M.J.C.M. Hertogh
Please Note
35 records found
1
Bridging the Procurement Gap
Improving Tender Attractiveness Through Procurement Design to Support Contractor Participation in Dutch Infrastructure Renewal
The attractiveness of infrastructure renewal tenders depends on how public clients translate renewal work into tender opportunities and how contractors evaluate them. Public-client choices regarding the object being procured, the form of collaboration, and the market approach shape the work and conditions contractors evaluate during their bid/no-bid decisions.
On the contractor side, the bid/no-bid decision reflects the interaction between work attractiveness and condition attractiveness relative to alternative opportunities. Work attractiveness concerns whether a contractor wants, can deliver, and has a credible chance of winning the work. Condition attractiveness concerns contractual, financial, technical, and procedural viability. Comparing contractor evaluations with client choices demonstrates how procurement design shapes opportunity attractiveness.
This comparison shows that attractiveness emerges from combinations of procurement design elements within the specific renewal context. To guide this configuration process, public clients should adopt seven procurement design principles:
1. Recognise renewal context: Recognise the complex, uncertain, and market conditions of infrastructure renewal and reflect this in appropriate procurement.
2. Reduce uncertainty before tendering: Build asset knowledge and scope clarity before approaching the market.
3. Create an executable and commercially viable workload: Consider scale, bundling, continuity, pipeline visibility, and repeatability.
4. Match residual uncertainty to risk allocation, collaboration, and pricing: Configure risk allocation, contract form, collaboration, and pricing mechanisms as a coherent response to remaining uncertainty.
5. Involve the market at the right time and for a clear purpose: Use early contractor involvement to optimise decisions without substituting for the client’s responsibility to define the tender.
6. Provide a credible and proportionate route to contract award: Keep tender effort proportionate, allow meaningful differentiation, and provide a credible chance of winning.
7. Use procurement design as a balancing mechanism: Balance contractor participation against public-client objectives to secure sufficient suitable competition at an acceptable value for money.
Rather than aiming to maximize attractiveness unconditionally, these principles guide public clients in balancing market participation with public value. Effective application depends heavily on client maturity and institutional capacity, as well as clear communication from contractors regarding their selection logic.
To derive these insights, the research followed a sequential mixed-methods design. First, the public procurement process was reconstructed using a decision tree and mapped into a morphological chart. Second, tender selection data from a case-study contractor were analysed using cross-tabulations and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), supplemented by semi-structured interviews. Finally, these findings were combined into a configuration set to establish the principles.
Ultimately, while procurement design cannot increase total sector capacity or alter brownfield constraints, it shapes how these constraints are reflected in individual tenders. Its contribution lies in reducing avoidable unattractiveness and improving alignment, enabling public clients to compete more effectively for scarce contractor capacity. ...
The attractiveness of infrastructure renewal tenders depends on how public clients translate renewal work into tender opportunities and how contractors evaluate them. Public-client choices regarding the object being procured, the form of collaboration, and the market approach shape the work and conditions contractors evaluate during their bid/no-bid decisions.
On the contractor side, the bid/no-bid decision reflects the interaction between work attractiveness and condition attractiveness relative to alternative opportunities. Work attractiveness concerns whether a contractor wants, can deliver, and has a credible chance of winning the work. Condition attractiveness concerns contractual, financial, technical, and procedural viability. Comparing contractor evaluations with client choices demonstrates how procurement design shapes opportunity attractiveness.
This comparison shows that attractiveness emerges from combinations of procurement design elements within the specific renewal context. To guide this configuration process, public clients should adopt seven procurement design principles:
1. Recognise renewal context: Recognise the complex, uncertain, and market conditions of infrastructure renewal and reflect this in appropriate procurement.
2. Reduce uncertainty before tendering: Build asset knowledge and scope clarity before approaching the market.
3. Create an executable and commercially viable workload: Consider scale, bundling, continuity, pipeline visibility, and repeatability.
4. Match residual uncertainty to risk allocation, collaboration, and pricing: Configure risk allocation, contract form, collaboration, and pricing mechanisms as a coherent response to remaining uncertainty.
5. Involve the market at the right time and for a clear purpose: Use early contractor involvement to optimise decisions without substituting for the client’s responsibility to define the tender.
6. Provide a credible and proportionate route to contract award: Keep tender effort proportionate, allow meaningful differentiation, and provide a credible chance of winning.
7. Use procurement design as a balancing mechanism: Balance contractor participation against public-client objectives to secure sufficient suitable competition at an acceptable value for money.
Rather than aiming to maximize attractiveness unconditionally, these principles guide public clients in balancing market participation with public value. Effective application depends heavily on client maturity and institutional capacity, as well as clear communication from contractors regarding their selection logic.
To derive these insights, the research followed a sequential mixed-methods design. First, the public procurement process was reconstructed using a decision tree and mapped into a morphological chart. Second, tender selection data from a case-study contractor were analysed using cross-tabulations and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), supplemented by semi-structured interviews. Finally, these findings were combined into a configuration set to establish the principles.
Ultimately, while procurement design cannot increase total sector capacity or alter brownfield constraints, it shapes how these constraints are reflected in individual tenders. Its contribution lies in reducing avoidable unattractiveness and improving alignment, enabling public clients to compete more effectively for scarce contractor capacity.
Governing Phase I: time in the two-phase approach for Dutch infrastructure projects
Towards a predictable phase I in Dutch two-phase infrastructure Projects
The literature is drawn together into an alignment framework: structural complexity, the fixed and knowable arrangement of components, suits a predict-and-control (Type I) approach, whereas dynamic complexity, the emergent and changing relations among components, calls for a prepare-and-commit (Type II) approach. A misalignment between the two is expected to hinder time management and the predictability of the phase. Two completed or sufficiently advanced Phase I trajectories were studied, the A27 Houten–Hooipolder Noord (Case A) and the OVT 2 terminal at Zuidasdok (Case B), each through a structured assessment of Technical, Organisational and External (TOE) complexity and thirteen semi-structured interviews across client and contractor sides, with the contractor Mobilis as the main point of entry. Six resulting suggestions were then validated in a focus group with two independent RWS practitioners.
The two cases produced markedly different trajectories, and the comparison indicates that the operative variable is not the contract form but the presence or absence of deliberate counter-arrangements: where a Type II arrangement was put in place to hold control and interaction together for each pocket of dynamic complexity, complexity was contained. Where it was absent, it was free to convert into mistrust and delay. Alignment is therefore achieved or missed process by process rather than at the level of the project as a whole, and “time overrun” proved broader than mere calendar slippage. The practical leverage lies less in the choice of contract form than in the conscious, process-by-process construction of counter-arrangements that hold control and interaction together where dynamic complexity arises.
...
The literature is drawn together into an alignment framework: structural complexity, the fixed and knowable arrangement of components, suits a predict-and-control (Type I) approach, whereas dynamic complexity, the emergent and changing relations among components, calls for a prepare-and-commit (Type II) approach. A misalignment between the two is expected to hinder time management and the predictability of the phase. Two completed or sufficiently advanced Phase I trajectories were studied, the A27 Houten–Hooipolder Noord (Case A) and the OVT 2 terminal at Zuidasdok (Case B), each through a structured assessment of Technical, Organisational and External (TOE) complexity and thirteen semi-structured interviews across client and contractor sides, with the contractor Mobilis as the main point of entry. Six resulting suggestions were then validated in a focus group with two independent RWS practitioners.
The two cases produced markedly different trajectories, and the comparison indicates that the operative variable is not the contract form but the presence or absence of deliberate counter-arrangements: where a Type II arrangement was put in place to hold control and interaction together for each pocket of dynamic complexity, complexity was contained. Where it was absent, it was free to convert into mistrust and delay. Alignment is therefore achieved or missed process by process rather than at the level of the project as a whole, and “time overrun” proved broader than mere calendar slippage. The practical leverage lies less in the choice of contract form than in the conscious, process-by-process construction of counter-arrangements that hold control and interaction together where dynamic complexity arises.
The two-stage approach has been introduced as a possible response. In this approach, the contractor is involved earlier in the project. During phase 1, the client and contractor jointly develop the design, identify and manage risks, prepare the planning and work towards a more reliable cost estimate. The final price is agreed only at the end of phase 1, when the project is better understood. After a positive go/no-go decision, the project enters phase 2, the execution phase. The approach aims to improve predictability, risk management and collaboration. However, it also weakens the client’s position, because the contractor gains more influence over the design, risks, planning and price formation.
This research examines how clients can structure a two-stage approach during the preparation and design phase in order to achieve the project goals: delivering the required scope within the agreed time and budget. The research is conducted from the client’s perspective and combines literature research, desk research and case study analysis. Three Dutch infrastructure projects were analysed: A27 Houten–Hooipolder North, A27 Houten–Hooipolder South and the Neder-Betuwe dyke reinforcement project.
The theoretical foundation is based on principal-agent theory and stewardship theory. The two-stage approach contains elements of both: it depends on trust, openness and collaboration, but also creates situations in which interests may diverge, especially when price, risk allocation and the go/no-go decision are discussed.
The main finding is that the two-stage approach can create value, but also introduces new control risks for the client. Early contractor involvement can improve the design, make risks visible earlier and support more realistic pricing. However, the client may lose control over time, budget and scope due to information asymmetry and the lock-in effect. As the contractor gains more project-specific knowledge during phase 1, switching to another contractor becomes increasingly difficult.
The case studies show that collaboration alone is not sufficient. Measures such as open-book arrangements, shared risk registers, baselines, external reviews and go/no-go moments only support client control when combined with clear agreements, sufficient client-side expertise, transparent information, genuine exit strategies and real decision-making power.
In conclusion, the two-stage approach is not a universal solution and should therefore be applied only selectively. It can improve risk management, pricing and execution, but only when the client is able to organise and fulfil its own role effectively. Ultimately, delivering the required scope within the agreed time and budget requires both collaboration and control.
...
The two-stage approach has been introduced as a possible response. In this approach, the contractor is involved earlier in the project. During phase 1, the client and contractor jointly develop the design, identify and manage risks, prepare the planning and work towards a more reliable cost estimate. The final price is agreed only at the end of phase 1, when the project is better understood. After a positive go/no-go decision, the project enters phase 2, the execution phase. The approach aims to improve predictability, risk management and collaboration. However, it also weakens the client’s position, because the contractor gains more influence over the design, risks, planning and price formation.
This research examines how clients can structure a two-stage approach during the preparation and design phase in order to achieve the project goals: delivering the required scope within the agreed time and budget. The research is conducted from the client’s perspective and combines literature research, desk research and case study analysis. Three Dutch infrastructure projects were analysed: A27 Houten–Hooipolder North, A27 Houten–Hooipolder South and the Neder-Betuwe dyke reinforcement project.
The theoretical foundation is based on principal-agent theory and stewardship theory. The two-stage approach contains elements of both: it depends on trust, openness and collaboration, but also creates situations in which interests may diverge, especially when price, risk allocation and the go/no-go decision are discussed.
The main finding is that the two-stage approach can create value, but also introduces new control risks for the client. Early contractor involvement can improve the design, make risks visible earlier and support more realistic pricing. However, the client may lose control over time, budget and scope due to information asymmetry and the lock-in effect. As the contractor gains more project-specific knowledge during phase 1, switching to another contractor becomes increasingly difficult.
The case studies show that collaboration alone is not sufficient. Measures such as open-book arrangements, shared risk registers, baselines, external reviews and go/no-go moments only support client control when combined with clear agreements, sufficient client-side expertise, transparent information, genuine exit strategies and real decision-making power.
In conclusion, the two-stage approach is not a universal solution and should therefore be applied only selectively. It can improve risk management, pricing and execution, but only when the client is able to organise and fulfil its own role effectively. Ultimately, delivering the required scope within the agreed time and budget requires both collaboration and control.
From Input to Insight
How Organizational Sensemaking Shapes Professionals' Assessment of Stakeholder Input in Infrastructure Projects
This research investigates how practitioners' attitudes toward public participation develop and persist, using Weick's organizational sensemaking theory as a theoretical framework. The study targets the Dutch infrastructure sector, where the new Environment and Planning Act (Omgevingswet) has prompted professionals to reconsider when and how to organize public participation at earlier project stages. Public Engagement Professionals (PEPs) (Omgevingsmanagers) are essential to this environment, as they are responsible for designing and coordinating participatory initiatives within project teams.
The study adopts a qualitative approach including a literature review, an exploratory study, and 17 semi-structured interviews with PEPs and project managers. Furthermore, two co-creative expert sessions were organized to validate the study’s results.
The research's findings are presented through three interconnected frameworks. The Process model maps how project organizations move through three sensemaking stages (Enactment, Selection, and Retention) when organizing participatory initiatives. It highlights that participatory quality is shaped not only by procedural factors but also significantly influenced by mental and organizational factors.
The Vulnerability model extends this first framework by identifying challenges across each sensemaking stage, such as limiting external constraints and established dismissive mindsets within project teams. Crucially, the model shows that procedural reforms, such as the Environment and Planning Act, address what organizations must do procedurally but cannot change how they think. Accordingly, if mental and organizational obstacles remain unaddressed, procedural improvements alone might be insufficient to achieve development in public participation.
To address these vulnerabilities, the Strategy model is developed, identifying 20 intervening strategies that directly correspond to the Vulnerability model's challenges. These strategies are categorized as meaning-, structure-, or practice-oriented, enabling practitioners to select approaches suited to their institutional context.
By framing public participation as a continuous organizational and mental process rather than a purely procedural activity, this study highlights why stakeholder input remains frequently undervalued. The sensemaking models offer both a theoretical explanation and practical guidance, supporting PEPs in changing dismissive attitudes and unsupportive cultures. Ultimately, assuring that public participation is not merely seen as a legal obligation, but as an essential driver of project success.
...
This research investigates how practitioners' attitudes toward public participation develop and persist, using Weick's organizational sensemaking theory as a theoretical framework. The study targets the Dutch infrastructure sector, where the new Environment and Planning Act (Omgevingswet) has prompted professionals to reconsider when and how to organize public participation at earlier project stages. Public Engagement Professionals (PEPs) (Omgevingsmanagers) are essential to this environment, as they are responsible for designing and coordinating participatory initiatives within project teams.
The study adopts a qualitative approach including a literature review, an exploratory study, and 17 semi-structured interviews with PEPs and project managers. Furthermore, two co-creative expert sessions were organized to validate the study’s results.
The research's findings are presented through three interconnected frameworks. The Process model maps how project organizations move through three sensemaking stages (Enactment, Selection, and Retention) when organizing participatory initiatives. It highlights that participatory quality is shaped not only by procedural factors but also significantly influenced by mental and organizational factors.
The Vulnerability model extends this first framework by identifying challenges across each sensemaking stage, such as limiting external constraints and established dismissive mindsets within project teams. Crucially, the model shows that procedural reforms, such as the Environment and Planning Act, address what organizations must do procedurally but cannot change how they think. Accordingly, if mental and organizational obstacles remain unaddressed, procedural improvements alone might be insufficient to achieve development in public participation.
To address these vulnerabilities, the Strategy model is developed, identifying 20 intervening strategies that directly correspond to the Vulnerability model's challenges. These strategies are categorized as meaning-, structure-, or practice-oriented, enabling practitioners to select approaches suited to their institutional context.
By framing public participation as a continuous organizational and mental process rather than a purely procedural activity, this study highlights why stakeholder input remains frequently undervalued. The sensemaking models offer both a theoretical explanation and practical guidance, supporting PEPs in changing dismissive attitudes and unsupportive cultures. Ultimately, assuring that public participation is not merely seen as a legal obligation, but as an essential driver of project success.
Navigating the Future of Ageing Bridges
Addressing Deep Uncertainty through Adaptive Pathways for the Renewal and Renovation Program in the Netherlands
This thesis explores the applicability of Dynamic Adaptive Pathways Planning (DAPP) as a framework for managing deep uncertainty in the Renewal and Renovation (R&R) program led by Rijkswaterstaat. Using a Design Science Research approach, the study combines literature review, case study analysis, and expert interviews to identify key drivers, enablers, and barriers in bridge renewal. Adaptive pathways were developed to map possible sequences of preservation, mitigation, renovation, and renewal actions, supported by adaptation tipping points and monitoring indicators.
A demonstration with fictional bridge portfolios illustrates how adaptive pathways enable prioritisation, capacity-driven planning, and cross-project learning. The evaluation shows that adaptive pathways complement life cycle management by integrating flexibility, sequencing, and preparedness into long-term infrastructure strategies.
The study concludes that adaptive pathways can support Rijkswaterstaat in navigating uncertainty by promoting resilience, flexibility, and portfolio-based planning. Recommendations include categorizing bridges by shared challenges, adopting integrated cost–risk–performance indicators, developing flexible budget reserves, and using thresholds as triggers for action. ...
This thesis explores the applicability of Dynamic Adaptive Pathways Planning (DAPP) as a framework for managing deep uncertainty in the Renewal and Renovation (R&R) program led by Rijkswaterstaat. Using a Design Science Research approach, the study combines literature review, case study analysis, and expert interviews to identify key drivers, enablers, and barriers in bridge renewal. Adaptive pathways were developed to map possible sequences of preservation, mitigation, renovation, and renewal actions, supported by adaptation tipping points and monitoring indicators.
A demonstration with fictional bridge portfolios illustrates how adaptive pathways enable prioritisation, capacity-driven planning, and cross-project learning. The evaluation shows that adaptive pathways complement life cycle management by integrating flexibility, sequencing, and preparedness into long-term infrastructure strategies.
The study concludes that adaptive pathways can support Rijkswaterstaat in navigating uncertainty by promoting resilience, flexibility, and portfolio-based planning. Recommendations include categorizing bridges by shared challenges, adopting integrated cost–risk–performance indicators, developing flexible budget reserves, and using thresholds as triggers for action.
Bridge to Collaboration
Aligning asset owners for their infrastructure renewal challenges
interests and goals can bring challenges, which are important to overcome.
This research was executed by using a literature research, looking into a case study and conducting interviews within this case. The case is an initiative in the province of Noord Holland that has started to develop a collaboration between the different asset owners. The findings show that there are many different challenges and success factors for collaboration. The main challenges that were identified are the lack of a relationship and trust between the organisations, limited time, fear of losing autonomy and that there are different levels in the asset owner organisations. Some success factors are trust, transparency, clear communication, early involvement of stakeholders, having shared goals and having an approachable collaboration.
The collaboration in the case was described as a voluntary collaboration, where the asset owners could decide for themselves whether they want to participate in the collaboration network. A voluntary collaboration is developed when organisations see a shared challenge for which they recognise opportunities to work together. This collaboration is based on trust and having a shared goal. These components are especially important to develop in a collaboration. To answer the research question, a process description on how to initiate and develop a collaboration is designed. This model consists of five steps, which goes from defining the problem, to having informal meetings and working on building trust, to exploring the opportunities for actions that can come from the collaboration, to eventually executing these actions. Also, some important strategies and recommendations have been formulated here for the development of collaboration, which are to start small and work progressively on expanding the collaboration, it is important to define the reason for collaboration clearly, there should be goals within the collaboration, it is crucial to work on building a relationship and trust, and there has to be transparency about roles, responsibilities and
expectations.
This model can be useful for other organisations that want to initiate a collaboration for the renewal task in another region. For this, it is crucial that the interests and goals of those asset owner organisations are clear and there is a shared reason for the collaboration. ...
interests and goals can bring challenges, which are important to overcome.
This research was executed by using a literature research, looking into a case study and conducting interviews within this case. The case is an initiative in the province of Noord Holland that has started to develop a collaboration between the different asset owners. The findings show that there are many different challenges and success factors for collaboration. The main challenges that were identified are the lack of a relationship and trust between the organisations, limited time, fear of losing autonomy and that there are different levels in the asset owner organisations. Some success factors are trust, transparency, clear communication, early involvement of stakeholders, having shared goals and having an approachable collaboration.
The collaboration in the case was described as a voluntary collaboration, where the asset owners could decide for themselves whether they want to participate in the collaboration network. A voluntary collaboration is developed when organisations see a shared challenge for which they recognise opportunities to work together. This collaboration is based on trust and having a shared goal. These components are especially important to develop in a collaboration. To answer the research question, a process description on how to initiate and develop a collaboration is designed. This model consists of five steps, which goes from defining the problem, to having informal meetings and working on building trust, to exploring the opportunities for actions that can come from the collaboration, to eventually executing these actions. Also, some important strategies and recommendations have been formulated here for the development of collaboration, which are to start small and work progressively on expanding the collaboration, it is important to define the reason for collaboration clearly, there should be goals within the collaboration, it is crucial to work on building a relationship and trust, and there has to be transparency about roles, responsibilities and
expectations.
This model can be useful for other organisations that want to initiate a collaboration for the renewal task in another region. For this, it is crucial that the interests and goals of those asset owner organisations are clear and there is a shared reason for the collaboration.
Focusing on the proposed Bolivar Roads Gate System, the research integrates operational and maintenance needs into early design and planning. It applies the Flexibility in Engineering Design method to identify and evaluate how external drivers, like relative sea level rise and economic development (particularly increased vessel drafts), affect long-term barrier performance. The study maps dependencies between critical system drivers and barrier components, identifying the sill as the most risk-sensitive and costly to modify. As a result, it proposes an innovative, adaptable sill design: a two-stage structure that can be upgraded in the future to accommodate deeper vessel drafts, allowing the barrier to “change” rather than fail under unanticipated pressures.
The study also identifies the importance of designing for maintainability. Barrier components have varying lifespans, electrical (8–15 years), movable (50–100 years), and fixed (100 years), which demand different maintenance intervals. To address this, the research advocates for a maintainability-first design strategy, such as placing short-lived components in easily accessible locations. Maintenance should follow a state-based policy, combining preventive, corrective, and failure-based actions depending on the component’s role and risk level.
From a governance perspective, the study highlights the need for public clients to act as system integrators, balancing in-house oversight with selective outsourcing. The delivery of such complex infrastructure requires differentiated strategies across phases: detailed design should remain tightly managed in-house, while construction and certain maintenance tasks may be outsourced. Operational control, due to high reliability demands, should stay within the public domain. The governance of adaptable components, like the sill, must also remain with public authorities to ensure activation aligns with policy shifts.
Ultimately, the research proposes a bimodal strategy for barrier management. Mode 1 focuses on maintainability and predictable reliability through conventional design and maintenance practices. Mode 2 embraces uncertainty, embedding flexibility into components to adapt over time. This approach enables barriers to function as dynamic, living systems, built to endure, but also to evolve. By embedding adaptability in the most permanent elements and pairing it with tailored maintenance strategies, public agencies can maintain flood protection, performance, and accountability in the face of long-term uncertainty. ...
Focusing on the proposed Bolivar Roads Gate System, the research integrates operational and maintenance needs into early design and planning. It applies the Flexibility in Engineering Design method to identify and evaluate how external drivers, like relative sea level rise and economic development (particularly increased vessel drafts), affect long-term barrier performance. The study maps dependencies between critical system drivers and barrier components, identifying the sill as the most risk-sensitive and costly to modify. As a result, it proposes an innovative, adaptable sill design: a two-stage structure that can be upgraded in the future to accommodate deeper vessel drafts, allowing the barrier to “change” rather than fail under unanticipated pressures.
The study also identifies the importance of designing for maintainability. Barrier components have varying lifespans, electrical (8–15 years), movable (50–100 years), and fixed (100 years), which demand different maintenance intervals. To address this, the research advocates for a maintainability-first design strategy, such as placing short-lived components in easily accessible locations. Maintenance should follow a state-based policy, combining preventive, corrective, and failure-based actions depending on the component’s role and risk level.
From a governance perspective, the study highlights the need for public clients to act as system integrators, balancing in-house oversight with selective outsourcing. The delivery of such complex infrastructure requires differentiated strategies across phases: detailed design should remain tightly managed in-house, while construction and certain maintenance tasks may be outsourced. Operational control, due to high reliability demands, should stay within the public domain. The governance of adaptable components, like the sill, must also remain with public authorities to ensure activation aligns with policy shifts.
Ultimately, the research proposes a bimodal strategy for barrier management. Mode 1 focuses on maintainability and predictable reliability through conventional design and maintenance practices. Mode 2 embraces uncertainty, embedding flexibility into components to adapt over time. This approach enables barriers to function as dynamic, living systems, built to endure, but also to evolve. By embedding adaptability in the most permanent elements and pairing it with tailored maintenance strategies, public agencies can maintain flood protection, performance, and accountability in the face of long-term uncertainty.
Optimizing Lead Times in Greenfield Real Estate Projects
Combining Project Analysis and Practitioner Perspectives
and quantify second-order effects of risks in the design phase of construction and infrastructure projects, where a new methodology is developed that can help in this regard. The research method used, the Double Diamond Design process model, starts with an extensive literature review and semi-structured interviews with experts in the field to clarify the definition of first-order effects and second-order effects of risks and analyse
their current handling. The newly developed method focuses on cascading risk mapping, (dynamic) vulnerability analysis, exposure to risks, probabilistic assessments and Monte Carlo simulations to better predict project outcomes. The new method has been validated by an expert panel, showing that it improves the identification and quantification of risks, although its complexity may require additional training and time
for implementation. This research aims to improve the accuracy of cost estimates and project planning by incorporating second-order effects of risk into these processes. The developed method, while promising in improving the accuracy and clarity of risk management, needs further testing to evaluate its practical efficacy compared to current practices. ...
and quantify second-order effects of risks in the design phase of construction and infrastructure projects, where a new methodology is developed that can help in this regard. The research method used, the Double Diamond Design process model, starts with an extensive literature review and semi-structured interviews with experts in the field to clarify the definition of first-order effects and second-order effects of risks and analyse
their current handling. The newly developed method focuses on cascading risk mapping, (dynamic) vulnerability analysis, exposure to risks, probabilistic assessments and Monte Carlo simulations to better predict project outcomes. The new method has been validated by an expert panel, showing that it improves the identification and quantification of risks, although its complexity may require additional training and time
for implementation. This research aims to improve the accuracy of cost estimates and project planning by incorporating second-order effects of risk into these processes. The developed method, while promising in improving the accuracy and clarity of risk management, needs further testing to evaluate its practical efficacy compared to current practices.
Tussen droom en daad
Aanbevelingen voor het ruimtelijk planproces ten behoeve van klimaatadaptatie in de openbare ruimte bij de herontwikkeling van naoorlogse wijken
In this research three Dutch post-war neighbourhoods are reviewed as they have seen recent redevelopment of (parts of) the public space. Post-war neighbourhoods are relevant as a lot of infrastructure is in need of replacement, which makes this an opportunity to combine this with the implementation climate adaptation. Post-war neighbourhoods are common throughout Dutch cities and also house relatively large amounts of vulnerable groups of people. The amount of public space in these neighbourhoods gives municipalities a lot of influence on urban design and thus on the amount of climate adaptation.
The research reviewed the spatial planning process of the three cases with twenty interviews with practitioners in the redevelopment projects and through the analysis of project documentation. The three cases are Bernadottelaan (Utrecht), IVORIM (Haarlem) and Kruidenbuurt (Tilburg). Main bottlenecks of climate adaptation are the large investment and maintenance costs and the claim on the limited public space. The goal is to come up with recommendations to improve implementation of climate adaptation in the spatial planning process.
The outcome of the research is that there are six different recommendations related to actor involvement, project finance, project scale and design guidelines. Maintenance parties should be actively involved in the design process instead of only giving advice or testing designs. This would enhance the amount of climate adaptation as measures have to be maintainable. Early contractor involvement is necessary to be able to be more cost efficient and come up with practical design solutions. External parties like housing associations and public utilities should be informed in the early stages of project for them to be able to match the planning. This makes bundling of challenges possible and eliminates some spatial restrictions. Project finance has to be integral as climate adaptation is divided over several departments. With integral financing projects can be bundled and therefore overall be more cost efficient. Projects at neighbourhood scale benefit from the ability to solve different problems at larger scale and form the placement of solutions to other challenges so that climate adaptation measures can be done where they are needed the most. Design guidelines need to be implemented to ensure that ambitions and priorities are rationally translated and balanced in the final design.
...
In this research three Dutch post-war neighbourhoods are reviewed as they have seen recent redevelopment of (parts of) the public space. Post-war neighbourhoods are relevant as a lot of infrastructure is in need of replacement, which makes this an opportunity to combine this with the implementation climate adaptation. Post-war neighbourhoods are common throughout Dutch cities and also house relatively large amounts of vulnerable groups of people. The amount of public space in these neighbourhoods gives municipalities a lot of influence on urban design and thus on the amount of climate adaptation.
The research reviewed the spatial planning process of the three cases with twenty interviews with practitioners in the redevelopment projects and through the analysis of project documentation. The three cases are Bernadottelaan (Utrecht), IVORIM (Haarlem) and Kruidenbuurt (Tilburg). Main bottlenecks of climate adaptation are the large investment and maintenance costs and the claim on the limited public space. The goal is to come up with recommendations to improve implementation of climate adaptation in the spatial planning process.
The outcome of the research is that there are six different recommendations related to actor involvement, project finance, project scale and design guidelines. Maintenance parties should be actively involved in the design process instead of only giving advice or testing designs. This would enhance the amount of climate adaptation as measures have to be maintainable. Early contractor involvement is necessary to be able to be more cost efficient and come up with practical design solutions. External parties like housing associations and public utilities should be informed in the early stages of project for them to be able to match the planning. This makes bundling of challenges possible and eliminates some spatial restrictions. Project finance has to be integral as climate adaptation is divided over several departments. With integral financing projects can be bundled and therefore overall be more cost efficient. Projects at neighbourhood scale benefit from the ability to solve different problems at larger scale and form the placement of solutions to other challenges so that climate adaptation measures can be done where they are needed the most. Design guidelines need to be implemented to ensure that ambitions and priorities are rationally translated and balanced in the final design.
Public Participation in Action
Navigating the Environment and Planning Act: Public Participation in Spatial Development and Infrastructure
Enhancing Cost Forecasting Accuracy for Flood Protection Projects
Predicting pricing of future dike reinforcements using Regression Weighted Reference Class Forecasting for the Flood Protection Programme
Adaptive Urbanism
The Role of Collaboration in Water-Adaptive Design
The goal of this study is to provide new insights for actors in the housing construction chain, the government and science. To gain these new insights, the following research question has been formulated: How can the collaboration between actors in the Dutch housing construction industry be improved in the pursuit of sustainable supply chain management? This research was conducted through an in-depth case study research, based on literature research and semi-structured interviews with representatives from the most influential actor types in the Dutch housing construction supply chain. The housing construction supply chain contains a wide variety of actors with key players herein being main contractors, property developers and so-called first tier subcontractors
During the analysis of the interview results, an extensive amount of barriers and drivers were uncovered that actors encounter during the implementation of SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. For both barriers and drivers, it was found that subcontractors and property developers focus on the market and networking category, indicating they look more at the supply chain compared to main contractors. For main contractors, it seems they focus more on regulations, institutional barriers and drivers from within their own organization.
Based on the identified barriers and drivers, the following practical recommendations can accelerate the transition to SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. First, share knowledge with all actors in the supply chain. Second, develop a sustainable corporate culture that is reinforced both top-down and bottom-up in the organization. Third, some investments in sustainable operations are too high for a single actor to realize. Therefore, it is recommended that supply chain actors find effective ways to share financial burdens with each other in housing projects. Fourth and last, governmental institutions draft long term visions for the environment and subsequently translate this into policy.
The research findings can be used to inform and motivate main contractors, subcontractors, property developers and governments about practical implications and the use of policy instruments to achieve a sustainable supply chain in the Dutch housing construction industry. The combination of more intrinsic motivation from all actors in the housing construction chain can pave the way for creating a sustainable way of constructing houses.
...
The goal of this study is to provide new insights for actors in the housing construction chain, the government and science. To gain these new insights, the following research question has been formulated: How can the collaboration between actors in the Dutch housing construction industry be improved in the pursuit of sustainable supply chain management? This research was conducted through an in-depth case study research, based on literature research and semi-structured interviews with representatives from the most influential actor types in the Dutch housing construction supply chain. The housing construction supply chain contains a wide variety of actors with key players herein being main contractors, property developers and so-called first tier subcontractors
During the analysis of the interview results, an extensive amount of barriers and drivers were uncovered that actors encounter during the implementation of SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. For both barriers and drivers, it was found that subcontractors and property developers focus on the market and networking category, indicating they look more at the supply chain compared to main contractors. For main contractors, it seems they focus more on regulations, institutional barriers and drivers from within their own organization.
Based on the identified barriers and drivers, the following practical recommendations can accelerate the transition to SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. First, share knowledge with all actors in the supply chain. Second, develop a sustainable corporate culture that is reinforced both top-down and bottom-up in the organization. Third, some investments in sustainable operations are too high for a single actor to realize. Therefore, it is recommended that supply chain actors find effective ways to share financial burdens with each other in housing projects. Fourth and last, governmental institutions draft long term visions for the environment and subsequently translate this into policy.
The research findings can be used to inform and motivate main contractors, subcontractors, property developers and governments about practical implications and the use of policy instruments to achieve a sustainable supply chain in the Dutch housing construction industry. The combination of more intrinsic motivation from all actors in the housing construction chain can pave the way for creating a sustainable way of constructing houses.
A material passport as a means to support the circular transition?
-“The proof of the pudding is in the eating”-
Reflecting the findings of this research against the broadly accepted work agreements of the guideline, it can be concluded that implementation within practice is much more unruly and ad hoc than the suggested implementation guideline and road towards standardisation. Within this research, multiple discrepancies have been found that could create a barrier for effective implementation with respect to ease of use and could impact the added value of the tool over the lifetime of the construction. Private and public support of the work agreements is not aligned and could lead to the separation of MP development. Nevertheless, parties recognise the need for data registration in order to transition towards a circular economy. MP development should work towards creating the essential committed cooperation of all parties in the value chain, as within a circular economy the whole value chain should be involved. This could either mature through governmental involvement or market force, but balancing the economic and societal values of stakeholders within the value chain will become necessary to ensure the full potential of the tool to facilitate circular material flow within the construction industry. Future research should gather more empirical knowledge, and it is recommended that perspectives from both private and public clients be included. ...
Reflecting the findings of this research against the broadly accepted work agreements of the guideline, it can be concluded that implementation within practice is much more unruly and ad hoc than the suggested implementation guideline and road towards standardisation. Within this research, multiple discrepancies have been found that could create a barrier for effective implementation with respect to ease of use and could impact the added value of the tool over the lifetime of the construction. Private and public support of the work agreements is not aligned and could lead to the separation of MP development. Nevertheless, parties recognise the need for data registration in order to transition towards a circular economy. MP development should work towards creating the essential committed cooperation of all parties in the value chain, as within a circular economy the whole value chain should be involved. This could either mature through governmental involvement or market force, but balancing the economic and societal values of stakeholders within the value chain will become necessary to ensure the full potential of the tool to facilitate circular material flow within the construction industry. Future research should gather more empirical knowledge, and it is recommended that perspectives from both private and public clients be included.
When Effective Stakeholder Alignment Actions Are Carried Out, Within Infrastructure Projects
A single case study at Schiphol Landside Infrastructure
Assessing collaborative behaviour as partner selection mechanism
An explorative study into team assessments used in the tender process of infrastructure projects