J.R. Ortt
Please Note
38 records found
1
Between Exploration and Exploitation
Structural Alignment in Corporate Innovation Hubs
This thesis investigates how structures designed for exploitative operations influence exploratory innovation activities within an embedded corporate innovation hub. The study adopts a qualitative, phenomenon-centred case-study design, using the Collins Aerospace Innovation Hub as an empirical entry point into the broader organisational phenomenon. A theoretical analysis of ambidexterity, governance, process management, and embedded innovation units was combined with several semi-structured interviews and secondary cases from comparable organisational settings. The findings were analysed across three interconnected levels: industry, firm, and innovation unit.
The results show that industry-level requirements related to safety, certification, and regulation are primarily translated into internal governance procedures at the firm level and subsequently experienced as operational tensions within the innovation unit. The firm-unit interface therefore represents the main practical location of the exploration-exploitation tension. While exploitative structures can constrain experimentation when applied too early or uniformly, they also support accountability, future certifiability, and the transfer of exploratory outcomes into the wider organisation.
The thesis concludes that the central managerial task is not to remove governance, but to tailor it to the maturity and uncertainty of exploratory work. Differentiated governance, phased controls, boundary-spanning roles, internal alignment mechanisms, and a carefully designed balance between autonomy and organisational connection can help innovation hubs remain sufficiently flexible to explore while sufficiently integrated to generate value for the parent organisation. ...
This thesis investigates how structures designed for exploitative operations influence exploratory innovation activities within an embedded corporate innovation hub. The study adopts a qualitative, phenomenon-centred case-study design, using the Collins Aerospace Innovation Hub as an empirical entry point into the broader organisational phenomenon. A theoretical analysis of ambidexterity, governance, process management, and embedded innovation units was combined with several semi-structured interviews and secondary cases from comparable organisational settings. The findings were analysed across three interconnected levels: industry, firm, and innovation unit.
The results show that industry-level requirements related to safety, certification, and regulation are primarily translated into internal governance procedures at the firm level and subsequently experienced as operational tensions within the innovation unit. The firm-unit interface therefore represents the main practical location of the exploration-exploitation tension. While exploitative structures can constrain experimentation when applied too early or uniformly, they also support accountability, future certifiability, and the transfer of exploratory outcomes into the wider organisation.
The thesis concludes that the central managerial task is not to remove governance, but to tailor it to the maturity and uncertainty of exploratory work. Differentiated governance, phased controls, boundary-spanning roles, internal alignment mechanisms, and a carefully designed balance between autonomy and organisational connection can help innovation hubs remain sufficiently flexible to explore while sufficiently integrated to generate value for the parent organisation.
Modular Non-Linear Technology and Innovation Diffusion Model
Trajectory Model and Navigation Framework
The model consists of two tightly coupled components. The trajectory model is descriptive and answers how technology and innovation diffuse. It conceptualizes diffusion as an eight phase modular system consisting of Invention or Discovery, Innovation, Pilot, Adaptation, Acceleration, Stabilization, Decline, and Legacy. Phases are defined by functional purpose and empirically interpretable entry and exit conditions. By treating phases as modular states rather than as a fixed chronological sequence, diffusion histories are reconstructed as transition sequences instead of a single canonical path. This enables systematic representation of skipping, looping, regression, compression, overlap, and parallel progression within a bounded transition space. The navigation framework is explanatory and answers why diffusion unfolds along a specific pathway. It identifies and categorizes internal and external drivers and links them to transition sequences through a structured driver transition matrix. This framework clarifies how interacting technological, resource, market, institutional, organizational, and infrastructural conditions shape feasible pathways and constrain alternative trajectories.
To operationalize the model, a methodological framework was developed that integrates criteria driven phase reconstruction, transition space mapping, driver typology construction, and structured case validation. The architecture was subjected to breadth oriented micro validation across more than forty historical innovation and technology cases and depth validation through two longitudinal illustrative cases, namely mRNA COVID 19 vaccines and passenger airplanes. Across cases, diffusion histories mapped coherently onto the modular phase architecture without imposing artificial linearity. The bounded transition grammar proved sufficiently flexible to represent diverse diffusion patterns while preserving analytical comparability. Driver mappings provided systematic explanatory depth for pathway divergence, acceleration, regression, and stabilization.
The thesis contributes an integrated descriptive and explanatory language for analyzing innovation diffusion, enabling cross case comparison, cumulative theory building, and more structured reasoning for managerial and policy decision making. ...
The model consists of two tightly coupled components. The trajectory model is descriptive and answers how technology and innovation diffuse. It conceptualizes diffusion as an eight phase modular system consisting of Invention or Discovery, Innovation, Pilot, Adaptation, Acceleration, Stabilization, Decline, and Legacy. Phases are defined by functional purpose and empirically interpretable entry and exit conditions. By treating phases as modular states rather than as a fixed chronological sequence, diffusion histories are reconstructed as transition sequences instead of a single canonical path. This enables systematic representation of skipping, looping, regression, compression, overlap, and parallel progression within a bounded transition space. The navigation framework is explanatory and answers why diffusion unfolds along a specific pathway. It identifies and categorizes internal and external drivers and links them to transition sequences through a structured driver transition matrix. This framework clarifies how interacting technological, resource, market, institutional, organizational, and infrastructural conditions shape feasible pathways and constrain alternative trajectories.
To operationalize the model, a methodological framework was developed that integrates criteria driven phase reconstruction, transition space mapping, driver typology construction, and structured case validation. The architecture was subjected to breadth oriented micro validation across more than forty historical innovation and technology cases and depth validation through two longitudinal illustrative cases, namely mRNA COVID 19 vaccines and passenger airplanes. Across cases, diffusion histories mapped coherently onto the modular phase architecture without imposing artificial linearity. The bounded transition grammar proved sufficiently flexible to represent diverse diffusion patterns while preserving analytical comparability. Driver mappings provided systematic explanatory depth for pathway divergence, acceleration, regression, and stabilization.
The thesis contributes an integrated descriptive and explanatory language for analyzing innovation diffusion, enabling cross case comparison, cumulative theory building, and more structured reasoning for managerial and policy decision making.
Introduction Strategies for Vehicle to Grid Technology in the United Kingdom
A comprehensive approach to understand and introduce the technology prior to large-scale diffusion
An exploration of societal impacts of quantum technology
Towards responsible quantum innovation
A framework to identify applications for a technical innovation
Case study: a pressure-activated, colour-changing and flexible material
Towards Inclusivity In Entrepreneurship: Utilizing Highly Skilled Refugees
A Research on Supporting Syrian Refugee Entrepreneurs in Germany and the Netherlands through Collaboration between Business Incubators and Local Governments
To answer this, a multiple case study was conducted on the scale-up support ecosystems of Planet B.io - Biotech Campus Delft, Copenhagen, and Brightlands Chemelot. This case study was performed through desk research and semi-structured expert interviews with 3 different types of experts (ecosystem, technical scale-up and start-up expert) per ecosystem, resulting in 9 interviewees. This case study applies the Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework to a novel context and integrates it with the four identified scale-up support elements (technical facilities \& services, funding \& business services, network formation \& coordination, and knowledge \& talent) offering a framework to study scale-up support ecosystems. This study identified the scale-up support requirements for industrial biotechnology. These scale-up support requirements are, among others, a flexible and fully-serviced shared piloting facility up until TRL 6 ($\approx$ 2000 L bioreactor), a lab- to pilot- and industrial-scale technical support service, investment planning service and help with raising funding. These should be offered within a scale-up support ecosystem using milestone-based billing as a preferred revenue model, whereas a government voucher system should be set up to pay for the lab- to pilot- and industrial-scale technical support service. Also, the most important stakeholders for a scale-up support ecosystem were identified, including multiple large corporations, government institutions, universities (and other types of education), suppliers, and service providers. Based on the findings, a roadmap for the development of the Planet B.io - Biotech Campus Delft scale-up support ecosystem was proposed, focusing on strengthening the network, knowledge, talent, and funding before offering a piloting facility and business services. This study contributes to the field with a framework to study scale-up support ecosystems as well as with practical recommendations for scale-up support ecosystems in industrial biotechnology and similar industries, identifying the scale-up support requirements, its business models and required stakeholders. ...
To answer this, a multiple case study was conducted on the scale-up support ecosystems of Planet B.io - Biotech Campus Delft, Copenhagen, and Brightlands Chemelot. This case study was performed through desk research and semi-structured expert interviews with 3 different types of experts (ecosystem, technical scale-up and start-up expert) per ecosystem, resulting in 9 interviewees. This case study applies the Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework to a novel context and integrates it with the four identified scale-up support elements (technical facilities \& services, funding \& business services, network formation \& coordination, and knowledge \& talent) offering a framework to study scale-up support ecosystems. This study identified the scale-up support requirements for industrial biotechnology. These scale-up support requirements are, among others, a flexible and fully-serviced shared piloting facility up until TRL 6 ($\approx$ 2000 L bioreactor), a lab- to pilot- and industrial-scale technical support service, investment planning service and help with raising funding. These should be offered within a scale-up support ecosystem using milestone-based billing as a preferred revenue model, whereas a government voucher system should be set up to pay for the lab- to pilot- and industrial-scale technical support service. Also, the most important stakeholders for a scale-up support ecosystem were identified, including multiple large corporations, government institutions, universities (and other types of education), suppliers, and service providers. Based on the findings, a roadmap for the development of the Planet B.io - Biotech Campus Delft scale-up support ecosystem was proposed, focusing on strengthening the network, knowledge, talent, and funding before offering a piloting facility and business services. This study contributes to the field with a framework to study scale-up support ecosystems as well as with practical recommendations for scale-up support ecosystems in industrial biotechnology and similar industries, identifying the scale-up support requirements, its business models and required stakeholders.
A ten-step framework for finding applications for a breakthrough technology
Partially applied to the case of quantum dots
The Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework, viewed from a company perspective, serves as the basis for this research. The TIS framework can be defined as "the network of actors interacting within the industry, subject to certain institutions and involved in the generation, diffusion, and utilisation of a novel innovation." Through the examination of seven essential dimensions, referred to as TIS building blocks, the most significant bottlenecks impeding the implementation of hydrogen and ultra-efficient aircraft have been identified.
This knowledge has been utilised to create a three-phased deployment strategy for both sustainable aircraft technologies, considering timing and scale. The research scope has focused on the regional market segment, using a 70-90 passenger Embraer 175 aircraft design as reference aircraft. Key insights from the research have led to proposed recommendations to industry stakeholders, policy-makers and academics. ...
The Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework, viewed from a company perspective, serves as the basis for this research. The TIS framework can be defined as "the network of actors interacting within the industry, subject to certain institutions and involved in the generation, diffusion, and utilisation of a novel innovation." Through the examination of seven essential dimensions, referred to as TIS building blocks, the most significant bottlenecks impeding the implementation of hydrogen and ultra-efficient aircraft have been identified.
This knowledge has been utilised to create a three-phased deployment strategy for both sustainable aircraft technologies, considering timing and scale. The research scope has focused on the regional market segment, using a 70-90 passenger Embraer 175 aircraft design as reference aircraft. Key insights from the research have led to proposed recommendations to industry stakeholders, policy-makers and academics.
Barriers and Strategies Analysis on Mass Adoption of Solar Electric Vehicle in Indonesia
A Technological Innovation System Study
“From the technical innovation system perspective, how could solar electric vehicles reach mass adoption in Indonesia?”
This research is conducted in collaboration with Lightyear – a SEV producer. As Lightyear is aiming to mass produce its SEV, therefore, this research is conducted to explore and evaluate the Indonesian market, so that the best strategy recommendation could be provided to Lightyear so it could commercialize its SEV in a large scale in Indonesia. The qualitative research approach is implemented in this research by reviewing diverse online literature, including both scientific and grey literature.
The TIS Framework (Ortt & Kamp, 2022) and the Ten Niche Strategies framework (Ortt et al., 2013) are used as the starting point of the research. TIS is defined as innovation systems around a specific technology that consists of four main elements: the technology, a network of actors, the institutions, and the demand. Ortt & Kamp’s TIS framework is a tool to examine the TIS of an innovation that is in its adaptation phase to judge whether the innovation is ready for its mass uptake or whether a small-scale niche introduction strategy is needed prior to the large-scale diffusion. The framework consists of three major elements: TIS building blocks (most important aspects needed for large-scale diffusion), influencing factors, and strategies. When certain influencing factors negatively affect the completeness of the TIS building blocks, they pose as barriers to the mass adoption of the innovation. Certain strategies could be implemented to circumvent these barriers, such as the generic Ten Niche Strategies proposed by Ortt et al.
The research is conducted in four major steps. First, basic information about SEV technology is explored. Second, a new framework called “the Best Strategy Framework” is developed to extend and complete the original TIS Framework and Ten Niche Strategies Framework so that the users/readers could select the best strategy based on the combination of barriers that hinder mass adoption of the innovations. Third, the newly developed framework is used to evaluate the Indonesian market and to identify the barriers that might hamper Lightyear’s SEV mass adoption in Indonesia. Finally, by using the newly developed framework, the best strategy that could circumvent the identified barriers is selected and proposed to Lightyear. ...
“From the technical innovation system perspective, how could solar electric vehicles reach mass adoption in Indonesia?”
This research is conducted in collaboration with Lightyear – a SEV producer. As Lightyear is aiming to mass produce its SEV, therefore, this research is conducted to explore and evaluate the Indonesian market, so that the best strategy recommendation could be provided to Lightyear so it could commercialize its SEV in a large scale in Indonesia. The qualitative research approach is implemented in this research by reviewing diverse online literature, including both scientific and grey literature.
The TIS Framework (Ortt & Kamp, 2022) and the Ten Niche Strategies framework (Ortt et al., 2013) are used as the starting point of the research. TIS is defined as innovation systems around a specific technology that consists of four main elements: the technology, a network of actors, the institutions, and the demand. Ortt & Kamp’s TIS framework is a tool to examine the TIS of an innovation that is in its adaptation phase to judge whether the innovation is ready for its mass uptake or whether a small-scale niche introduction strategy is needed prior to the large-scale diffusion. The framework consists of three major elements: TIS building blocks (most important aspects needed for large-scale diffusion), influencing factors, and strategies. When certain influencing factors negatively affect the completeness of the TIS building blocks, they pose as barriers to the mass adoption of the innovation. Certain strategies could be implemented to circumvent these barriers, such as the generic Ten Niche Strategies proposed by Ortt et al.
The research is conducted in four major steps. First, basic information about SEV technology is explored. Second, a new framework called “the Best Strategy Framework” is developed to extend and complete the original TIS Framework and Ten Niche Strategies Framework so that the users/readers could select the best strategy based on the combination of barriers that hinder mass adoption of the innovations. Third, the newly developed framework is used to evaluate the Indonesian market and to identify the barriers that might hamper Lightyear’s SEV mass adoption in Indonesia. Finally, by using the newly developed framework, the best strategy that could circumvent the identified barriers is selected and proposed to Lightyear.
Becoming a quantum safe organization: Why it is important and how to get there
Exploring the need and readiness for quantum safe communication, and the strategies that can be formulated as a result
This thesis proposes a model to illustrate the factors that influence the decision to enter the market. Aspects that influence the formulation of a market entry strategy are included in the model. For the sake of simplicity, only the strategy to enter a market has been investigated. Next to the model, we created a flowchart that describes the steps required to develop a market entry strategy. Eventually the goal is to make a well-thought decision. The dialogue of the deaf on first, second or late being most favourable has been the cause of this thesis but the conclusion is none of those. The most important part of first-mover advantages and disadvantages is the effect they bring along with the entry into a market. This thesis claims that first-mover advantages are advantages and disadvantages that may be evaluated over the development of a product category, rather than belonging to any particular order. The weights of (dis)advantages differ over the course of the development so at different points in time, different advantages can be utilised. The first-mover (dis)advantages present aspects that can be utilised at a particular situation. The decision maker should foresee whether, given the current (dis)advantages, after its introduction the situation is most favourable or if the situation is most favourable when you wait, and competitors have entered the market. The combination of the pattern of development and first-mover advantages show this principle and show why the dialogue of the deaf on market order is not useful. The decision to enter a market has never been simple, and it likely never will be. This thesis offers direction for the decision-making procedure and explains how to comprehend it. The complexities of market entry decision making are not yet resolved, but a well-thought decision is getting closer. ...
This thesis proposes a model to illustrate the factors that influence the decision to enter the market. Aspects that influence the formulation of a market entry strategy are included in the model. For the sake of simplicity, only the strategy to enter a market has been investigated. Next to the model, we created a flowchart that describes the steps required to develop a market entry strategy. Eventually the goal is to make a well-thought decision. The dialogue of the deaf on first, second or late being most favourable has been the cause of this thesis but the conclusion is none of those. The most important part of first-mover advantages and disadvantages is the effect they bring along with the entry into a market. This thesis claims that first-mover advantages are advantages and disadvantages that may be evaluated over the development of a product category, rather than belonging to any particular order. The weights of (dis)advantages differ over the course of the development so at different points in time, different advantages can be utilised. The first-mover (dis)advantages present aspects that can be utilised at a particular situation. The decision maker should foresee whether, given the current (dis)advantages, after its introduction the situation is most favourable or if the situation is most favourable when you wait, and competitors have entered the market. The combination of the pattern of development and first-mover advantages show this principle and show why the dialogue of the deaf on market order is not useful. The decision to enter a market has never been simple, and it likely never will be. This thesis offers direction for the decision-making procedure and explains how to comprehend it. The complexities of market entry decision making are not yet resolved, but a well-thought decision is getting closer.
Influences on Technology Entrepreneurship
A Comparative Analysis Between The Netherlands and Japan
This thesis shows that TE and ME are different, should be treated as such, and has identified several influencing variables that affect TE differently than ME. Thus, TE and ME can be independently stimulated by increasing the levels of the influencing variables. For governments seeking to increase their levels of TE through relevant policies, despite a traditionally non-entrepreneurial environment, it means that all is not lost, and that the levels of TE can be raised by focusing on increasing levels of education, economic environment, and technological environment. Managerial recommendations include the geographical placement of technology start-ups and the diversification of the team to improve success. ...
This thesis shows that TE and ME are different, should be treated as such, and has identified several influencing variables that affect TE differently than ME. Thus, TE and ME can be independently stimulated by increasing the levels of the influencing variables. For governments seeking to increase their levels of TE through relevant policies, despite a traditionally non-entrepreneurial environment, it means that all is not lost, and that the levels of TE can be raised by focusing on increasing levels of education, economic environment, and technological environment. Managerial recommendations include the geographical placement of technology start-ups and the diversification of the team to improve success.
Knowing the time point of large-scale diffusion of a radically new high-tech innovation is a highly relevant topic. Companies, researchers, and government institutions can plan their research and development efforts, production, as well as marketing plans according to the predicted time point of large-scale diffusion. The research is based upon the assumption that specific indicators can predict the start of large-scale diffusion. The scientific field of forecasting the start of large-scale diffusion is relatively new. Therefore, an explorative methodology was required for this research. During the explorative process, it was ensured that indicators reflect on the holistic environment of an innovation by minding the so-called data collection cube. A data selection funnel was created, narrowing scientific branches down to a list of indicators in three steps. Each of these steps has its own criteria designed to: • Select scientific branches with the highest potential to find results in the literature reviews • Derive indicators that can observe the diffusion • Select indicators that can predict the start of large-scale diffusion The last step of the data selection funnel, selecting the indicators which can actually predict, was carried out with the support of three researchers. Eight criteria were used to select the most potential indicators: (i) Prediction, (ii) Timeliness of prediction, (iii) Availability of data, (iv) Cost of data, (v) Quantifiable& Objectivity, (vi) Empirical proof, (vii) Generalizability, (viii)Simplicity. The researchers were asked to evaluate the indicators according to the criteria (i) and (vi) as part of the scientific quality gate selecting the most potential indicators. After the indicators have been evaluated, a sensitivity analysis has been performed to improve the robustness of the selection mechanisms and to rule out an arbitrary selection of the indicators. Out of 50 indicators found in the literature or derived from the literature, 38 indicators were selected according to the selection mechanism. These 38 indicators have been split into two sets of judgemental and non-judgemental indicators to prepare the design of the forecasting approach. The forecasting approach aims to guide a user towards the correct forecasting technique given an innovation and situation. Five forecasting techniques were found to befitting the: (i) assumptions-based modelling, (ii) Delphi method, (iii)analogous forecasting, (iv) time series & regression models, and (v)artificial neural networks. However, each of the five forecasting techniques have disadvantages that can be overcome by one of the other methods. Hence, the forecasting approach has two stages. First, the user is guided towards the primary method and subsequently towards an additional method overcoming the disadvantages of the first method and improving the overall reliability of the forecast. For each method, a set of indicators is recommended. Once the forecasting approach has been developed, the completeness of indicators has been checked by using Ortt & Kamp’s 14 factors influencing the pre-diffusion phase. Additionally, four validation interviews applying the research on green hydrogen have been performed to let external actors reflect. These validation interviews formed the practical quality gate forging a bridge to the earlier mentioned scientific quality gate.
Knowing
the time point of large-scale diffusion of a radically new high-tech innovation
is a highly relevant topic. Companies, researchers, and government institutions
can plan their research and development efforts, production, as well as
marketing plans according to the predicted time point of large-scale diffusion.
The research is based upon the assumption that specific indicators can predict
the start of large-scale diffusion. The scientific field of forecasting the
start of large-scale diffusion is relatively new. Therefore, an explorative
methodology was required for this research. During the explorative process, it
was ensured that indicators reflect on the holistic environment of an
innovation by minding the so-called data collection cube.
A data selection funnel was created, narrowing scientific branches down to a
list of indicators in three steps. Each of these steps has its own criteria
designed to:
• Select scientific branches with the highest potential to find results in the
literature reviews
• Derive indicators that can observe the diffusion
• Select indicators that can predict the start of large-scale diffusion The
last step of the data selection funnel, selecting the indicators which can
actually predict, was carried out with the support of three researchers. Eight
criteria were used to select the most potential indicators: (i) Prediction,
(ii) Timeliness of prediction, (iii) Availability of data, (iv) Cost of data,
(v) Quantifiable& Objectivity, (vi) Empirical proof, (vii)
Generalizability, (viii)Simplicity. The researchers were asked to evaluate the
indicators according to the criteria (i) and (vi) as part of the scientific
quality gate selecting the most potential indicators. After the indicators have
been evaluated, a sensitivity analysis has been performed to improve the
robustness of the selection mechanisms and to rule out an arbitrary selection
of the indicators. Out of 50 indicators found in the literature or derived from
the literature, 38 indicators were selected according to the selection
mechanism. These 38 indicators have been split into two sets of judgemental and
non-judgemental indicators to prepare the design of the forecasting approach.
The forecasting approach aims to guide a user towards the correct forecasting
technique given an innovation and situation. Five forecasting techniques were
found to befitting the: (i) assumptions-based modelling, (ii) Delphi method,
(iii)analogous forecasting, (iv) time series & regression models, and
(v)artificial neural networks. However, each of the five forecasting techniques
have disadvantages that can be overcome by one of the other methods. Hence, the
forecasting approach has two stages. First, the user is guided towards the
primary method and subsequently towards an additional method overcoming the
disadvantages of the first method and improving the overall reliability of the
forecast. For each method, a set of indicators is recommended. Once the
forecasting approach has been developed, the completeness of indicators has
been checked by using Ortt & Kamp’s 14 factors influencing the
pre-diffusion phase. Additionally, four validation interviews applying the
research on green hydrogen have been performed to let external actors reflect.
These validation interviews formed the practical quality gate forging a bridge
to the earlier mentioned scientific quality gate.
...
Knowing the time point of large-scale diffusion of a radically new high-tech innovation is a highly relevant topic. Companies, researchers, and government institutions can plan their research and development efforts, production, as well as marketing plans according to the predicted time point of large-scale diffusion. The research is based upon the assumption that specific indicators can predict the start of large-scale diffusion. The scientific field of forecasting the start of large-scale diffusion is relatively new. Therefore, an explorative methodology was required for this research. During the explorative process, it was ensured that indicators reflect on the holistic environment of an innovation by minding the so-called data collection cube. A data selection funnel was created, narrowing scientific branches down to a list of indicators in three steps. Each of these steps has its own criteria designed to: • Select scientific branches with the highest potential to find results in the literature reviews • Derive indicators that can observe the diffusion • Select indicators that can predict the start of large-scale diffusion The last step of the data selection funnel, selecting the indicators which can actually predict, was carried out with the support of three researchers. Eight criteria were used to select the most potential indicators: (i) Prediction, (ii) Timeliness of prediction, (iii) Availability of data, (iv) Cost of data, (v) Quantifiable& Objectivity, (vi) Empirical proof, (vii) Generalizability, (viii)Simplicity. The researchers were asked to evaluate the indicators according to the criteria (i) and (vi) as part of the scientific quality gate selecting the most potential indicators. After the indicators have been evaluated, a sensitivity analysis has been performed to improve the robustness of the selection mechanisms and to rule out an arbitrary selection of the indicators. Out of 50 indicators found in the literature or derived from the literature, 38 indicators were selected according to the selection mechanism. These 38 indicators have been split into two sets of judgemental and non-judgemental indicators to prepare the design of the forecasting approach. The forecasting approach aims to guide a user towards the correct forecasting technique given an innovation and situation. Five forecasting techniques were found to befitting the: (i) assumptions-based modelling, (ii) Delphi method, (iii)analogous forecasting, (iv) time series & regression models, and (v)artificial neural networks. However, each of the five forecasting techniques have disadvantages that can be overcome by one of the other methods. Hence, the forecasting approach has two stages. First, the user is guided towards the primary method and subsequently towards an additional method overcoming the disadvantages of the first method and improving the overall reliability of the forecast. For each method, a set of indicators is recommended. Once the forecasting approach has been developed, the completeness of indicators has been checked by using Ortt & Kamp’s 14 factors influencing the pre-diffusion phase. Additionally, four validation interviews applying the research on green hydrogen have been performed to let external actors reflect. These validation interviews formed the practical quality gate forging a bridge to the earlier mentioned scientific quality gate.
Knowing
the time point of large-scale diffusion of a radically new high-tech innovation
is a highly relevant topic. Companies, researchers, and government institutions
can plan their research and development efforts, production, as well as
marketing plans according to the predicted time point of large-scale diffusion.
The research is based upon the assumption that specific indicators can predict
the start of large-scale diffusion. The scientific field of forecasting the
start of large-scale diffusion is relatively new. Therefore, an explorative
methodology was required for this research. During the explorative process, it
was ensured that indicators reflect on the holistic environment of an
innovation by minding the so-called data collection cube.
A data selection funnel was created, narrowing scientific branches down to a
list of indicators in three steps. Each of these steps has its own criteria
designed to:
• Select scientific branches with the highest potential to find results in the
literature reviews
• Derive indicators that can observe the diffusion
• Select indicators that can predict the start of large-scale diffusion The
last step of the data selection funnel, selecting the indicators which can
actually predict, was carried out with the support of three researchers. Eight
criteria were used to select the most potential indicators: (i) Prediction,
(ii) Timeliness of prediction, (iii) Availability of data, (iv) Cost of data,
(v) Quantifiable& Objectivity, (vi) Empirical proof, (vii)
Generalizability, (viii)Simplicity. The researchers were asked to evaluate the
indicators according to the criteria (i) and (vi) as part of the scientific
quality gate selecting the most potential indicators. After the indicators have
been evaluated, a sensitivity analysis has been performed to improve the
robustness of the selection mechanisms and to rule out an arbitrary selection
of the indicators. Out of 50 indicators found in the literature or derived from
the literature, 38 indicators were selected according to the selection
mechanism. These 38 indicators have been split into two sets of judgemental and
non-judgemental indicators to prepare the design of the forecasting approach.
The forecasting approach aims to guide a user towards the correct forecasting
technique given an innovation and situation. Five forecasting techniques were
found to befitting the: (i) assumptions-based modelling, (ii) Delphi method,
(iii)analogous forecasting, (iv) time series & regression models, and
(v)artificial neural networks. However, each of the five forecasting techniques
have disadvantages that can be overcome by one of the other methods. Hence, the
forecasting approach has two stages. First, the user is guided towards the
primary method and subsequently towards an additional method overcoming the
disadvantages of the first method and improving the overall reliability of the
forecast. For each method, a set of indicators is recommended. Once the
forecasting approach has been developed, the completeness of indicators has
been checked by using Ortt & Kamp’s 14 factors influencing the
pre-diffusion phase. Additionally, four validation interviews applying the
research on green hydrogen have been performed to let external actors reflect.
These validation interviews formed the practical quality gate forging a bridge
to the earlier mentioned scientific quality gate.
A support system for strategic decision making in a Sea Rescue Institute
By applying a Multi-criteria Decision Making model and theory