N.Y. Aydin
Please Note
25 records found
1
Anatomy of a Disaster
Mapping Multi-layered Typological Vulnerabilities Across European Flood Events
The Future Ground. Urban Planning Under Climate Uncertainty
Theoretical Contributions, Methodological Innovation, and Empirical Insights from Amsterdam and Mumbai
As the focal point of the climate crisis, urban regions face a critical mismatch between the century-long lifecycles of physical infrastructure and the short-term institutional planning timeframes that govern them. This research addresses the dual constraints of temporal myopia (short-sightedness) and sectoral fragmentation, addressing the lack of mechanisms to systematically embed climate uncertainty into spatial masterplans.
Positioned within the emerging paradigm of climate urbanism, this dissertation examines how urban planning can operationalize resilience thinking and apply design thinking to steer transformation under uncertainty. The research adopts a mixed-methods design grounded in Multi-Case Theory building (MCT), enabling a rigorous exchange between theory and practice. The approach is empirically refined through two contrasting global contexts: the Metropolitan Region of Amsterdam (MRA) and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR).
The research culminates in a new theories and conceptual framework that connects resilience and uncertainty approaches to physical planning interventions and an advanced understanding of the temporal dynamics of urban systems. Furthermore, it introduces a methodological innovation: a stepwise Design Thinking methodology for blending computational models and scenario narratives that embeds expert feedback into the modelling process to navigate and design for complex urban futures.
...
As the focal point of the climate crisis, urban regions face a critical mismatch between the century-long lifecycles of physical infrastructure and the short-term institutional planning timeframes that govern them. This research addresses the dual constraints of temporal myopia (short-sightedness) and sectoral fragmentation, addressing the lack of mechanisms to systematically embed climate uncertainty into spatial masterplans.
Positioned within the emerging paradigm of climate urbanism, this dissertation examines how urban planning can operationalize resilience thinking and apply design thinking to steer transformation under uncertainty. The research adopts a mixed-methods design grounded in Multi-Case Theory building (MCT), enabling a rigorous exchange between theory and practice. The approach is empirically refined through two contrasting global contexts: the Metropolitan Region of Amsterdam (MRA) and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR).
The research culminates in a new theories and conceptual framework that connects resilience and uncertainty approaches to physical planning interventions and an advanced understanding of the temporal dynamics of urban systems. Furthermore, it introduces a methodological innovation: a stepwise Design Thinking methodology for blending computational models and scenario narratives that embeds expert feedback into the modelling process to navigate and design for complex urban futures.
The main research question guiding this thesis is: “How can the Nature’s Contributions to People framework be applied to evaluate the benefits of nature-based solutions in urban environments?” To answer this, the thesis follows four steps. First, it compares existing evaluation frameworks, highlighting limitations of the ES approach and how they can undermine just NbS implementation. Second, it narrows down NCP categories most relevant to urban environments, confirming the relevance of NCP for cities. It then analyses how urban NbS contribute to those categories, which formed a basis for selecting a promising NCP category for further spatial analysis. Third, it compiles suitable indicators for each NCP category. Lastly, to validate the approach, a focused selection of NCP 16 indicators was tested through a spatial analysis using ArcGIS, applied to the case study of park Frankendael in Amsterdam.
The analysis demonstrates that the NCP framework adds value by not only capturing biophysical and economic benefits but also revealing who receives these benefits, who is excluded, and how access is distributed. These insights support more inclusive and equitable urban NbS evaluation. While this study focused on one NCP category, it provides a replicable methodology for broader applications. Future research should expand indicator testing across additional NCP categories, urban context, and NbS types to further strengthen inclusive NbS evaluations.
...
The main research question guiding this thesis is: “How can the Nature’s Contributions to People framework be applied to evaluate the benefits of nature-based solutions in urban environments?” To answer this, the thesis follows four steps. First, it compares existing evaluation frameworks, highlighting limitations of the ES approach and how they can undermine just NbS implementation. Second, it narrows down NCP categories most relevant to urban environments, confirming the relevance of NCP for cities. It then analyses how urban NbS contribute to those categories, which formed a basis for selecting a promising NCP category for further spatial analysis. Third, it compiles suitable indicators for each NCP category. Lastly, to validate the approach, a focused selection of NCP 16 indicators was tested through a spatial analysis using ArcGIS, applied to the case study of park Frankendael in Amsterdam.
The analysis demonstrates that the NCP framework adds value by not only capturing biophysical and economic benefits but also revealing who receives these benefits, who is excluded, and how access is distributed. These insights support more inclusive and equitable urban NbS evaluation. While this study focused on one NCP category, it provides a replicable methodology for broader applications. Future research should expand indicator testing across additional NCP categories, urban context, and NbS types to further strengthen inclusive NbS evaluations.
The Power of Trust
How patterns of trust in flood information influence the intention to take flood adaptation measures
As the intensity of climate change is increasing, flood adaptation measures are not keeping up with rising flood risks. This study therefore analyses the influence of trust in information on floods and flood adaptation on different types of flood adaptation strategies. Based on a UK case study using survey data from the SCALAR-team within the European Research Council project, a descriptive analysis, a binary logistic regression and a clustering analysis have been performed to answer the research gap.
Results showed that rural areas tend to trust information sources less than urban areas, except when the information originates from family and friends. However, trust in information sources is not always associated with the intent to take flood adaptation measures. Sources such as family and friends, social media and the prime minister are associated with an increase in certain flood adaptation measures, whereas trust in a government representative is associated with a decrease in the intent to take certain flood adaptation measures. Moreover, the clustering analysis identified five distinct groups of respondents, showing the importance of area-specific policies as local trust characteristics vary.
It is advised to look into longitudinal studies using the UK survey data to further establish the relationship between trust and flood adaptation strategies. The results of this study are not generalisable, but the methods are transferable for future research. Acknowledging the power of trust is fundamental for designing successful flood adaptation policies.
...
As the intensity of climate change is increasing, flood adaptation measures are not keeping up with rising flood risks. This study therefore analyses the influence of trust in information on floods and flood adaptation on different types of flood adaptation strategies. Based on a UK case study using survey data from the SCALAR-team within the European Research Council project, a descriptive analysis, a binary logistic regression and a clustering analysis have been performed to answer the research gap.
Results showed that rural areas tend to trust information sources less than urban areas, except when the information originates from family and friends. However, trust in information sources is not always associated with the intent to take flood adaptation measures. Sources such as family and friends, social media and the prime minister are associated with an increase in certain flood adaptation measures, whereas trust in a government representative is associated with a decrease in the intent to take certain flood adaptation measures. Moreover, the clustering analysis identified five distinct groups of respondents, showing the importance of area-specific policies as local trust characteristics vary.
It is advised to look into longitudinal studies using the UK survey data to further establish the relationship between trust and flood adaptation strategies. The results of this study are not generalisable, but the methods are transferable for future research. Acknowledging the power of trust is fundamental for designing successful flood adaptation policies.
This study addresses these uncertainties by first identifying the offshore wind generation goals of the countries surrounding the North Sea. Next, it evaluates various methods for integrating hydrogen production into the energy system. Based on the findings, multiple scenarios were designed to represent a spectrum of future system arrangements.
A scenario-based energy flow model was created to simulate and compare the behavior of different network designs under varying assumptions about electricity demand and hydrogen inclusion. The analysis reveals that electricity demand has a major impact on system design. Higher demand reduces the availability of surplus electricity, thereby limiting both hydrogen production and the cable capacity needed to transport electricity across the network. The results also show that onshore hydrogen production requires approximately 11% more cable capacity than offshore hydrogen production, although it avoids additional offshore infrastructure costs.
This study concludes that the North Sea hub and spoke energy system could serve as a foundational element of a flexible, robust, and integrated European energy system. However, to support effective planning and implementation, several critical areas require further research. These include the development of a time-based optimization model that incorporates real weather data and demand profiles to reveal seasonal and daily performance patterns. Moreover, there is an urgent need for more accurate projections of future electricity and hydrogen demand, as these will heavily influence infrastructure decisions. Lastly, detailed economic assessments must be conducted to better understand the investment requirements, market dynamics, and potential policy interventions needed to make this vision feasible.
By clarifying key design choices and highlighting critical next steps, this research contributes to a more informed and coordinated development of the North Sea energy system, advancing Europe’s transition toward a sustainable, carbon-neutral future. ...
This study addresses these uncertainties by first identifying the offshore wind generation goals of the countries surrounding the North Sea. Next, it evaluates various methods for integrating hydrogen production into the energy system. Based on the findings, multiple scenarios were designed to represent a spectrum of future system arrangements.
A scenario-based energy flow model was created to simulate and compare the behavior of different network designs under varying assumptions about electricity demand and hydrogen inclusion. The analysis reveals that electricity demand has a major impact on system design. Higher demand reduces the availability of surplus electricity, thereby limiting both hydrogen production and the cable capacity needed to transport electricity across the network. The results also show that onshore hydrogen production requires approximately 11% more cable capacity than offshore hydrogen production, although it avoids additional offshore infrastructure costs.
This study concludes that the North Sea hub and spoke energy system could serve as a foundational element of a flexible, robust, and integrated European energy system. However, to support effective planning and implementation, several critical areas require further research. These include the development of a time-based optimization model that incorporates real weather data and demand profiles to reveal seasonal and daily performance patterns. Moreover, there is an urgent need for more accurate projections of future electricity and hydrogen demand, as these will heavily influence infrastructure decisions. Lastly, detailed economic assessments must be conducted to better understand the investment requirements, market dynamics, and potential policy interventions needed to make this vision feasible.
By clarifying key design choices and highlighting critical next steps, this research contributes to a more informed and coordinated development of the North Sea energy system, advancing Europe’s transition toward a sustainable, carbon-neutral future.
Enhancing Transportation Resilience under Multi-Hazard Conditions: A Tool for the Mid-Term Recovery Phase in Earthquake-Affected Regions
A Case Study of Earthquake and Flood Disruptions in Antakya, Türkiye
Through an illustrative case study of Antakya, Türkiye, severely affected by the February 2023 earthquake and subsequent flooding, a modeling framework is developed that overlays flood simulations onto an earthquake-damaged network. This integrated approach combines flood hazard mapping with network performance analysis, capturing how inundation fragments connectivity and reduces access to essential services. Such disruptions are particularly damaging during the intermediate recovery phase, when infrastructure remains only partially functional and communities are highly sensitive to further disruption.
The analysis adopts three performance metrics to assess different dimensions of network resilience. Network centrality identifies structurally critical road segments for maintaining connectivity. Accessibility to critical services evaluates whether shelters retain access to essential facilities such as hospitals and markets. Disruption-adjusted shelter flows estimate howmany potential trips are affected by flooded roads, linking structural exposure to functional loss. These indicators are assessed across both single-hazard and multi-hazard scenarios, with flood intensities corresponding to 25-, 50-, and 100-year return periods.
Results show that flooding worsens network performance in a system already weakened by earthquake damage. Accessibility to critical amenities deteriorates, particularly in communities reliant on a limited number of corridors. These disruptions reroute shelter-related travel flows onto secondary roads, increasing travel distances and reducing accessibility, particularly in areas with low network connectivity. Spatial analysis highlights that targeted recovery of a few key corridors could improve mobility and prevent further disruptions affecting already displaced communities during multi-hazard events.
From a policy perspective, the findings emphasize the importance of adopting a multi-hazard approach in mid-term recovery planning. Strategies designed for a single hazard often lack robustness when additional threats emerge. Incorporating multi-hazard risk perspectives enables an improved understanding of vulnerabilities and supports more effective recovery planning. Doing so requires the integration of data on flood risks, transport infrastructure, and population movements into the recovery process. ...
Through an illustrative case study of Antakya, Türkiye, severely affected by the February 2023 earthquake and subsequent flooding, a modeling framework is developed that overlays flood simulations onto an earthquake-damaged network. This integrated approach combines flood hazard mapping with network performance analysis, capturing how inundation fragments connectivity and reduces access to essential services. Such disruptions are particularly damaging during the intermediate recovery phase, when infrastructure remains only partially functional and communities are highly sensitive to further disruption.
The analysis adopts three performance metrics to assess different dimensions of network resilience. Network centrality identifies structurally critical road segments for maintaining connectivity. Accessibility to critical services evaluates whether shelters retain access to essential facilities such as hospitals and markets. Disruption-adjusted shelter flows estimate howmany potential trips are affected by flooded roads, linking structural exposure to functional loss. These indicators are assessed across both single-hazard and multi-hazard scenarios, with flood intensities corresponding to 25-, 50-, and 100-year return periods.
Results show that flooding worsens network performance in a system already weakened by earthquake damage. Accessibility to critical amenities deteriorates, particularly in communities reliant on a limited number of corridors. These disruptions reroute shelter-related travel flows onto secondary roads, increasing travel distances and reducing accessibility, particularly in areas with low network connectivity. Spatial analysis highlights that targeted recovery of a few key corridors could improve mobility and prevent further disruptions affecting already displaced communities during multi-hazard events.
From a policy perspective, the findings emphasize the importance of adopting a multi-hazard approach in mid-term recovery planning. Strategies designed for a single hazard often lack robustness when additional threats emerge. Incorporating multi-hazard risk perspectives enables an improved understanding of vulnerabilities and supports more effective recovery planning. Doing so requires the integration of data on flood risks, transport infrastructure, and population movements into the recovery process.
Creeping Towards the Red Light
An Exploratory Study to Detect the Tippping Points of a Creeping Crisis
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Post-Disaster Reconstruction
A Case Study of the 2023 Earthquake in Antakya, Turkey
The Democratic Dimension of the 15-Minute City model
A Preliminary Spatial Analysis of Accessibility, Voter Turnout, and Electoral Volatility across selected European Cities
The results show that accessibility is related to democratic behaviour but in a context dependent way. In Paris and Rome, longer travel times to state related services are generally associated with lower turnout and, in Rome, with strongly concentrated belts of high volatility in peripheral areas. Berlin displays an opposite configuration in which more distant zones record slightly higher participation, a pattern that reflects its polycentric structure and relatively stable residential communities. Across all three cities, rental costs explain only a small fraction of the variation in accessibility, which suggests that planning legacies and urban morphology play an independent role. Overall, the findings provide suggestive but strictly correlational evidence. They indicate that accessibility can act as a territorial channel through which institutional presence is experienced, while also highlighting the need for longitudinal and quasi experimental research designs to establish whether changes in accessibility have causal effects on democratic engagement. ...
The results show that accessibility is related to democratic behaviour but in a context dependent way. In Paris and Rome, longer travel times to state related services are generally associated with lower turnout and, in Rome, with strongly concentrated belts of high volatility in peripheral areas. Berlin displays an opposite configuration in which more distant zones record slightly higher participation, a pattern that reflects its polycentric structure and relatively stable residential communities. Across all three cities, rental costs explain only a small fraction of the variation in accessibility, which suggests that planning legacies and urban morphology play an independent role. Overall, the findings provide suggestive but strictly correlational evidence. They indicate that accessibility can act as a territorial channel through which institutional presence is experienced, while also highlighting the need for longitudinal and quasi experimental research designs to establish whether changes in accessibility have causal effects on democratic engagement.
Equitable Implementation of Green Roofs in The Hague
Integrating Social Cost–Benefit Analysis with Spatial Equity Assessment
The central question guiding this thesis is: How can social cost-benefit analysis and spatial equity analysis support policy making for equitable and effective implementation of green roofs in The Hague?
The research framework combines several steps. A literature review identified recognised costs and benefits of green roofs and highlighted persistent gaps in monetisation, especially for co-benefits such as biodiversity and mental health. A city-wide social cost-benefit analysis was then carried out using harmonised GIS-based data on roof suitability, climate vulnerability, and socio-economic conditions. Four expansion scenarios were analysed: environmental-priority, income-based, uniform, and optimised allocation. Results were evaluated through equity analysis, using indicators such as the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curves, followed by clustering into neighbourhood typologies. Representative neighbourhoods were decomposed into postcode-5 units for detailed analysis disaggregated by housing type (owner-occupied, private rental, social rental). Finally, robustness was tested with exploratory model analysis, including Latin Hypercube Sampling, tornado diagrams, and partial dependence diagnostics.
The current stock of green roofs in The Hague covers about 323,000 m² but delivers limited societal returns. All neighbourhoods record negative net present values, and no benefit–cost ratio exceeds one. Expansion scenarios substantially improve performance: uniform, income-based, and environmental allocations enable roughly two thirds of neighbourhoods to surpass break-even, showing that scaling up can create sufficient critical mass for societal benefits to outweigh costs. The optimised allocation, in contrast, delivers very high returns in a small number of neighbourhoods while leaving most of the city unchanged, achieving efficiency at the expense of coverage.
Distributional outcomes differ strongly by allocation rule. The income-based strategy performs best: it reduces inequality, directs benefits to lower-income and climate-vulnerable areas, and is the only scenario that achieves positive alignment between benefits and adaptation need. Uniform and environmental allocations increase coverage and improve averages, but fail to systematically prioritise vulnerable groups. The optimised allocation generates extreme inequality by concentrating benefits in affluent, low-density areas with high property values, while excluding most neighbourhoods.
Clustering reveals four neighbourhood types: High Gain–Equity, Low Uptake–Stable, High Risk–Reward, and Low Return–Saturated. Detailed analysis of representative cases shows how socio-economic context shapes outcomes. Affluent, low-density areas such as Zorgvliet incur the largest losses despite high roof potential, as costs are spread across fewer households and collective benefits remain limited. By contrast, dense, mixed-income areas such as Oostbroek-Zuid and Moerwijk-Noord perform relatively better in per-household terms, as health and energy benefits accumulate across many dwellings. Tenure also proves decisive: homeowners capture most property-related benefits, while tenants, particularly in social housing, gain relatively little, and housing corporations bear a disproportionate share of costs.
Uncertainty analysis confirms that results are sensitive to assumptions about installation costs, annual maintenance, flood damages, energy prices, and property values. While absolute figures shift under different assumptions, the relative ranking of scenarios remains broadly consistent. At the same time, outcome ranges overlap, meaning no allocation is universally superior. This highlights the importance of designing flexible policies and safeguards for vulnerable groups to ensure that equity goals are met under uncertainty.
Overall, the findings demonstrate that green roofs can contribute meaningfully to The Hague’s climate adaptation goals, but distributive outcomes vary strongly by allocation strategy, neighbourhood type, and tenure composition. Efficiency and fairness are not automatic by-products of expansion; they must be deliberately embedded in policy design. For policymakers, this means that targeting denser, lower-income areas can combine efficiency with equity, collaboration with housing corporations is essential to avoid overburdening social renters, and evaluations must acknowledge co-benefits that remain difficult to monetise. By integrating social cost-benefit analysis with spatial equity assessment, this thesis shows how economic evaluation can be extended beyond aggregate efficiency to incorporate distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice. For The Hague and similar mid-sized European cities, this provides a framework for implementing green roofs not only as effective climate measures but also as pathways towards more inclusive and just urban futures. ...
The central question guiding this thesis is: How can social cost-benefit analysis and spatial equity analysis support policy making for equitable and effective implementation of green roofs in The Hague?
The research framework combines several steps. A literature review identified recognised costs and benefits of green roofs and highlighted persistent gaps in monetisation, especially for co-benefits such as biodiversity and mental health. A city-wide social cost-benefit analysis was then carried out using harmonised GIS-based data on roof suitability, climate vulnerability, and socio-economic conditions. Four expansion scenarios were analysed: environmental-priority, income-based, uniform, and optimised allocation. Results were evaluated through equity analysis, using indicators such as the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curves, followed by clustering into neighbourhood typologies. Representative neighbourhoods were decomposed into postcode-5 units for detailed analysis disaggregated by housing type (owner-occupied, private rental, social rental). Finally, robustness was tested with exploratory model analysis, including Latin Hypercube Sampling, tornado diagrams, and partial dependence diagnostics.
The current stock of green roofs in The Hague covers about 323,000 m² but delivers limited societal returns. All neighbourhoods record negative net present values, and no benefit–cost ratio exceeds one. Expansion scenarios substantially improve performance: uniform, income-based, and environmental allocations enable roughly two thirds of neighbourhoods to surpass break-even, showing that scaling up can create sufficient critical mass for societal benefits to outweigh costs. The optimised allocation, in contrast, delivers very high returns in a small number of neighbourhoods while leaving most of the city unchanged, achieving efficiency at the expense of coverage.
Distributional outcomes differ strongly by allocation rule. The income-based strategy performs best: it reduces inequality, directs benefits to lower-income and climate-vulnerable areas, and is the only scenario that achieves positive alignment between benefits and adaptation need. Uniform and environmental allocations increase coverage and improve averages, but fail to systematically prioritise vulnerable groups. The optimised allocation generates extreme inequality by concentrating benefits in affluent, low-density areas with high property values, while excluding most neighbourhoods.
Clustering reveals four neighbourhood types: High Gain–Equity, Low Uptake–Stable, High Risk–Reward, and Low Return–Saturated. Detailed analysis of representative cases shows how socio-economic context shapes outcomes. Affluent, low-density areas such as Zorgvliet incur the largest losses despite high roof potential, as costs are spread across fewer households and collective benefits remain limited. By contrast, dense, mixed-income areas such as Oostbroek-Zuid and Moerwijk-Noord perform relatively better in per-household terms, as health and energy benefits accumulate across many dwellings. Tenure also proves decisive: homeowners capture most property-related benefits, while tenants, particularly in social housing, gain relatively little, and housing corporations bear a disproportionate share of costs.
Uncertainty analysis confirms that results are sensitive to assumptions about installation costs, annual maintenance, flood damages, energy prices, and property values. While absolute figures shift under different assumptions, the relative ranking of scenarios remains broadly consistent. At the same time, outcome ranges overlap, meaning no allocation is universally superior. This highlights the importance of designing flexible policies and safeguards for vulnerable groups to ensure that equity goals are met under uncertainty.
Overall, the findings demonstrate that green roofs can contribute meaningfully to The Hague’s climate adaptation goals, but distributive outcomes vary strongly by allocation strategy, neighbourhood type, and tenure composition. Efficiency and fairness are not automatic by-products of expansion; they must be deliberately embedded in policy design. For policymakers, this means that targeting denser, lower-income areas can combine efficiency with equity, collaboration with housing corporations is essential to avoid overburdening social renters, and evaluations must acknowledge co-benefits that remain difficult to monetise. By integrating social cost-benefit analysis with spatial equity assessment, this thesis shows how economic evaluation can be extended beyond aggregate efficiency to incorporate distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice. For The Hague and similar mid-sized European cities, this provides a framework for implementing green roofs not only as effective climate measures but also as pathways towards more inclusive and just urban futures.
Towards the Oasis
Assessing Urban Green Infrastructure for Heat Resilience and Nature-Based Cooling in Arid Climates: A Case Study of Riyadh
Shielding Jakarta’s Household
A Multidimensional Analysis of Climate Maladaptation
Equity on the grid
An Analysis of the Relation between Socioeconomic Status and Electricity Infrastructure
In order to research how investments in the electricity grid are related to the socioeconomic status of neighbourhoods and how this affects equality in the province of South-Holland, this thesis is conducted. The study aims to answer the research question: "To what extent can spatial relations between electricity grid infrastructure and socioeconomic characteristics be identified and quantified in the province of South-Holland and what does this relation imply for inequality?"
To answer this question, first a literature study was conducted in order to identify socioeconomic variables related to energy poverty and energy justice to use in the research. Subsequently, data for these selected variables is collected on a neighbourhood level and the electricity infrastructure in the province of South-Holland is mapped. The research focuses on the low and middle voltage grid infrastructure as these grid levels directly influence households and their impact can be assessed on a neighbourhood level.
The collected data was then used in a correlation analysis to discover a possible relationship between the socioeconomic status of a neighbourhood and the amount of low and middle voltage stations located in it. As the electricity demand of wealthier households is higher than the demand of lower income households, it was expected that there would be a positive correlation between prosperity and electricity infrastructure. The found correlations, however, did not result in any definitive conclusions, except for the relation between the amount of inhabitants and the amount of electricity infrastructure, so another analysis was performed that focused more on the spatial correlations. In this hotspot analysis the variables with a strong relation from the correlation analysis were used in a clustering research. This resulted in indications being found that linked areas of socioeconomic prosperity to more investments in electricity infrastructure, as was assumed. This implicates that there is an unbalanced distribution of costs and benefits on the grid as everyone pays the same for the investments, but wealthier neighbourhoods profit more.
In order to learn how this relation came to be and how it affects equality, experts on the topic were interviewed. In total five interviews were conducted with people from main stakeholders in the system, namely: grid operators, municipalities and researchers on energy justice. The interviewees were asked about their thoughts on the results of the analyses, the developments of the electricity grid, its effect on equality and the role of the province of South-Holland in the system. From these interviews it was concluded that the indicated unbalanced distribution of electricity grid investments among different socioeconomic groups in the population is not necessarily a problem for equality on the short term, although it might provide difficulties in the future. The investments follow demand and thus it is a logical consequence that neighbourhoods with a higher electricity usage require more electricity infrastructure.
The problem in the system is that there are socioeconomic groups who have no access to the energy transition and can therefore not benefit from the developments, while others are enriched by it. This unequal balance of costs and benefits causes inequality to grow in the future, so governments will have to ensure lower income households have access to energy transition innovations in order to secure a balanced and sustainable future. ...
In order to research how investments in the electricity grid are related to the socioeconomic status of neighbourhoods and how this affects equality in the province of South-Holland, this thesis is conducted. The study aims to answer the research question: "To what extent can spatial relations between electricity grid infrastructure and socioeconomic characteristics be identified and quantified in the province of South-Holland and what does this relation imply for inequality?"
To answer this question, first a literature study was conducted in order to identify socioeconomic variables related to energy poverty and energy justice to use in the research. Subsequently, data for these selected variables is collected on a neighbourhood level and the electricity infrastructure in the province of South-Holland is mapped. The research focuses on the low and middle voltage grid infrastructure as these grid levels directly influence households and their impact can be assessed on a neighbourhood level.
The collected data was then used in a correlation analysis to discover a possible relationship between the socioeconomic status of a neighbourhood and the amount of low and middle voltage stations located in it. As the electricity demand of wealthier households is higher than the demand of lower income households, it was expected that there would be a positive correlation between prosperity and electricity infrastructure. The found correlations, however, did not result in any definitive conclusions, except for the relation between the amount of inhabitants and the amount of electricity infrastructure, so another analysis was performed that focused more on the spatial correlations. In this hotspot analysis the variables with a strong relation from the correlation analysis were used in a clustering research. This resulted in indications being found that linked areas of socioeconomic prosperity to more investments in electricity infrastructure, as was assumed. This implicates that there is an unbalanced distribution of costs and benefits on the grid as everyone pays the same for the investments, but wealthier neighbourhoods profit more.
In order to learn how this relation came to be and how it affects equality, experts on the topic were interviewed. In total five interviews were conducted with people from main stakeholders in the system, namely: grid operators, municipalities and researchers on energy justice. The interviewees were asked about their thoughts on the results of the analyses, the developments of the electricity grid, its effect on equality and the role of the province of South-Holland in the system. From these interviews it was concluded that the indicated unbalanced distribution of electricity grid investments among different socioeconomic groups in the population is not necessarily a problem for equality on the short term, although it might provide difficulties in the future. The investments follow demand and thus it is a logical consequence that neighbourhoods with a higher electricity usage require more electricity infrastructure.
The problem in the system is that there are socioeconomic groups who have no access to the energy transition and can therefore not benefit from the developments, while others are enriched by it. This unequal balance of costs and benefits causes inequality to grow in the future, so governments will have to ensure lower income households have access to energy transition innovations in order to secure a balanced and sustainable future.
Evaluating the role of critical infrastructure in disaster management
A case study of Hatay in 2023 Turkey - Syria earthquake
The earthquake devastated critical infrastructure in Hatay, delaying rescue and emergency response efforts and exacerbating loss of life and property damage. This research seeks to uncover the root causes that contributed to these failures and evaluate post-disaster recovery plans. The study’s primary question centers on the planning and management shortcomings within critical infrastructure systems and explores how these might be rectified in future disaster responses. The objectives include identifying the key critical infrastructures, analyzing root causes of the key critical infrastructure's system failures, and evaluating the long-term recovery plans’ effectiveness in mitigating risks.
A mixed-methods approach was selected for this case study to provide a comprehensive understanding of the key factors at play. The study includes qualitative analysis based on semi-structured interviews enabling the identification of key critical infrastructures based on stakeholder experiences and perspectives. To investigate the root causes of system failures, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is employed, offering a systematic and logical approach to identify underlying issues and contributing factors. Additionally, the study evaluates the effectiveness of long-term recovery plans through a comparative analysis of retrospective and prospective risk assessments.
In the analysis of the interviews education sector, healthcare services and transportation systems emerged as the key critical infrastructure, with their failure significantly impeding immediate response efforts and their importance in recovery. The education sector, in particular, emerged as a crucial component for long-term recovery and the restoration of societal normalcy. Meanwhile, the healthcare system struggled to manage overwhelming patient surges, while transportation bottlenecks, worsened by damage to road networks and airports, severely delayed the delivery of essential services and resources.
The FTA revealed several critical failures in CI planning and management. Healthcare services experienced capacity overload and staff shortage resulting from resource allocation and distribution failures, lack of seismic retrofitting and neglected structural faults in hospital buildings and restricted access to hospitals originated from transportation system failure. Transportation systems suffered from non-functional airport and road network failure originating from poor site location, previous inaccurate site assessments, inadequate design for site conditions, lack of maintenance and lack of redundancy, leaving many areas inaccessible post-disaster. A recurring theme across CIs was a lack of region-specific resilience planning to account for Hatay’s unique geographic context.
While the recovery plans address several CI weaknesses identified in the root cause analysis, significant gaps remain, especially in aligning strategies with the identified pre-disaster vulnerabilities. Although the recovery efforts incorporate bed capacity improvements and increased redundancy, heightened risk concerning neglected structural faults inaccurate site assessment were observed.
The increased risk suggests that the recovery plans may be addressing symptoms rather than the root causes of vulnerabilities. This points to a need for recovery strategies that go beyond immediate repairs, focusing instead on addressing foundational risks to ensure lasting resilience and reduce the likelihood of repeated failures.
This case study highlights the devastating effects of infrastructure failures during disasters. By addressing the root causes of these failures and implementing more comprehensive, resilient recovery plans, Turkey can build a disaster management framework that is robust enough to withstand future natural disasters. Although disaster management is highly context-dependent and cannot be universally applied, this study is important at a broader level, highlighting the need to identify the root causes of system failures in order to effectively mitigate future disaster risks. ...
The earthquake devastated critical infrastructure in Hatay, delaying rescue and emergency response efforts and exacerbating loss of life and property damage. This research seeks to uncover the root causes that contributed to these failures and evaluate post-disaster recovery plans. The study’s primary question centers on the planning and management shortcomings within critical infrastructure systems and explores how these might be rectified in future disaster responses. The objectives include identifying the key critical infrastructures, analyzing root causes of the key critical infrastructure's system failures, and evaluating the long-term recovery plans’ effectiveness in mitigating risks.
A mixed-methods approach was selected for this case study to provide a comprehensive understanding of the key factors at play. The study includes qualitative analysis based on semi-structured interviews enabling the identification of key critical infrastructures based on stakeholder experiences and perspectives. To investigate the root causes of system failures, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is employed, offering a systematic and logical approach to identify underlying issues and contributing factors. Additionally, the study evaluates the effectiveness of long-term recovery plans through a comparative analysis of retrospective and prospective risk assessments.
In the analysis of the interviews education sector, healthcare services and transportation systems emerged as the key critical infrastructure, with their failure significantly impeding immediate response efforts and their importance in recovery. The education sector, in particular, emerged as a crucial component for long-term recovery and the restoration of societal normalcy. Meanwhile, the healthcare system struggled to manage overwhelming patient surges, while transportation bottlenecks, worsened by damage to road networks and airports, severely delayed the delivery of essential services and resources.
The FTA revealed several critical failures in CI planning and management. Healthcare services experienced capacity overload and staff shortage resulting from resource allocation and distribution failures, lack of seismic retrofitting and neglected structural faults in hospital buildings and restricted access to hospitals originated from transportation system failure. Transportation systems suffered from non-functional airport and road network failure originating from poor site location, previous inaccurate site assessments, inadequate design for site conditions, lack of maintenance and lack of redundancy, leaving many areas inaccessible post-disaster. A recurring theme across CIs was a lack of region-specific resilience planning to account for Hatay’s unique geographic context.
While the recovery plans address several CI weaknesses identified in the root cause analysis, significant gaps remain, especially in aligning strategies with the identified pre-disaster vulnerabilities. Although the recovery efforts incorporate bed capacity improvements and increased redundancy, heightened risk concerning neglected structural faults inaccurate site assessment were observed.
The increased risk suggests that the recovery plans may be addressing symptoms rather than the root causes of vulnerabilities. This points to a need for recovery strategies that go beyond immediate repairs, focusing instead on addressing foundational risks to ensure lasting resilience and reduce the likelihood of repeated failures.
This case study highlights the devastating effects of infrastructure failures during disasters. By addressing the root causes of these failures and implementing more comprehensive, resilient recovery plans, Turkey can build a disaster management framework that is robust enough to withstand future natural disasters. Although disaster management is highly context-dependent and cannot be universally applied, this study is important at a broader level, highlighting the need to identify the root causes of system failures in order to effectively mitigate future disaster risks.
Protective Resource Allocation on Critical Road Segments
The case of Mali and the fight against terrorism
Analyzing the spatial relationship between energy and the built environment
A cluster-based approach to spatial planning
The Social Impacts of Urban Densification in Times of Climate Action
Creating a knowledge base on the social impacts of urban interventions pursuing simultaneous densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation and comparing the extracted main points with the perceptions of urban policymakers in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
At the same time, unique environmental and social challenges are requiring urban developers to adapt their approaches to changed long-term or short-term physical conditions while considering the social consequences.
Many cities around the globe, and amongst them Amsterdam, The Netherlands, are striving to align urban interventions in the field of densification and climate action. This led to the research question: Which social impacts arise from simultaneous urban densification and climate action in the form of climate change adaptation and the energy transition?
This study provides insight into the current knowledge in scientific literature and the perceptions of urban policymakers. A qualitative mixed methods approach was applied. The approach was constituted of a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. A social impact framework was combined with an understanding of the natural sciences, engineering and urban planning to assess the social impacts of urban densification in times of climate action.
I first collected the current literature at the interface of urban densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation to compile the perspective of academic literature in a knowledge base.
Secondly, I conducted semi-structured interviews with urban policymakers of the Dutch capital of Amsterdam to gain insight into the perspective of policymakers. In the analysis of both my data sets, I discerned explicitly mentioned social impacts as well as social impacts which were not explicitly stated, but could be reasoned from the collected literature and the conducted interviews.
Finally, the comparison of both perspectives shows a strong prevalence of social impacts in the spheres of livability in the built environment, health and economic relations. How densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation exert consequences on communities and institutional relations is much less observed at the current state. Lastly, impacts on cultural or gender relations are close to absent from the discussion - in academic literature and the perceptions of urban policy-makers in the case study alike.
While the results are largely connected to the conceptualisation and methods applied, implications can be drawn for future research and policy-making. It is essential to explore the origins of the low occurrence of cultural and gender impacts in the data set to evaluate whether these are due to knowledge constraints or actual low impact rates. But, given the understandings gained, I urge to observe these spheres more strongly, in particular in relation to indirect social impacts. Moreover, the case study shows that social impacts of densification and climate action transitions are highly context-driven. They are subject to questions of ownership, human behaviour, urban inequalities and social differentiation within the constraints of physical space and monetary as well as environmental budgets. Additionally, it is indispensable to further strengthen the interaction and communication between researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders. ...
At the same time, unique environmental and social challenges are requiring urban developers to adapt their approaches to changed long-term or short-term physical conditions while considering the social consequences.
Many cities around the globe, and amongst them Amsterdam, The Netherlands, are striving to align urban interventions in the field of densification and climate action. This led to the research question: Which social impacts arise from simultaneous urban densification and climate action in the form of climate change adaptation and the energy transition?
This study provides insight into the current knowledge in scientific literature and the perceptions of urban policymakers. A qualitative mixed methods approach was applied. The approach was constituted of a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. A social impact framework was combined with an understanding of the natural sciences, engineering and urban planning to assess the social impacts of urban densification in times of climate action.
I first collected the current literature at the interface of urban densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation to compile the perspective of academic literature in a knowledge base.
Secondly, I conducted semi-structured interviews with urban policymakers of the Dutch capital of Amsterdam to gain insight into the perspective of policymakers. In the analysis of both my data sets, I discerned explicitly mentioned social impacts as well as social impacts which were not explicitly stated, but could be reasoned from the collected literature and the conducted interviews.
Finally, the comparison of both perspectives shows a strong prevalence of social impacts in the spheres of livability in the built environment, health and economic relations. How densification, the energy transition and climate change adaptation exert consequences on communities and institutional relations is much less observed at the current state. Lastly, impacts on cultural or gender relations are close to absent from the discussion - in academic literature and the perceptions of urban policy-makers in the case study alike.
While the results are largely connected to the conceptualisation and methods applied, implications can be drawn for future research and policy-making. It is essential to explore the origins of the low occurrence of cultural and gender impacts in the data set to evaluate whether these are due to knowledge constraints or actual low impact rates. But, given the understandings gained, I urge to observe these spheres more strongly, in particular in relation to indirect social impacts. Moreover, the case study shows that social impacts of densification and climate action transitions are highly context-driven. They are subject to questions of ownership, human behaviour, urban inequalities and social differentiation within the constraints of physical space and monetary as well as environmental budgets. Additionally, it is indispensable to further strengthen the interaction and communication between researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders.