Michael Peeters
Please Note
27 records found
1
From Implicit to Explicit
Bridging Practice and Theory in the Valuation of Tenant Break Options in Dutch Office Leases
This study examines how real-options logic can be applied to value tenant break options in Dutch office leases and assesses the implications for property valuation. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. The qualitative research consisted of semi-structured interviews with valuers, an asset manager, and a corporate real estate manager. The quantitative research involved the development of a binomial option pricing model, parameterized using office lease data from the Randstad.
The findings indicate that break options are widely recognized in practice but are generally treated implicitly rather than through explicit pricing methods. Respondents acknowledged that break options create value for tenants while increasing uncertainty for landlords and investors. The quantitative analysis demonstrates that tenant break options can be modelled as real options and valued in a manner consistent with both option-pricing theory and market practice.
The study concludes that explicit option pricing provides a transparent and reproducible framework for analyzing lease flexibility. While the resulting valuations are broadly consistent with those produced by traditional DCF models, the real-options approach improves transparency, supports lease negotiations, and provides a clearer understanding of the economic implications of tenant break rights in office lease contracts. ...
This study examines how real-options logic can be applied to value tenant break options in Dutch office leases and assesses the implications for property valuation. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. The qualitative research consisted of semi-structured interviews with valuers, an asset manager, and a corporate real estate manager. The quantitative research involved the development of a binomial option pricing model, parameterized using office lease data from the Randstad.
The findings indicate that break options are widely recognized in practice but are generally treated implicitly rather than through explicit pricing methods. Respondents acknowledged that break options create value for tenants while increasing uncertainty for landlords and investors. The quantitative analysis demonstrates that tenant break options can be modelled as real options and valued in a manner consistent with both option-pricing theory and market practice.
The study concludes that explicit option pricing provides a transparent and reproducible framework for analyzing lease flexibility. While the resulting valuations are broadly consistent with those produced by traditional DCF models, the real-options approach improves transparency, supports lease negotiations, and provides a clearer understanding of the economic implications of tenant break rights in office lease contracts.
Integrating Social Impact Management Plans
From Concept to Strategy: A Framework for the Built Environment
This research repositions Social Impact Management Plans (SIMPs) as strategic management mechanisms for integrating social sustainability within the built environment. An exploratory qualitative methodology was adopted, combining a literature study, framework analysis using the Social Equity Assessment Method (SEAM) as an analytical reference, and semi-structured interviews with investors and developers. The findings from theory and practice were synthesised into a conceptual integration framework, which was subsequently translated into a practical tool for implementation.
The framework, inspired by the Business Canvas Model, provides a structured tool for understanding how SIMPs can be integrated into the strategic and organisational practices of investors and developers. By bridging theory and practice, the study contributes to the operationalisation of social sustainability within the built environment. As this framework is conceptual, further studies must be done to strengthen its practical credibility.
...
This research repositions Social Impact Management Plans (SIMPs) as strategic management mechanisms for integrating social sustainability within the built environment. An exploratory qualitative methodology was adopted, combining a literature study, framework analysis using the Social Equity Assessment Method (SEAM) as an analytical reference, and semi-structured interviews with investors and developers. The findings from theory and practice were synthesised into a conceptual integration framework, which was subsequently translated into a practical tool for implementation.
The framework, inspired by the Business Canvas Model, provides a structured tool for understanding how SIMPs can be integrated into the strategic and organisational practices of investors and developers. By bridging theory and practice, the study contributes to the operationalisation of social sustainability within the built environment. As this framework is conceptual, further studies must be done to strengthen its practical credibility.
The Future of Hotel Real Estate: Flexibility as an opportunity to capture value while mitigating stranding risks
Exploratory research for hotel real estate equity investors or operators on the role of flexibility for future investments
The European hotel real estate sector faces converging pressures from regulations, shift in socio-economic demand and a volatile hotel capital market increasing risk of stranding. Investors are slowly starting to be concerned about the rising uncertainty especially as the deterministic financial models overexpose investments to risks of lost value in periods of crisis. Although some operators are utilising flexibility in practice, empirical evidence remains limited and outcomes are still theoretical.
Method:
This exploratory study employs a mixed method design. The qualitative approach consists of six semi-structured interviews with hotel capital market stakeholders with expert knowledge about the Dutch market. The quantitative approach consists of a developed synthetic Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model of an Amsterdam hotel under a COVID-19 scenario with an incorporated switch use real option between hotel, hostel and apart hotel typologies. To obtain probabilistic results of the Real Option Values (ROV), the DCF model was run 10 000 through a Monte Carlo simulation. The mixed method allowed the research to share knowledge about flexibility in real estate and quantify its capture of hidden value.
Frame:
The study focuses on the value of flexibility in the Dutch hotel capital market, conceptualising it across three interdependent dimensions: physical, operational and strategical. The primary interest of this paper is to assess the potential value of flexibility concerning valuation & risk management.
Objectives:
The research aims to determine how flexibility is integrated in hotel real estate and identify core features, drivers and barriers that influence its integration. Examine flexibility's environmental outcomes and their financial implications. Quantify the Real Option Value generated by a switch use option. Finally, evaluate whether flexibility can capture hidden investment value while mitigating stranding risk. The results will support equity investors in long-term decision-making, to move beyond short-termism and view flexibility as a crucial ability.
Outcomes:
The interviewed stakeholders recognised the value of flexibility, stating that it remains absent from the valuation methodology and revealed extensive knowledge about its integration in practice. The synthetic hotel case during COVID-19 demonstrated that the median output from a DCF with a switch use real option under 10 000 Monte Carlo simulation could improve NPV value by 163% and reduce initial NPV value loss without real option by 54%. In this case, exercising real options transformed a negative NPV to a profitable one with more upsides than downsides. The Real Option Value (ROV) shifted the distribution of the investment, reducing downside losses while preserving more upside opportunities These findings provide a holistic perspective around the value of flexibility.
...
The European hotel real estate sector faces converging pressures from regulations, shift in socio-economic demand and a volatile hotel capital market increasing risk of stranding. Investors are slowly starting to be concerned about the rising uncertainty especially as the deterministic financial models overexpose investments to risks of lost value in periods of crisis. Although some operators are utilising flexibility in practice, empirical evidence remains limited and outcomes are still theoretical.
Method:
This exploratory study employs a mixed method design. The qualitative approach consists of six semi-structured interviews with hotel capital market stakeholders with expert knowledge about the Dutch market. The quantitative approach consists of a developed synthetic Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model of an Amsterdam hotel under a COVID-19 scenario with an incorporated switch use real option between hotel, hostel and apart hotel typologies. To obtain probabilistic results of the Real Option Values (ROV), the DCF model was run 10 000 through a Monte Carlo simulation. The mixed method allowed the research to share knowledge about flexibility in real estate and quantify its capture of hidden value.
Frame:
The study focuses on the value of flexibility in the Dutch hotel capital market, conceptualising it across three interdependent dimensions: physical, operational and strategical. The primary interest of this paper is to assess the potential value of flexibility concerning valuation & risk management.
Objectives:
The research aims to determine how flexibility is integrated in hotel real estate and identify core features, drivers and barriers that influence its integration. Examine flexibility's environmental outcomes and their financial implications. Quantify the Real Option Value generated by a switch use option. Finally, evaluate whether flexibility can capture hidden investment value while mitigating stranding risk. The results will support equity investors in long-term decision-making, to move beyond short-termism and view flexibility as a crucial ability.
Outcomes:
The interviewed stakeholders recognised the value of flexibility, stating that it remains absent from the valuation methodology and revealed extensive knowledge about its integration in practice. The synthetic hotel case during COVID-19 demonstrated that the median output from a DCF with a switch use real option under 10 000 Monte Carlo simulation could improve NPV value by 163% and reduce initial NPV value loss without real option by 54%. In this case, exercising real options transformed a negative NPV to a profitable one with more upsides than downsides. The Real Option Value (ROV) shifted the distribution of the investment, reducing downside losses while preserving more upside opportunities These findings provide a holistic perspective around the value of flexibility.
The Attendance Question
Steering Office Attendance in Dutch Banking: Configurations, Tensions, and Adaptation
All three cases converge on an autonomy-dominant steering configuration, producing two consequences: displacement of the autonomy–control paradox across levels and the generation of downstream tensions. The most notable is the Distribution Paradox, a Belonging–Organizing paradox in which individually rational attendance choices concentrate on the same weekdays. Navigation occurs primarily at the team–management interface through reframing, output substitution, and iterative recalibration. ...
All three cases converge on an autonomy-dominant steering configuration, producing two consequences: displacement of the autonomy–control paradox across levels and the generation of downstream tensions. The most notable is the Distribution Paradox, a Belonging–Organizing paradox in which individually rational attendance choices concentrate on the same weekdays. Navigation occurs primarily at the team–management interface through reframing, output substitution, and iterative recalibration.
Bridging Risks, Uniting Vision
Enhancing Developer-Investor Dealmaking By Structured Data-Sharing
Financing the Energy Transition in Dutch Co-owners Associations
A Financing Framework using Public and Private Instruments for Deep Energy Renovation
In order to answer the main research question, four subquestions are created. The first sub-question clarifies the demand side by mapping the financial barriers. The most significant barriers for co-owners associations are high up-front costs, difficult collection of funds, and lack of sufficient funding. The second sub-question, also done by desk research, defines available financial models for Dutch co-owners associations. In the Netherlands, we have public and private financial resources. Across these models, the key differentiators are who pays the investment costs upfront, how costs are recovered, and how savings or revenues flow back. The allocation of risk also differs. After the sub-questions that involve desk research, the third sub-question involves a first round of semi-structured interviews with homeowners association board members and Dutch financing experts. The outputs are used to create a financial instrument framework. This framework is intended to support co-owners associations in selecting a financing route for deep energy renovation. The framework consists of four sequential steps: (1) Project and barrier profile, (2) Finance-ready dossier, (3) Selection of financial instruments, and (4) calculate and compare net monthly impact. The last sub-question validates the framework model by a second round of interviews with the homeowners association board members and financial experts. The feedback is implemented and used to refine the framework.
This qualitative, multi-method design delivers five outputs: (a) Overview of barriers (b) and opportunities for co-owners associations, (c) a list of design requirements from the board members to provide financing models, and (d) a financing instrument framework that structures decision-making and documentation for financing deep renovations (e) policy recommendations resulting from the synthesis of the analytical and empirical research. The main output is a practical framework that supports co-owners associations to compare relevant public and private instruments, understand their eligibility and data requirements, and structure a finance-ready dossier. In doing so, the framework reduces the risk of missing requirements and supports associations in making informed funding decisions for their energy transition. For policymakers, the findings are translated into actionable guidelines aligned with the Homeowners Association Acceleration Agenda. For financial experts, the framework and finance-ready dossier concept improves communication with co-owners associations. ...
In order to answer the main research question, four subquestions are created. The first sub-question clarifies the demand side by mapping the financial barriers. The most significant barriers for co-owners associations are high up-front costs, difficult collection of funds, and lack of sufficient funding. The second sub-question, also done by desk research, defines available financial models for Dutch co-owners associations. In the Netherlands, we have public and private financial resources. Across these models, the key differentiators are who pays the investment costs upfront, how costs are recovered, and how savings or revenues flow back. The allocation of risk also differs. After the sub-questions that involve desk research, the third sub-question involves a first round of semi-structured interviews with homeowners association board members and Dutch financing experts. The outputs are used to create a financial instrument framework. This framework is intended to support co-owners associations in selecting a financing route for deep energy renovation. The framework consists of four sequential steps: (1) Project and barrier profile, (2) Finance-ready dossier, (3) Selection of financial instruments, and (4) calculate and compare net monthly impact. The last sub-question validates the framework model by a second round of interviews with the homeowners association board members and financial experts. The feedback is implemented and used to refine the framework.
This qualitative, multi-method design delivers five outputs: (a) Overview of barriers (b) and opportunities for co-owners associations, (c) a list of design requirements from the board members to provide financing models, and (d) a financing instrument framework that structures decision-making and documentation for financing deep renovations (e) policy recommendations resulting from the synthesis of the analytical and empirical research. The main output is a practical framework that supports co-owners associations to compare relevant public and private instruments, understand their eligibility and data requirements, and structure a finance-ready dossier. In doing so, the framework reduces the risk of missing requirements and supports associations in making informed funding decisions for their energy transition. For policymakers, the findings are translated into actionable guidelines aligned with the Homeowners Association Acceleration Agenda. For financial experts, the framework and finance-ready dossier concept improves communication with co-owners associations.
Conditions for Collectivity
An exploration of drivers and barriers for collective energy on Dutch SME business parks
Commercial and operational drivers, including cost advantages, price stability, business continuity and congestion-related growth limitations, most strongly motivate participation. Necessary conditions for implementation arise in both the political and the social organisational domains: an enabling regulatory framework and applicable contract forms, together with trust, willingness to cooperate and the presence of a coordinating actor, are critical. Barriers persist where commercial risks, regulatory uncertainty, limited organisational capacity or weak collaboration culture undermine collective action.
The thesis demonstrates that collective energy on Dutch SME business parks is not a single technical solution but a multi-dimensional, multi-scale process shaped by the alignment of SME-level incentives, organisational business park dynamics and political-institutional conditions. Ensuring this alignment is essential for translating collective ambitions into feasible and durable energy arrangements. ...
Commercial and operational drivers, including cost advantages, price stability, business continuity and congestion-related growth limitations, most strongly motivate participation. Necessary conditions for implementation arise in both the political and the social organisational domains: an enabling regulatory framework and applicable contract forms, together with trust, willingness to cooperate and the presence of a coordinating actor, are critical. Barriers persist where commercial risks, regulatory uncertainty, limited organisational capacity or weak collaboration culture undermine collective action.
The thesis demonstrates that collective energy on Dutch SME business parks is not a single technical solution but a multi-dimensional, multi-scale process shaped by the alignment of SME-level incentives, organisational business park dynamics and political-institutional conditions. Ensuring this alignment is essential for translating collective ambitions into feasible and durable energy arrangements.
Exploring the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) in Hotel Capital Markets
Insights from Across Europe & Globally
Methodology - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 FMPs, representing 6 stakeholder types active in European hotel capital markets, between March and April 2025.
Findings - Investors and lenders prioritize ESG indicators such as energy performance certificates (EPCs) and operational KPIs – particularly energy consumption data – though ESG integration remains largely driven by “financial-first logics.” SFDR implementation is uneven: “highly professional investors” possess the capacity to meet the directive’s demands, whereas smaller actors, including “mom-and-pop” hotel owners and operators, often lack the necessary resources, data infrastructure, or expertise. While SFDR classification increasingly shapes fund structure and capital raising, its influence on individual asset transactions remains limited but is expected to grow.
Research Limitations/Implications - Semi-structured interviews with a small, diverse sample enabled context-specific insights but limited comparability and replicability. Findings should be viewed as exploratory and indicative rather than representative of the sector.
Practical Implications - The findings underscore that ESG alignment is increasingly tied to both financial and operational leverage in commercial real estate, yet many investors still overlook its influence on cost of capital and asset-level performance. A persistent “wait-and-see” mindset – amplified by geopolitical uncertainty – continues to delay capital flows into at-risk hotel assets. To advance transition finance, SFDR must be recalibrated to avoid reinforcing divestment from stranded assets and instead incentivize their decarbonization.
Originality/Value - This is the first empirical investigation into how FMPs experience SFDR and ESG within the distinct context of hotel capital markets.
...
Methodology - Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 FMPs, representing 6 stakeholder types active in European hotel capital markets, between March and April 2025.
Findings - Investors and lenders prioritize ESG indicators such as energy performance certificates (EPCs) and operational KPIs – particularly energy consumption data – though ESG integration remains largely driven by “financial-first logics.” SFDR implementation is uneven: “highly professional investors” possess the capacity to meet the directive’s demands, whereas smaller actors, including “mom-and-pop” hotel owners and operators, often lack the necessary resources, data infrastructure, or expertise. While SFDR classification increasingly shapes fund structure and capital raising, its influence on individual asset transactions remains limited but is expected to grow.
Research Limitations/Implications - Semi-structured interviews with a small, diverse sample enabled context-specific insights but limited comparability and replicability. Findings should be viewed as exploratory and indicative rather than representative of the sector.
Practical Implications - The findings underscore that ESG alignment is increasingly tied to both financial and operational leverage in commercial real estate, yet many investors still overlook its influence on cost of capital and asset-level performance. A persistent “wait-and-see” mindset – amplified by geopolitical uncertainty – continues to delay capital flows into at-risk hotel assets. To advance transition finance, SFDR must be recalibrated to avoid reinforcing divestment from stranded assets and instead incentivize their decarbonization.
Originality/Value - This is the first empirical investigation into how FMPs experience SFDR and ESG within the distinct context of hotel capital markets.
Making Sense of Regenerative Development and Design in the Built Environment
Exploring how Real Estate Projects can Create Net-positive Value for People and Planet
Bridging a Path to Social Value
Strategies to Improve End-user Well-being in Housing
Adopting Digital Green Bonds
Benefits, Barriers, and Solutions
Evaluating the environmental payback time of energy improvement measures for small office building retrofits in the Netherlands
Analysing the environmental exploitation of retrofitting a small office building with energy improvement measures aimed at reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions to reach the ultimate goal of a Paris-proof building (Net-zero Energy & Carbon)
The decarbonisation of the built environment is a crucial step towards meeting the Paris climate agreement. In the Netherlands, this decarbonisation is incentivised with the BENG and a mandatory minimum EPC label C for all office buildings. While energy improvement measures (EIMs) are widely adopted to reduce operational carbon, their environmental payback, meaning the time needed to offset the embodied carbon introduced during retrofitting, remains under-researched, particularly for small office buildings.
Aim and methods
This study investigates the environmental payback time of common EIMs in retrofitting small office buildings (100, 200 and 500m²) in the Dutch context. A simulation-based experimental approach was used, modelling four scenarios: baseline, hybrid, full-electric, and full-electric with PV panels across the three building sizes. Operational energy use and emissions were calculated using Vabi Elements software, while embodied carbon was assessed through the Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA) framework using the input from the Ökobaudat EPD/LCA database.
Results
Results show energy reductions between 56% and 78%, depending on retrofit depth, with smaller buildings exhibiting proportionally higher savings. However, operational carbon reductions were not always proportional in relation to the energy reduction, due to the carbon intensity of grid electricity. Embodied carbon varied greatly, especially between biobased and conventional materials, and was also significantly influenced by the PV system. Payback times ranged from less than 1 year (in the 500m² biobased retrofits) to over 6 years (in small 100m² conventional+ PV scenario).
Conclusion
This research confirms that, despite variability, all retrofits examined achieved environmental payback well within the lifespan of the implemented measures. The findings underscore the importance of material choice and highlight the growing value of biobased solutions. They also suggest that hybrid systems, in light of the payback times, can offer a better solution as long as the electricity grid is not decarbonising rapidly and there is no access to renewable energy. These insights ultimately support informed, lifecycle-based retrofit decision-making.
...
The decarbonisation of the built environment is a crucial step towards meeting the Paris climate agreement. In the Netherlands, this decarbonisation is incentivised with the BENG and a mandatory minimum EPC label C for all office buildings. While energy improvement measures (EIMs) are widely adopted to reduce operational carbon, their environmental payback, meaning the time needed to offset the embodied carbon introduced during retrofitting, remains under-researched, particularly for small office buildings.
Aim and methods
This study investigates the environmental payback time of common EIMs in retrofitting small office buildings (100, 200 and 500m²) in the Dutch context. A simulation-based experimental approach was used, modelling four scenarios: baseline, hybrid, full-electric, and full-electric with PV panels across the three building sizes. Operational energy use and emissions were calculated using Vabi Elements software, while embodied carbon was assessed through the Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA) framework using the input from the Ökobaudat EPD/LCA database.
Results
Results show energy reductions between 56% and 78%, depending on retrofit depth, with smaller buildings exhibiting proportionally higher savings. However, operational carbon reductions were not always proportional in relation to the energy reduction, due to the carbon intensity of grid electricity. Embodied carbon varied greatly, especially between biobased and conventional materials, and was also significantly influenced by the PV system. Payback times ranged from less than 1 year (in the 500m² biobased retrofits) to over 6 years (in small 100m² conventional+ PV scenario).
Conclusion
This research confirms that, despite variability, all retrofits examined achieved environmental payback well within the lifespan of the implemented measures. The findings underscore the importance of material choice and highlight the growing value of biobased solutions. They also suggest that hybrid systems, in light of the payback times, can offer a better solution as long as the electricity grid is not decarbonising rapidly and there is no access to renewable energy. These insights ultimately support informed, lifecycle-based retrofit decision-making.
The Energy Divide
Assessing Equitable Access to Energy Efficiency in Housing
Integrating Physical Climate Risks in Real Estate Development
A systematic analysis of Dutch developer decision-making
A synthesis of stakeholder perspectives shows that while public and financial actors are becoming more aware of climate risks, their capacity and willingness to act vary significantly depending on the risk in question. A stakeholder–risk matrix was developed to illustrate these diverging positions. In addition, a visualisation of the developer’s trajectory identifies critical phases in which climate risks could be embedded more proactively. The findings indicate that adaptation is rarely considered during the initiative and feasibility stages – when flexibility is highest – unless it is enforced through regulation or financial conditions.
The research concludes that successful integration of climate risks requires not only technical
solutions or financial means, but timely alignment across key actors. Developers can play a pivotal role by initiating early engagement with municipalities, investors, and banks, tailored to their respective concerns regarding specific climate risks. By embedding adaptation measures early in the process, developers can avoid costly late-stage revisions and external pressures. The study offers practical recommendations for developers and public actors to improve early-stage climate risk integration in the built environment. ...
A synthesis of stakeholder perspectives shows that while public and financial actors are becoming more aware of climate risks, their capacity and willingness to act vary significantly depending on the risk in question. A stakeholder–risk matrix was developed to illustrate these diverging positions. In addition, a visualisation of the developer’s trajectory identifies critical phases in which climate risks could be embedded more proactively. The findings indicate that adaptation is rarely considered during the initiative and feasibility stages – when flexibility is highest – unless it is enforced through regulation or financial conditions.
The research concludes that successful integration of climate risks requires not only technical
solutions or financial means, but timely alignment across key actors. Developers can play a pivotal role by initiating early engagement with municipalities, investors, and banks, tailored to their respective concerns regarding specific climate risks. By embedding adaptation measures early in the process, developers can avoid costly late-stage revisions and external pressures. The study offers practical recommendations for developers and public actors to improve early-stage climate risk integration in the built environment.
Uncovering the Value of Circularity
Real Option Valuation of Detachable Aluminium Façade Components
Assessing Asset Manager Familiarity with the EU Taxonomy Concerning Climate Risks
Understanding the Compliance Factors, Drivers, Challenges, of the EU Taxonomy concerning climate risks
AI enhancing knowledge exchange about university buildings
Exploratory research on how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be utilized to enhance knowledge exchange about university real estate buildings
This research aims to address this gap by exploring the effectiveness of AI enhancing knowledge exchange about university buildings. Drawing on theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence, the research seeks to investigate how a knowledge database can be created for university real estate with the help of AI. Therefore, the goal of this research is how the exchange of knowledge between Dutch universities can be enhanced by the quick and effortless creation of a centralized AI-driven knowledge database for university real estate projects. The research uses a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. The quantitative method involves the theoretical background and creation of the knowledge database using four steps: finding, collecting, creating an overview, and analyzing and identifying. The qualitative method involves interviews with campus managers, in which the created knowledge database will be explained and in which the campus managers can give their feedback. In the synthesis, the results from the theoretical and empirical research will be demonstrated in an expert panel. In the expert panel the project database is evaluated and the Tailored GPT is tested by people working in campus management to get a final understanding on how the database and GPT can be further improved. Resulting in a database and GPT model that can be used by people working in campus management as a stepping stool for the enhancement of the exchange of knowledge. ...
This research aims to address this gap by exploring the effectiveness of AI enhancing knowledge exchange about university buildings. Drawing on theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence, the research seeks to investigate how a knowledge database can be created for university real estate with the help of AI. Therefore, the goal of this research is how the exchange of knowledge between Dutch universities can be enhanced by the quick and effortless creation of a centralized AI-driven knowledge database for university real estate projects. The research uses a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. The quantitative method involves the theoretical background and creation of the knowledge database using four steps: finding, collecting, creating an overview, and analyzing and identifying. The qualitative method involves interviews with campus managers, in which the created knowledge database will be explained and in which the campus managers can give their feedback. In the synthesis, the results from the theoretical and empirical research will be demonstrated in an expert panel. In the expert panel the project database is evaluated and the Tailored GPT is tested by people working in campus management to get a final understanding on how the database and GPT can be further improved. Resulting in a database and GPT model that can be used by people working in campus management as a stepping stool for the enhancement of the exchange of knowledge.
Flood risk labels
An investor's perspective