T. Verma
Please Note
36 records found
1
Unequal Cities
An investigation into the reproduction of urban inequalities through socio-technical processes and policy
Living on Less
Sufficiency-enabling Policies as a Lever for a Just Housing Transition in Germany
the German housing context for meaningful policy recommendations. With an agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm, I identify households with the highest floor area per capita, characterized as single, without children, older, living outside large cities, residing in (detached) single-family houses, owning their homes, having low incomes, and located in West Germany. The historical driver analysis reveals the influence of capitalist, market-oriented policies, which promoted home ownership as retirement security to decrease provisioning by the state. These policies included subsidies favouring ownership and single-family houses, as well as large-scale privatization and financialization, shifting the housing sector’s focus to (international) investor profits rather than providing affordable and sufficient living space for all. Current policies miss the opportunity to redistribute floor area and hinder the flexible matching of housing supply and demand. Taking into account the identified target households and the historical context, a final critical reflection on existing policy proposals enriches the future design of sufficiency-enabling policies for the German housing sector and allows for a more accurate quantification of the impact reduction potential. This social science perspective allows sufficiency and industrial ecology scholars to situate their research in the German context and gain a deeper understanding of the historical drivers and enablers for sufficiency application. ...
the German housing context for meaningful policy recommendations. With an agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm, I identify households with the highest floor area per capita, characterized as single, without children, older, living outside large cities, residing in (detached) single-family houses, owning their homes, having low incomes, and located in West Germany. The historical driver analysis reveals the influence of capitalist, market-oriented policies, which promoted home ownership as retirement security to decrease provisioning by the state. These policies included subsidies favouring ownership and single-family houses, as well as large-scale privatization and financialization, shifting the housing sector’s focus to (international) investor profits rather than providing affordable and sufficient living space for all. Current policies miss the opportunity to redistribute floor area and hinder the flexible matching of housing supply and demand. Taking into account the identified target households and the historical context, a final critical reflection on existing policy proposals enriches the future design of sufficiency-enabling policies for the German housing sector and allows for a more accurate quantification of the impact reduction potential. This social science perspective allows sufficiency and industrial ecology scholars to situate their research in the German context and gain a deeper understanding of the historical drivers and enablers for sufficiency application.
Urban Fragmentation & Spatial Segregation Patterns in Europe
A similarity analysis and the importance of local context
Towards a just heating transition
Exploration of socio-spatial inequalities in individual and collective access to clean heating technologies for The Hague
Navigating Flood Vulnerability in the Global North and South
Exploring the Differences Between Social, Physical and Perceived Vulnerability in Jakarta and Houston
Recognising the varying manifestations of these vulnerabilities depending on the flood-prone location, this study prioritises the examination of disparities in vulnerability profiles between two representative cities: Jakarta, representing the Global South, and Houston, representing the Global North. By doing so, this research contributes significantly to the ongoing scientific discourse on climate change adaptation, as well as assist in extrapolating gained insights to data-scarce regions. This research aims to assists in aligning flood management efforts more closely with the needs and concerns of the residents in each city, acknowledging the distinct perceptions of flood hazards and socio-economic disparities. This, in turn, lays the groundwork for the development of targeted support and interventions, fostering more inclusive and resilient communities capable of mitigating the impacts of flooding and adapting to future challenges. The primary research question driving this study is as follows: 'How are social, physical and perceived vulnerabilities that influence flood adaptation different among households in an urban space?' To answer this question comprehensively, the research employs a multi-faceted approach, examining each vulnerability dimension separately before exploring their interactions in the urban context.
Comparing the social, physical and perceived vulnerability maps for Jakarta in the context of flooding uncovered many discrepancies and complexities that contribute to the scientific debate surrounding flood adaptation. The disparities between these dimensions highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to vulnerability assessment and flood mitigation. By recognising that vulnerability is not solely determined by physical factors, but also influenced by social dynamics and individual perceptions, authorities can develop strategies that foster community resilience and enhance disaster preparedness. Therefore, this research recommends addressing mismatches in risk perception, understanding the nuanced distribution of vulnerabilities and implementing context-specific interventions in order to build a safer and more resilient world in the face of flooding and other environmental challenges. ...
Recognising the varying manifestations of these vulnerabilities depending on the flood-prone location, this study prioritises the examination of disparities in vulnerability profiles between two representative cities: Jakarta, representing the Global South, and Houston, representing the Global North. By doing so, this research contributes significantly to the ongoing scientific discourse on climate change adaptation, as well as assist in extrapolating gained insights to data-scarce regions. This research aims to assists in aligning flood management efforts more closely with the needs and concerns of the residents in each city, acknowledging the distinct perceptions of flood hazards and socio-economic disparities. This, in turn, lays the groundwork for the development of targeted support and interventions, fostering more inclusive and resilient communities capable of mitigating the impacts of flooding and adapting to future challenges. The primary research question driving this study is as follows: 'How are social, physical and perceived vulnerabilities that influence flood adaptation different among households in an urban space?' To answer this question comprehensively, the research employs a multi-faceted approach, examining each vulnerability dimension separately before exploring their interactions in the urban context.
Comparing the social, physical and perceived vulnerability maps for Jakarta in the context of flooding uncovered many discrepancies and complexities that contribute to the scientific debate surrounding flood adaptation. The disparities between these dimensions highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to vulnerability assessment and flood mitigation. By recognising that vulnerability is not solely determined by physical factors, but also influenced by social dynamics and individual perceptions, authorities can develop strategies that foster community resilience and enhance disaster preparedness. Therefore, this research recommends addressing mismatches in risk perception, understanding the nuanced distribution of vulnerabilities and implementing context-specific interventions in order to build a safer and more resilient world in the face of flooding and other environmental challenges.
Gender and Accessibility
An Intersectional Approach
Exploring Gender Disparities in Accessibility Levels
A Comprehensive Analysis of Transportation Modes, Activity Types and Personal Characteristics
To Redefine, Not Reinforce
A Spatial Decision Support System with Generative Design Model for Exploring Optimal Improvements to Existing Street Networks for Enhancing Equity of Accessibility
In the SDSS, equity of accessibility is formulated as a generative design (GD) problem, named the Street Allocation Decision Problem (SADP), a single-objective optimization problem that searches for generated designs with the maximum weighted improvement in accessibility per unit of its cost. A GD model is built to solve SADP. Lastly, an operational framework is developed to guide prospective users in tuning and operating the SDSS for their specific context, problem, and objective.
The SDSS is tested on a toy problem, a 0.09km2 area in The Hague, The Netherlands. The toy problem is small in scale, easy and fast to implement and useful for initial testing of the model. Preliminary results have demonstrated the feasibility of the model. This is the first and humble attempt at developing an SDSS for enhancing equity of accessibility with a GD model. However, there are shortcomings in methodology and result quality, which compromise the practicality of the model and the interpretability of results. Although, only a proof of concept at the moment, the SDSS is a valuable starting point due to its advantages, such as transparency, modularity, humane-ness, and flexibility. This SDSS is built to involve decision-makers in the design process, which could serve as a useful learning experience for questioning and understanding what is the problem, what is considered equitable, and what are possible solutions. The SDSS has the potential to facilitate learning during transport decision-making in experimental settings or as explorative aids in early design stages. ...
In the SDSS, equity of accessibility is formulated as a generative design (GD) problem, named the Street Allocation Decision Problem (SADP), a single-objective optimization problem that searches for generated designs with the maximum weighted improvement in accessibility per unit of its cost. A GD model is built to solve SADP. Lastly, an operational framework is developed to guide prospective users in tuning and operating the SDSS for their specific context, problem, and objective.
The SDSS is tested on a toy problem, a 0.09km2 area in The Hague, The Netherlands. The toy problem is small in scale, easy and fast to implement and useful for initial testing of the model. Preliminary results have demonstrated the feasibility of the model. This is the first and humble attempt at developing an SDSS for enhancing equity of accessibility with a GD model. However, there are shortcomings in methodology and result quality, which compromise the practicality of the model and the interpretability of results. Although, only a proof of concept at the moment, the SDSS is a valuable starting point due to its advantages, such as transparency, modularity, humane-ness, and flexibility. This SDSS is built to involve decision-makers in the design process, which could serve as a useful learning experience for questioning and understanding what is the problem, what is considered equitable, and what are possible solutions. The SDSS has the potential to facilitate learning during transport decision-making in experimental settings or as explorative aids in early design stages.
Searching for the built environment
Clustering built environment typologies to find spatial patterns and areas of deprivation using remote sensing techniques
A Just City: Optimizing Low Emission Zone Allocation
Sing socio-demographic vulnerability to air pollution and transport poverty to identify adequate Low Emission Zone locations
LEZ locations were optimised for either the total population or the total vulnerable population. For the application of the Hague, some neighbourhoods dominantly come forward from the analysis. These neighbourhoods have favorable transport poverty values and in combination with poor air pollution and a higher number of (vulnerable) population it is only logical that they come forward from the analysis. Also, results for the Hague show that shifting the priority from the total population to the total vulnerable population does not have a significant effect on the outcome, especially when employing the multi-objective problem formulation. This can be explained by the fact that the highest number of vulnerable people are present at the highest populated neighbourhoods. For the case of the Hague, when employing a single-objective problem formulation, shifting from the total population to the total vulnerable population also has insignificant effects on the solution set when considering transport poverty. However, when considering the air pollution objective, there is a significant change in solution set. This implies that when taking a multi-objective approach, optimising for both air pollution and transport poverty vulnerability, the priority within the population has only minor effects on the outcomes, in stead, the trade-off between the objectives is the determining factor in the solution sets for the case of the Hague. Nevertheless, this work proposes a way to transition to a just LEZ allocation and evaluation method, that includes socio-spatial vulnerabilities to air pollution and transport poverty by employing an optimisation tool. ...
LEZ locations were optimised for either the total population or the total vulnerable population. For the application of the Hague, some neighbourhoods dominantly come forward from the analysis. These neighbourhoods have favorable transport poverty values and in combination with poor air pollution and a higher number of (vulnerable) population it is only logical that they come forward from the analysis. Also, results for the Hague show that shifting the priority from the total population to the total vulnerable population does not have a significant effect on the outcome, especially when employing the multi-objective problem formulation. This can be explained by the fact that the highest number of vulnerable people are present at the highest populated neighbourhoods. For the case of the Hague, when employing a single-objective problem formulation, shifting from the total population to the total vulnerable population also has insignificant effects on the solution set when considering transport poverty. However, when considering the air pollution objective, there is a significant change in solution set. This implies that when taking a multi-objective approach, optimising for both air pollution and transport poverty vulnerability, the priority within the population has only minor effects on the outcomes, in stead, the trade-off between the objectives is the determining factor in the solution sets for the case of the Hague. Nevertheless, this work proposes a way to transition to a just LEZ allocation and evaluation method, that includes socio-spatial vulnerabilities to air pollution and transport poverty by employing an optimisation tool.
The Social Impacts of Urban Densification in Times of Climate Action
Creating a knowledge base on the social impacts of urban interventions pursuing simultaneous densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation and comparing the extracted main points with the perceptions of urban policymakers in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
At the same time, unique environmental and social challenges are requiring urban developers to adapt their approaches to changed long-term or short-term physical conditions while considering the social consequences.
Many cities around the globe, and amongst them Amsterdam, The Netherlands, are striving to align urban interventions in the field of densification and climate action. This led to the research question: Which social impacts arise from simultaneous urban densification and climate action in the form of climate change adaptation and the energy transition?
This study provides insight into the current knowledge in scientific literature and the perceptions of urban policymakers. A qualitative mixed methods approach was applied. The approach was constituted of a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. A social impact framework was combined with an understanding of the natural sciences, engineering and urban planning to assess the social impacts of urban densification in times of climate action.
I first collected the current literature at the interface of urban densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation to compile the perspective of academic literature in a knowledge base.
Secondly, I conducted semi-structured interviews with urban policymakers of the Dutch capital of Amsterdam to gain insight into the perspective of policymakers. In the analysis of both my data sets, I discerned explicitly mentioned social impacts as well as social impacts which were not explicitly stated, but could be reasoned from the collected literature and the conducted interviews.
Finally, the comparison of both perspectives shows a strong prevalence of social impacts in the spheres of livability in the built environment, health and economic relations. How densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation exert consequences on communities and institutional relations is much less observed at the current state. Lastly, impacts on cultural or gender relations are close to absent from the discussion - in academic literature and the perceptions of urban policy-makers in the case study alike.
While the results are largely connected to the conceptualisation and methods applied, implications can be drawn for future research and policy-making. It is essential to explore the origins of the low occurrence of cultural and gender impacts in the data set to evaluate whether these are due to knowledge constraints or actual low impact rates. But, given the understandings gained, I urge to observe these spheres more strongly, in particular in relation to indirect social impacts. Moreover, the case study shows that social impacts of densification and climate action transitions are highly context-driven. They are subject to questions of ownership, human behaviour, urban inequalities and social differentiation within the constraints of physical space and monetary as well as environmental budgets. Additionally, it is indispensable to further strengthen the interaction and communication between researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders. ...
At the same time, unique environmental and social challenges are requiring urban developers to adapt their approaches to changed long-term or short-term physical conditions while considering the social consequences.
Many cities around the globe, and amongst them Amsterdam, The Netherlands, are striving to align urban interventions in the field of densification and climate action. This led to the research question: Which social impacts arise from simultaneous urban densification and climate action in the form of climate change adaptation and the energy transition?
This study provides insight into the current knowledge in scientific literature and the perceptions of urban policymakers. A qualitative mixed methods approach was applied. The approach was constituted of a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. A social impact framework was combined with an understanding of the natural sciences, engineering and urban planning to assess the social impacts of urban densification in times of climate action.
I first collected the current literature at the interface of urban densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation to compile the perspective of academic literature in a knowledge base.
Secondly, I conducted semi-structured interviews with urban policymakers of the Dutch capital of Amsterdam to gain insight into the perspective of policymakers. In the analysis of both my data sets, I discerned explicitly mentioned social impacts as well as social impacts which were not explicitly stated, but could be reasoned from the collected literature and the conducted interviews.
Finally, the comparison of both perspectives shows a strong prevalence of social impacts in the spheres of livability in the built environment, health and economic relations. How densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation exert consequences on communities and institutional relations is much less observed at the current state. Lastly, impacts on cultural or gender relations are close to absent from the discussion - in academic literature and the perceptions of urban policy-makers in the case study alike.
While the results are largely connected to the conceptualisation and methods applied, implications can be drawn for future research and policy-making. It is essential to explore the origins of the low occurrence of cultural and gender impacts in the data set to evaluate whether these are due to knowledge constraints or actual low impact rates. But, given the understandings gained, I urge to observe these spheres more strongly, in particular in relation to indirect social impacts. Moreover, the case study shows that social impacts of densification and climate action transitions are highly context-driven. They are subject to questions of ownership, human behaviour, urban inequalities and social differentiation within the constraints of physical space and monetary as well as environmental budgets. Additionally, it is indispensable to further strengthen the interaction and communication between researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders.
...
Central to this thesis was the following main question: “What is the impact of including social information in the information provided for decision-making processes on the social responsibility of policymakers’ decisions for the heat transition?”. To assess this impact, interviews were conducted, and a 1x2 between-subjects experiment was set up where participants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions: group A: exposure to only technical and economic information, and group B: exposure to technical, economic and social information. With a Mann-Whitney U test, it was determined whether there were differences between the two groups.
The results of this study indicated that the inclusion of social aspects leads to more socially responsible decisions in the heat transition for nine out of 20 neighbourhoods, meaning that neighbourhoods with specific social characteristics are prioritised more than after including this information. These neighbourhoods often had extreme values for the social indicators. For example, neighbourhoods with high public participation or support were prioritised more. Future research should study which social factors increase residents’ participation or public support so policymakers can meaningfully include such social indicators for heat transition decision-making. Another interesting finding is that many policymakers (and therefore municipalities) seemed to have diverging approaches to the heat transition. Future studies should research what causes these differences between municipalities by focusing on personal (of the policymaker) or organisational (of the municipality) characteristics.
...
Central to this thesis was the following main question: “What is the impact of including social information in the information provided for decision-making processes on the social responsibility of policymakers’ decisions for the heat transition?”. To assess this impact, interviews were conducted, and a 1x2 between-subjects experiment was set up where participants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions: group A: exposure to only technical and economic information, and group B: exposure to technical, economic and social information. With a Mann-Whitney U test, it was determined whether there were differences between the two groups.
The results of this study indicated that the inclusion of social aspects leads to more socially responsible decisions in the heat transition for nine out of 20 neighbourhoods, meaning that neighbourhoods with specific social characteristics are prioritised more than after including this information. These neighbourhoods often had extreme values for the social indicators. For example, neighbourhoods with high public participation or support were prioritised more. Future research should study which social factors increase residents’ participation or public support so policymakers can meaningfully include such social indicators for heat transition decision-making. Another interesting finding is that many policymakers (and therefore municipalities) seemed to have diverging approaches to the heat transition. Future studies should research what causes these differences between municipalities by focusing on personal (of the policymaker) or organisational (of the municipality) characteristics.
The Renovation Wave: An opportunity to tackle energy poverty?
A Case Study-Mixed Methods (CS-MM) approach to including justice in renovation policies considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty
economic and energy indicators. Consequently, scholars have called to include justice in renovation policies and explore how vulnerable groups can be identified. To address this knowledge gap, the following main research question was formulated:
Using a Case-Study Mixed Methods (CS-MM) approach, how can justice be included in renovation policies considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty?
The results showed that by identifying vulnerable groups based on a locally developed index of the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty and acknowledging their vulnerability, recognitional justice can be included in renovation policies. Besides, identifying tailored policy strategies in a multi-stakeholder environment that, on the one hand, focus on the distribution of renovation resources based on the needs and characteristics of the identified vulnerable groups and, on the other hand, on how the vulnerable groups can be included in the decision-making, distributional and procedural justice can be included in renovation policies. Thus, it can be concluded that by deploying the current CS-MM approach, justice can be included.
The outcomes of the present study are twofold. Firstly, from a scientific perspective, the present study contributes to the current body of scientific knowledge on: (1) how vulnerable groups in need of renovation can be identified, (2) how justice can be included in renovation policies to address energy poverty and (3) how a CS-MM approach can be deployed to research how justice can be included in renovation policies considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty. Secondly, from a societal perspective, this study provides insights to improve policy strategies that enable local decision-makers to identify vulnerable groups and include justice in renovation, considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty. ...
economic and energy indicators. Consequently, scholars have called to include justice in renovation policies and explore how vulnerable groups can be identified. To address this knowledge gap, the following main research question was formulated:
Using a Case-Study Mixed Methods (CS-MM) approach, how can justice be included in renovation policies considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty?
The results showed that by identifying vulnerable groups based on a locally developed index of the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty and acknowledging their vulnerability, recognitional justice can be included in renovation policies. Besides, identifying tailored policy strategies in a multi-stakeholder environment that, on the one hand, focus on the distribution of renovation resources based on the needs and characteristics of the identified vulnerable groups and, on the other hand, on how the vulnerable groups can be included in the decision-making, distributional and procedural justice can be included in renovation policies. Thus, it can be concluded that by deploying the current CS-MM approach, justice can be included.
The outcomes of the present study are twofold. Firstly, from a scientific perspective, the present study contributes to the current body of scientific knowledge on: (1) how vulnerable groups in need of renovation can be identified, (2) how justice can be included in renovation policies to address energy poverty and (3) how a CS-MM approach can be deployed to research how justice can be included in renovation policies considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty. Secondly, from a societal perspective, this study provides insights to improve policy strategies that enable local decision-makers to identify vulnerable groups and include justice in renovation, considering the socio-spatial vulnerability to energy poverty.
Sharing our Sunlight
Evaluating Access to Solar Energy in Light of a Just Energy Transition
Considering the fact that solar PV is a major driver of the renewable energy transition, this thesis in part addresses this knowledge gap by spatially analyzing which socioeconomic groups in the urban environment lack access to solar PV and where these groups are located. Access to solar PV in this context is defined as: the freedom of individuals or households to decide whether or not to adopt residential solar PV energy resources, dependent on the existence of one or more barriers. Secondly, does the research assess how access to solar PV resources spatially intersects with the ability to generate solar energy through these resources. The location that is selected as the area of study for this research is the city of The Hague, Netherlands. A framework is constructed to assess access to solar PV using the Theory of Planned Behavior originating from social sciences, which is frequently used to model adoption behavior of novel energy technologies. To evaluate the technical PV potential of the case-area the ArcGIS Solar Analyst Tool is applied. A K-means clustering analysis is performed to find any meaningful patterns in the distribution of access to solar PV across the area of study.
The key findings of this study are:
•Access to solar PV resources is unequally distributed across the Hague. Large parts of The Hague have unfavorable characteristics for solar PV adoption.
•The highest levels of technical PV potential are found in areas that are considered to have poor access to solar PV. As a consequence, currently the majority of technical PV potential within the case area is likely to remain unexploited due to poor access to solar PV within these areas.
•There is a need for energy policy that focuses on the groups that have poor access to solar PV and are unserved by current energy policy focused on stimulating adoption of solar PV. These groups are non-home owners in the private rental sector, home-owners that share ownership of the roof of a shared building and households that are provided housing by social housing corporations.
Further research could focus on exploring and evaluating policy design that is aimed at supporting socioeconomic groups that currently lack access to the renewable energy transition. This is important in order to ensure that the renewable energy transition makes its way throughout all layers of society.
...
Considering the fact that solar PV is a major driver of the renewable energy transition, this thesis in part addresses this knowledge gap by spatially analyzing which socioeconomic groups in the urban environment lack access to solar PV and where these groups are located. Access to solar PV in this context is defined as: the freedom of individuals or households to decide whether or not to adopt residential solar PV energy resources, dependent on the existence of one or more barriers. Secondly, does the research assess how access to solar PV resources spatially intersects with the ability to generate solar energy through these resources. The location that is selected as the area of study for this research is the city of The Hague, Netherlands. A framework is constructed to assess access to solar PV using the Theory of Planned Behavior originating from social sciences, which is frequently used to model adoption behavior of novel energy technologies. To evaluate the technical PV potential of the case-area the ArcGIS Solar Analyst Tool is applied. A K-means clustering analysis is performed to find any meaningful patterns in the distribution of access to solar PV across the area of study.
The key findings of this study are:
•Access to solar PV resources is unequally distributed across the Hague. Large parts of The Hague have unfavorable characteristics for solar PV adoption.
•The highest levels of technical PV potential are found in areas that are considered to have poor access to solar PV. As a consequence, currently the majority of technical PV potential within the case area is likely to remain unexploited due to poor access to solar PV within these areas.
•There is a need for energy policy that focuses on the groups that have poor access to solar PV and are unserved by current energy policy focused on stimulating adoption of solar PV. These groups are non-home owners in the private rental sector, home-owners that share ownership of the roof of a shared building and households that are provided housing by social housing corporations.
Further research could focus on exploring and evaluating policy design that is aimed at supporting socioeconomic groups that currently lack access to the renewable energy transition. This is important in order to ensure that the renewable energy transition makes its way throughout all layers of society.
of air pollution. Therefore, improving air quality is high on political agendas in modern societies. In the Netherlands, particularly around major roads, NO2 standards set by the government are often exceeded. Air quality models are used to monitor air quality values and design policies to reduce air pollution. Currently, authorities in the Netherlands use a Gaussian Plume Model for decision-making, but this model paints a rather skewed view of reality due to
its underlying assumptions. This research contributes to academic
knowledge about air quality modelling by evaluating two innovative model types, a physics-based LES model and a data-driven regression model, for their usage in decision-making to improve air quality. This is done by comparing the performance of both models with the performance of a Gaussian Plume Model for predicting NO2 levels around a large highway in the Netherlands. Also, two
combinations of the LES model and the regression model are examined. It is concluded that both the LES model and the regression model show potential for accurately predicting air quality around highways in the Netherlands. The LES model is particularly suitable for predicting high NO2 levels, and the regression model is considered suitable for predicting the average NO2 levels over a longer timeframe. A model in which the LES results were combined with a
regression model outperformed the original models and is therefore considered to hold the most potential for usage within air quality
policy. ...
of air pollution. Therefore, improving air quality is high on political agendas in modern societies. In the Netherlands, particularly around major roads, NO2 standards set by the government are often exceeded. Air quality models are used to monitor air quality values and design policies to reduce air pollution. Currently, authorities in the Netherlands use a Gaussian Plume Model for decision-making, but this model paints a rather skewed view of reality due to
its underlying assumptions. This research contributes to academic
knowledge about air quality modelling by evaluating two innovative model types, a physics-based LES model and a data-driven regression model, for their usage in decision-making to improve air quality. This is done by comparing the performance of both models with the performance of a Gaussian Plume Model for predicting NO2 levels around a large highway in the Netherlands. Also, two
combinations of the LES model and the regression model are examined. It is concluded that both the LES model and the regression model show potential for accurately predicting air quality around highways in the Netherlands. The LES model is particularly suitable for predicting high NO2 levels, and the regression model is considered suitable for predicting the average NO2 levels over a longer timeframe. A model in which the LES results were combined with a
regression model outperformed the original models and is therefore considered to hold the most potential for usage within air quality
policy.
Urban Voices
Citizen Voice: An innovative Open-source Map-based tool for effective public participation
While many methods and tools have been developed over the years, for enhancing citizen engagement and the effectiveness of public participation, there seems to be an evident gap in substantial and two-way collaboration among the (relevant) urban stakeholders. This thesis project aims to hark the perspectives and needs of the urban stakeholders, translating them into a conceptual design of a digital public participation platform. Next to that, except for the importance of the platform itself, as a tool, the focus was also given to participation, as a process, considering that such a platform could and should act as a promoter of effective public participation rather than a stand-alone solution. Consequently, the main research question of this study is: Which characteristics need to be included in designing a public participation platform so that it can enhance citizen engagement and facilitate more effective public participation in urban planning?
For this research, a design science research approach was chosen. A theoretical background was developed on existing theories, methods and frameworks related to public participation and digital platforms. Data collection was conducted using multiple methods, including workshops, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires, while data analysis was conducted inductively, to identify all the emerging patterns and their interrelations.
From the data analysis, five core themes emerged: General findings; (De)Motivational factors for public participation; Characteristics; Technical requirements; Technological features. Retaining these themes, the analyzed results were then critically synthesized, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, to provide a holistic overview.
Combing the obtained results, the main research outputs were developed, providing an overall answer to the main research question. First, a trifold validation of the results, related to the past, present, and future, was conducted, fulfilling the rigor and design cycle of the design science research, and attaining a continuous assessment. Building upon the evaluation results, for the platform as a tool, a conceptual design was developed, based on the different views of the urban stakeholders. For the process of public participation in general, a set of guidelines was developed, providing recommendations on how to enhance citizen engagement and the effectiveness of public participation, based on the different views of the urban stakeholders.
This thesis concludes with some important final remarks, including limitations, recommendations for future research, research relevance, and the author’s final reflections on the research.
...
While many methods and tools have been developed over the years, for enhancing citizen engagement and the effectiveness of public participation, there seems to be an evident gap in substantial and two-way collaboration among the (relevant) urban stakeholders. This thesis project aims to hark the perspectives and needs of the urban stakeholders, translating them into a conceptual design of a digital public participation platform. Next to that, except for the importance of the platform itself, as a tool, the focus was also given to participation, as a process, considering that such a platform could and should act as a promoter of effective public participation rather than a stand-alone solution. Consequently, the main research question of this study is: Which characteristics need to be included in designing a public participation platform so that it can enhance citizen engagement and facilitate more effective public participation in urban planning?
For this research, a design science research approach was chosen. A theoretical background was developed on existing theories, methods and frameworks related to public participation and digital platforms. Data collection was conducted using multiple methods, including workshops, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires, while data analysis was conducted inductively, to identify all the emerging patterns and their interrelations.
From the data analysis, five core themes emerged: General findings; (De)Motivational factors for public participation; Characteristics; Technical requirements; Technological features. Retaining these themes, the analyzed results were then critically synthesized, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, to provide a holistic overview.
Combing the obtained results, the main research outputs were developed, providing an overall answer to the main research question. First, a trifold validation of the results, related to the past, present, and future, was conducted, fulfilling the rigor and design cycle of the design science research, and attaining a continuous assessment. Building upon the evaluation results, for the platform as a tool, a conceptual design was developed, based on the different views of the urban stakeholders. For the process of public participation in general, a set of guidelines was developed, providing recommendations on how to enhance citizen engagement and the effectiveness of public participation, based on the different views of the urban stakeholders.
This thesis concludes with some important final remarks, including limitations, recommendations for future research, research relevance, and the author’s final reflections on the research.
Urban Commons as a Driver of Social Inclusion
A Socio-Spatial Analysis of the Accessibility to Urban Commons in Amsterdam
However, it is still unclear whether the benefits of Urban Commons are ultimately accessible to the culturally and socioeconomically vulnerable. For instance, in a literature review study, Huron (2017) found significant uncertainties in how Urban Commons relate to feminism, race, gender, and ethnicity – factors that could constitute immaterial barriers of access, following Vrasti & Dayal’s (2017) terminology. In fact, while several studies have investigated the commons’ role in promoting urban justice, explorations of whether access to the commons itself is just have been neglected.
This master’s thesis explores what constitutes material and immaterial barriers to accessing Urban Commons to understand whether these initiatives can work, policy-wise, as a driver of social inclusion. 29 Urban Commons in Amsterdam were selected as a case study. A quantitative geo-spatial analysis was conducted to evaluate the material accessibility to each initiative. In parallel, commoners were surveyed about their perception of immaterial barriers and benefits of commoning. Finally, a representative of the municipality of Amsterdam was interviewed to assess the potential challenges and benefits of policies involving Urban Commons.
Concurring with Park et al. (2020), the case study findings suggest commons could indeed promote social inclusion. Moreover, it was also found that the excluded could face, in addition to the initially proposed material and immaterial walls, an ecosystem barrier to access commons. Yet this could be addressed from a policy standpoint with the development of a commons ecosystem that is capable of scaling the benefits of commoning across an entire city.
The results have academic and societal relevance. This study provides a new theoretical framework to research the factors influencing access to commons and also contributes to literature with a unique city-wide case study. It can also function as a reference for policy-makers who wish to learn about the commons landscape in Amsterdam and who interested in understanding the factors that contribute to participation in a commons.
...
However, it is still unclear whether the benefits of Urban Commons are ultimately accessible to the culturally and socioeconomically vulnerable. For instance, in a literature review study, Huron (2017) found significant uncertainties in how Urban Commons relate to feminism, race, gender, and ethnicity – factors that could constitute immaterial barriers of access, following Vrasti & Dayal’s (2017) terminology. In fact, while several studies have investigated the commons’ role in promoting urban justice, explorations of whether access to the commons itself is just have been neglected.
This master’s thesis explores what constitutes material and immaterial barriers to accessing Urban Commons to understand whether these initiatives can work, policy-wise, as a driver of social inclusion. 29 Urban Commons in Amsterdam were selected as a case study. A quantitative geo-spatial analysis was conducted to evaluate the material accessibility to each initiative. In parallel, commoners were surveyed about their perception of immaterial barriers and benefits of commoning. Finally, a representative of the municipality of Amsterdam was interviewed to assess the potential challenges and benefits of policies involving Urban Commons.
Concurring with Park et al. (2020), the case study findings suggest commons could indeed promote social inclusion. Moreover, it was also found that the excluded could face, in addition to the initially proposed material and immaterial walls, an ecosystem barrier to access commons. Yet this could be addressed from a policy standpoint with the development of a commons ecosystem that is capable of scaling the benefits of commoning across an entire city.
The results have academic and societal relevance. This study provides a new theoretical framework to research the factors influencing access to commons and also contributes to literature with a unique city-wide case study. It can also function as a reference for policy-makers who wish to learn about the commons landscape in Amsterdam and who interested in understanding the factors that contribute to participation in a commons.
Escaping Suburbia
A Case Study on Microtransit and Access Equity in the Minneapolis-St.Paul Metropolitan Area