K.B.J. Van den Berghe
Please Note
27 records found
1
Successful Innovation District Development
The Role of Spatial Quality
A combination of quantitative and qualitative strategies was used for the research. Virtual water impacts were calculated using an Economic Input Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIOLCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), organised through the Quantity Time Impact (Q T I) framework and applied to a Dutch high rise case study. Water use and implementation dynamics were examined through semi structured interviews.
The findings show that water use in high-rise development is both large and largely invisible. Embodied water in construction materials, particularly concrete and aluminium, equals roughly 29 years of operational water use, meaning nearly one-third of the total lifecycle water demand is already fixed before the first resident moves in. Material choices and procurement decisions made early in the design phase therefore determine this footprint in ways that cannot be corrected later. Operational water use accounts for the remaining two-thirds over a 75-year lifespan and offers the largest direct reduction potential: 30-50% through efficient fixtures alone, and up to 70% when combining greywater and rainwater reuse.
Implementation of these solutions is shaped by five interconnected factors: low awareness and knowledge of water footprints, municipal requirements (increasingly acting as a driver, as in The Hague), financial feasibility constraints (greywater reuse systems carry payback periods of up to 60 years under current water prices), regulatory barriers limiting indoor use of rainwater and treated greywater, and execution and maintenance complexity in high-rise settings. Despite these barriers, developing contractors hold a central coordinating position that allows them to influence procurement, early design, and stakeholder collaboration. By applying a small-wins approach, preparing buildings for future greywater reuse, integrating water-impact optimization in early design phases, or initiating supplier conversations, contractors can trigger broader organisational change and lower barriers for more comprehensive circular water strategies.
This research advances the Circular Water Economy (CWE) by linking lifecycle water assessments with organisational decision-making. It provides developers and contractors with actionable guidance to reduce water footprints beyond regulatory compliance and demonstrates that integrating circular water principles into project execution is both feasible and increasingly necessary under growing water scarcity and tightening regulations. ...
A combination of quantitative and qualitative strategies was used for the research. Virtual water impacts were calculated using an Economic Input Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIOLCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), organised through the Quantity Time Impact (Q T I) framework and applied to a Dutch high rise case study. Water use and implementation dynamics were examined through semi structured interviews.
The findings show that water use in high-rise development is both large and largely invisible. Embodied water in construction materials, particularly concrete and aluminium, equals roughly 29 years of operational water use, meaning nearly one-third of the total lifecycle water demand is already fixed before the first resident moves in. Material choices and procurement decisions made early in the design phase therefore determine this footprint in ways that cannot be corrected later. Operational water use accounts for the remaining two-thirds over a 75-year lifespan and offers the largest direct reduction potential: 30-50% through efficient fixtures alone, and up to 70% when combining greywater and rainwater reuse.
Implementation of these solutions is shaped by five interconnected factors: low awareness and knowledge of water footprints, municipal requirements (increasingly acting as a driver, as in The Hague), financial feasibility constraints (greywater reuse systems carry payback periods of up to 60 years under current water prices), regulatory barriers limiting indoor use of rainwater and treated greywater, and execution and maintenance complexity in high-rise settings. Despite these barriers, developing contractors hold a central coordinating position that allows them to influence procurement, early design, and stakeholder collaboration. By applying a small-wins approach, preparing buildings for future greywater reuse, integrating water-impact optimization in early design phases, or initiating supplier conversations, contractors can trigger broader organisational change and lower barriers for more comprehensive circular water strategies.
This research advances the Circular Water Economy (CWE) by linking lifecycle water assessments with organisational decision-making. It provides developers and contractors with actionable guidance to reduce water footprints beyond regulatory compliance and demonstrates that integrating circular water principles into project execution is both feasible and increasingly necessary under growing water scarcity and tightening regulations.
Turning Ash into Opportunity
Ecosystem conditions for Geopolymer adoption in Chile’s Construction Sector
Fly ash-based geopolymers offer a promising pathway for transforming this underutilized industrial residue into a low-carbon construction material. However, existing research remains focused mainly on technical performance, leaving limited understanding of the ecosystem conditions that shape adoption.
This research examines the ecosystem conditions and interactions that shape the feasibility of adopting fly ash-based geopolymers as a construction material in Chile. The study applies Adner’s innovation ecosystem framework through a qualitative exploratory research design, combining literature review, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews. The analysis maps the focal value proposition, relevant actors, activities, flows, and positions, and identifies the main bottlenecks and gatekeepers within the ecosystem structure.
Chile presents enabling conditions such as fly ash availability, research capabilities, circular economy policies, decarbonization goals, and corporate sustainability agendas. However, adoption is constrained by precursor variability, alkaline activator cost and carbon intensity, and, most importantly, strict prescriptive regulation and stringent validation processes, which constitute the main upstream bottleneck. Downstream, project developers act as key gatekeepers, as they bear the economic and project-related risks associated with material adoption but lack concrete incentives to assume them.
The feasibility of adopting fly ash-based geopolymers depends on the coordinated alignment of technological capabilities, regulatory pathways, industrial actors, market incentives, and public policy, rather than on material optimization alone.
...
Fly ash-based geopolymers offer a promising pathway for transforming this underutilized industrial residue into a low-carbon construction material. However, existing research remains focused mainly on technical performance, leaving limited understanding of the ecosystem conditions that shape adoption.
This research examines the ecosystem conditions and interactions that shape the feasibility of adopting fly ash-based geopolymers as a construction material in Chile. The study applies Adner’s innovation ecosystem framework through a qualitative exploratory research design, combining literature review, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews. The analysis maps the focal value proposition, relevant actors, activities, flows, and positions, and identifies the main bottlenecks and gatekeepers within the ecosystem structure.
Chile presents enabling conditions such as fly ash availability, research capabilities, circular economy policies, decarbonization goals, and corporate sustainability agendas. However, adoption is constrained by precursor variability, alkaline activator cost and carbon intensity, and, most importantly, strict prescriptive regulation and stringent validation processes, which constitute the main upstream bottleneck. Downstream, project developers act as key gatekeepers, as they bear the economic and project-related risks associated with material adoption but lack concrete incentives to assume them.
The feasibility of adopting fly ash-based geopolymers depends on the coordinated alignment of technological capabilities, regulatory pathways, industrial actors, market incentives, and public policy, rather than on material optimization alone.
Integrating Donor Steel in Circular Construction
Technological enablers and collaborative strategies in the early design phases to overcome the identified obstacles of donor steel integration in the construction industry
This thesis researched how early-stage decision-making can support the integration of donor steel in circular construction projects. Therefore, the main research question states:
“How can applications of digital solutions and conditions for collaboration in the early design stages help to address the identified key obstacles to integrate donor steel in circular construction projects?”
To answer this question, a twofold approach was adopted: an exploratory approach and a case study approach. Data from exploratory interviews with construction stakeholders and multiple case studies were compared with the literature review, which identified five obstacles to donor steel. The following five obstacles were identified: supply and demand mismatch, certification and design standardization, the absence of legal frameworks, cost and economic uncertainty, and a lack of collaboration and transparency. The obstacles encompass technical, financial, regulatory, and organizational domains, indicating that technical obstacles alone do not hinder the widespread adoption of donor steel.
The exploratory interviews with stakeholders across the construction supply chain provided insights into how these obstacles manifest in practice. The interview data confirmed that ‘cost uncertainty’, ‘certification & design standardization’, and ‘supply & demand mismatches’ were the most significant obstacles in practice. The regulatory obstacle appeared less decisive than the literature review suggested, while several additional obstacles emerged, particularly related to client decision-making and timing. Additionally, ‘lack of collaboration and transparency’ was perceived as an obstacle in the interviews, but as an enabler in the case study research, showing the importance of strong collaborative structures in reuse projects. Moreover, the case study research provided further insights into how donor steel application is approached in real projects. The data showed that the key enablers were: early integration of digital and sustainability tools, strong collaborative structure with stakeholder engagement, and client sustainability ambitions. Showing the importance of digital solutions applications, such as BIM, MP’s, and material testing, supporting donor steel integration.
Overall, this thesis shows that the integration of donor steel is primarily constrained by early-stage organizational and economic conditions, rather than by technical constraints or the lack of digital solutions. The application of these digital tools is practical when embedded within the collaborative procurement process, early stakeholder engagement, and clear client commitment to circularity.
Finally, longitudinal, process-oriented research is recommended to generate more generalisable findings and to develop a coherent framework that provides actionable guidelines for future donor steel applications. Furthermore, practitioners should explicitly consider donor steel in the early design and procurement phases, support early stakeholder engagement, and integrate digital and sustainability tools early in a project to reduce uncertainty and prevent late-stage rejection. Additionally, policymakers must offer clarity and consistency in certification procedures and documentation requirements to reduce the perceived certification and regulatory risks. ...
This thesis researched how early-stage decision-making can support the integration of donor steel in circular construction projects. Therefore, the main research question states:
“How can applications of digital solutions and conditions for collaboration in the early design stages help to address the identified key obstacles to integrate donor steel in circular construction projects?”
To answer this question, a twofold approach was adopted: an exploratory approach and a case study approach. Data from exploratory interviews with construction stakeholders and multiple case studies were compared with the literature review, which identified five obstacles to donor steel. The following five obstacles were identified: supply and demand mismatch, certification and design standardization, the absence of legal frameworks, cost and economic uncertainty, and a lack of collaboration and transparency. The obstacles encompass technical, financial, regulatory, and organizational domains, indicating that technical obstacles alone do not hinder the widespread adoption of donor steel.
The exploratory interviews with stakeholders across the construction supply chain provided insights into how these obstacles manifest in practice. The interview data confirmed that ‘cost uncertainty’, ‘certification & design standardization’, and ‘supply & demand mismatches’ were the most significant obstacles in practice. The regulatory obstacle appeared less decisive than the literature review suggested, while several additional obstacles emerged, particularly related to client decision-making and timing. Additionally, ‘lack of collaboration and transparency’ was perceived as an obstacle in the interviews, but as an enabler in the case study research, showing the importance of strong collaborative structures in reuse projects. Moreover, the case study research provided further insights into how donor steel application is approached in real projects. The data showed that the key enablers were: early integration of digital and sustainability tools, strong collaborative structure with stakeholder engagement, and client sustainability ambitions. Showing the importance of digital solutions applications, such as BIM, MP’s, and material testing, supporting donor steel integration.
Overall, this thesis shows that the integration of donor steel is primarily constrained by early-stage organizational and economic conditions, rather than by technical constraints or the lack of digital solutions. The application of these digital tools is practical when embedded within the collaborative procurement process, early stakeholder engagement, and clear client commitment to circularity.
Finally, longitudinal, process-oriented research is recommended to generate more generalisable findings and to develop a coherent framework that provides actionable guidelines for future donor steel applications. Furthermore, practitioners should explicitly consider donor steel in the early design and procurement phases, support early stakeholder engagement, and integrate digital and sustainability tools early in a project to reduce uncertainty and prevent late-stage rejection. Additionally, policymakers must offer clarity and consistency in certification procedures and documentation requirements to reduce the perceived certification and regulatory risks.
Conditions for Collectivity
An exploration of drivers and barriers for collective energy on Dutch SME business parks
Commercial and operational drivers, including cost advantages, price stability, business continuity and congestion-related growth limitations, most strongly motivate participation. Necessary conditions for implementation arise in both the political and the social organisational domains: an enabling regulatory framework and applicable contract forms, together with trust, willingness to cooperate and the presence of a coordinating actor, are critical. Barriers persist where commercial risks, regulatory uncertainty, limited organisational capacity or weak collaboration culture undermine collective action.
The thesis demonstrates that collective energy on Dutch SME business parks is not a single technical solution but a multi-dimensional, multi-scale process shaped by the alignment of SME-level incentives, organisational business park dynamics and political-institutional conditions. Ensuring this alignment is essential for translating collective ambitions into feasible and durable energy arrangements. ...
Commercial and operational drivers, including cost advantages, price stability, business continuity and congestion-related growth limitations, most strongly motivate participation. Necessary conditions for implementation arise in both the political and the social organisational domains: an enabling regulatory framework and applicable contract forms, together with trust, willingness to cooperate and the presence of a coordinating actor, are critical. Barriers persist where commercial risks, regulatory uncertainty, limited organisational capacity or weak collaboration culture undermine collective action.
The thesis demonstrates that collective energy on Dutch SME business parks is not a single technical solution but a multi-dimensional, multi-scale process shaped by the alignment of SME-level incentives, organisational business park dynamics and political-institutional conditions. Ensuring this alignment is essential for translating collective ambitions into feasible and durable energy arrangements.
Space for Scale ups
Understanding how spatial dynamics shape the distribution of scale ups in the Netherlands
The Impact of Transformation on Businesses
Balancing Urban Growth and Industrial Retention in the Netherlands
This thesis examines how such transformations lead to business displacement and how this process is shaped by societal narratives, spatial-planning decisions, and legal frameworks. Using a mixed-methods approach, combining literature analysis, a multi-case study design, LISA database analysis, GIS mapping, and semi-structured interviews, this research investigates two Dutch transformation areas: Cruquius (Amsterdam) and the Binckhorst (The Hague). These contrasting governance models, one developer-led and one publicly steered, provide insight into different paths through which industrial restructuring unfolds.
The results show that displacement rarely occurs through direct measures such as expropriation or formal zoning bans. Instead, it emerges through gradual and indirect mechanisms: regulatory uncertainty, the revaluation of urban land toward housing and creative functions, tightening environmental norms, and strategic use of legal instruments under the (former) Environmental and Planning Act. Quantitative analysis reveals divergent business trajectories between the cases, ranging from managed relocation to large-scale disappearance, while qualitative insights highlight how uncertainty influences business behaviour long before redevelopment becomes formalised.
Overall, the findings demonstrate that industrial displacement is not an unintended side effect of mixed-use transformation but a systemic outcome of broader institutional and societal shifts. The thesis contributes to ongoing debates on urban productivity, economic diversity, and sustainable redevelopment, and offers recommendations for balancing urban growth with the retention of essential productive functions in Dutch cities. ...
This thesis examines how such transformations lead to business displacement and how this process is shaped by societal narratives, spatial-planning decisions, and legal frameworks. Using a mixed-methods approach, combining literature analysis, a multi-case study design, LISA database analysis, GIS mapping, and semi-structured interviews, this research investigates two Dutch transformation areas: Cruquius (Amsterdam) and the Binckhorst (The Hague). These contrasting governance models, one developer-led and one publicly steered, provide insight into different paths through which industrial restructuring unfolds.
The results show that displacement rarely occurs through direct measures such as expropriation or formal zoning bans. Instead, it emerges through gradual and indirect mechanisms: regulatory uncertainty, the revaluation of urban land toward housing and creative functions, tightening environmental norms, and strategic use of legal instruments under the (former) Environmental and Planning Act. Quantitative analysis reveals divergent business trajectories between the cases, ranging from managed relocation to large-scale disappearance, while qualitative insights highlight how uncertainty influences business behaviour long before redevelopment becomes formalised.
Overall, the findings demonstrate that industrial displacement is not an unintended side effect of mixed-use transformation but a systemic outcome of broader institutional and societal shifts. The thesis contributes to ongoing debates on urban productivity, economic diversity, and sustainable redevelopment, and offers recommendations for balancing urban growth with the retention of essential productive functions in Dutch cities.
Towards a circular plastics economy
A Relational Economic Geography Approach
Methodologically, the study operationalises relational economic geography as a framework for analysing which conditions shape commercialisation across multiple scales. In doing so, a multi-scalar contextual analysis is combined with patent mapping of Y02W30-classified technologies between 2000 and 2025.
The results show that innovation activity in this domain is concentrated in (petro-)chemical firms rather than pure recyclers, and that patent activity is dominated by a small number of large applicants located in the Antwerp–Rotterdam–Rhine–Ruhr (ARRRA) meta-cluster. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that the failure of innovative firms in plastic waste management in the Netherlands stems from an accumulation of several constraints, at its basis, high energy costs, the lack of offsets, and the use of non-targeted taxes and tax exemptions. As well as a lack of steering in policies and industrial policy. Combined with persistent labour shortages in STEM, long and complex food-approval permit applications.
For these inventions to commercialise, cluster embeddedness and regional specialisation, in addition to economies of scale, infrastructural co-location and vertical integration are important pillars. Co-location facilitates strategic coupling between firms, infrastructure and feedstock flows, enabling resource efficiency and reduced energy costs; conditions that are necessary to realise cost parity with virgin plastics. In addition, alignment through licensing, joint ventures, and open-innovation networks is a critical mechanism for scaling these technologies.
In sum, commercialisation is not determined by the invention itself, but by the relational conditions embedded in specialised industrial chemical clusters. Without alignment of infrastructural, economic and institutional conditions, inventions are unlikely to mature beyond the demonstration stage, particularly in contexts lacking targeted industrial support, as currently observed in the Netherlands.
...
Methodologically, the study operationalises relational economic geography as a framework for analysing which conditions shape commercialisation across multiple scales. In doing so, a multi-scalar contextual analysis is combined with patent mapping of Y02W30-classified technologies between 2000 and 2025.
The results show that innovation activity in this domain is concentrated in (petro-)chemical firms rather than pure recyclers, and that patent activity is dominated by a small number of large applicants located in the Antwerp–Rotterdam–Rhine–Ruhr (ARRRA) meta-cluster. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that the failure of innovative firms in plastic waste management in the Netherlands stems from an accumulation of several constraints, at its basis, high energy costs, the lack of offsets, and the use of non-targeted taxes and tax exemptions. As well as a lack of steering in policies and industrial policy. Combined with persistent labour shortages in STEM, long and complex food-approval permit applications.
For these inventions to commercialise, cluster embeddedness and regional specialisation, in addition to economies of scale, infrastructural co-location and vertical integration are important pillars. Co-location facilitates strategic coupling between firms, infrastructure and feedstock flows, enabling resource efficiency and reduced energy costs; conditions that are necessary to realise cost parity with virgin plastics. In addition, alignment through licensing, joint ventures, and open-innovation networks is a critical mechanism for scaling these technologies.
In sum, commercialisation is not determined by the invention itself, but by the relational conditions embedded in specialised industrial chemical clusters. Without alignment of infrastructural, economic and institutional conditions, inventions are unlikely to mature beyond the demonstration stage, particularly in contexts lacking targeted industrial support, as currently observed in the Netherlands.
Room for Reuse
Optimising spatial implications of circular paving flows through road maintenance planning and design in the city of Rotterdam
This thesis examines how Rotterdam’s road renovation practices can enable the systematic reuse of paving materials while managing the resulting spatial demand. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines a material flow analysis of municipal renovation projects with policy analysis, expert interviews, and site visits to reuse facilities. The analysis quantifies circular flows of paving materials, estimates the space required for reuse infrastructure, and identifies bottlenecks in planning and design.
Findings show that Rotterdam’s reuse potential is strongly shaped by the interaction between maintenance cycles and design regulations. Standardisation enables reuse of newer materials but limits the reintegration of older ones, leading to surpluses that require large storage areas. Two distinct forms of reuse infrastructure emerge: compact storage hubs for standardised materials and extensive construction hubs for non-standard materials. Adjustment pathways demonstrate that design flexibility, allowing non-standard materials in less visually sensitive areas, can reduce spatial demand by up to 80%.
The study concludes that circular efficiency in municipal infrastructure depends on aligning physical capacity, adaptive design standards, and institutional coordination. The combined use of material flow and spatial analysis provides a transferable method for other municipalities to anticipate the spatial implications of circular transition in their infrastructure systems.
...
This thesis examines how Rotterdam’s road renovation practices can enable the systematic reuse of paving materials while managing the resulting spatial demand. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines a material flow analysis of municipal renovation projects with policy analysis, expert interviews, and site visits to reuse facilities. The analysis quantifies circular flows of paving materials, estimates the space required for reuse infrastructure, and identifies bottlenecks in planning and design.
Findings show that Rotterdam’s reuse potential is strongly shaped by the interaction between maintenance cycles and design regulations. Standardisation enables reuse of newer materials but limits the reintegration of older ones, leading to surpluses that require large storage areas. Two distinct forms of reuse infrastructure emerge: compact storage hubs for standardised materials and extensive construction hubs for non-standard materials. Adjustment pathways demonstrate that design flexibility, allowing non-standard materials in less visually sensitive areas, can reduce spatial demand by up to 80%.
The study concludes that circular efficiency in municipal infrastructure depends on aligning physical capacity, adaptive design standards, and institutional coordination. The combined use of material flow and spatial analysis provides a transferable method for other municipalities to anticipate the spatial implications of circular transition in their infrastructure systems.
Improving policy coherence for circular cities
Evaluating circular built environment policies of London and Amsterdam
The concept of a circular city is inspired by biological metabolic systems and aims to implement circular economy principles in various aspects of urban functioning, i.e. to minimise the consumption of primary resources and energy, thereby reducing environmental impacts such as waste and emissions. This approach involves redefining urban processes to close, narrow and slow down material and energy flows.
The built environment is included as an area of intervention in most European circular city policies following it is a major resource consumer and polluter through construction and demolition. These policies generally promote a circular built environment by replacing primary raw materials with at least secondary ones, standardising circular practices in design, construction and deconstruction, creating markets for secondary resources and sharing knowledge to integrate circular practices into construction value chains.
However, there are two issues that make the evaluation of circular city policies, and those specific to the built environment, difficult. On the one hand, there is the issue of process: most circular city policies have been in place for less than a decade, and the scale of the built environment makes any policy aimed at changing it a long-term one, making ex-post evaluation impractical today. On the other hand, there is the issue of content: the lack of clear and commonly used conceptualisations of circular cities hampers policy (evaluation) frameworks. Therefore, the aim of this dissertation is to explore the extent to which circular built environment policies contribute to the policy ambitions formulated by cities. This leads to the main research question:
To what extent do circular built environment policies contribute to policy ambitions as formulated by cities?
To answer this research question this dissertation is structured as five independent, but related academic studies.
The first study explores the recent conceptualisation of circular cities as found in the academic literature. It introduces the concept of circular economy and the application of circularity at different levels of the built environment. It then provides a historical narrative from the study of urban metabolism as the dominant analytical lens to the more recently developed understanding of a circular city. Existing perspectives and conceptualisations of the circular city as well as current bibliometric trends are presented.
The second study presents the relationship between a circular built environment and the policy instruments for its implementation as discussed in the academic literature. This is done through a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It analyses over 140 articles in terms of circular urban development policies (i.e. circularity, ecological regeneration and adaptation) and policy instruments (i.e. regulatory, economic and information).
The third study proposes the ex-ante circular city policy coherence framework. The framework, resulting from the combination of two existing frameworks for policy coherence analysis and circular city development, is tested using the case study of the Delft University of Technology campus development as an urban development proxy.
Based on document analysis of spatial development and circular economy policies, the fourth study uses the ex-ante circular city policy coherence framework to evaluate the policy coherence - or (mis)alignment and potential synergies - of circular built environment policies in Greater London. The Greater London Authority (GLA) presents an interesting case for examining policy coherence of circular built environment policies due to its authority, governance structure, scale and the notable gap in governance research that has not been fully explored.
The fifth and last study examines an ex-ante policy evaluation of timber construction in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, given its decade-long circular city policy and recent ambitions for mass timber construction. This is done in two steps. Firstly, policy instruments from different policy documents in Amsterdam were identified and analysed in terms of how they aim to contribute to a more circular built environment. Secondly, an agent-based model was built as a tool for policy makers to simulate the emergent interactions and outcomes of selected policy instruments in increasing timber construction in Amsterdam.
Conclusions and implications
This dissertation concludes that the current understanding of a circular built environment does not see the city for the buildings. By advancing a perspective on circularity in the built environment based on the concept of circular cities, this dissertation proposes that while circular built environment policies have improved their overall coherence, particularly through business-led optimisations in construction practices, they fall short of fully realising a circular city as envisioned by the circular city policy coherence framework. The circular built environment policies of London and Amsterdam are increasingly designed to mitigate issues such as resource depletion and waste generation. However, their policies largely overlook a broader, more systemic approach, particularly in terms of assessing the need for new buildings, maintaining and adapting the existing building stock, and involving residents and communities in the development of a circular city.
The main contribution of this dissertation is to problematise circular built environment policies in relation to circular cities, with a pioneering evaluation of such policies in London and Amsterdam. It positions the built environment as a key component of circular cities, highlighting the influence of policy decisions on the design of the built environment. The work includes the first systematic literature review of policy instruments for circular built environments, identifying a technocratic trend and a focus on looping measures. It also presents an ex-ante policy evaluation framework for circular cities, tested in Amsterdam and London, which allows the assessment of policy coherence and potential impacts, complemented by an agent-based model to visualise interactions and emergent properties between policy instruments.
The circular city policy coherence framework is currently the only one (to the best of the author's knowledge at the time of writing) that not only integrates both process and content aspects within circular city policies, but also allows for the analysis of policy alignment and synergies between different urban policy areas.
Policy makers could use this framework to design more ambitious and well-rounded policies that include all three circularity actions. The policy coherence factors would provide the necessary justification to refine existing policy objectives and instruments or to propose new ones for future implementation, as well as to detect where or how a more systemic perspective of a circular city can improve its policy development.
...
The concept of a circular city is inspired by biological metabolic systems and aims to implement circular economy principles in various aspects of urban functioning, i.e. to minimise the consumption of primary resources and energy, thereby reducing environmental impacts such as waste and emissions. This approach involves redefining urban processes to close, narrow and slow down material and energy flows.
The built environment is included as an area of intervention in most European circular city policies following it is a major resource consumer and polluter through construction and demolition. These policies generally promote a circular built environment by replacing primary raw materials with at least secondary ones, standardising circular practices in design, construction and deconstruction, creating markets for secondary resources and sharing knowledge to integrate circular practices into construction value chains.
However, there are two issues that make the evaluation of circular city policies, and those specific to the built environment, difficult. On the one hand, there is the issue of process: most circular city policies have been in place for less than a decade, and the scale of the built environment makes any policy aimed at changing it a long-term one, making ex-post evaluation impractical today. On the other hand, there is the issue of content: the lack of clear and commonly used conceptualisations of circular cities hampers policy (evaluation) frameworks. Therefore, the aim of this dissertation is to explore the extent to which circular built environment policies contribute to the policy ambitions formulated by cities. This leads to the main research question:
To what extent do circular built environment policies contribute to policy ambitions as formulated by cities?
To answer this research question this dissertation is structured as five independent, but related academic studies.
The first study explores the recent conceptualisation of circular cities as found in the academic literature. It introduces the concept of circular economy and the application of circularity at different levels of the built environment. It then provides a historical narrative from the study of urban metabolism as the dominant analytical lens to the more recently developed understanding of a circular city. Existing perspectives and conceptualisations of the circular city as well as current bibliometric trends are presented.
The second study presents the relationship between a circular built environment and the policy instruments for its implementation as discussed in the academic literature. This is done through a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It analyses over 140 articles in terms of circular urban development policies (i.e. circularity, ecological regeneration and adaptation) and policy instruments (i.e. regulatory, economic and information).
The third study proposes the ex-ante circular city policy coherence framework. The framework, resulting from the combination of two existing frameworks for policy coherence analysis and circular city development, is tested using the case study of the Delft University of Technology campus development as an urban development proxy.
Based on document analysis of spatial development and circular economy policies, the fourth study uses the ex-ante circular city policy coherence framework to evaluate the policy coherence - or (mis)alignment and potential synergies - of circular built environment policies in Greater London. The Greater London Authority (GLA) presents an interesting case for examining policy coherence of circular built environment policies due to its authority, governance structure, scale and the notable gap in governance research that has not been fully explored.
The fifth and last study examines an ex-ante policy evaluation of timber construction in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, given its decade-long circular city policy and recent ambitions for mass timber construction. This is done in two steps. Firstly, policy instruments from different policy documents in Amsterdam were identified and analysed in terms of how they aim to contribute to a more circular built environment. Secondly, an agent-based model was built as a tool for policy makers to simulate the emergent interactions and outcomes of selected policy instruments in increasing timber construction in Amsterdam.
Conclusions and implications
This dissertation concludes that the current understanding of a circular built environment does not see the city for the buildings. By advancing a perspective on circularity in the built environment based on the concept of circular cities, this dissertation proposes that while circular built environment policies have improved their overall coherence, particularly through business-led optimisations in construction practices, they fall short of fully realising a circular city as envisioned by the circular city policy coherence framework. The circular built environment policies of London and Amsterdam are increasingly designed to mitigate issues such as resource depletion and waste generation. However, their policies largely overlook a broader, more systemic approach, particularly in terms of assessing the need for new buildings, maintaining and adapting the existing building stock, and involving residents and communities in the development of a circular city.
The main contribution of this dissertation is to problematise circular built environment policies in relation to circular cities, with a pioneering evaluation of such policies in London and Amsterdam. It positions the built environment as a key component of circular cities, highlighting the influence of policy decisions on the design of the built environment. The work includes the first systematic literature review of policy instruments for circular built environments, identifying a technocratic trend and a focus on looping measures. It also presents an ex-ante policy evaluation framework for circular cities, tested in Amsterdam and London, which allows the assessment of policy coherence and potential impacts, complemented by an agent-based model to visualise interactions and emergent properties between policy instruments.
The circular city policy coherence framework is currently the only one (to the best of the author's knowledge at the time of writing) that not only integrates both process and content aspects within circular city policies, but also allows for the analysis of policy alignment and synergies between different urban policy areas.
Policy makers could use this framework to design more ambitious and well-rounded policies that include all three circularity actions. The policy coherence factors would provide the necessary justification to refine existing policy objectives and instruments or to propose new ones for future implementation, as well as to detect where or how a more systemic perspective of a circular city can improve its policy development.
Crossing Borders Sustainably
Using Metagovernance to Activate Stakeholders to Facilitate Sustainable Mobility Transitions in a Cross-Border Context
Utilising a multifaceted research methodology, including an extensive literature review, in-depth case studies of HSL-Zuid and IJzeren Rijn, stakeholder interviews, this research navigates the complex landscape of meta-governance in cross-border regions.
The study reveals three pivotal tensions that disrupt current decision-making processes for cross-border connections: (1) National and Regional Imbalance in Decision-Making, (2) Formal and Informal Routes to Decision-Making and Flexibility, (3) Conflicting Interests. These tensions intricately impact governance styles, creating challenges and inefficiencies.
To address the identified issues, the research proposes actionable recommendations. Emphasising the need to harmonise national-regional governance frameworks, work on nuanced approaches to formal and informal routes, considerate divergent national interests, and heightened awareness of governance style interplay. Moreover, the research also highlights that metagovernance is already ingrained in current practices. The key lies in raising awareness of its presence among stakeholders, enabling a more informed and seamless navigation of the cross-border governance landscape. Metagovernance’s true value lies in its ability to articulate and navigate through different governance styles, adapting to various challenges and opportunities. While it may not always represent a novel approach, it serves as a critical analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of governance in complex infrastructure projects. ...
Utilising a multifaceted research methodology, including an extensive literature review, in-depth case studies of HSL-Zuid and IJzeren Rijn, stakeholder interviews, this research navigates the complex landscape of meta-governance in cross-border regions.
The study reveals three pivotal tensions that disrupt current decision-making processes for cross-border connections: (1) National and Regional Imbalance in Decision-Making, (2) Formal and Informal Routes to Decision-Making and Flexibility, (3) Conflicting Interests. These tensions intricately impact governance styles, creating challenges and inefficiencies.
To address the identified issues, the research proposes actionable recommendations. Emphasising the need to harmonise national-regional governance frameworks, work on nuanced approaches to formal and informal routes, considerate divergent national interests, and heightened awareness of governance style interplay. Moreover, the research also highlights that metagovernance is already ingrained in current practices. The key lies in raising awareness of its presence among stakeholders, enabling a more informed and seamless navigation of the cross-border governance landscape. Metagovernance’s true value lies in its ability to articulate and navigate through different governance styles, adapting to various challenges and opportunities. While it may not always represent a novel approach, it serves as a critical analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of governance in complex infrastructure projects.
Sustainable and circular development of business parks
A cross-case analysis on the current practices and developments in sustainable and circular business parks in Zuid-Holland, the Netherlands in their contribution to the national, regional and local circular and energy transitions
The thesis starts with an evaluation of literature to determine what options for sustainable and circular development business parks can implement. A variety of collective or individual initiatives aimed at either streams and production processes, or site arrangement, park organization and architecture/construction were found.
Next, case studies were performed to evaluate current policies and strategies on sustainable and circular development of business parks by the national, provincial and municipal governments. And to investigate the current practices, initiatives and developments at sustainable and circular business parks in Zuid-Holland. This resulted in a detailed overview of policies and strategies, and in depth documentation of four business parks using ten variables: (1) Initiation, vision and ambition; (2) Organization and actors’ roles; (3) Sustainable and circular initiatives at the park; (4) Physical location specific and business specific features; (5) Social location specific and business specific features; (6) Regional and local characteristics; (7); Regional spatial-economic strategies and environment policy; (8) Policy instruments; (9) Economic context; and (10) External context.
Lastly, based on a cross case analysis, eight key lessons were formulated for future development of sustainable and circular business parks.
...
The thesis starts with an evaluation of literature to determine what options for sustainable and circular development business parks can implement. A variety of collective or individual initiatives aimed at either streams and production processes, or site arrangement, park organization and architecture/construction were found.
Next, case studies were performed to evaluate current policies and strategies on sustainable and circular development of business parks by the national, provincial and municipal governments. And to investigate the current practices, initiatives and developments at sustainable and circular business parks in Zuid-Holland. This resulted in a detailed overview of policies and strategies, and in depth documentation of four business parks using ten variables: (1) Initiation, vision and ambition; (2) Organization and actors’ roles; (3) Sustainable and circular initiatives at the park; (4) Physical location specific and business specific features; (5) Social location specific and business specific features; (6) Regional and local characteristics; (7); Regional spatial-economic strategies and environment policy; (8) Policy instruments; (9) Economic context; and (10) External context.
Lastly, based on a cross case analysis, eight key lessons were formulated for future development of sustainable and circular business parks.
Building a Sustainable Future
The Interplay of Collaboration and Innovation in Circular Construction
The Next Step in Circular Housing
An exploratory user-centred research into the relationship between design and circular behaviour of students living in student housing complexes
The goal of this research is to describe the relation between design and circular behaviour. To do so, a flexible analytical framework is created based on a literature study, which can be used to perform an empirical study in any context for any behaviour. The applicability of the framework is tested in this initial exploratory research of which the scope is focused on the circular behaviours of Reuse and Recycle Materials of students living in student housing complexes. The framework is filled in with document analysis on the context and semi-structured interviews with the inhabitants of the cases.
The results show that a design has influence on behaviour. A design can make behaviour impossible by having a negative influence on one or more of the three categories of the COM-B theory. A design can also make a behaviour possible, by changing the categories that are negative into positive. In between the two extremes of possible and impossible there is also the degree of the categories that influence behaviours. Someone could be able to show behaviour, but if it takes too much effort the person can refrain from showing the behaviour. If there is a high degree of capability and opportunity, it can motivate a person to show the behaviour, and likewise a low degree can demotivate. Therefore a design should strive to have a high degree of capability and opportunity for a behaviour that is desired.
However, it must be noted that behaviour is a complex phenomenon with a multitude of factors that influence it, both conscious and unconscious. It is difficult to map all the different factors for every person. Not all factors are related to a design, there are also beliefs and values which have a major influence in behaviour. ...
The goal of this research is to describe the relation between design and circular behaviour. To do so, a flexible analytical framework is created based on a literature study, which can be used to perform an empirical study in any context for any behaviour. The applicability of the framework is tested in this initial exploratory research of which the scope is focused on the circular behaviours of Reuse and Recycle Materials of students living in student housing complexes. The framework is filled in with document analysis on the context and semi-structured interviews with the inhabitants of the cases.
The results show that a design has influence on behaviour. A design can make behaviour impossible by having a negative influence on one or more of the three categories of the COM-B theory. A design can also make a behaviour possible, by changing the categories that are negative into positive. In between the two extremes of possible and impossible there is also the degree of the categories that influence behaviours. Someone could be able to show behaviour, but if it takes too much effort the person can refrain from showing the behaviour. If there is a high degree of capability and opportunity, it can motivate a person to show the behaviour, and likewise a low degree can demotivate. Therefore a design should strive to have a high degree of capability and opportunity for a behaviour that is desired.
However, it must be noted that behaviour is a complex phenomenon with a multitude of factors that influence it, both conscious and unconscious. It is difficult to map all the different factors for every person. Not all factors are related to a design, there are also beliefs and values which have a major influence in behaviour.
SCRAPYARDS UNITED
Nesting local scrap metal cycles in a national network - ZH2050
TRANSTOPIA
Activating the energy transition through a synergy of landscapes
An analysis of the prevalent scenario revealed that the fossil-based energy production systems are not only embedded in the physical infrastructure of the region (Zuid Holland) but also in its social, economic and geopolitical networks. This means that as we phase out fossil fuels, its implications will be witnessed on both the local as well as global scales. Keeping this in mind, “Transtopia” aims to accelerate the transition towards renewable energy (production - consumption) by proposing synergies between the Port of Rotterdam and the rest of the Zuid Holland region.
Primarily, by decentralizing, diversifying renewable energy production, and activating the potentialities of its regional landscapes to harness energy. It proposes endogenous methods of co-creating energy landscapes aimed to establish a resilient and adaptable energy system. One where all sectors of society (civil, public and private) can contribute and play an active role in facilitating this transition. Consequently, the spatial relations between areas of energy consumption and production can be seen as activators of urban development in Zuid Holland. Not only by strengthening the economic resilience of the region in face of the energy transition, but also ensuring social integration in this change by co-creating new infrastructure initiated by a collaboration of active sectors.
Additionally, Transtopia focuses on the transformation of the port into a renewable energy hub. Since selected renewable energy such as solar, wind and biomass will be produced locally, the port becomes a backbone for the production and distribution of hydrogen in the Netherlands and around the globe. As an energy hub, the port will also facilitate research and innovation for renewable energy, establishing collaborations with universities and institutions to constantly improve the functionality of the newly integrated renewable energy systems.
Transtopia aims to accelerate energy transition, focusing on engaging multiple stakeholders by creating policies. Thereby ensuring different levels of systems and synergies, which will eventually transform the urban environment into a symbiotic landscape, with a resilient and inclusive energy system that creates opportunities for economic growth. ...
An analysis of the prevalent scenario revealed that the fossil-based energy production systems are not only embedded in the physical infrastructure of the region (Zuid Holland) but also in its social, economic and geopolitical networks. This means that as we phase out fossil fuels, its implications will be witnessed on both the local as well as global scales. Keeping this in mind, “Transtopia” aims to accelerate the transition towards renewable energy (production - consumption) by proposing synergies between the Port of Rotterdam and the rest of the Zuid Holland region.
Primarily, by decentralizing, diversifying renewable energy production, and activating the potentialities of its regional landscapes to harness energy. It proposes endogenous methods of co-creating energy landscapes aimed to establish a resilient and adaptable energy system. One where all sectors of society (civil, public and private) can contribute and play an active role in facilitating this transition. Consequently, the spatial relations between areas of energy consumption and production can be seen as activators of urban development in Zuid Holland. Not only by strengthening the economic resilience of the region in face of the energy transition, but also ensuring social integration in this change by co-creating new infrastructure initiated by a collaboration of active sectors.
Additionally, Transtopia focuses on the transformation of the port into a renewable energy hub. Since selected renewable energy such as solar, wind and biomass will be produced locally, the port becomes a backbone for the production and distribution of hydrogen in the Netherlands and around the globe. As an energy hub, the port will also facilitate research and innovation for renewable energy, establishing collaborations with universities and institutions to constantly improve the functionality of the newly integrated renewable energy systems.
Transtopia aims to accelerate energy transition, focusing on engaging multiple stakeholders by creating policies. Thereby ensuring different levels of systems and synergies, which will eventually transform the urban environment into a symbiotic landscape, with a resilient and inclusive energy system that creates opportunities for economic growth.
PLASTICITY
Shaping the transitions to a resilient and circular plastic manufacturing system
Theory on transition management and socio-technical systems, analyses of spatial use and networks of the plastics industry in South Holland, and research on the developments in plastic manufacturing, has led to the understanding of the current networks and flows in the plastics industry. A subsequent analysis of stakeholders, policies and design options has led to a vision and strategy for the South Holland region, on how to shape a new circular plastics economy.
In the proposed strategy of Plasticity, (1) the strength of a strategic location in the port of Rotterdam is used to expand the renewable cycle of the bioplastics industry, and (2) by actively engaging citizens in reusing and recycling plastic products on a local level in the whole region, a technical circular cycle is enhanced in the whole province. Plastic is used as an example to demonstrate the contemporary issues around dependency on fossil material in the South Holland context, but similar principles regarding integrating the biological and technical cycle, facilitating space for innovation and growth of circular models, and engaging the whole socio-technical system in the transition process can be applied to other sectors and places. This expands the applicability of this vision and strategy beyond plastic.
...
Theory on transition management and socio-technical systems, analyses of spatial use and networks of the plastics industry in South Holland, and research on the developments in plastic manufacturing, has led to the understanding of the current networks and flows in the plastics industry. A subsequent analysis of stakeholders, policies and design options has led to a vision and strategy for the South Holland region, on how to shape a new circular plastics economy.
In the proposed strategy of Plasticity, (1) the strength of a strategic location in the port of Rotterdam is used to expand the renewable cycle of the bioplastics industry, and (2) by actively engaging citizens in reusing and recycling plastic products on a local level in the whole region, a technical circular cycle is enhanced in the whole province. Plastic is used as an example to demonstrate the contemporary issues around dependency on fossil material in the South Holland context, but similar principles regarding integrating the biological and technical cycle, facilitating space for innovation and growth of circular models, and engaging the whole socio-technical system in the transition process can be applied to other sectors and places. This expands the applicability of this vision and strategy beyond plastic.
The Protein Factory
An inclusive spatial strategy for the transition towards a sustain- able system of protein-based food within the province of South Holland
BIO-LOOP ZH2050
A trigger strategy towards a circular economy based on the bio-based plastic industry in the region of Port of Rotterdam
This strengthens the aim to create a circular economy. The industry in the Port of Rotterdam is mainly based on fossil-based industries that follow the linear system. Therefore, high emissions and waste are caused. This contradicts the aims of the SDG and the idea of a circular system. Consequently, the port area should be transformed into a flexible system that can adapt to changing future situations. This will be realized by a circular system that contributes to the development of the bio-based industry.
This transition is triggered by the current oil- and plastic industries taking place within the Port. By treating the bio-plastic industry as a trigger industry, a strategy for the transition towards a bio-based system is created. This leads to a circular economy that depends on bio-based materials. Since the bio-based system might face future challenges, it is important to guarantee further adaptation and self-improvement over time. The final goal is to create a closed-loop within the Port region to reduce emissions and waste products using these bio-based materials.
To close this loop, the Bio-Loop ZH2050 is integrated into the Port area. A Green Belt strategy promotes the circular economy within the province of South Holland, and by implementing the Living Labs, knowledge and technologies are improved over time. The Bio-Loop ZH2050 influences the aim of the province to become 100% circular by 2050 and several SDG topics. Environmentally, this project supports the transition towards a circular bio-based system and to reduce the impact of pollution and climate change. Socially, the Bio-Loop ZH2050 creates the possibility to get society involved in the bio-based circularity. And finally, economically, the Port of Rotterdam will become the port of Europe based on the bio-based economy, which is the entrance connecting the global market and EU market.
...
This strengthens the aim to create a circular economy. The industry in the Port of Rotterdam is mainly based on fossil-based industries that follow the linear system. Therefore, high emissions and waste are caused. This contradicts the aims of the SDG and the idea of a circular system. Consequently, the port area should be transformed into a flexible system that can adapt to changing future situations. This will be realized by a circular system that contributes to the development of the bio-based industry.
This transition is triggered by the current oil- and plastic industries taking place within the Port. By treating the bio-plastic industry as a trigger industry, a strategy for the transition towards a bio-based system is created. This leads to a circular economy that depends on bio-based materials. Since the bio-based system might face future challenges, it is important to guarantee further adaptation and self-improvement over time. The final goal is to create a closed-loop within the Port region to reduce emissions and waste products using these bio-based materials.
To close this loop, the Bio-Loop ZH2050 is integrated into the Port area. A Green Belt strategy promotes the circular economy within the province of South Holland, and by implementing the Living Labs, knowledge and technologies are improved over time. The Bio-Loop ZH2050 influences the aim of the province to become 100% circular by 2050 and several SDG topics. Environmentally, this project supports the transition towards a circular bio-based system and to reduce the impact of pollution and climate change. Socially, the Bio-Loop ZH2050 creates the possibility to get society involved in the bio-based circularity. And finally, economically, the Port of Rotterdam will become the port of Europe based on the bio-based economy, which is the entrance connecting the global market and EU market.
UrbanScraps
A local steel cycle for maritime manufacturing in South-Holland by 2050