J. Ubacht
Please Note
26 records found
1
Structuring Phase Tranistions in Housing Development Projects
A Design Science Approach to Structuring Information Transfer Between Development and Construction
The problem analysis, based on ten semi-structured interviews across all disciplines and an extensive analysis of internal documents and completed projects, reveals a developer-builder paradox: the projects with the greatest financial exposure, the company's own developments, are governed the least formally. At internal transitions, handover documents, phase budgets, and recorded risks are absent, and coordination is informal and person-bound. Three deficiencies recur: responsibility shifts without clear decision ownership, risks are not structurally assessed and transferred, and financial assumptions remain untested until they surface in a later phase. Four mechanisms explain information loss: rising external volatility rapidly outdates early assumptions; tension between commercial and technical disciplines remains uncoordinated; financial blind spots leave assumptions untested; and path dependency locks projects into costly rework. The underlying gap is the absence of a structural moment at which assumptions, risks, and responsibilities are made explicit and allocated.
The project follows the Design Science Research methodology (Johannesson & Perjons, 2021) within a single embedded case study. Four design activities were conducted: explicating the problem, defining requirements, designing the artefact, and demonstrating and evaluating it. The root causes were translated into three design principles: freedom within frameworks, phased financial transparency, and adaptive responsiveness and organisational learning, operationalised into eight functional and four non-functional requirements.
The resulting artefact is a sprint-based decision model designed as an agile hybrid. A stage-gate structure of formal Directors' Decisions marks every phase transition and is complemented by iterative, multidisciplinary sprints between the gates. Four streams carry an explicit role per phase (Leads, Decides, Advises, or Monitors), formally shifting the lead as the design matures. Every transition converges in a fixed-format gate document containing an investment proposal and handover matrix, recording who hands over what, to whom, and under which conditions. A one-time, irreversible Hard Gate ties the build commitment to criteria for pre-sales, contracts, and margin. A notification register carries early risk signals through the gates, while a central project archive and three organisational learning mechanisms convert individual experience into transferable organisational knowledge.
The model was demonstrated on De Weverij, a fictitious but realistic own-development project of 43 dwellings subjected to disturbances including soil contamination, a municipal social housing condition, and an appeal procedure. The walkthrough indicates that the model can function logically under adverse conditions, while five expert sessions indicate that it is perceived as useful and organisationally feasible, provided that administrative intensity remains limited, cashflow steering is added, and sufficient preparation capacity is secured. The resulting refinements constitute version 2 of the artefact. Given the ex-ante and artificial character of the evaluation, these findings suggest, but cannot yet prove, that the model will reduce rework and information loss in practice.
The refined model is translated into a phased implementation roadmap involving a group simulation, a pilot on three live projects, and organisation-wide scaling. Future research should measure the effect on rework and information loss, establish an evidence-based rule for the timing of the lead transition, examine portfolio-level cashflow control, and test the design at other developer-builders. The project contributes by explicating the developer-builder paradox, extending the agile-stage-gate hybrid to a context with irreversible physical and legal commitments, and adding a boundary condition to the literature on tacit knowledge. ...
The problem analysis, based on ten semi-structured interviews across all disciplines and an extensive analysis of internal documents and completed projects, reveals a developer-builder paradox: the projects with the greatest financial exposure, the company's own developments, are governed the least formally. At internal transitions, handover documents, phase budgets, and recorded risks are absent, and coordination is informal and person-bound. Three deficiencies recur: responsibility shifts without clear decision ownership, risks are not structurally assessed and transferred, and financial assumptions remain untested until they surface in a later phase. Four mechanisms explain information loss: rising external volatility rapidly outdates early assumptions; tension between commercial and technical disciplines remains uncoordinated; financial blind spots leave assumptions untested; and path dependency locks projects into costly rework. The underlying gap is the absence of a structural moment at which assumptions, risks, and responsibilities are made explicit and allocated.
The project follows the Design Science Research methodology (Johannesson & Perjons, 2021) within a single embedded case study. Four design activities were conducted: explicating the problem, defining requirements, designing the artefact, and demonstrating and evaluating it. The root causes were translated into three design principles: freedom within frameworks, phased financial transparency, and adaptive responsiveness and organisational learning, operationalised into eight functional and four non-functional requirements.
The resulting artefact is a sprint-based decision model designed as an agile hybrid. A stage-gate structure of formal Directors' Decisions marks every phase transition and is complemented by iterative, multidisciplinary sprints between the gates. Four streams carry an explicit role per phase (Leads, Decides, Advises, or Monitors), formally shifting the lead as the design matures. Every transition converges in a fixed-format gate document containing an investment proposal and handover matrix, recording who hands over what, to whom, and under which conditions. A one-time, irreversible Hard Gate ties the build commitment to criteria for pre-sales, contracts, and margin. A notification register carries early risk signals through the gates, while a central project archive and three organisational learning mechanisms convert individual experience into transferable organisational knowledge.
The model was demonstrated on De Weverij, a fictitious but realistic own-development project of 43 dwellings subjected to disturbances including soil contamination, a municipal social housing condition, and an appeal procedure. The walkthrough indicates that the model can function logically under adverse conditions, while five expert sessions indicate that it is perceived as useful and organisationally feasible, provided that administrative intensity remains limited, cashflow steering is added, and sufficient preparation capacity is secured. The resulting refinements constitute version 2 of the artefact. Given the ex-ante and artificial character of the evaluation, these findings suggest, but cannot yet prove, that the model will reduce rework and information loss in practice.
The refined model is translated into a phased implementation roadmap involving a group simulation, a pilot on three live projects, and organisation-wide scaling. Future research should measure the effect on rework and information loss, establish an evidence-based rule for the timing of the lead transition, examine portfolio-level cashflow control, and test the design at other developer-builders. The project contributes by explicating the developer-builder paradox, extending the agile-stage-gate hybrid to a context with irreversible physical and legal commitments, and adding a boundary condition to the literature on tacit knowledge.
Accounting for student use of generative artificial intelligence in STEM education
Designing ethical and sustainability-driven course guidelines
Navigating the Twin Transition for the Dutch high-tech manufacturing sector
Designing a decision-support tool to align digital innovation with sustainability goals
This research addresses a key gap in both academic literature and industry practice: the lack of a sector-specific decision-support tool that connects digital maturity with sustainability performance. Using a Design Science Research (DSR) approach, the study followed four phases: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, and demonstration and evaluation.
1. Through expert interviews and literature reviews, ten key challenges were identified, of which four were prioritized for tool development by applying the Stacey Matrix. These include unclear returns on investment, limited visibility into sustainability impacts, the absence of sector-specific roadmaps, and a lack of methods for weighing trade-offs between digital and sustainability goals.
2. To define the tool’s requirements, a second literature review and five user interviews were conducted, resulting in functional, structural, and contextual specifications using the MoSCoW framework.
3. The resulting tool consists of three integrated components: a company-specific ESG and digital maturity survey, a Twin Transition maturity model across People, Process, and Policy dimensions, and a recommendation dashboard. This dashboard maps digital manufacturing technologies based on their sustainability impact and implementation complexity. The tool adapts an existing maturity model by aligning ESG priorities with digital transformation levels, and uses Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis (EEIOA) and ESG materiality mapping for impact assessment.
4. Demonstrations with consultants and a manufacturing firm showed that the tool is effective in bridging departmental silos and supporting strategic discussions. It helps companies translate high-level sustainability and digital goals into actionable steps suited to their specific context. Rather than offering prescriptive solutions, the tool serves as a structured guide for informed decision-making.
The research contributes to Twin Transition theory by providing the first integrated framework that explicitly links digital capabilities to ESG outcomes in the high-tech manufacturing sector. Methodologically, it shows how stakeholder input and quantitative analysis can be combined in a practical, industry-ready tool. While the tool offers a valuable starting point, the study also highlights its limitations, particularly in addressing the political and cultural dynamics that shape real-world change. Future research should explore how this approach can be adapted to other sectors and to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Longitudinal studies, deeper lifecycle assessments, and cross-national comparisons will also be needed to understand the broader dynamics of the Twin Transition.
...
This research addresses a key gap in both academic literature and industry practice: the lack of a sector-specific decision-support tool that connects digital maturity with sustainability performance. Using a Design Science Research (DSR) approach, the study followed four phases: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, and demonstration and evaluation.
1. Through expert interviews and literature reviews, ten key challenges were identified, of which four were prioritized for tool development by applying the Stacey Matrix. These include unclear returns on investment, limited visibility into sustainability impacts, the absence of sector-specific roadmaps, and a lack of methods for weighing trade-offs between digital and sustainability goals.
2. To define the tool’s requirements, a second literature review and five user interviews were conducted, resulting in functional, structural, and contextual specifications using the MoSCoW framework.
3. The resulting tool consists of three integrated components: a company-specific ESG and digital maturity survey, a Twin Transition maturity model across People, Process, and Policy dimensions, and a recommendation dashboard. This dashboard maps digital manufacturing technologies based on their sustainability impact and implementation complexity. The tool adapts an existing maturity model by aligning ESG priorities with digital transformation levels, and uses Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis (EEIOA) and ESG materiality mapping for impact assessment.
4. Demonstrations with consultants and a manufacturing firm showed that the tool is effective in bridging departmental silos and supporting strategic discussions. It helps companies translate high-level sustainability and digital goals into actionable steps suited to their specific context. Rather than offering prescriptive solutions, the tool serves as a structured guide for informed decision-making.
The research contributes to Twin Transition theory by providing the first integrated framework that explicitly links digital capabilities to ESG outcomes in the high-tech manufacturing sector. Methodologically, it shows how stakeholder input and quantitative analysis can be combined in a practical, industry-ready tool. While the tool offers a valuable starting point, the study also highlights its limitations, particularly in addressing the political and cultural dynamics that shape real-world change. Future research should explore how this approach can be adapted to other sectors and to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Longitudinal studies, deeper lifecycle assessments, and cross-national comparisons will also be needed to understand the broader dynamics of the Twin Transition.
Viability Assessment of Vertical Farming
A Decision Support Framework with a Case Study on York, Pennsylvania
The research approach used to support the development of the decision support framework is a single case study method. The case was on an ongoing project at the York State Fair in York, Pennsylvania, in the United States, which involved several stakeholders. In this research, the advantages and disadvantages of vertical farming were first compared to traditional farming in terms of economic viability. Disadvantages such as high investment costs and energy usage were found to be more financially impactful than the advantages such as no-pesticide use, and water efficiency.
It was found that multiple important stakeholders had concerns about profitability. In addition, there is potential for conflict due to different interests in what the workforce must be in the project. The most suitable solution was to include educational aspects such as hiring interns. In addition, to cope with possible external factors such as shortages in the agricultural workforce, including automation via robotics, could make the project more resilient. The business models best suited to the project are the differentiation and experience business models. Based on the factors critical to the viability of vertical farming, a financial model tool was made in Excel. This tool can calculate a vertical farm project's profitability and test how resilient the profitability is to changes in the critical parameters.
A decision support framework was created, consisting of the following six stages: “identify drivers,” “analyze business environment,” “analyze stakeholder alignment,” “develop business case,” “analyze viability,” and “implement vertical farm initiative.” The stakeholder methods that should be used include a power-interest matrix, value network analysis, and, depending on potential conflicts between stakeholders, a system diagram analysis. A Business Model Canvas can be used to develop the business case. The vertical farm's viability can be assessed using the financial model tool. If the viability is satisfactory, the vertical farming initiative can be implemented. Private organizations and public institutions can use the decision support framework to assess whether a vertical farming initiative is profitable in a specific location, what type of business model fits the vertical farm, and whether policies need to be changed to increase a vertical farm’s viability. ...
The research approach used to support the development of the decision support framework is a single case study method. The case was on an ongoing project at the York State Fair in York, Pennsylvania, in the United States, which involved several stakeholders. In this research, the advantages and disadvantages of vertical farming were first compared to traditional farming in terms of economic viability. Disadvantages such as high investment costs and energy usage were found to be more financially impactful than the advantages such as no-pesticide use, and water efficiency.
It was found that multiple important stakeholders had concerns about profitability. In addition, there is potential for conflict due to different interests in what the workforce must be in the project. The most suitable solution was to include educational aspects such as hiring interns. In addition, to cope with possible external factors such as shortages in the agricultural workforce, including automation via robotics, could make the project more resilient. The business models best suited to the project are the differentiation and experience business models. Based on the factors critical to the viability of vertical farming, a financial model tool was made in Excel. This tool can calculate a vertical farm project's profitability and test how resilient the profitability is to changes in the critical parameters.
A decision support framework was created, consisting of the following six stages: “identify drivers,” “analyze business environment,” “analyze stakeholder alignment,” “develop business case,” “analyze viability,” and “implement vertical farm initiative.” The stakeholder methods that should be used include a power-interest matrix, value network analysis, and, depending on potential conflicts between stakeholders, a system diagram analysis. A Business Model Canvas can be used to develop the business case. The vertical farm's viability can be assessed using the financial model tool. If the viability is satisfactory, the vertical farming initiative can be implemented. Private organizations and public institutions can use the decision support framework to assess whether a vertical farming initiative is profitable in a specific location, what type of business model fits the vertical farm, and whether policies need to be changed to increase a vertical farm’s viability.
From Compliance to Control: A Roadmap for ERP-Based Emission Reporting
Investigating how ERP systems, like SAP, can enable automated sustainability reporting and strategic decision-making under CSRD and ESRS E1
The research identified critical emission metrics required by ESRS E1 and evaluated SAP's capability to manage these metrics through its Sustainability Control Tower. Key challenges were found in the accurate and complete collection of emission data, particularly Scope 3 emissions. Furthermore, organizational and strategic obstacles, such as unclear responsibilities and viewing emissions reporting purely as compliance rather than a strategic advantage, were highlighted.
To address these challenges, the study proposes a structured 12-step roadmap, emphasizing data integration, clear internal governance, and strategic alignment of emissions reporting with broader business objectives. The roadmap facilitates accurate, compliant reporting while enhancing strategic decision-making capabilities. The thesis concludes that, although further validation of this roadmap in practice is necessary, ERP systems like SAP, when properly integrated, provide robust tools for effective emissions reporting and strategic sustainability management.
...
The research identified critical emission metrics required by ESRS E1 and evaluated SAP's capability to manage these metrics through its Sustainability Control Tower. Key challenges were found in the accurate and complete collection of emission data, particularly Scope 3 emissions. Furthermore, organizational and strategic obstacles, such as unclear responsibilities and viewing emissions reporting purely as compliance rather than a strategic advantage, were highlighted.
To address these challenges, the study proposes a structured 12-step roadmap, emphasizing data integration, clear internal governance, and strategic alignment of emissions reporting with broader business objectives. The roadmap facilitates accurate, compliant reporting while enhancing strategic decision-making capabilities. The thesis concludes that, although further validation of this roadmap in practice is necessary, ERP systems like SAP, when properly integrated, provide robust tools for effective emissions reporting and strategic sustainability management.
Ontology Engineering with Large Language Models
Unveiling the potential of human-LLM collaboration in the ontology extension process
In parallel, the fast evolution of Artificial Intelligence is leading the emergence of infinite possibilities in terms of automation of tasks that have hitherto been completely manual. In particular, the use of Large Language Models is booming, though its use to help in the extension of existing ontologies has not been exploited yet. This research proposal aims to answer the question of: How can LLMs be integrated into a semi-automated and domain-independent process for the extension of existing ontologies?
This master’s thesis, carried out in collaboration with TNO, follows the Design Science Research Approach to analyze the problems associated with ontology engineering and the integration of LLMs in the ontology extension process by interviewing 11 ontology engineers and experts in the field. The analysis of the interviews is used to generate a model of the current ontology extension process and to produce a set of 22 high-level design requirements to guide the design a process framework for human-LLM collaboration for the ontology extension process. The design prototype proposed consists of an extended version of the current ontology extension process model augmented by the assistance of LLMs on various ontology extension tasks and incorporating additional ontology engineering tools and stakeholders in the process. The design includes a set of prompt templates that can be customized by the ontology engineer to extend an ontology in any domain. The final design is demonstrated and evaluated with a real use case, which consists of extending the Common Greenhouse Ontology (CGO), developed by TNO, with the use case Semantic Explanation and Navigation System (SENS), previously executed by TNO. The demonstration and evaluation is performed using OpenAI’s model GPT-4 Omni, through the creation of a GPT Assistant.
The generated ontology extension using the process framework and the GPT assistant is similar to the manually crafted extension. Remarkably good results are achieved in tasks such as defining business scenarios and creating a glossary of terms, generating Competency Questions, formalizing the ontology (in OWL) and the CQs (in SPARQL queries), and verifying the generated ontology extension using mock data and CQs. An end-user (ontology engineer) is asked to use the proposed process framework prototype and qualitatively evaluate the tasks, concluding that this approach is very useful for ontology engineers with various level of expertise to structure and increase the quality of the current ontology extension process.
Although the proposed design holds a great potential to be implemented and integrated with the current methodologies and tools used by ontology engineers, several challenges need to be tackled before we see a wide adoption and integration of LLMs in the ontology extension process. These challenges go beyond the technical performance of the LLMs, but revolve around the societal implications of the use of this technology instead. The loss of enriching human interactions and expertise, and the environmental and ethical impact are big concerns of the ontology engineers. These must be addressed before the potential of LLMs for the ontology extension process can be unveiled. ...
In parallel, the fast evolution of Artificial Intelligence is leading the emergence of infinite possibilities in terms of automation of tasks that have hitherto been completely manual. In particular, the use of Large Language Models is booming, though its use to help in the extension of existing ontologies has not been exploited yet. This research proposal aims to answer the question of: How can LLMs be integrated into a semi-automated and domain-independent process for the extension of existing ontologies?
This master’s thesis, carried out in collaboration with TNO, follows the Design Science Research Approach to analyze the problems associated with ontology engineering and the integration of LLMs in the ontology extension process by interviewing 11 ontology engineers and experts in the field. The analysis of the interviews is used to generate a model of the current ontology extension process and to produce a set of 22 high-level design requirements to guide the design a process framework for human-LLM collaboration for the ontology extension process. The design prototype proposed consists of an extended version of the current ontology extension process model augmented by the assistance of LLMs on various ontology extension tasks and incorporating additional ontology engineering tools and stakeholders in the process. The design includes a set of prompt templates that can be customized by the ontology engineer to extend an ontology in any domain. The final design is demonstrated and evaluated with a real use case, which consists of extending the Common Greenhouse Ontology (CGO), developed by TNO, with the use case Semantic Explanation and Navigation System (SENS), previously executed by TNO. The demonstration and evaluation is performed using OpenAI’s model GPT-4 Omni, through the creation of a GPT Assistant.
The generated ontology extension using the process framework and the GPT assistant is similar to the manually crafted extension. Remarkably good results are achieved in tasks such as defining business scenarios and creating a glossary of terms, generating Competency Questions, formalizing the ontology (in OWL) and the CQs (in SPARQL queries), and verifying the generated ontology extension using mock data and CQs. An end-user (ontology engineer) is asked to use the proposed process framework prototype and qualitatively evaluate the tasks, concluding that this approach is very useful for ontology engineers with various level of expertise to structure and increase the quality of the current ontology extension process.
Although the proposed design holds a great potential to be implemented and integrated with the current methodologies and tools used by ontology engineers, several challenges need to be tackled before we see a wide adoption and integration of LLMs in the ontology extension process. These challenges go beyond the technical performance of the LLMs, but revolve around the societal implications of the use of this technology instead. The loss of enriching human interactions and expertise, and the environmental and ethical impact are big concerns of the ontology engineers. These must be addressed before the potential of LLMs for the ontology extension process can be unveiled.
Several factors impact the adoption of telemedicine among its users. The adoption of this technology, including by healthcare professionals, will depend on these factors. To understand these factors, the adoption of telemedicine for depression care among healthcare professionals in Indonesia is explored in this study.
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is employed as the theoretical foundation. Performance expectancy and effort expectancy are used to find the answer to the main research question. Performance expectancy refers to the degree to which one expects a system to help them raise their job performance, while effort expectancy refers to the degree to which a system is easy to use. Eleven interviewees were interviewed for this research, of whom eight are psychologists, two are psychiatrists, and one is an academic.
In terms of performance expectancy, there are nine key factors that could contribute to the adoption of telemedicine for depression care. In terms of effort expectancy, it was found that five key factors influence healthcare professionals’ perceived ease of use towards telemedicine. As a result, it was found through deeper analysis that education and technology are two additional contributors to the UTAUT framework in telemedicine for depression care. Additionally, the findings show that current regulations are still inadequate to provide comprehensive rules related to telemedicine practices in Indonesia.
This research has several limitations. It focuses exclusively on depression care in Indonesia as a country and not specific to certain locations. Bias can arise from the small number of interviewees in this research. Future research should consider the location, gender, age, and experience of interviewees to provide more comprehensive results. Another research can be employed to ensure the validity and generalization of the suggested framework in similar cases.
The implications of this research are intended for policymakers, academic institutions, and technology providers. To ensure the proper functioning of telemedicine, policymakers supported by academic institutions should incorporate telemedicine courses into the curriculum and establish formal regulations of telemedicine in the country. For technology providers, they must ensure that telemedicine functionalities meet the needs of healthcare professionals in order for them to perform their duties. ...
Several factors impact the adoption of telemedicine among its users. The adoption of this technology, including by healthcare professionals, will depend on these factors. To understand these factors, the adoption of telemedicine for depression care among healthcare professionals in Indonesia is explored in this study.
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is employed as the theoretical foundation. Performance expectancy and effort expectancy are used to find the answer to the main research question. Performance expectancy refers to the degree to which one expects a system to help them raise their job performance, while effort expectancy refers to the degree to which a system is easy to use. Eleven interviewees were interviewed for this research, of whom eight are psychologists, two are psychiatrists, and one is an academic.
In terms of performance expectancy, there are nine key factors that could contribute to the adoption of telemedicine for depression care. In terms of effort expectancy, it was found that five key factors influence healthcare professionals’ perceived ease of use towards telemedicine. As a result, it was found through deeper analysis that education and technology are two additional contributors to the UTAUT framework in telemedicine for depression care. Additionally, the findings show that current regulations are still inadequate to provide comprehensive rules related to telemedicine practices in Indonesia.
This research has several limitations. It focuses exclusively on depression care in Indonesia as a country and not specific to certain locations. Bias can arise from the small number of interviewees in this research. Future research should consider the location, gender, age, and experience of interviewees to provide more comprehensive results. Another research can be employed to ensure the validity and generalization of the suggested framework in similar cases.
The implications of this research are intended for policymakers, academic institutions, and technology providers. To ensure the proper functioning of telemedicine, policymakers supported by academic institutions should incorporate telemedicine courses into the curriculum and establish formal regulations of telemedicine in the country. For technology providers, they must ensure that telemedicine functionalities meet the needs of healthcare professionals in order for them to perform their duties.
Motivating “Sharing” to Enhance Circular Community in Bali, Indonesia
A Participatory Action Research on Balinese Community
However, despite its potential, IoT adoption in the logistics sector, particularly among third-party logistics firms (3PLs), faces several challenges. Legacy systems are often incompatible with modern IoT solutions, requiring costly upgrades and extensive integration efforts. Organizational resistance also poses a barrier, as employees accustomed to traditional methods may be hesitant to embrace new technologies, especially if the benefits are not clearly communicated. Financial constraints further complicate adoption, with high upfront costs for hardware, software, and infrastructure, as well as ongoing expenses for maintenance, data management, and training. These factors often lead to "pilot purgatory," where IoT projects remain in the testing phase due to financial and organizational limitations.
To address these challenges, the IoT Technology Adoption Framework (ITAF) was developed as a structured approach to guide companies through IoT integration. ITAF outlines a stage-gated process, starting with identifying challenges and assessing organizational capabilities. This is followed by planning, pilot testing, and ultimately, large-scale implementation. Each stage includes decision gates to evaluate progress and determine the best course of action, ensuring a systematic and informed transition. Metrics are integrated into the framework to assess the technical, organizational, and financial feasibility of IoT projects.
Expert insights, particularly from FedEx Europe, helped refine the ITAF to better address real-world complexities. These include improving system interoperability, fostering organizational buy-in, and managing financial risks. Feedback led to enhancements such as greater vendor involvement, continuous reassessment of company capabilities, and cost-benefit analyses post-launch. These refinements make the framework adaptable for various company sizes and IoT applications, from fleet management to real-time inventory tracking.
The flexibility of ITAF allows it to be tailored to the needs of different logistics providers. Smaller companies can prioritize financial considerations, while larger organizations may focus on system compatibility and scaling solutions. Its modular design also makes it applicable beyond logistics to sectors like healthcare, manufacturing, and retail, which face similar IoT integration challenges. Testing the framework across diverse industries could further validate its scalability and refine its approach for broader applicability.
As IoT technologies rapidly evolve, ITAF emphasizes the importance of continuous reassessment and updates to ensure companies remain competitive and aligned with industry standards. Clear stakeholder ownership at each stage of implementation fosters accountability and minimizes delays. By providing a practical and adaptable roadmap, ITAF addresses the complexities of IoT adoption, enabling companies to unlock its transformative potential and maintain a competitive edge in an increasingly data-driven industry. ...
However, despite its potential, IoT adoption in the logistics sector, particularly among third-party logistics firms (3PLs), faces several challenges. Legacy systems are often incompatible with modern IoT solutions, requiring costly upgrades and extensive integration efforts. Organizational resistance also poses a barrier, as employees accustomed to traditional methods may be hesitant to embrace new technologies, especially if the benefits are not clearly communicated. Financial constraints further complicate adoption, with high upfront costs for hardware, software, and infrastructure, as well as ongoing expenses for maintenance, data management, and training. These factors often lead to "pilot purgatory," where IoT projects remain in the testing phase due to financial and organizational limitations.
To address these challenges, the IoT Technology Adoption Framework (ITAF) was developed as a structured approach to guide companies through IoT integration. ITAF outlines a stage-gated process, starting with identifying challenges and assessing organizational capabilities. This is followed by planning, pilot testing, and ultimately, large-scale implementation. Each stage includes decision gates to evaluate progress and determine the best course of action, ensuring a systematic and informed transition. Metrics are integrated into the framework to assess the technical, organizational, and financial feasibility of IoT projects.
Expert insights, particularly from FedEx Europe, helped refine the ITAF to better address real-world complexities. These include improving system interoperability, fostering organizational buy-in, and managing financial risks. Feedback led to enhancements such as greater vendor involvement, continuous reassessment of company capabilities, and cost-benefit analyses post-launch. These refinements make the framework adaptable for various company sizes and IoT applications, from fleet management to real-time inventory tracking.
The flexibility of ITAF allows it to be tailored to the needs of different logistics providers. Smaller companies can prioritize financial considerations, while larger organizations may focus on system compatibility and scaling solutions. Its modular design also makes it applicable beyond logistics to sectors like healthcare, manufacturing, and retail, which face similar IoT integration challenges. Testing the framework across diverse industries could further validate its scalability and refine its approach for broader applicability.
As IoT technologies rapidly evolve, ITAF emphasizes the importance of continuous reassessment and updates to ensure companies remain competitive and aligned with industry standards. Clear stakeholder ownership at each stage of implementation fosters accountability and minimizes delays. By providing a practical and adaptable roadmap, ITAF addresses the complexities of IoT adoption, enabling companies to unlock its transformative potential and maintain a competitive edge in an increasingly data-driven industry.
Carbon Credit Incentives for Agroforestry
A Feasibility Study for Smallholder Farmers in Ghana's Ashanti Region
The carbon-based agroforestry system consists of three main parts: the carbon credit system, the institutional system, and the socio-technical system. To study this complex system, we adopt an illustrative case study approach, focusing on the Ashanti region in Ghana. Our research follows a top-down approach, beginning with comprehensive desk research to build a foundational understanding, followed by in-depth interviews with local farmers and selected experts, including government agencies and an NGO, to gain a nuanced understanding of the Ashanti region's context.
Taking into account the carbon credit system, significant attention is devoted to crafting a project framework that aligns with rigorous carbon standards. The accumulation of carbon credits over time serves as a means to secure initial investments. Farmer involvement, particularly their commitment, assumes paramount importance in the context of the carbon credit system, given that only mature trees can generate carbon credits. Primary risks pertain to tree cutting or tree mortality. To mitigate these risks, farmers need comprehensive training and access to essential tools for tree maintenance.
The land tenure system in the Ashanti region is notably complex, predominantly relying on the customary framework. Insights garnered from farmer interviews underscore the pronounced tenure insecurity that impedes farmer participation in the system. Securing land tenure documents is pivotal to instilling confidence among farmers regarding the equitable distribution of system benefits. Notably, varying farmer characteristics and specific traditional areas wield varying degrees of influence over land tenure security and the complexity of acquiring such documents. For system feasibility, a targeted approach focusing on engaging landowners and dispelling misconceptions while emphasising the advantages of land tenure documents is essential. Incentivising landowners through a share of the carbon revenue may also be necessary to ensure their active participation.
Farmers in the Ashanti region grapple with diverse challenges, stemming from erratic rainfall patterns, pest infestations, weed proliferation, and soil nutrient depletion. These challenges are compounded by financial constraints, exacerbating the farmers' livelihood struggles. Notably, farmers place a higher premium on the tangible benefits of increased fruit tree yields as the primary incentive for system participation, displaying comparatively lesser interest in the intangible monetary returns from carbon credits. Effective communication with farmers necessitates addressing their immediate concerns. Consequently, the agroforestry system should be designed to incorporate intercropped fruit trees, delivering additional yields while preserving the cultural significance of existing crops and optimising the environmental advantages of the system. Given that farmers predominantly learn through visual exposure, the initiation of a pilot agroforestry system can substantially bolster their willingness to participate. Simultaneously, the development of tailored training programs and the provision of essential tools are indispensable for empowering farmers to proficiently maintain the trees.
The significance of carbon credits within the system primarily lies in compensating cooperating and financial parties, as farmers prioritise other benefits. The institutional system's challenges, particularly in securing land tenure documents, pose substantial feasibility hurdles for the system's viability. In future research on this topic, it would be valuable to seek the insights of traditional authorities. ...
The carbon-based agroforestry system consists of three main parts: the carbon credit system, the institutional system, and the socio-technical system. To study this complex system, we adopt an illustrative case study approach, focusing on the Ashanti region in Ghana. Our research follows a top-down approach, beginning with comprehensive desk research to build a foundational understanding, followed by in-depth interviews with local farmers and selected experts, including government agencies and an NGO, to gain a nuanced understanding of the Ashanti region's context.
Taking into account the carbon credit system, significant attention is devoted to crafting a project framework that aligns with rigorous carbon standards. The accumulation of carbon credits over time serves as a means to secure initial investments. Farmer involvement, particularly their commitment, assumes paramount importance in the context of the carbon credit system, given that only mature trees can generate carbon credits. Primary risks pertain to tree cutting or tree mortality. To mitigate these risks, farmers need comprehensive training and access to essential tools for tree maintenance.
The land tenure system in the Ashanti region is notably complex, predominantly relying on the customary framework. Insights garnered from farmer interviews underscore the pronounced tenure insecurity that impedes farmer participation in the system. Securing land tenure documents is pivotal to instilling confidence among farmers regarding the equitable distribution of system benefits. Notably, varying farmer characteristics and specific traditional areas wield varying degrees of influence over land tenure security and the complexity of acquiring such documents. For system feasibility, a targeted approach focusing on engaging landowners and dispelling misconceptions while emphasising the advantages of land tenure documents is essential. Incentivising landowners through a share of the carbon revenue may also be necessary to ensure their active participation.
Farmers in the Ashanti region grapple with diverse challenges, stemming from erratic rainfall patterns, pest infestations, weed proliferation, and soil nutrient depletion. These challenges are compounded by financial constraints, exacerbating the farmers' livelihood struggles. Notably, farmers place a higher premium on the tangible benefits of increased fruit tree yields as the primary incentive for system participation, displaying comparatively lesser interest in the intangible monetary returns from carbon credits. Effective communication with farmers necessitates addressing their immediate concerns. Consequently, the agroforestry system should be designed to incorporate intercropped fruit trees, delivering additional yields while preserving the cultural significance of existing crops and optimising the environmental advantages of the system. Given that farmers predominantly learn through visual exposure, the initiation of a pilot agroforestry system can substantially bolster their willingness to participate. Simultaneously, the development of tailored training programs and the provision of essential tools are indispensable for empowering farmers to proficiently maintain the trees.
The significance of carbon credits within the system primarily lies in compensating cooperating and financial parties, as farmers prioritise other benefits. The institutional system's challenges, particularly in securing land tenure documents, pose substantial feasibility hurdles for the system's viability. In future research on this topic, it would be valuable to seek the insights of traditional authorities.
The AI Act covers various AI applications, including machine learning, logical, statistical, and knowledge-based approaches. It provides a classification framework based on the purpose and risks posed by AI applications: Prohibited/Unacceptable risk, High-Risk, Limited-Risk, and Minimal/No risk. However, there are concerns about the clarity of the classification criteria mentioned in the AI Act. Some AI systems may fall into multiple classifications, leading to ambiguity. For example, a social robot used in patient treatment could be classified as High-Risk or Limited-Risk. This ambiguity is also observed in classifying AI systems in enterprise functions, where 40{\%} of the classifications remain unclear.
Therefore, these challenges provide an opportunity to improve the classification process of AI systems under the AI Act, facilitating the classification process and accommodating emerging AI technologies. The main research question addressed in this thesis is: \textbf{"To what extent can the process of AI systems classification under the AI Act be improved?"}
The research focuses specifically on AI systems classification. It explores specific provisions of the AI Act, including Prohibited Risk, Classification Rules for High-Risk AI systems, Transparency Obligations, and Annexes II and III.
To achieve the objective of improving the classification accuracy of AI systems based on the AI Act, the study adopts the Design Science Methodology. This methodology involves systematically studying existing AI systems classifications and challenges, extracting themes to develop a framework, and evaluating the framework through feedback from AI experts.
A decision tree is designed as the proposed framework. It is evaluated on 16 respondents from two different backgrounds: legal and non-legal. In order to obtain comprehensive insights, the evaluation is designed to incorporate an experiment where respondents are tasked to classify AI systems to the risk level with the AI Act only. Then in the second experiment, they have to classify AI systems using the proposed decision tree framework. It is important to note that the study acknowledges the possibility of overestimating or underestimating respondents' ability to classify AI systems due to their diverse backgrounds and levels of understanding of the AI Act. Furthermore, a semi-structured interview is conducted to strengthen the analysis.
Based on the evaluation, the decision tree's performance revealed higher accuracy than the classification approach without the decision tree. However, the overall accuracy remained low, indicating room for improvement. Challenges identified include the need for additional context and understanding of terms, definitions, and examples in the decision tree and the potential for misclassification due to vague definitions and assumptions. Respondents also expressed the need for more detailed information about AI system use cases to improve classification accuracy.
The decision tree's performance varied between obvious and non-obvious use cases, with non-obvious cases presenting challenges in accurate classification. The accuracy for obvious cases was higher, highlighting the difficulty of distinguishing between High-Risk and Unacceptable Risk categories. Lack of clarity in terms and definitions and limited contextual information contributed to the challenges faced in classifying non-obvious cases.
Legal experts demonstrated higher accuracy than non-legal respondents, indicating familiarity with legal terminology and the AI Act. However, legal and non-legal respondents encountered difficulties classifying non-obvious cases, emphasizing the need for clearer frameworks and tools to enhance clarity and streamline the classification process. Greater clarity in the AI Act and an interdisciplinary approach were recommended to address these challenges and facilitate understanding of the risks associated with AI systems.
Based on the analysis, several areas for improving AI systems classification under the AI Act have been identified. The current classification process faces challenges related to ambiguities in definitions, lack of contextual information, and difficulties in distinguishing between different risk levels.
To address these challenges and enhance the classification process, it is recommended to introduce clearer guidelines and refine the decision tree used for classification. The decision tree should incorporate additional criteria and features that provide more clarity and context. It is important to consider biases, subjective interpretations, clarity, and the dynamic nature of AI technologies in these improvements.
The study has certain limitations. The small sample size of respondents may impact the generalizability of the findings. The number of participants might not be representative of the entire population. Additionally, the limited number of use cases utilized in the research may limit the comprehensiveness of the classification framework. The study is based on the latest amendment of a policy proposal, and there is a potential for changes in the regulation's details, which may affect the effectiveness of the results. Finally, potential biases may exist in the development of the research, such as in making the decision tree and selecting the use cases.
Future research should explore the continuity of the decision tree's performance over time and its evaluation. There should be more research on non-obvious cases in specific domains or industries. It is crucial to focus on potential issues in classifying certain risk levels in the AI Act that hinder classification accuracy. Understanding the differences between legal and non-legal perspectives on the AI Act is also important to establish standardized understanding among stakeholders. Additionally, conducting quantitative research with larger and more diverse respondents from industrial backgrounds can further evaluate the proposed framework. ...
The AI Act covers various AI applications, including machine learning, logical, statistical, and knowledge-based approaches. It provides a classification framework based on the purpose and risks posed by AI applications: Prohibited/Unacceptable risk, High-Risk, Limited-Risk, and Minimal/No risk. However, there are concerns about the clarity of the classification criteria mentioned in the AI Act. Some AI systems may fall into multiple classifications, leading to ambiguity. For example, a social robot used in patient treatment could be classified as High-Risk or Limited-Risk. This ambiguity is also observed in classifying AI systems in enterprise functions, where 40{\%} of the classifications remain unclear.
Therefore, these challenges provide an opportunity to improve the classification process of AI systems under the AI Act, facilitating the classification process and accommodating emerging AI technologies. The main research question addressed in this thesis is: \textbf{"To what extent can the process of AI systems classification under the AI Act be improved?"}
The research focuses specifically on AI systems classification. It explores specific provisions of the AI Act, including Prohibited Risk, Classification Rules for High-Risk AI systems, Transparency Obligations, and Annexes II and III.
To achieve the objective of improving the classification accuracy of AI systems based on the AI Act, the study adopts the Design Science Methodology. This methodology involves systematically studying existing AI systems classifications and challenges, extracting themes to develop a framework, and evaluating the framework through feedback from AI experts.
A decision tree is designed as the proposed framework. It is evaluated on 16 respondents from two different backgrounds: legal and non-legal. In order to obtain comprehensive insights, the evaluation is designed to incorporate an experiment where respondents are tasked to classify AI systems to the risk level with the AI Act only. Then in the second experiment, they have to classify AI systems using the proposed decision tree framework. It is important to note that the study acknowledges the possibility of overestimating or underestimating respondents' ability to classify AI systems due to their diverse backgrounds and levels of understanding of the AI Act. Furthermore, a semi-structured interview is conducted to strengthen the analysis.
Based on the evaluation, the decision tree's performance revealed higher accuracy than the classification approach without the decision tree. However, the overall accuracy remained low, indicating room for improvement. Challenges identified include the need for additional context and understanding of terms, definitions, and examples in the decision tree and the potential for misclassification due to vague definitions and assumptions. Respondents also expressed the need for more detailed information about AI system use cases to improve classification accuracy.
The decision tree's performance varied between obvious and non-obvious use cases, with non-obvious cases presenting challenges in accurate classification. The accuracy for obvious cases was higher, highlighting the difficulty of distinguishing between High-Risk and Unacceptable Risk categories. Lack of clarity in terms and definitions and limited contextual information contributed to the challenges faced in classifying non-obvious cases.
Legal experts demonstrated higher accuracy than non-legal respondents, indicating familiarity with legal terminology and the AI Act. However, legal and non-legal respondents encountered difficulties classifying non-obvious cases, emphasizing the need for clearer frameworks and tools to enhance clarity and streamline the classification process. Greater clarity in the AI Act and an interdisciplinary approach were recommended to address these challenges and facilitate understanding of the risks associated with AI systems.
Based on the analysis, several areas for improving AI systems classification under the AI Act have been identified. The current classification process faces challenges related to ambiguities in definitions, lack of contextual information, and difficulties in distinguishing between different risk levels.
To address these challenges and enhance the classification process, it is recommended to introduce clearer guidelines and refine the decision tree used for classification. The decision tree should incorporate additional criteria and features that provide more clarity and context. It is important to consider biases, subjective interpretations, clarity, and the dynamic nature of AI technologies in these improvements.
The study has certain limitations. The small sample size of respondents may impact the generalizability of the findings. The number of participants might not be representative of the entire population. Additionally, the limited number of use cases utilized in the research may limit the comprehensiveness of the classification framework. The study is based on the latest amendment of a policy proposal, and there is a potential for changes in the regulation's details, which may affect the effectiveness of the results. Finally, potential biases may exist in the development of the research, such as in making the decision tree and selecting the use cases.
Future research should explore the continuity of the decision tree's performance over time and its evaluation. There should be more research on non-obvious cases in specific domains or industries. It is crucial to focus on potential issues in classifying certain risk levels in the AI Act that hinder classification accuracy. Understanding the differences between legal and non-legal perspectives on the AI Act is also important to establish standardized understanding among stakeholders. Additionally, conducting quantitative research with larger and more diverse respondents from industrial backgrounds can further evaluate the proposed framework.
A Socio-Technical Analysis of the Importance of primary data for the Decarbonisation in road logistics
The impact of onboard sensors on road logistics to improve the estimation accuracy of emission factors
The research aimed to investigate the current practices of using vehicles’ primary data to improve GHG emissions’ accuracy by creating a system architecture for the data flow from the vehicle to the final visualisation of the GHG emissions. For that, the design science research methodology (DSRM) approach was chosen to answer the main research question of:
”What onboard sensor systems architecture can enable road logistics operators to gather primary data from their fleet to accurately determine their vehicle emissions?”
Four sub-questions were formulated in line with the used DSRM design cycle to answer the main research question and to contribute to the existing body of knowledge via a socio-technical analysis, system requirements, system architecture, and an evaluation.
The research utilised interviews, scientific literature, and informal conversations with industry players as the main knowledge source. The expert interviews were first used during the design process to understand the environment, derive system requirements for the later design, and to create a stakeholder overview. In the second phase of the research, the experts were utilised to evaluate the created design. Interview partners were selected based on their role in the system and potential expertise to help steer the design and evaluation. The feedback received was directly implemented in the designs.
The first step of the analysis was the socio-technical analysis. It revealed the first requirements and design principles for the later design phase, based on the institutional setting and stakeholder demands derived from interviews and the available literature. It also showcased the active and influencing role of the EU in the system, which underlined the need for a socio-technical analysis. Lastly, the stakeholder overview visualised the transport sector’s highly fragmented and multi-stakeholder domain, which industry experts evaluated and approved.
The complete system requirements were established and finalised in the second phase of the research. They were separated into three clusters: institutional, stakeholder, and technical-related requirements and were further categorised into functional and non-functional system requirements. Design principles were also created to steer the design process. Six functional and ten non-function system requirements were derived and four design principles. The requirements were evaluated and approved by the expert interviews and were used as the main input for the design phase. The main conclusion was the stakeholder-specific characteristic of some of the requirements due to the different needs of logistical actors and related IT companies that calculated GHG emissions.
The third phase was the designing of the system architecture. It was separated into two parts. First, the creation of a list of possible design options to address the derived system requirements with another evaluation round with the expert. Second, the creation of the system architecture by creating system architecture components, which incorporate the most fundamental design options from the design phase. The experts again evaluated these system architecture components before they were incorporated into stakeholder-specific system architecture, which captured the overarching processes and data flows of an IT company that specialised in the quantification of GHG emissions of vehicles in road logistics. The main conclusion was that, due to the diversity of system stakeholders, a general system architecture that adresses all stakeholder needs is less feasible than the creation of stakeholder-specific system architectures.
The fourth phase was the evaluation, which happened throughout all stages of this research, and concluded the general correctness of the derived stakeholder-specific system architecture by the experts. It also pointed out potential limitations of the designs. The specific knowledge needed to validate such designs of the technical domain (data management structures), the policy and institutional knowledge, and the specific details of state-of-the-art GHG quantification methodologies makes evaluating the entire system more challenging. Thus, a broad sample of interview partners was needed. Moreover, selecting a design option, especially in the perception and physical layer of the system architecture, can create path dependencies and narrow down the design space. The evaluation phase was concluded by addressing the general success factors of the proposed design. Here the willingness of the logistical operators to adopt the GHG emissions reporting, the importance of methodology alignments and the need for truly value-adding services were especially highlighted as success factors of the system architecture.
The research concluded by recognising the great potential of primary data to improve the accuracy of emission factors in road logistics. Seven main conclusions and contributions to the field of logistics were made:
1. The inclusion of a multi-domain designer perspective when designing an abstract system architecture in the logistical sector - should be mandatory in the scoping of any project.
2. The identification of relevant stakeholder clusters and an abstract stakeholder analysis to be considered when designing in the socio-technical environment.
3. The categorization of systems requirements into institutional, stakeholder and technical requirements to represent the multi-domain character of the system.
4. The need for financial quantification tools of the CO2 reduction for logistical operators to validate their investment decisions.
5. Compliance with leading European GHG emissions quantification methodologies and data regulations - should also be implemented, e.g. in the EU taxonomy.
6. A stakeholder cluster-specific system architecture, which incorporated the derived requirements and outlined business relationships and data flows in the system, evaluated and approved by industry experts.
7. The issue of the stakeholder-specific requirements for the system leading to multiple co-existing system architecture specifications.
Finally, the research concluded with a short and long-term outlook of how the sector might develop and presented potential future research topics, such as the possibility of using other forms of data sharing, such as data spaces or blockchain applications, for secure and trusted data sharing. ...
The research aimed to investigate the current practices of using vehicles’ primary data to improve GHG emissions’ accuracy by creating a system architecture for the data flow from the vehicle to the final visualisation of the GHG emissions. For that, the design science research methodology (DSRM) approach was chosen to answer the main research question of:
”What onboard sensor systems architecture can enable road logistics operators to gather primary data from their fleet to accurately determine their vehicle emissions?”
Four sub-questions were formulated in line with the used DSRM design cycle to answer the main research question and to contribute to the existing body of knowledge via a socio-technical analysis, system requirements, system architecture, and an evaluation.
The research utilised interviews, scientific literature, and informal conversations with industry players as the main knowledge source. The expert interviews were first used during the design process to understand the environment, derive system requirements for the later design, and to create a stakeholder overview. In the second phase of the research, the experts were utilised to evaluate the created design. Interview partners were selected based on their role in the system and potential expertise to help steer the design and evaluation. The feedback received was directly implemented in the designs.
The first step of the analysis was the socio-technical analysis. It revealed the first requirements and design principles for the later design phase, based on the institutional setting and stakeholder demands derived from interviews and the available literature. It also showcased the active and influencing role of the EU in the system, which underlined the need for a socio-technical analysis. Lastly, the stakeholder overview visualised the transport sector’s highly fragmented and multi-stakeholder domain, which industry experts evaluated and approved.
The complete system requirements were established and finalised in the second phase of the research. They were separated into three clusters: institutional, stakeholder, and technical-related requirements and were further categorised into functional and non-functional system requirements. Design principles were also created to steer the design process. Six functional and ten non-function system requirements were derived and four design principles. The requirements were evaluated and approved by the expert interviews and were used as the main input for the design phase. The main conclusion was the stakeholder-specific characteristic of some of the requirements due to the different needs of logistical actors and related IT companies that calculated GHG emissions.
The third phase was the designing of the system architecture. It was separated into two parts. First, the creation of a list of possible design options to address the derived system requirements with another evaluation round with the expert. Second, the creation of the system architecture by creating system architecture components, which incorporate the most fundamental design options from the design phase. The experts again evaluated these system architecture components before they were incorporated into stakeholder-specific system architecture, which captured the overarching processes and data flows of an IT company that specialised in the quantification of GHG emissions of vehicles in road logistics. The main conclusion was that, due to the diversity of system stakeholders, a general system architecture that adresses all stakeholder needs is less feasible than the creation of stakeholder-specific system architectures.
The fourth phase was the evaluation, which happened throughout all stages of this research, and concluded the general correctness of the derived stakeholder-specific system architecture by the experts. It also pointed out potential limitations of the designs. The specific knowledge needed to validate such designs of the technical domain (data management structures), the policy and institutional knowledge, and the specific details of state-of-the-art GHG quantification methodologies makes evaluating the entire system more challenging. Thus, a broad sample of interview partners was needed. Moreover, selecting a design option, especially in the perception and physical layer of the system architecture, can create path dependencies and narrow down the design space. The evaluation phase was concluded by addressing the general success factors of the proposed design. Here the willingness of the logistical operators to adopt the GHG emissions reporting, the importance of methodology alignments and the need for truly value-adding services were especially highlighted as success factors of the system architecture.
The research concluded by recognising the great potential of primary data to improve the accuracy of emission factors in road logistics. Seven main conclusions and contributions to the field of logistics were made:
1. The inclusion of a multi-domain designer perspective when designing an abstract system architecture in the logistical sector - should be mandatory in the scoping of any project.
2. The identification of relevant stakeholder clusters and an abstract stakeholder analysis to be considered when designing in the socio-technical environment.
3. The categorization of systems requirements into institutional, stakeholder and technical requirements to represent the multi-domain character of the system.
4. The need for financial quantification tools of the CO2 reduction for logistical operators to validate their investment decisions.
5. Compliance with leading European GHG emissions quantification methodologies and data regulations - should also be implemented, e.g. in the EU taxonomy.
6. A stakeholder cluster-specific system architecture, which incorporated the derived requirements and outlined business relationships and data flows in the system, evaluated and approved by industry experts.
7. The issue of the stakeholder-specific requirements for the system leading to multiple co-existing system architecture specifications.
Finally, the research concluded with a short and long-term outlook of how the sector might develop and presented potential future research topics, such as the possibility of using other forms of data sharing, such as data spaces or blockchain applications, for secure and trusted data sharing.
The Cryptogeddon of Blockchain
Designing policy recommendations for public blockchains to transition towards a quantum-safe environment
This research addresses this question within the context of the emerging quantum threat to blockchain. Quantum computing capabilities are progressing exponentially, surpassing Moore’s Law in computational growth, and are expected to reach the level of Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers (CRQCs) within the coming decade(s). At this stage, quantum algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s will threaten existing public-key cryptography, including blockchain security. Failure to transition to quantum-safe protocols risks undermining trust, destabilizing infrastructure, and compromising user funds. Therefore, preparing for a quantum-secure blockchain environment is critical.
The objective of this research is to provide an overview of recommendations that support blockchain’s timely transition to quantum safety. Recommendations encompass regulatory and policy guidance, technical strategies, and community engagement approaches. The methodology combines literature review, secondary data analysis, market analysis, case studies, and expert interviews. The technical chapter explores post-quantum cryptography options, evaluating trade-offs and considerations for integration into existing blockchain architectures, culminating in a technical framework for practitioners.
The organizational perspective analyzes blockchain governance, including decentralized change mechanisms and stakeholder influence. A market analysis of the top 100 cryptocurrency projects assessed their quantum-awareness, research activities, and adoption of mitigation strategies, forming the basis of the N.A.R.A.Q. framework. Additionally, 30 interviews with blockchain founders, project leads, CEOs, CTOs, cybersecurity experts, and post-quantum cryptosystem designers provided insights into the perceived threats, regulatory perspectives, barriers, and enablers for transitioning to quantum safety.
The study integrates these findings into actionable recommendations, proposing the Quantum-Secure Stamp of Approval (QSSA) and an enhanced N.A.R.A.Q. framework. The implications for Non-Quantum-Secure Blockchain Technologies (NQSBTs) are addressed, alongside policy recommendations targeting regulators, stakeholders, and the broader blockchain community. The research emphasizes collaborative efforts and external institutional support while analyzing key obstacles and barriers to adoption.
Ultimately, the study highlights the delicate balance between regulation and innovation. While regulatory frameworks can protect users and investors, overregulation or lack of technological understanding may hinder innovation. The findings aim to guide policymakers and blockchain stakeholders in facilitating a smooth transition to a quantum-safe environment, ensuring security, trust, and continued technological progress. By providing a foundation for discussion, this research contributes to strategic planning for the future of blockchain in a post-quantum era. ...
This research addresses this question within the context of the emerging quantum threat to blockchain. Quantum computing capabilities are progressing exponentially, surpassing Moore’s Law in computational growth, and are expected to reach the level of Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers (CRQCs) within the coming decade(s). At this stage, quantum algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s will threaten existing public-key cryptography, including blockchain security. Failure to transition to quantum-safe protocols risks undermining trust, destabilizing infrastructure, and compromising user funds. Therefore, preparing for a quantum-secure blockchain environment is critical.
The objective of this research is to provide an overview of recommendations that support blockchain’s timely transition to quantum safety. Recommendations encompass regulatory and policy guidance, technical strategies, and community engagement approaches. The methodology combines literature review, secondary data analysis, market analysis, case studies, and expert interviews. The technical chapter explores post-quantum cryptography options, evaluating trade-offs and considerations for integration into existing blockchain architectures, culminating in a technical framework for practitioners.
The organizational perspective analyzes blockchain governance, including decentralized change mechanisms and stakeholder influence. A market analysis of the top 100 cryptocurrency projects assessed their quantum-awareness, research activities, and adoption of mitigation strategies, forming the basis of the N.A.R.A.Q. framework. Additionally, 30 interviews with blockchain founders, project leads, CEOs, CTOs, cybersecurity experts, and post-quantum cryptosystem designers provided insights into the perceived threats, regulatory perspectives, barriers, and enablers for transitioning to quantum safety.
The study integrates these findings into actionable recommendations, proposing the Quantum-Secure Stamp of Approval (QSSA) and an enhanced N.A.R.A.Q. framework. The implications for Non-Quantum-Secure Blockchain Technologies (NQSBTs) are addressed, alongside policy recommendations targeting regulators, stakeholders, and the broader blockchain community. The research emphasizes collaborative efforts and external institutional support while analyzing key obstacles and barriers to adoption.
Ultimately, the study highlights the delicate balance between regulation and innovation. While regulatory frameworks can protect users and investors, overregulation or lack of technological understanding may hinder innovation. The findings aim to guide policymakers and blockchain stakeholders in facilitating a smooth transition to a quantum-safe environment, ensuring security, trust, and continued technological progress. By providing a foundation for discussion, this research contributes to strategic planning for the future of blockchain in a post-quantum era.
Have you updated your lightbulb?
Solving IoT vulnerabilities through governance
Using a literature study to define IoT concepts and the governance of IoT and current governance examples, background information is provided for the rest of this research. The database of 1649 IP addresses of network scan data from the area of The Hague is then used to find what vulnerabilities are present and what stakeholders are identifiable from this data. Exploring this network scan data showed only 191 devices are fully identifiable from the total number of IP addresses. These devices all carry vulnerabilities for the user of these devices, and being visible is by itself a vulnerability. No device owners could be directly identified, only the providers of the networks these devices are found in. This results in the identifiable stakeholders from the dataset: ISPs and device manufacturers.
Governance options are defined for these stakeholders (e.g. security-by-design, informing users etc.). These options are assessed on viability and validity through semi-structured interviews with three ISPs and the municipality.
The conclusion found is that the most viable action to take is informing device users since secure configuration and usage of a device would take away vulnerabilities while waiting for European legislation to be implemented. This legislation will force more security-by-design. The recommendation for the municipality is to take the role of leading actor, provide a better problematization with the data available, and use this to generate more urgency with other stakeholders. Starting public-private partnerships (with ISPs, device vendors, universities, other municipalities: different perspectives to progress the problem) and starting information campaigns and therefore try to reach as many people as possible. Even though ISPs can not provide in reaching vulnerable users directly, they can help in general information campaigns. Increasing security practices on the user side while waiting for legislation on the manufacturer's side.
...
Using a literature study to define IoT concepts and the governance of IoT and current governance examples, background information is provided for the rest of this research. The database of 1649 IP addresses of network scan data from the area of The Hague is then used to find what vulnerabilities are present and what stakeholders are identifiable from this data. Exploring this network scan data showed only 191 devices are fully identifiable from the total number of IP addresses. These devices all carry vulnerabilities for the user of these devices, and being visible is by itself a vulnerability. No device owners could be directly identified, only the providers of the networks these devices are found in. This results in the identifiable stakeholders from the dataset: ISPs and device manufacturers.
Governance options are defined for these stakeholders (e.g. security-by-design, informing users etc.). These options are assessed on viability and validity through semi-structured interviews with three ISPs and the municipality.
The conclusion found is that the most viable action to take is informing device users since secure configuration and usage of a device would take away vulnerabilities while waiting for European legislation to be implemented. This legislation will force more security-by-design. The recommendation for the municipality is to take the role of leading actor, provide a better problematization with the data available, and use this to generate more urgency with other stakeholders. Starting public-private partnerships (with ISPs, device vendors, universities, other municipalities: different perspectives to progress the problem) and starting information campaigns and therefore try to reach as many people as possible. Even though ISPs can not provide in reaching vulnerable users directly, they can help in general information campaigns. Increasing security practices on the user side while waiting for legislation on the manufacturer's side.
Software Architecture for a Self-Organizing Logistics Planning System
A continuation study on the SOLiD project