation by examining sustainable mobility concepts and the role of mobility hubs in transport systems. Policy documents from the municipality of Amsterdam and the province of Noord-Holland were analysed to understand the goals and objectives behind the development of mobility hubs. These policy documents highlight broad ambitions such as enhancing accessibility, promoting modal shifts away from private car use, and improving public space. However, they often lack specific, measurable indicators for assessing effectiveness.
Empirical data was gathered through semi-structured expert interviews with municipal representatives, provinces and developers involved in mobility hub development. These interviews provided insights into the current practices, challenges, and expectations for evaluating the effectiveness of mobility hubs. The findings from the interviews informed the creation of the ex-post evaluation framework, which includes indicators for measuring the contribution of mobility hubs to societal goals. Further, it was revealed that current practices aimed for moving from monitoring towards evaluation.
A key aspect of this research was testing the evaluation framework through a case application of the Appeltjesmarkt mobility hub in Amsterdam. This case application examined the feasibility, relevance, and practicality of applying the framework to a real-world example. The findings revealed that quantitative data on usage is readily available, evaluating broader impacts such as changes in travel behaviour and social cohesion remains challenging. The case study also highlighted the importance of contextual factors, such as the urban setting and hub size, in influencing the evaluation process.
The research emphasises the need for adaptive, context-sensitive evaluation frameworks, that can account for the diversity of mobility hubs and their varying roles. The proposed framework provides a practical tool for municipalities and stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of mobility hubs and supports evidence-based decision-making in the development of mobility hubs. This study contributes to bridging the gap between policy ambitions and the actual performance of mobility hubs. ...
The study applies different methods, combining a literature review, policy analysis, expert interviews, and a case application. The literature review sets the theoretical foundation by examining sustainable mobility concepts and the role of mobility hubs in transport systems. Policy documents from the municipality of Amsterdam and the province of Noord-Holland were analysed to understand the goals and objectives behind the development of mobility hubs. These policy documents highlight broad ambitions such as enhancing accessibility, promoting modal shifts away from private car use, and improving public space. However, they often lack specific, measurable indicators for assessing effectiveness.
Empirical data was gathered through semi-structured expert interviews with municipal representatives, provinces and developers involved in mobility hub development. These interviews provided insights into the current practices, challenges, and expectations for evaluating the effectiveness of mobility hubs. The findings from the interviews informed the creation of the ex-post evaluation framework, which includes indicators for measuring the contribution of mobility hubs to societal goals. Further, it was revealed that current practices aimed for moving from monitoring towards evaluation.
A key aspect of this research was testing the evaluation framework through a case application of the Appeltjesmarkt mobility hub in Amsterdam. This case application examined the feasibility, relevance, and practicality of applying the framework to a real-world example. The findings revealed that quantitative data on usage is readily available, evaluating broader impacts such as changes in travel behaviour and social cohesion remains challenging. The case study also highlighted the importance of contextual factors, such as the urban setting and hub size, in influencing the evaluation process.
The research emphasises the need for adaptive, context-sensitive evaluation frameworks, that can account for the diversity of mobility hubs and their varying roles. The proposed framework provides a practical tool for municipalities and stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of mobility hubs and supports evidence-based decision-making in the development of mobility hubs. This study contributes to bridging the gap between policy ambitions and the actual performance of mobility hubs.
A Structured Decision Model for Climate-Adaptive Green Roofs in Dutch Urban Renovation
Integrating Scientific Evidence, Stakeholder Requirements, and Minimal Monitoring in an SDM Framework
However, although green roofs are frequently marketed as climate-adaptive solutions, their uptake in projects often hinges on broad pledges, isolated pilots, or aesthetic ambition rather than decision-ready justification. Post-occupancy evidence regarding cooling, water retention, and other effects remains fragmented, and the links between measured performance and actual decisions are weak. The core problem is therefore not a lack of technical options, but a decision and governance gap. Projects struggle to translate mixed evidence into choices that stakeholders accept, can resource, and can follow through on, with clear responsibilities and feasible routines. This thesis asks how evidence for climate-adaptive green roofs in Dutch renovation projects can be structured to better support decision-making.
The research shows that thermal and hydrological effects are supported by relatively robust and repeatable quantitative findings. In contrast, ecosystem services and planning or governance aspects remain less consistently measured, often staying at the level of qualitative claims. While indicators exist, they are rarely translated into decision rules for renovation portfolios, and roof-level measurements are seldom tied to responsibility allocation or follow-through. Stakeholder perspectives confirm this pattern: respondents value clear, conservative performance indicators for water retention and basic financial performance, but they also rely heavily on qualitative signals such as perceived cooling, user satisfaction, and the symbolic value of greenery. Structural barriers, including limited budgets, fragmented responsibilities, and limited data processing capacity, reinforce a preference for simple, repeatable checks that can be integrated into existing routines and clarify responsibilities at handover.
Building on these insights, the thesis develops a Structured Decision Making (SDM) model that organizes justification around a compact objectives hierarchy and archetypal roof alternatives. The model makes explicit which evidence reduces which uncertainty at key decision points, linking technical, financial, experiential, and governance evidence to the relevant organizational levels. Monitoring is redefined as a minimal, decision-driven practice that supports decision traceability and basic performance assurance.
By proposing this SDM-based model, the thesis provides decision-ready justification criteria and minimal monitoring commitments. It integrates robust hydrological indicators with qualitative drivers, making responsibilities explicit. This context-informed prototype offers a practical starting point for municipalities, consultants, and portfolio managers to justify green roof decisions in a transparent and learning-oriented way. ...
However, although green roofs are frequently marketed as climate-adaptive solutions, their uptake in projects often hinges on broad pledges, isolated pilots, or aesthetic ambition rather than decision-ready justification. Post-occupancy evidence regarding cooling, water retention, and other effects remains fragmented, and the links between measured performance and actual decisions are weak. The core problem is therefore not a lack of technical options, but a decision and governance gap. Projects struggle to translate mixed evidence into choices that stakeholders accept, can resource, and can follow through on, with clear responsibilities and feasible routines. This thesis asks how evidence for climate-adaptive green roofs in Dutch renovation projects can be structured to better support decision-making.
The research shows that thermal and hydrological effects are supported by relatively robust and repeatable quantitative findings. In contrast, ecosystem services and planning or governance aspects remain less consistently measured, often staying at the level of qualitative claims. While indicators exist, they are rarely translated into decision rules for renovation portfolios, and roof-level measurements are seldom tied to responsibility allocation or follow-through. Stakeholder perspectives confirm this pattern: respondents value clear, conservative performance indicators for water retention and basic financial performance, but they also rely heavily on qualitative signals such as perceived cooling, user satisfaction, and the symbolic value of greenery. Structural barriers, including limited budgets, fragmented responsibilities, and limited data processing capacity, reinforce a preference for simple, repeatable checks that can be integrated into existing routines and clarify responsibilities at handover.
Building on these insights, the thesis develops a Structured Decision Making (SDM) model that organizes justification around a compact objectives hierarchy and archetypal roof alternatives. The model makes explicit which evidence reduces which uncertainty at key decision points, linking technical, financial, experiential, and governance evidence to the relevant organizational levels. Monitoring is redefined as a minimal, decision-driven practice that supports decision traceability and basic performance assurance.
By proposing this SDM-based model, the thesis provides decision-ready justification criteria and minimal monitoring commitments. It integrates robust hydrological indicators with qualitative drivers, making responsibilities explicit. This context-informed prototype offers a practical starting point for municipalities, consultants, and portfolio managers to justify green roof decisions in a transparent and learning-oriented way.
Project Steering Committees
The struggle at the interface of the temporary and permanent organization
Monitoring Circular Urban Metabolism
A Framework for Evaluating Municipal Material Hubs
Project portfolio management (PPM) in highly uncertain environments
Case study at Schiphol Airport
Using Schiphol Airport as a case study, the research investigates when and how dynamic capabilities are complemented by ad-hoc capabilities to manage disruptions. The study aims to answer the main research question: In what context can ad-hoc and dynamic capabilities complement each other to manage disruptions in project portfolios?
This question is addressed through a comprehensive literature review, document analysis, interviews with 11 decision-makers, and an expert judgment session with seven professionals. The research explores how these capabilities are applied in practice and offers recommendations for managing uncertainty in complex environments.
The case study of Schiphol Airport identified 13 disruptions, stemming from different sources of uncertainty, namely single-project (e.g., unexpected weather), organizational complexity (e.g., resource shortages), and environmental (e.g., COVID-19 impacts) disruptions. The analysis revealed 24 capabilities employed to manage these disruptions. Dynamic capabilities included sensing capabilities (e.g., resource monitoring), seizing capabilities (e.g., prioritization, escalation), and reconfiguration capabilities (e.g., workforce adjustments, project postponements). Ad-hoc capabilities comprised situational data gathering and improvised problem-solving, which addressed immediate challenges when structured approaches were insufficient.
The findings illustrate how a hybrid approach integrates ad-hoc and dynamic capabilities to manage both foreseen and unforeseen disruptions through two types of hybrid approaches. Type 1 involves ad-hoc data gathering complementing dynamic sensing and seizing by providing situational insights during critical decision-making. Type 2 involves ad-hoc problem-solving, offering immediate responses to challenges such as resource shortages and severe weather impacts, filling gaps when dynamic capabilities alone are inadequate.
Schiphol Airport’s hybrid approach to managing disruptions also demonstrates the complementary roles of dynamic capabilities (DCs) and ad-hoc capabilities (AHCs) under different conditions:
Impact and Capabilities: AHCs are used for localized disruptions, like security lane shortages or weather-related issues, where quick adjustments are needed without portfolio-wide coordination. In contrast, when disruptions affect broader operations, DCs are essential for coordinated, strategic responses, as seen with the pandemic or security personnel shortages.
Response Time and Capabilities: Delayed responses limit the applicability of DCs, leading to an increased reliance on AHCs. For example, delays in addressing security personnel shortages or weather conditions required Schiphol to use reactive, ad-hoc measures. Timely identification of disruptions is crucial to fully leverage DCs, while delays necessitate improvised solutions.
The expert judgment session reinforced these findings, suggesting the need to integrate lessons from AHCs into structured decision-making at the portfolio level. This integration could strengthen the hybrid approach, offering a more cohesive strategy for managing disruptions across both project and portfolio levels. ...
Using Schiphol Airport as a case study, the research investigates when and how dynamic capabilities are complemented by ad-hoc capabilities to manage disruptions. The study aims to answer the main research question: In what context can ad-hoc and dynamic capabilities complement each other to manage disruptions in project portfolios?
This question is addressed through a comprehensive literature review, document analysis, interviews with 11 decision-makers, and an expert judgment session with seven professionals. The research explores how these capabilities are applied in practice and offers recommendations for managing uncertainty in complex environments.
The case study of Schiphol Airport identified 13 disruptions, stemming from different sources of uncertainty, namely single-project (e.g., unexpected weather), organizational complexity (e.g., resource shortages), and environmental (e.g., COVID-19 impacts) disruptions. The analysis revealed 24 capabilities employed to manage these disruptions. Dynamic capabilities included sensing capabilities (e.g., resource monitoring), seizing capabilities (e.g., prioritization, escalation), and reconfiguration capabilities (e.g., workforce adjustments, project postponements). Ad-hoc capabilities comprised situational data gathering and improvised problem-solving, which addressed immediate challenges when structured approaches were insufficient.
The findings illustrate how a hybrid approach integrates ad-hoc and dynamic capabilities to manage both foreseen and unforeseen disruptions through two types of hybrid approaches. Type 1 involves ad-hoc data gathering complementing dynamic sensing and seizing by providing situational insights during critical decision-making. Type 2 involves ad-hoc problem-solving, offering immediate responses to challenges such as resource shortages and severe weather impacts, filling gaps when dynamic capabilities alone are inadequate.
Schiphol Airport’s hybrid approach to managing disruptions also demonstrates the complementary roles of dynamic capabilities (DCs) and ad-hoc capabilities (AHCs) under different conditions:
Impact and Capabilities: AHCs are used for localized disruptions, like security lane shortages or weather-related issues, where quick adjustments are needed without portfolio-wide coordination. In contrast, when disruptions affect broader operations, DCs are essential for coordinated, strategic responses, as seen with the pandemic or security personnel shortages.
Response Time and Capabilities: Delayed responses limit the applicability of DCs, leading to an increased reliance on AHCs. For example, delays in addressing security personnel shortages or weather conditions required Schiphol to use reactive, ad-hoc measures. Timely identification of disruptions is crucial to fully leverage DCs, while delays necessitate improvised solutions.
The expert judgment session reinforced these findings, suggesting the need to integrate lessons from AHCs into structured decision-making at the portfolio level. This integration could strengthen the hybrid approach, offering a more cohesive strategy for managing disruptions across both project and portfolio levels.
This study investigates how to stimulate the realisation of urban mining hubs in the Netherlands. The primary research question is: How can the realisation of urban mining hubs in the Netherlands be stimulated? Data was collected through a literature review and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders in the construction sector.
Findings highlight the undefined role of hubs within the urban mining process and the advantages they offer, including resource conservation, financial savings, and employment opportunities within a circular economy. Barriers include insufficient material supply and demand, inventory uncertainties, and inadequate legislation. An actionable framework was developed, consisting of three phases: initiation, optimisation, and expansion, with a focus on innovation, education, and collaboration among stakeholders. ...
This study investigates how to stimulate the realisation of urban mining hubs in the Netherlands. The primary research question is: How can the realisation of urban mining hubs in the Netherlands be stimulated? Data was collected through a literature review and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders in the construction sector.
Findings highlight the undefined role of hubs within the urban mining process and the advantages they offer, including resource conservation, financial savings, and employment opportunities within a circular economy. Barriers include insufficient material supply and demand, inventory uncertainties, and inadequate legislation. An actionable framework was developed, consisting of three phases: initiation, optimisation, and expansion, with a focus on innovation, education, and collaboration among stakeholders.
Managing project complexity through interdependencies
A case study of the Zuidas-Tunnels using a hydrid fuzzy approach
A literature review and exploratory interviews were conducted to assess existing complexity management strategies. The research utilizes the TOE (Technical, Organizational, Environmental) framework to categorize 47 complexity elements. The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) methods were applied to model and analyze these interdependencies between these elements.
The results reveal that understanding the relationships between complexity elements is crucial for effective complexity management. This insight can help project managers develop more targeted strategies to mitigate complexity's impact, thus improving the performance of large-scale infrastructure projects. The study concludes by recommending that such methods be integrated into project management practices for dynamic assessment and management of complexity throughout the project lifecycle. ...
A literature review and exploratory interviews were conducted to assess existing complexity management strategies. The research utilizes the TOE (Technical, Organizational, Environmental) framework to categorize 47 complexity elements. The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) methods were applied to model and analyze these interdependencies between these elements.
The results reveal that understanding the relationships between complexity elements is crucial for effective complexity management. This insight can help project managers develop more targeted strategies to mitigate complexity's impact, thus improving the performance of large-scale infrastructure projects. The study concludes by recommending that such methods be integrated into project management practices for dynamic assessment and management of complexity throughout the project lifecycle.
The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining literature review, semi-structured interviews with risk and project managers at Dura Vermeer, and a serious game designed to simulate decision-making processes.
The study identifies several common biases, such as the representativeness heuristic, affect heuristic, and optimism bias, which significantly impact risk assessments. The literature review provides a theoretical framework on the impact of heuristics and biases on risk management. Interviews reveal that while risk assessment at Dura Vermeer follows structured methodologies, biases still influence the decision-making processes. The serious game, incorporating real-life scenarios from Dura Vermeer's projects, demonstrates its effectiveness in engaging participants and fostering a collaborative environment where biases can be identified and addressed. The serious game also highlights discrepancies between perceived and actual use of biases, indicating a lack of self-awareness among professionals.
Findings suggest that although biases are acknowledged, there is a preference for objective risk assessment methods. Serious gaming emerges as an effective tool for increasing awareness of biases, thereby improving risk management practices. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating serious gaming into risk management training at Dura Vermeer, emphasizing its potential to enhance team dynamics and decision-making processes. This research contributes to both theoretical and practical understanding of risk management in construction, offering insights into how biases can be managed to improve project performance. The insights gained provide a foundation for further research and practical applications in the construction sector.
...
The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining literature review, semi-structured interviews with risk and project managers at Dura Vermeer, and a serious game designed to simulate decision-making processes.
The study identifies several common biases, such as the representativeness heuristic, affect heuristic, and optimism bias, which significantly impact risk assessments. The literature review provides a theoretical framework on the impact of heuristics and biases on risk management. Interviews reveal that while risk assessment at Dura Vermeer follows structured methodologies, biases still influence the decision-making processes. The serious game, incorporating real-life scenarios from Dura Vermeer's projects, demonstrates its effectiveness in engaging participants and fostering a collaborative environment where biases can be identified and addressed. The serious game also highlights discrepancies between perceived and actual use of biases, indicating a lack of self-awareness among professionals.
Findings suggest that although biases are acknowledged, there is a preference for objective risk assessment methods. Serious gaming emerges as an effective tool for increasing awareness of biases, thereby improving risk management practices. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating serious gaming into risk management training at Dura Vermeer, emphasizing its potential to enhance team dynamics and decision-making processes. This research contributes to both theoretical and practical understanding of risk management in construction, offering insights into how biases can be managed to improve project performance. The insights gained provide a foundation for further research and practical applications in the construction sector.
The objective of this study is to propose a framework that could help improve the risk management project by offering a more proactive approach and at the same time enhance people’s engagement with risks. The goal of this thesis project is to support construction companies in approaching risk management in a way that incorporates agile methods.
Implemented in a project and evaluated through questionnaires and a focus group, the framework showed promise in elevating risk awareness and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. However, incomplete implementation of some elements limited definitive effectiveness assessments. Subsequent expert judgment sessions confirmed the framework's potential in proactive risk identification and management, alongside the initial findings of heightened awareness and collaboration. Recommendations for improvement include clearer risk impact depiction and explicit framework objectives communication. Essential for success are targeted risk training, clear vision articulation, and structured step-by-step implementation supported by project managers and risk coordinators.
In summary, the proposed framework merges agile principles with risk management, aiming to cultivate a proactive risk culture, enhance team communication, and mitigate increase engagement with risks. While showing significant benefits, it also highlights the need for adjustments to fully realize its effectiveness in the construction industry's risk management practices. This study underscores the importance of agile methodologies in enhancing traditional risk management approaches, offering insights for future application and refinement. ...
The objective of this study is to propose a framework that could help improve the risk management project by offering a more proactive approach and at the same time enhance people’s engagement with risks. The goal of this thesis project is to support construction companies in approaching risk management in a way that incorporates agile methods.
Implemented in a project and evaluated through questionnaires and a focus group, the framework showed promise in elevating risk awareness and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. However, incomplete implementation of some elements limited definitive effectiveness assessments. Subsequent expert judgment sessions confirmed the framework's potential in proactive risk identification and management, alongside the initial findings of heightened awareness and collaboration. Recommendations for improvement include clearer risk impact depiction and explicit framework objectives communication. Essential for success are targeted risk training, clear vision articulation, and structured step-by-step implementation supported by project managers and risk coordinators.
In summary, the proposed framework merges agile principles with risk management, aiming to cultivate a proactive risk culture, enhance team communication, and mitigate increase engagement with risks. While showing significant benefits, it also highlights the need for adjustments to fully realize its effectiveness in the construction industry's risk management practices. This study underscores the importance of agile methodologies in enhancing traditional risk management approaches, offering insights for future application and refinement.
The main research question is: “How can flood preparedness of hospitals in the Netherlands be assessed and improved?” The main aim of this research is to quantitatively assess the flood preparedness of hospitals to enable comparison between flood strategies and to make recommendations on which stakeholders should be engaged for the implementation of flood strategies and how this can be achieved.
Six different flood preparedness indicators were selected that together describe flood preparedness of hospitals. Based on these indicators, the impact of several flood scenarios on the Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis (RdGG) and Erasmus Medical Centre (EMC) was quantitatively assessed. The costs per flood strategy are highest for “shelter in place with additional measures”, followed by both “shelter in place without additional measures” and “preventive evacuation”. “Accept” is least expensive. The number of fatalities per flood strategy for the RdGG (0,2 to 2,1 fatalities) is much lower than for the EMC (18,8 to 195,3 fatalities). Furthermore, it was determined which stakeholders should be engaged for the implementation of each flood strategy. Experts who have experience with hospital floods were interviewed to obtain their view on how these stakeholders could be engaged.
In conclusion, essential hospital functions can be categorised based on the flood preparedness indicators and flood strategies can be quantitatively compared. For the RdGG and EMC, "shelter in place with additional measures" yield the least amount of fatalities and is therefore the "best" flood strategy. The Executive Board of a hospital, hospital personnel, water boards, municipalities and safety regions should be engaged to realise the implementation of flood strategies. Experts with lived experience recommended to engage stakeholders through legislation or creating awareness.
It is recommended to calibrate the number of fatalities based on historical flood events and to analyse the vulnerability of the regional healthcare system to supplier failure during floods.
...
The main research question is: “How can flood preparedness of hospitals in the Netherlands be assessed and improved?” The main aim of this research is to quantitatively assess the flood preparedness of hospitals to enable comparison between flood strategies and to make recommendations on which stakeholders should be engaged for the implementation of flood strategies and how this can be achieved.
Six different flood preparedness indicators were selected that together describe flood preparedness of hospitals. Based on these indicators, the impact of several flood scenarios on the Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis (RdGG) and Erasmus Medical Centre (EMC) was quantitatively assessed. The costs per flood strategy are highest for “shelter in place with additional measures”, followed by both “shelter in place without additional measures” and “preventive evacuation”. “Accept” is least expensive. The number of fatalities per flood strategy for the RdGG (0,2 to 2,1 fatalities) is much lower than for the EMC (18,8 to 195,3 fatalities). Furthermore, it was determined which stakeholders should be engaged for the implementation of each flood strategy. Experts who have experience with hospital floods were interviewed to obtain their view on how these stakeholders could be engaged.
In conclusion, essential hospital functions can be categorised based on the flood preparedness indicators and flood strategies can be quantitatively compared. For the RdGG and EMC, "shelter in place with additional measures" yield the least amount of fatalities and is therefore the "best" flood strategy. The Executive Board of a hospital, hospital personnel, water boards, municipalities and safety regions should be engaged to realise the implementation of flood strategies. Experts with lived experience recommended to engage stakeholders through legislation or creating awareness.
It is recommended to calibrate the number of fatalities based on historical flood events and to analyse the vulnerability of the regional healthcare system to supplier failure during floods.
Activating Organisational Memory
Understanding the Activation of Organisational Memory through Social Learning in the Construction Sector
To explore this, the research has been structured into three parts. In part 1 the theoretical groundwork has been laid through a literature review on social learning, organisational learning, organisational memory in project-based organisations, and memory activation dynamics. In part 2 practical insights from semi-structured interviews with ten tender experts at Count & Cooper have been gathered. The thematic analysis of these interviews has been revealed how organisational memory, organisational learning, and social learning are interconnected within the dynamic environment of project-based organisations. In part 3 a problem-based learning (PBL) workshop simulating a portion of the tender process has been involved, providing practical observations on how social learning practices are influencing organisational memory use in decision-making.
The findings have been revealing a complex, dynamic flow within organisational memory, showing how it is being accessed and is being activated in non-linear ways through social learning practices. This research has been challenging the view of organisational memory as a static repository, showing it is continually being reshaped within project-based organisations (PBOs). Pattern recognition, emotional triggers, and competing memories have been shaping how organisational memory is being activated and being used. Through social learning, members are engaging with various forms of conscious, automatic, objectified, and collective knowledge, often uncovering overlooked or competing knowledge of the organisational memory. Social learning has been facilitating knowledge retention and application while guiding members through these diverse memory flows, aiding them in navigating and learning from organisational challenges.
The research has been highlighting a shift toward more structured social learning practices to ensure systematic sharing of insights across the organisation. While unstructured practices, such as informal mentorship, have been remaining essential for collaboration, time pressures in PBOs have often been limiting the revisiting of prior knowledge, causing insights to become siloed and leading to organisational forgetting. Yet, this process has also been promoting growth by discarding outdated knowledge, allowing room for innovation. Consequently, organisational memory has been emerging as both a valuable resource and a potential liability, depending on how it is managed and have being used.
In conclusion, this research has been providing insights into how social learning practices are generating and activating organisational memory, allowing organisations to capitalise on it as a resource. Through social learning, members have been using pattern recognition, emotional triggers, and the resolution of competing memories to increase awareness of organisational memory’s facets, ensuring relevant knowledge is being accessed, being applied, and being used for learning. This approach has been supporting decision-making, has been reducing corporate amnesia and has been fostering continuous learning across the organisation, preventing the reinvention of the wheel by drawing on different parts of organisational memory. By fostering environments where social learning is being encouraged where knowledge is being exchanged, validated, and applied by which organisations have been reducing knowledge fragmentation and forgetting, enhancing accessibility, and preventing silos. The findings are suggesting that project-based organisations would be benefitting from a hybrid social learning model combining structured and unstructured approaches.
...
To explore this, the research has been structured into three parts. In part 1 the theoretical groundwork has been laid through a literature review on social learning, organisational learning, organisational memory in project-based organisations, and memory activation dynamics. In part 2 practical insights from semi-structured interviews with ten tender experts at Count & Cooper have been gathered. The thematic analysis of these interviews has been revealed how organisational memory, organisational learning, and social learning are interconnected within the dynamic environment of project-based organisations. In part 3 a problem-based learning (PBL) workshop simulating a portion of the tender process has been involved, providing practical observations on how social learning practices are influencing organisational memory use in decision-making.
The findings have been revealing a complex, dynamic flow within organisational memory, showing how it is being accessed and is being activated in non-linear ways through social learning practices. This research has been challenging the view of organisational memory as a static repository, showing it is continually being reshaped within project-based organisations (PBOs). Pattern recognition, emotional triggers, and competing memories have been shaping how organisational memory is being activated and being used. Through social learning, members are engaging with various forms of conscious, automatic, objectified, and collective knowledge, often uncovering overlooked or competing knowledge of the organisational memory. Social learning has been facilitating knowledge retention and application while guiding members through these diverse memory flows, aiding them in navigating and learning from organisational challenges.
The research has been highlighting a shift toward more structured social learning practices to ensure systematic sharing of insights across the organisation. While unstructured practices, such as informal mentorship, have been remaining essential for collaboration, time pressures in PBOs have often been limiting the revisiting of prior knowledge, causing insights to become siloed and leading to organisational forgetting. Yet, this process has also been promoting growth by discarding outdated knowledge, allowing room for innovation. Consequently, organisational memory has been emerging as both a valuable resource and a potential liability, depending on how it is managed and have being used.
In conclusion, this research has been providing insights into how social learning practices are generating and activating organisational memory, allowing organisations to capitalise on it as a resource. Through social learning, members have been using pattern recognition, emotional triggers, and the resolution of competing memories to increase awareness of organisational memory’s facets, ensuring relevant knowledge is being accessed, being applied, and being used for learning. This approach has been supporting decision-making, has been reducing corporate amnesia and has been fostering continuous learning across the organisation, preventing the reinvention of the wheel by drawing on different parts of organisational memory. By fostering environments where social learning is being encouraged where knowledge is being exchanged, validated, and applied by which organisations have been reducing knowledge fragmentation and forgetting, enhancing accessibility, and preventing silos. The findings are suggesting that project-based organisations would be benefitting from a hybrid social learning model combining structured and unstructured approaches.
Well-being Indicators for Car-Free Policies
A study into the selection and operationalisation of well-being indicators for representing local stakeholder interests in the ex-ante evaluation of car-free policies
The most relevant stakeholders - municipality, local residents, and local business owners - were selected to be involved in the well-being indicator selection process in the case study. Based on their interests, the most relevant aspects of well-being were found to be the use of space, accessibility of mobility options, accessibility of activities, traffic safety, and noise pollution. This resulted in the operationalisation of three indicators: the use of space for car parking, the number of mobility options, and the traffic mix safety warning.
While the small sample size does not allow for generalisation of the case study results, the results of this thesis do show that the well-being indicator selection process can yield relevant indicators of well-being and that this process can be applied in practice. The operationalised indicators can be relevant to represent stakeholder interests in car-free policy evaluation and can be applied to other cases as well. However, the relevance of the indicators does depend on the type of policy and the stage of the planning process. Using well-being indicators in policy evaluation can enhance the relatability of the evaluation results for stakeholders and potentially increase stakeholder support for policies. ...
The most relevant stakeholders - municipality, local residents, and local business owners - were selected to be involved in the well-being indicator selection process in the case study. Based on their interests, the most relevant aspects of well-being were found to be the use of space, accessibility of mobility options, accessibility of activities, traffic safety, and noise pollution. This resulted in the operationalisation of three indicators: the use of space for car parking, the number of mobility options, and the traffic mix safety warning.
While the small sample size does not allow for generalisation of the case study results, the results of this thesis do show that the well-being indicator selection process can yield relevant indicators of well-being and that this process can be applied in practice. The operationalised indicators can be relevant to represent stakeholder interests in car-free policy evaluation and can be applied to other cases as well. However, the relevance of the indicators does depend on the type of policy and the stage of the planning process. Using well-being indicators in policy evaluation can enhance the relatability of the evaluation results for stakeholders and potentially increase stakeholder support for policies.
To encourage businesses to employ modular design and reuse the equipment in their projects, multiple suggestions are offered. One of the most important first steps for adopting this method seems to be raising awareness and developing a culture where new ideas are encouraged and accepted.
...
To encourage businesses to employ modular design and reuse the equipment in their projects, multiple suggestions are offered. One of the most important first steps for adopting this method seems to be raising awareness and developing a culture where new ideas are encouraged and accepted.