M.J.C.M. Hertogh
Please Note
51 records found
1
Actualizing Sustainability Opportunities
Enhancing Management of Sustainability Opportunities during Front-End Development in Infrastructure Projects
Putting Sustainability into Project Practice
Strategies for Structuring Sustainability in Exploration Phases of MIRT-Projects
This research examines how sustainability is defined, debated, and embedded in MIRT explorations, and how the process can be structured to safeguard ambitions. It describes two case studies: Station Dordrecht and the Amsterdam–Haarlemmermeer (OVAH) connection. Using a combination of a literature review, document analysis and expert interviews the study traces how sustainability is operationalised in practice. The findings show that sustainability is a normative and context-dependent concept, interpreted differently across cases. Its definition and integration are strongly shaped by site-specific conditions, the scale on which the project makes impact, and the organisation of the process of embedding Sustainability. The study also identifies 24 influential factors across 10 themes that affect the successful integration of sustainability considerations.
Building on these insights, the research proposes a toolkit that reconceptualises sustainability in large transport infrastructure projects as an organising principle rather than a separate goal. The shift in perspective is based on three key insights: first, sustainability is inherently normative, shaped by the values and institutional contexts of the actors involved; second, the use of the label “sustainability” to refer only to a limited set of themes does not do justice to the multidimensional nature of the concept. This narrow framing can lead to misconceptions about what sustainability truly entails within a project context; and third, despite divergent interpretations of the concept, consensus and a converged understanding can be achieved when the process of embedding sustainability is approached in a structured and systematic way.
The toolkit translates these insights into practical guidance for embedding sustainability in governance structures, assessment frameworks, and decision-making processes. By organising the MIRT exploration itself as a sustainable process, projects can anchor sustainability within project logic and ensure it becomes an integral and lasting component of Dutch infrastructure planning. ...
This research examines how sustainability is defined, debated, and embedded in MIRT explorations, and how the process can be structured to safeguard ambitions. It describes two case studies: Station Dordrecht and the Amsterdam–Haarlemmermeer (OVAH) connection. Using a combination of a literature review, document analysis and expert interviews the study traces how sustainability is operationalised in practice. The findings show that sustainability is a normative and context-dependent concept, interpreted differently across cases. Its definition and integration are strongly shaped by site-specific conditions, the scale on which the project makes impact, and the organisation of the process of embedding Sustainability. The study also identifies 24 influential factors across 10 themes that affect the successful integration of sustainability considerations.
Building on these insights, the research proposes a toolkit that reconceptualises sustainability in large transport infrastructure projects as an organising principle rather than a separate goal. The shift in perspective is based on three key insights: first, sustainability is inherently normative, shaped by the values and institutional contexts of the actors involved; second, the use of the label “sustainability” to refer only to a limited set of themes does not do justice to the multidimensional nature of the concept. This narrow framing can lead to misconceptions about what sustainability truly entails within a project context; and third, despite divergent interpretations of the concept, consensus and a converged understanding can be achieved when the process of embedding sustainability is approached in a structured and systematic way.
The toolkit translates these insights into practical guidance for embedding sustainability in governance structures, assessment frameworks, and decision-making processes. By organising the MIRT exploration itself as a sustainable process, projects can anchor sustainability within project logic and ensure it becomes an integral and lasting component of Dutch infrastructure planning.
Bridging Minds for Building the Future
Facilitating Inter-Organizational Collaboration for Next-Generation Infrastructures
Infrastructure operators play a crucial role in balancing the diverse and often competing demands and requirements for infrastructures and their services. The complexity of the task highlights the importance of strategic decision-making in infrastructure design, as these decisions can significantly shape societal outcomes. With the increase in urbanization, next-generation infrastructures are expected to optimize transportation, facilitate the creation of smart cities, and enhance the overall quality of life. Additionally, they must ensure resilience against disasters and cybersecurity threats. Furthermore, investments in these infrastructures can boost global competitiveness, attract innovation, and drive economic growth. Nevertheless, addressing the needs of a technologically advanced and interconnected world requires a careful consideration of societal impacts and a balanced approach to sustainability, efficiency, and resilience.
Infrastructure encompasses essential systems including physical constructs like roads, bridges, and utilities, as well as intricate socio-technical networks such as telecommunications grids. Infrastructure sectors were traditionally managed in relative isolation. However, the evolving landscape of societal needs, environmental dynamics, and technological advancements demand increased recognition of the interconnected nature of current day infrastructures, as assets increasingly influence each other. Recognizing these interdependencies is crucial for effective design and management of future infrastructures under a variety of conditions which include crises and infrastructure failures. Failures in one infrastructure can cascade to others. Asset managers who operate independently with their own specific way of working, must increasingly work closely together to design and operate these interconnected systems. This collaborative approach is essential for designing and managing the next generation of infrastructures to ensure their stabile and resilient performance...
...
Infrastructure operators play a crucial role in balancing the diverse and often competing demands and requirements for infrastructures and their services. The complexity of the task highlights the importance of strategic decision-making in infrastructure design, as these decisions can significantly shape societal outcomes. With the increase in urbanization, next-generation infrastructures are expected to optimize transportation, facilitate the creation of smart cities, and enhance the overall quality of life. Additionally, they must ensure resilience against disasters and cybersecurity threats. Furthermore, investments in these infrastructures can boost global competitiveness, attract innovation, and drive economic growth. Nevertheless, addressing the needs of a technologically advanced and interconnected world requires a careful consideration of societal impacts and a balanced approach to sustainability, efficiency, and resilience.
Infrastructure encompasses essential systems including physical constructs like roads, bridges, and utilities, as well as intricate socio-technical networks such as telecommunications grids. Infrastructure sectors were traditionally managed in relative isolation. However, the evolving landscape of societal needs, environmental dynamics, and technological advancements demand increased recognition of the interconnected nature of current day infrastructures, as assets increasingly influence each other. Recognizing these interdependencies is crucial for effective design and management of future infrastructures under a variety of conditions which include crises and infrastructure failures. Failures in one infrastructure can cascade to others. Asset managers who operate independently with their own specific way of working, must increasingly work closely together to design and operate these interconnected systems. This collaborative approach is essential for designing and managing the next generation of infrastructures to ensure their stabile and resilient performance...
Empathy Driving Performance
A study on the interaction between empathy, the integrated design process and the performance of civil engineering projects
Therefore, this dissertation focuses on the question of how performance can be improved by focusing on integration in the civil engineering design process. An optimal, integrated approach emerges as a critical factor. Additionally, the increasingly integrative, social and dynamic character of the civil engineering design process necessitates project team members to collaborate, connect and delve into the others’ interests. Therefore, empathy turns out to be a relevant factor for project success. Moreover, the empathic abilities of the Dutch civil engineering sector appear to be relatively low, implying room for improvement. ...
Therefore, this dissertation focuses on the question of how performance can be improved by focusing on integration in the civil engineering design process. An optimal, integrated approach emerges as a critical factor. Additionally, the increasingly integrative, social and dynamic character of the civil engineering design process necessitates project team members to collaborate, connect and delve into the others’ interests. Therefore, empathy turns out to be a relevant factor for project success. Moreover, the empathic abilities of the Dutch civil engineering sector appear to be relatively low, implying room for improvement.
From Tinkering to Transitioning
Cultivating Innovation within Public Agencies operating in the Construction Industry
This research investigates how public agencies operating in the construction industry can effectively govern innovation processes to increase public value creation. Deploying a pragmatic, process-oriented research approach, empirical work was conducted in partnership with the Province of Noord-Holland, with findings iteratively refined through practitioner engagement.
A central contribution is the articulation of the Triple-A innovation capabilities framework, comprising absorptive, adoptive, and adaptive capabilities. These capabilities are not static attributes but must be actively developed at the individual, team, and organisational levels. The research demonstrates that the effective governance of innovation is inherently a multi-layered challenge, requiring distinct yet interconnected interventions across these levels.
To bridge the gap between ad hoc ‘tinkering’ and systemic change, the study foregrounds the importance of reflective practices. A bespoke serious game was developed and implemented, providing a structured yet engaging environment for teams to reflect on innovation challenges, share tacit knowledge, and co-create actionable strategies. The study advances both theory and practice by providing a layered framework for diagnosing and developing innovation capabilities, a practical tool for enhancing reflective practices, and actionable recommendations for public agencies. By investing in Triple-A capability development, embedding reflection routines, and weaving a robust organisational ‘fabric’, public agencies can better navigate the innovation paradox, accelerate transitions in the built environment, and increase their impact as agents of change. ...
This research investigates how public agencies operating in the construction industry can effectively govern innovation processes to increase public value creation. Deploying a pragmatic, process-oriented research approach, empirical work was conducted in partnership with the Province of Noord-Holland, with findings iteratively refined through practitioner engagement.
A central contribution is the articulation of the Triple-A innovation capabilities framework, comprising absorptive, adoptive, and adaptive capabilities. These capabilities are not static attributes but must be actively developed at the individual, team, and organisational levels. The research demonstrates that the effective governance of innovation is inherently a multi-layered challenge, requiring distinct yet interconnected interventions across these levels.
To bridge the gap between ad hoc ‘tinkering’ and systemic change, the study foregrounds the importance of reflective practices. A bespoke serious game was developed and implemented, providing a structured yet engaging environment for teams to reflect on innovation challenges, share tacit knowledge, and co-create actionable strategies. The study advances both theory and practice by providing a layered framework for diagnosing and developing innovation capabilities, a practical tool for enhancing reflective practices, and actionable recommendations for public agencies. By investing in Triple-A capability development, embedding reflection routines, and weaving a robust organisational ‘fabric’, public agencies can better navigate the innovation paradox, accelerate transitions in the built environment, and increase their impact as agents of change.
Bridging circularity and inclusion
Rethinking municipal solid waste infrastructure for sustainable urban transitions
Towards Acceleration of Re-Use Transition in the Infrastructure Sector
A practical framework for public client organizations to link the tactical level to the operational level in implementing the re-use strategy
The effect of empathy in collaboration on project performance
Steering on empathy to improve project performance through client-contractor collaboration in the first phase of the two-phase model
The research findings reveal two key relationships: the relationship between client-contractor collaboration and project performance and the relationship between empathy and client-contractor collaboration.
The relationship between client-contractor collaboration and project performance: the study indicates that client-contractor collaboration significantly influences project performance in the first phase of the two-phase model. Collaboration affects the actual performance of quality criteria and the perception of time and cost criteria. Key differences in the collaborative process within the two-phase model are a shift towards process-focused outcomes, shared responsibility between the client and contractor, and flexibility in criteria. Affective trust, communication, and cohesion are identified as crucial factors for successful collaboration. Tools such as Project Start-Up and team-building sessions facilitate collaboration and should be utilized to enhance project performance.
The relationship between empathy and client-contractor collaboration: empathy plays a pivotal role in facilitating understanding at the team member and organizational levels, fostering relationships, and promoting collaboration. It is particularly important in project phases where unfamiliarity between client and contractor exists. Empathy influences factors essential to the collaborative process, such as trust, communication, and cohesion. The research identifies factors that influence the occurrence of empathic behavior, including the work environment, team relationships, communication, and team size. A proactive attitude towards empathy and continuous development of empathic behavior are recommended for project success.
The research findings support the hypotheses that client-contractor collaboration and empathy positively contribute to project performance in the first phase of the two-phase model. A practical framework is proposed, consisting of four strategies, to improve project performance through empathy and collaboration. The framework should be applied collectively by project managers at the start of the first phase and throughout the project. Future research should explore quantitative testing of the hypotheses, validate the framework in practice, and investigate additional relevant competencies...
...
The research findings reveal two key relationships: the relationship between client-contractor collaboration and project performance and the relationship between empathy and client-contractor collaboration.
The relationship between client-contractor collaboration and project performance: the study indicates that client-contractor collaboration significantly influences project performance in the first phase of the two-phase model. Collaboration affects the actual performance of quality criteria and the perception of time and cost criteria. Key differences in the collaborative process within the two-phase model are a shift towards process-focused outcomes, shared responsibility between the client and contractor, and flexibility in criteria. Affective trust, communication, and cohesion are identified as crucial factors for successful collaboration. Tools such as Project Start-Up and team-building sessions facilitate collaboration and should be utilized to enhance project performance.
The relationship between empathy and client-contractor collaboration: empathy plays a pivotal role in facilitating understanding at the team member and organizational levels, fostering relationships, and promoting collaboration. It is particularly important in project phases where unfamiliarity between client and contractor exists. Empathy influences factors essential to the collaborative process, such as trust, communication, and cohesion. The research identifies factors that influence the occurrence of empathic behavior, including the work environment, team relationships, communication, and team size. A proactive attitude towards empathy and continuous development of empathic behavior are recommended for project success.
The research findings support the hypotheses that client-contractor collaboration and empathy positively contribute to project performance in the first phase of the two-phase model. A practical framework is proposed, consisting of four strategies, to improve project performance through empathy and collaboration. The framework should be applied collectively by project managers at the start of the first phase and throughout the project. Future research should explore quantitative testing of the hypotheses, validate the framework in practice, and investigate additional relevant competencies...
The core interaction of a circular construction platform
How can a digital market platform address the construction market for secondary materials?
How should a secondary ‘digital’ product marketplace function within the construction industry?
Before addressing this question, a literature review is conducted on various aspects. These include the concepts within digital marketplaces and platforms, as well as those within reuse projects, focusing on specific information about materials and products in the context of reuse. Additionally, the current state of the industry has been examined in terms of challenges, opportunities in general, and those related to digitalization. This is done to get a better understanding of the surroundings in which the marketplace must operate.
The literature research concludes that the core interaction is the most important form of activity on a platform – the value that attracts the most users to the platform in the first place (Parker et al., 2016). It consists of three parts: Participants + Value Unit + Filter. Fundamentally there are two participants on the platform, namely producers and consumers. In this case, producers are building/construction elements and their owners/sellers. Consumers are the ones that are willing to buy them (potentially; architects, engineers, contractors, or suppliers). Where the value unit starts with the exchange of information that has value to the participants. This information delivery to consumers depends on filters. A filter enables the transfer of appropriate value units between users. A well-designed filter ensures that platform users see only information units that are relevant and valuable to them. No filters or a poorly designed filter overwhelms users with units they find valueless and irrelevant, which causes them to abandon the platform. No research has been done to the specific design of the core interaction of a secondary product marketplace within the construction industry.
In addition, few scientific articles investigate software interfaces, ease of use and the user's role and experience within the construction industry. An action- and design-oriented research method is a new approach to this problem/goal. The information system framework is chosen to combine rigor research and the application domain within a design practices.
To structure this research the research question is divided into three steps (based on the core interaction). In step 1, the input for the design is investigated, which includes determining the participants who should use the marketplace (champions), how they should search for products, and what improvements can be made in the design process to promote reuse. In step 2, the filters and interfaces of the marketplace are designed. Within step 2, solutions for situations with limited data or, conversely, when there is sufficient data in the future are also explored. In step 3, the chosen champion validates if they can use the designed solution and whether it provides value.
To define the main users/champions (step 1), potential users-(roles) are interviewed about their needs for such a marketplace, assuming reuse becomes the norm. The literature review covers all aspects of digital (construction) applications and reuse in the construction industry. This is supplemented with expert interviews in IFC (an open data standard), user interface/user experience (UI/UX), current construction marketplaces, and material passports. In addition, various roles from several reuse projects are interviewed, including designers, project developers, purchasers, demolition specialists, and engineers, in line with the information system framework and action design. This is done to get an complete overview of all the stakeholders involved within the process of selecting/buying reused products.
The information of the literature research and the first interview phase is used in the design process to create ‘search and facet’ filters. Therefor a division based on the Brand/shearing layers (site, structure, services, skin/facade, space, and stuff) is made to improve the design the facet filters. The engineer and the architect is chosen as the primary user but in consultation with the design team. For all the engineers responsible or related to the a Brand layer a recommendation is made for a first set a (search) parameters.
Concerning the information need (step 2) of the structural engineer, the primary focus is on the elements' functional and physical properties (moment-of-inertia, material type, strength, and dimensions). Thereby the core interaction disregards environmental or economic properties. These are of secondary interest for the core interaction. The three main materials, wood, steel and concrete, require all different ways of working for reuse but share common properties which makes the design of filters less complex. Capacity, dimension, grid size, floor height and more properties could influence the structural design decision, increasing the demand for reusable structural products. However, more traditional engineers prefer to filter within one type of material. Even more in-depth material and product knowledge for reuse could is a next step for the core interaction, thereby evolving into a knowledge marketplace.
The other Brand layers (skin, services and space) information need should also focus on their functional and physical reusability properties, which are covered and designed in this thesis but not validated with real users. The skin and the space layer are more visually oriented; images support the architect's and engineer's decision-making. Aesthetic filters to filter on certain styles, colours, types and tags will support the architect where functional filters relating to dimension are of first need for the façade engineer. Secondly the physical filters benefit the search tremendously, such as; U-value, fire resistance, Rc-value, sound resistance, waterproofness etc. The service/building engineer wants to filter into three categories. Namely the machine, the distribution point (ventilation grille, water tap, heating element) and the transport (cable tray, pipe and wires). The machine (e.g., heating, cooling and air filters) has a more dynamical environment with a high change in regulation, expecting a low reuse pattern. The other two categories, distribution and transport are more suitable for reuse; these filters contain service type (energy, water, air, data and heating), minimum length and the capacity of distribution and transportation.
After step 2 (design) various structural engineers are interviewed using a working digital prototype to examine whether the search filters are effective for their reuse process (step 3). Besides various side notes on the design culture, system changes and the willingness of a client to reuse products. The interviewed users made recommendations which should be taken into account for a next design iteration. The proposed design is usable and could meet its goal/value proposition when reusing products becomes the norm.
This research is a small link in the bigger picture of a ‘circular’ construction industry. Still, many challenges remain that a digital marketplace could not solve. When interpreting the results, the following points should be considered as well. The interviewees in this research are involved or interested in reusing products. When less interested engineers/users must use this marketplace, other items could be of more importance or totally different obstacles could arise.
Further research should examine the other Brand layers and their primary users. Additionally, to succeed as a marketplace, choices need to be made. Which users and product categories will be supported in first place. What is the business plan and initial investment? Building and rolling out a marketplace requires entrepreneurial skills and courage. This research hopes to provide the readers with a holistic view of all the challenges related to a digital market platform that address the construction market for secondary materials. Together with a set of validated user interfaces of such marketplace.
...
How should a secondary ‘digital’ product marketplace function within the construction industry?
Before addressing this question, a literature review is conducted on various aspects. These include the concepts within digital marketplaces and platforms, as well as those within reuse projects, focusing on specific information about materials and products in the context of reuse. Additionally, the current state of the industry has been examined in terms of challenges, opportunities in general, and those related to digitalization. This is done to get a better understanding of the surroundings in which the marketplace must operate.
The literature research concludes that the core interaction is the most important form of activity on a platform – the value that attracts the most users to the platform in the first place (Parker et al., 2016). It consists of three parts: Participants + Value Unit + Filter. Fundamentally there are two participants on the platform, namely producers and consumers. In this case, producers are building/construction elements and their owners/sellers. Consumers are the ones that are willing to buy them (potentially; architects, engineers, contractors, or suppliers). Where the value unit starts with the exchange of information that has value to the participants. This information delivery to consumers depends on filters. A filter enables the transfer of appropriate value units between users. A well-designed filter ensures that platform users see only information units that are relevant and valuable to them. No filters or a poorly designed filter overwhelms users with units they find valueless and irrelevant, which causes them to abandon the platform. No research has been done to the specific design of the core interaction of a secondary product marketplace within the construction industry.
In addition, few scientific articles investigate software interfaces, ease of use and the user's role and experience within the construction industry. An action- and design-oriented research method is a new approach to this problem/goal. The information system framework is chosen to combine rigor research and the application domain within a design practices.
To structure this research the research question is divided into three steps (based on the core interaction). In step 1, the input for the design is investigated, which includes determining the participants who should use the marketplace (champions), how they should search for products, and what improvements can be made in the design process to promote reuse. In step 2, the filters and interfaces of the marketplace are designed. Within step 2, solutions for situations with limited data or, conversely, when there is sufficient data in the future are also explored. In step 3, the chosen champion validates if they can use the designed solution and whether it provides value.
To define the main users/champions (step 1), potential users-(roles) are interviewed about their needs for such a marketplace, assuming reuse becomes the norm. The literature review covers all aspects of digital (construction) applications and reuse in the construction industry. This is supplemented with expert interviews in IFC (an open data standard), user interface/user experience (UI/UX), current construction marketplaces, and material passports. In addition, various roles from several reuse projects are interviewed, including designers, project developers, purchasers, demolition specialists, and engineers, in line with the information system framework and action design. This is done to get an complete overview of all the stakeholders involved within the process of selecting/buying reused products.
The information of the literature research and the first interview phase is used in the design process to create ‘search and facet’ filters. Therefor a division based on the Brand/shearing layers (site, structure, services, skin/facade, space, and stuff) is made to improve the design the facet filters. The engineer and the architect is chosen as the primary user but in consultation with the design team. For all the engineers responsible or related to the a Brand layer a recommendation is made for a first set a (search) parameters.
Concerning the information need (step 2) of the structural engineer, the primary focus is on the elements' functional and physical properties (moment-of-inertia, material type, strength, and dimensions). Thereby the core interaction disregards environmental or economic properties. These are of secondary interest for the core interaction. The three main materials, wood, steel and concrete, require all different ways of working for reuse but share common properties which makes the design of filters less complex. Capacity, dimension, grid size, floor height and more properties could influence the structural design decision, increasing the demand for reusable structural products. However, more traditional engineers prefer to filter within one type of material. Even more in-depth material and product knowledge for reuse could is a next step for the core interaction, thereby evolving into a knowledge marketplace.
The other Brand layers (skin, services and space) information need should also focus on their functional and physical reusability properties, which are covered and designed in this thesis but not validated with real users. The skin and the space layer are more visually oriented; images support the architect's and engineer's decision-making. Aesthetic filters to filter on certain styles, colours, types and tags will support the architect where functional filters relating to dimension are of first need for the façade engineer. Secondly the physical filters benefit the search tremendously, such as; U-value, fire resistance, Rc-value, sound resistance, waterproofness etc. The service/building engineer wants to filter into three categories. Namely the machine, the distribution point (ventilation grille, water tap, heating element) and the transport (cable tray, pipe and wires). The machine (e.g., heating, cooling and air filters) has a more dynamical environment with a high change in regulation, expecting a low reuse pattern. The other two categories, distribution and transport are more suitable for reuse; these filters contain service type (energy, water, air, data and heating), minimum length and the capacity of distribution and transportation.
After step 2 (design) various structural engineers are interviewed using a working digital prototype to examine whether the search filters are effective for their reuse process (step 3). Besides various side notes on the design culture, system changes and the willingness of a client to reuse products. The interviewed users made recommendations which should be taken into account for a next design iteration. The proposed design is usable and could meet its goal/value proposition when reusing products becomes the norm.
This research is a small link in the bigger picture of a ‘circular’ construction industry. Still, many challenges remain that a digital marketplace could not solve. When interpreting the results, the following points should be considered as well. The interviewees in this research are involved or interested in reusing products. When less interested engineers/users must use this marketplace, other items could be of more importance or totally different obstacles could arise.
Further research should examine the other Brand layers and their primary users. Additionally, to succeed as a marketplace, choices need to be made. Which users and product categories will be supported in first place. What is the business plan and initial investment? Building and rolling out a marketplace requires entrepreneurial skills and courage. This research hopes to provide the readers with a holistic view of all the challenges related to a digital market platform that address the construction market for secondary materials. Together with a set of validated user interfaces of such marketplace.
Sustainability in subcontractor and supplier selection
Qualitative research on the effectiveness of environmental EMAT criteria on achieving sustainability in the selection of subcontractors and suppliers in the Dutch infrastructure sector
In the past years, sustainability became more important in the procurement of infrastructure projects. One of the ways to implement sustainability in infrastructure projects is by award criteria in the tender phase of the project, called EMAT criteria, which stands for Economically Most Advantageous Tender. In this way, the client or procurer can determine the added value of the quality per contractor. So, the EMAT criteria is a way of tendering through the best quality/price ratio.
Selecting a suitable subcontractor and supplier will considerably improve the professional services capabilities of the main contractor. Approximately 80 – 90 percent of large infrastructure projects are subcontracted. This means that to have a transition towards a sustainable sector, the subcontractors and suppliers must help too.
This research, therefore, aims to generate insight into how the EMAT criteria influence the selection of subcontractors and suppliers
A literature study and case study with three cases were performed in this research.
The results of the case study show that the EMAT criteria influenced the selection of subcontractors and suppliers, especially when it comes to sustainability. The EMAT criteria are an incentive for the contractor to look at the sustainability level and development of the subcontractors and suppliers. When the client asks for sustainability in the tender through EMAT criteria, the contractor will use sustainability as one of the selection criteria for subcontractors and suppliers. Moreover, the importance of the EMAT criteria (read the percentage of deduction of the tender bid) influence the trade-offs between the selection criteria as well. When the deduction for sustainability in the EMAT criteria is higher, the more important the sustainability selection criteria will be in the trade-offs for subcontractors and suppliers.
It is recommended to the client and the contractor to have dialogue sessions with each other about the measurement of the sustainable EMAT criteria and the responsibility for the monitoring of this. Making clear how sustainability is measured and what is needed to monitor it, will stimulate the contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers of the infrastructure sector to be more sustainable in the future.
Furthermore, the use of equally weighted sustainable EMAT criteria makes it easier for the contractor to select the most sustainable subcontractor or supplier.
A final recommendation towards the clients of infrastructure projects is that sustainability should be part of EMAT, or part of all present and future contracts in general if we are to achieve sustainability goals for the infrastructure sector, but mostly for the ambitious goals in the Netherlands.
...
In the past years, sustainability became more important in the procurement of infrastructure projects. One of the ways to implement sustainability in infrastructure projects is by award criteria in the tender phase of the project, called EMAT criteria, which stands for Economically Most Advantageous Tender. In this way, the client or procurer can determine the added value of the quality per contractor. So, the EMAT criteria is a way of tendering through the best quality/price ratio.
Selecting a suitable subcontractor and supplier will considerably improve the professional services capabilities of the main contractor. Approximately 80 – 90 percent of large infrastructure projects are subcontracted. This means that to have a transition towards a sustainable sector, the subcontractors and suppliers must help too.
This research, therefore, aims to generate insight into how the EMAT criteria influence the selection of subcontractors and suppliers
A literature study and case study with three cases were performed in this research.
The results of the case study show that the EMAT criteria influenced the selection of subcontractors and suppliers, especially when it comes to sustainability. The EMAT criteria are an incentive for the contractor to look at the sustainability level and development of the subcontractors and suppliers. When the client asks for sustainability in the tender through EMAT criteria, the contractor will use sustainability as one of the selection criteria for subcontractors and suppliers. Moreover, the importance of the EMAT criteria (read the percentage of deduction of the tender bid) influence the trade-offs between the selection criteria as well. When the deduction for sustainability in the EMAT criteria is higher, the more important the sustainability selection criteria will be in the trade-offs for subcontractors and suppliers.
It is recommended to the client and the contractor to have dialogue sessions with each other about the measurement of the sustainable EMAT criteria and the responsibility for the monitoring of this. Making clear how sustainability is measured and what is needed to monitor it, will stimulate the contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers of the infrastructure sector to be more sustainable in the future.
Furthermore, the use of equally weighted sustainable EMAT criteria makes it easier for the contractor to select the most sustainable subcontractor or supplier.
A final recommendation towards the clients of infrastructure projects is that sustainability should be part of EMAT, or part of all present and future contracts in general if we are to achieve sustainability goals for the infrastructure sector, but mostly for the ambitious goals in the Netherlands.
Managing Transitions Toward Adaptive Delta Infrastructure
A framework for improving the decision context stage
Objective:
This study aims to provide a framework to improve decision-making methods by focusing on the decision context stage and the important aspects that must be considered by decision-makers at this stage. The decision context stage is the theoretical fundamental for the methods and a signpost to steer the whole decision-making process.
Questions:
The objective leads to the following research questions:
How to improve the decision-making context stage to deal with deep uncertainty in redesigning delta infrastructure?
1. What are the decision-making under deep uncertainty methods (DMDU) and to what extent do they consider uncertainty over sea level rise and future states of the delta?
2. What are the different functions of the Eastern Scheldt barrier system and how are they affected by the drivers?
3. What are the steps to improve the decision context for decision-making?
The resulting framework emphasizes the importance of zooming in to improve the context stage and integrate the life cycle management and shows an iterative way to improve the context stage in case of disagreement on the definition of success between different stakeholders and disciplines. Furthermore, the framework includes understanding the influence of drivers and the order of priorities to minimize uncertainty by integrating long-term planning into social and political contexts to avoid radical changes in the future. The study attempts to include these different steps in the context stage within other steps that already exist in the methods. The suggested steps can be considered as a trial to interconnect the infrastructure with the changing factors on the political, social, and economical levels. Redesigning delta infrastructure requires an integral approach to comprehending different aspects that play a role in handling deep uncertainty in the future.
...
Objective:
This study aims to provide a framework to improve decision-making methods by focusing on the decision context stage and the important aspects that must be considered by decision-makers at this stage. The decision context stage is the theoretical fundamental for the methods and a signpost to steer the whole decision-making process.
Questions:
The objective leads to the following research questions:
How to improve the decision-making context stage to deal with deep uncertainty in redesigning delta infrastructure?
1. What are the decision-making under deep uncertainty methods (DMDU) and to what extent do they consider uncertainty over sea level rise and future states of the delta?
2. What are the different functions of the Eastern Scheldt barrier system and how are they affected by the drivers?
3. What are the steps to improve the decision context for decision-making?
The resulting framework emphasizes the importance of zooming in to improve the context stage and integrate the life cycle management and shows an iterative way to improve the context stage in case of disagreement on the definition of success between different stakeholders and disciplines. Furthermore, the framework includes understanding the influence of drivers and the order of priorities to minimize uncertainty by integrating long-term planning into social and political contexts to avoid radical changes in the future. The study attempts to include these different steps in the context stage within other steps that already exist in the methods. The suggested steps can be considered as a trial to interconnect the infrastructure with the changing factors on the political, social, and economical levels. Redesigning delta infrastructure requires an integral approach to comprehending different aspects that play a role in handling deep uncertainty in the future.
Towards proactive decision-making for sustainability in the construction industry
An application to project delivery of urban utility infrastructure systems
From Best Practices to Next Practices
Project-based learning in the development of large infrastructure
Upscaling circularity in urban area development
A qualitative study in ‘Circular Buiksloterham’
Breaking Through Data Silos in Multinational Engineering Companies
A study on how to enhance intra-organizational data sharing by understanding social networks
Asset Aggregation
Structuring condition data for decision-making
Windows for Circularity
An analysis to identify circular interventions in the different stages of the design process of an office building