R.A. Hakvoort
Please Note
28 records found
1
Evaluating investment performance under uncertainty for Battolyser Systems
A Value Driver Tree-based simulation model
One promising innovation is Battolyser Systems, a dual-function technology that combines battery storage with electrolytic hydrogen production. Its ability to dynamically switch between energy storage and conversion makes it a valuable asset for grid flexibility. Nevertheless, the market uptake is limited by systemic barriers, underscoring the need for robust, uncertainty-based decision-making frameworks to support early-stage investments.
This research addresses this need by developing a simulation model based on a value driver tree (VDT) to evaluate the investment performance of Battolyser Systems under uncertainty in the Dutch green hydrogen market. The central research question is: How can a simulation model based on a value driver tree be designed and applied to the investment performance of Battolyser Systems under uncertainty?
The VDT framework is used as a visual and causal tool to decompose the economic added value (EVA) into its drivers: revenues, costs and capital input. The approach explicitly links technical parameters and policy instruments to investment performance, allowing for a structured analysis under uncertain conditions. After identifying the most important value drivers through literature research and stakeholder analysis, five primary uncertainties were selected for further modelling: electricity price, hydrogen price, unit capital costs, operating hours and system efficiency.
These drivers were formalised in a computational model using Monte Carlo simulation, yielding probabilistic distributions of EVA outcomes. Sensitivity and entropic analyses were performed to assess which parameters most strongly influence investment viability and where vulnerability to uncertainty is greatest. Baseline results indicate a negative EVA under current assumptions, indicating limited financial viability. However, the results show that policy factors, in particular hydrogen price and operating hours, have the greatest influence on shifting outcomes towards profitability.
The findings demonstrate that VDT simulation is a valuable method to capture the techno-economic complexity in energy innovations at an early stage. It allows for transparently tracing causal paths from technical inputs to financial outcomes and supports the exploration of risks and robustness in uncertain futures. Nevertheless, the scope of the model is limited by the availability of empirical data, in particular for new technologies. Moreover, institutional and behavioural dynamics, such as regulatory evolution and stakeholder strategies, have not yet been integrated.
In conclusion, this study provides a structured, simulation-based approach for evaluating investments in emerging hydrogen technologies. The VDT model improves decision-making by linking technical feasibility to financial feasibility under uncertainty. Future extensions should integrate dynamic institutional modelling and broader sustainability metrics to better inform adaptive policy design and systemic innovation in the energy transition. ...
One promising innovation is Battolyser Systems, a dual-function technology that combines battery storage with electrolytic hydrogen production. Its ability to dynamically switch between energy storage and conversion makes it a valuable asset for grid flexibility. Nevertheless, the market uptake is limited by systemic barriers, underscoring the need for robust, uncertainty-based decision-making frameworks to support early-stage investments.
This research addresses this need by developing a simulation model based on a value driver tree (VDT) to evaluate the investment performance of Battolyser Systems under uncertainty in the Dutch green hydrogen market. The central research question is: How can a simulation model based on a value driver tree be designed and applied to the investment performance of Battolyser Systems under uncertainty?
The VDT framework is used as a visual and causal tool to decompose the economic added value (EVA) into its drivers: revenues, costs and capital input. The approach explicitly links technical parameters and policy instruments to investment performance, allowing for a structured analysis under uncertain conditions. After identifying the most important value drivers through literature research and stakeholder analysis, five primary uncertainties were selected for further modelling: electricity price, hydrogen price, unit capital costs, operating hours and system efficiency.
These drivers were formalised in a computational model using Monte Carlo simulation, yielding probabilistic distributions of EVA outcomes. Sensitivity and entropic analyses were performed to assess which parameters most strongly influence investment viability and where vulnerability to uncertainty is greatest. Baseline results indicate a negative EVA under current assumptions, indicating limited financial viability. However, the results show that policy factors, in particular hydrogen price and operating hours, have the greatest influence on shifting outcomes towards profitability.
The findings demonstrate that VDT simulation is a valuable method to capture the techno-economic complexity in energy innovations at an early stage. It allows for transparently tracing causal paths from technical inputs to financial outcomes and supports the exploration of risks and robustness in uncertain futures. Nevertheless, the scope of the model is limited by the availability of empirical data, in particular for new technologies. Moreover, institutional and behavioural dynamics, such as regulatory evolution and stakeholder strategies, have not yet been integrated.
In conclusion, this study provides a structured, simulation-based approach for evaluating investments in emerging hydrogen technologies. The VDT model improves decision-making by linking technical feasibility to financial feasibility under uncertainty. Future extensions should integrate dynamic institutional modelling and broader sustainability metrics to better inform adaptive policy design and systemic innovation in the energy transition.
Impact of Alternative Transport Tariffs on Battery Performance
An Optimization and Distribution Network Model
This research examines how alternative transport tariffs impact battery behavior and grid stability in the Dutch distribution network. Specifically, it evaluates the effects of two newly introduced tariff structures: Time-of-Use (TOU) tariffs, which warrant flexible participation on the grid, and Time-Block (TB) tariffs, which provide discounts for energy usage within predefined time windows. The study assesses battery behavior, congestion relief, and financial viability under these tariffs, comparing their effects to a baseline scenario without alternative transport tariffs and without a battery. A key objective is to determine whether non-market-based mechanisms such as alternative transport tariffs can enhance congestion management and whether the TOU tariff should be extended to the distribution grid.
To analyze these effects, a quantitative modeling approach is used, combining a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model, which optimizes battery operation in the day-ahead and intraday electricity markets, with a PyPSA distribution network model, which simulates battery interactions within the grid. The study evaluates three scenarios: no tariff, TOU tariffs, and TB tariffs. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to examine the robustness of results under different price fluctuations and seasonal variations.
The results show that battery storage significantly improves congestion management by reducing line overloading, renewable energy curtailment, and peak loads. However, the extent of these benefits depends on the tariff design. The Time-of-Use tariff proves to be an effective mechanism, providing a structured yet flexible approach that allows batteries to optimize charging and discharging based on real-time grid conditions. This improves both their financial viability and their role in congestion relief. In contrast, the Time-Block tariff imposes rigid constraints that limit battery owners’ ability to adapt to market signals, significantly reducing both the financial attractiveness and technical effectiveness of batteries for congestion management. Seasonal variations also affect battery performance, with winter periods exhibiting higher volatility due to fluctuating energy demand and supply conditions. While some peak shaving occurs under all tariff scenarios, its effectiveness is reduced under the TB tariff because of its restrictive design... ...
This research examines how alternative transport tariffs impact battery behavior and grid stability in the Dutch distribution network. Specifically, it evaluates the effects of two newly introduced tariff structures: Time-of-Use (TOU) tariffs, which warrant flexible participation on the grid, and Time-Block (TB) tariffs, which provide discounts for energy usage within predefined time windows. The study assesses battery behavior, congestion relief, and financial viability under these tariffs, comparing their effects to a baseline scenario without alternative transport tariffs and without a battery. A key objective is to determine whether non-market-based mechanisms such as alternative transport tariffs can enhance congestion management and whether the TOU tariff should be extended to the distribution grid.
To analyze these effects, a quantitative modeling approach is used, combining a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model, which optimizes battery operation in the day-ahead and intraday electricity markets, with a PyPSA distribution network model, which simulates battery interactions within the grid. The study evaluates three scenarios: no tariff, TOU tariffs, and TB tariffs. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to examine the robustness of results under different price fluctuations and seasonal variations.
The results show that battery storage significantly improves congestion management by reducing line overloading, renewable energy curtailment, and peak loads. However, the extent of these benefits depends on the tariff design. The Time-of-Use tariff proves to be an effective mechanism, providing a structured yet flexible approach that allows batteries to optimize charging and discharging based on real-time grid conditions. This improves both their financial viability and their role in congestion relief. In contrast, the Time-Block tariff imposes rigid constraints that limit battery owners’ ability to adapt to market signals, significantly reducing both the financial attractiveness and technical effectiveness of batteries for congestion management. Seasonal variations also affect battery performance, with winter periods exhibiting higher volatility due to fluctuating energy demand and supply conditions. While some peak shaving occurs under all tariff scenarios, its effectiveness is reduced under the TB tariff because of its restrictive design...
...
Success Factors of an Energy Community in an Urban Area
A Mixed Method Approach
An energy community typically comprises a designated area or neighborhood where households aim to produce and consume electricity locally as much as possible. Additionally, these communities actively adjust their energy consumption patterns to avoid peak loads, significantly reducing the need for extensive investments in electrical infrastructure. To encourage participation, a demand response program is implemented that financially rewards households for adjusting their usage during peak times. This strategy not only facilitates more efficient grid management but also provides incentives for participating stakeholders.
This research presents a case study from the Sporenburg neighborhood in Amsterdam, where an energy community model is being tested. The study aims to identify the factors that contribute to the success of such communities. Sporenburg is an ideal case study due to its equipped smart meters and Amsterdam's ambitious climate goals, which necessitate a higher rate of electrification. Although currently stable, projections suggest that by 2050, Amsterdam’s electricity demand could increase threefold to fivefold compared to 2022 levels. The primary research question this study addresses is: What are the critical factors, categorized into distinct groups, that contribute to the success of the energy community?
The research is structured into three sections focusing on different aspects of the energy community: the technical system, organizational structure, and individual perspectives. It identifies critical success factors, differentiated into essential conditions for success and contributory factors. The study employs various analytical methods, including a technical analysis of Sporenburg, stakeholder analysis, and a survey. ...
An energy community typically comprises a designated area or neighborhood where households aim to produce and consume electricity locally as much as possible. Additionally, these communities actively adjust their energy consumption patterns to avoid peak loads, significantly reducing the need for extensive investments in electrical infrastructure. To encourage participation, a demand response program is implemented that financially rewards households for adjusting their usage during peak times. This strategy not only facilitates more efficient grid management but also provides incentives for participating stakeholders.
This research presents a case study from the Sporenburg neighborhood in Amsterdam, where an energy community model is being tested. The study aims to identify the factors that contribute to the success of such communities. Sporenburg is an ideal case study due to its equipped smart meters and Amsterdam's ambitious climate goals, which necessitate a higher rate of electrification. Although currently stable, projections suggest that by 2050, Amsterdam’s electricity demand could increase threefold to fivefold compared to 2022 levels. The primary research question this study addresses is: What are the critical factors, categorized into distinct groups, that contribute to the success of the energy community?
The research is structured into three sections focusing on different aspects of the energy community: the technical system, organizational structure, and individual perspectives. It identifies critical success factors, differentiated into essential conditions for success and contributory factors. The study employs various analytical methods, including a technical analysis of Sporenburg, stakeholder analysis, and a survey.
Implementing Hydrogen Combustion for Sustainable Flexible Power Generation
A Techno-Economic Analysis about Balancing Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources
To conduct this research, a multi-criteria analysis is performed on the CCGT in Moerdijk for the year 2040. Comparing an alternative relying on blue hydrogen, one relying on green hydrogen, and one relying on a blend of blue and green hydrogen against the continuation of running on natural gas. This method established a systematical approach to evaluate and compare different alternatives based on multiple criteria, while aiding to narrow the knowledge gap in understanding the combined effect that different technologies have on flexible power generation. This analysis resulted in the continuation on natural gas as a fuel for the CCGT being the top performer. However, assuming the need for a sustainable alternative, the top performer was different for each of the three forecasts. In the forecast with a low installed capacity of renewable energy, the top performing option is to use blue hydrogen as a fuel. In the central forecast, the alternative that combines blue and green hydrogen as a fuel is the top performer, in the high forecast, green hydrogen takes the lead.
Two sensitivity analyses, decreasing the impact of capital expenditure and overall system efficiency in the analysis, revealed a decrease in the performance of natural gas and an increased performance of green hydrogen alternative. The results show that the lack of adaptability problems and capital expenditure outweigh the large CO2 emissions and CO2 related costs of the continuation of using natural gas as a fuel. Regulations or incentives to decrease the capital expenditure of alternatives running on hydrogen can greatly stimulate the development towards more sustainable flexible power generation.
The energy demand for the CCGT in Moerdijk in 2040 is determined based on three different forecasts for the year 2040. Using electricity data from the CCGT in Moerdijk, along Dutch energy data from 2023, three running profiles are established. This revealed that the running profiles are bound by the limitations of the CCGT across the forecast.
For each of these alternatives, the total annual cost is calculated by optimising the production capacity of hydrogen storage, the storage capacity, and the hydrogen flow for each hour throughout the year.
To reveal the problems and opportunities associated with implementing the alternatives for the year 2040, interviews with professionals in the energy sector are conducted. These interviews showed great challenges towards the technical and infrastructural adaptability of implementation of the hydrogen based alternatives, and great challenges for the alternative on natural gas from operational longevity and dependability perspective.
...
To conduct this research, a multi-criteria analysis is performed on the CCGT in Moerdijk for the year 2040. Comparing an alternative relying on blue hydrogen, one relying on green hydrogen, and one relying on a blend of blue and green hydrogen against the continuation of running on natural gas. This method established a systematical approach to evaluate and compare different alternatives based on multiple criteria, while aiding to narrow the knowledge gap in understanding the combined effect that different technologies have on flexible power generation. This analysis resulted in the continuation on natural gas as a fuel for the CCGT being the top performer. However, assuming the need for a sustainable alternative, the top performer was different for each of the three forecasts. In the forecast with a low installed capacity of renewable energy, the top performing option is to use blue hydrogen as a fuel. In the central forecast, the alternative that combines blue and green hydrogen as a fuel is the top performer, in the high forecast, green hydrogen takes the lead.
Two sensitivity analyses, decreasing the impact of capital expenditure and overall system efficiency in the analysis, revealed a decrease in the performance of natural gas and an increased performance of green hydrogen alternative. The results show that the lack of adaptability problems and capital expenditure outweigh the large CO2 emissions and CO2 related costs of the continuation of using natural gas as a fuel. Regulations or incentives to decrease the capital expenditure of alternatives running on hydrogen can greatly stimulate the development towards more sustainable flexible power generation.
The energy demand for the CCGT in Moerdijk in 2040 is determined based on three different forecasts for the year 2040. Using electricity data from the CCGT in Moerdijk, along Dutch energy data from 2023, three running profiles are established. This revealed that the running profiles are bound by the limitations of the CCGT across the forecast.
For each of these alternatives, the total annual cost is calculated by optimising the production capacity of hydrogen storage, the storage capacity, and the hydrogen flow for each hour throughout the year.
To reveal the problems and opportunities associated with implementing the alternatives for the year 2040, interviews with professionals in the energy sector are conducted. These interviews showed great challenges towards the technical and infrastructural adaptability of implementation of the hydrogen based alternatives, and great challenges for the alternative on natural gas from operational longevity and dependability perspective.
Mitigating Congestion on the Low-Voltage Electricity Network
Identifying the bottlenecks for widespread demand response
Energy Hubs for a Resilient Port Energy System
An Exploratory Modelling and Analysis Approach to Alleviate Grid Congestion in the HIC Rotterdam
The congestion problems faced in the HIC will last until project ’Loadpocket Simonshaven’ is commissioned in 2027-2029. Until then, energy hubs might be valuable in creating grid capacity. Making shared use of an electricity connection can already create some extra capacity, however the implementation of large electrification projects is most influenced by the availability of additional grid capacity. As becomes clear from the simulation results. In addition, a promising integration option is the inclusion of an electricity generation unit in the energy hub of which multiple exist in the HIC Rotterdam. ...
The congestion problems faced in the HIC will last until project ’Loadpocket Simonshaven’ is commissioned in 2027-2029. Until then, energy hubs might be valuable in creating grid capacity. Making shared use of an electricity connection can already create some extra capacity, however the implementation of large electrification projects is most influenced by the availability of additional grid capacity. As becomes clear from the simulation results. In addition, a promising integration option is the inclusion of an electricity generation unit in the energy hub of which multiple exist in the HIC Rotterdam.
Shift happens!
The influence of dynamic energy contracts on electricity consumption in individual households in the Netherlands
Enabling Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) in the EU
Evaluating technological pathways with a focus on direct air capture (DAC) technology
Addressing the chicken-and-egg problem and meeting EU mandates to enable sustainable air travel requires identifying the most viable sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) technology incorporating direct air capture (DAC) within the EU. To achieve this, the costs of state-of-the-art electrolysis technologies were analyzed alongside the latest DAC data provided by Skytree, a company specializing in direct air capture. This approach aims to bridge the gap between theoretical literature and practical industry values.
While viewing CO₂ as a valuable feedstock is not a new concept, this analysis is novel in combining this perspective with the varying carbon efficiencies of different SAF production technologies. These efficiencies directly impact the levelized cost of kerosene by requiring different volumes of 'valuable' CO₂ from direct air capture (DAC), offering a fresh approach to evaluating the economic viability of SAF pathways.
This study extends the existing literature, which provides substantial insight into cost and performance metrics, by adopting a socio-technical lens. This perspective explores what is needed beyond lower costs to enable the deployment of sustainable aviation fuel technologies within the current socio-technical system. Therefore, the research question guiding this study is: How can sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) be developed within the EU, specifically considering technologies that incorporate direct air capture (DAC)?
The socio-technical analysis began with a literature review to identify SAF technologies and their components, guiding an actor analysis using the Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework to link stakeholders with technological and regulatory roles. An institutional analysis followed, identified key policies, formal rules, and regulatory hurdles shaping the SAF innovation system, while subsequent network analyses examined system support structures. Together with the problem statement, these analyses guided the development of technical criteria to assess the feasibility of the outlined technologies as well as non-technical criteria addressing broader factors necessary for successful short-term deployment within the EU. Using techno-economic data from the literature review, along with up-to-date direct air capture data provided by the internship provider, Skytree, the best-assessed technologies from the socio-technical analysis were compared based on the levelized cost of fuel. The analysis transitions from an overall cost comparison to a detailed examination of specific cost components, using CAPEX degression curves to average future estimates from literature and comparing cost breakdowns in 2024, 2035, and 2050 to highlight structural shifts as technologies mature. A concluding sensitivity analysis varies key assumptions to identify critical cost drivers influencing the economic viability of SAF technologies.
This study selected fossil, biogenic, and direct air capture (DAC) carbon sources coupled with proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM), solid oxide electrolysis (SOE), reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reactor, and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis for further analysis. Socio-technical analyses emphasized collaboration among airlines, knowledge institutes, and supporting organizations, alongside strong connections with energy providers, feedstock suppliers, and infrastructure providers to address supply chain complexities. IATA (International Air Transport Association) was identified as a potential coordinator for collective investments to overcome high costs, low initial demand, and narrow profit margins, particularly in EU states with SAF regulations. Production sites near renewable energy sources and fueling infrastructure were recommended to reduce logistical costs and grid congestion, with regions like Iceland or Norway offering short-term potential despite higher costs. Locating facilities in areas without alternative carbon sources strengthened the case for DAC by reducing reliance on limited carbon infrastructure. Policy analysis highlighted the need to phase out or reevaluate free EU ETS allowances for fossil CO₂ to ensure fair competition and support DAC and biogenic CO₂ adoption.
Techno-economic analysis identified proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM) coupled with a reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reactor, Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis and biogenic (BIO) CO₂ as the most cost-effective current option due to its lower CAPEX compared to solid oxide electrolysis (SOE), though it remains 4 to 5 times more expensive than fossil kerosene. DAC-based pathways, while initially more costly, are projected to become competitive by 2028 with rising EU ETS carbon prices and to surpass fossil-based CO₂ in cost-effectiveness across all scenarios by 2036, highlighting the need to revise transitional fossil CO₂ timelines and phase out free allowances. High-concentration biogenic CO₂ can meet demand but is currently underutilized due to limited economic incentives for capture and insufficient carbon infrastructure. By 2050, all studied sustainable aviation fuel pathways are expected to cost between €1.80 and €2.00/liter, with proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM) technology emerging as the most economical and SAF prices ranging from 1 to 2 times the cost of fossil kerosene. Solid oxide electrolysis (SOE) technology demonstrates strong potential with improved efficiency, extended lifetimes, and the ability to co-electrolyze CO₂ and water to produce syngas, making it particularly promising for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production. High CAPEX and low operational hours, particularly for direct air capture, drive up costs, necessitating strategies such as electricity storage development and nuclear energy expansion to ensure affordable power and meet the EU’s increasing electricity demand for aviation decarbonization. The OPEX-heavy nature of sustainable aviation fuel production underscores the urgency for cost-effective electricity, raising concerns about whether renewable energy could be better utilized in sectors with greater decarbonization potential. ...
Addressing the chicken-and-egg problem and meeting EU mandates to enable sustainable air travel requires identifying the most viable sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) technology incorporating direct air capture (DAC) within the EU. To achieve this, the costs of state-of-the-art electrolysis technologies were analyzed alongside the latest DAC data provided by Skytree, a company specializing in direct air capture. This approach aims to bridge the gap between theoretical literature and practical industry values.
While viewing CO₂ as a valuable feedstock is not a new concept, this analysis is novel in combining this perspective with the varying carbon efficiencies of different SAF production technologies. These efficiencies directly impact the levelized cost of kerosene by requiring different volumes of 'valuable' CO₂ from direct air capture (DAC), offering a fresh approach to evaluating the economic viability of SAF pathways.
This study extends the existing literature, which provides substantial insight into cost and performance metrics, by adopting a socio-technical lens. This perspective explores what is needed beyond lower costs to enable the deployment of sustainable aviation fuel technologies within the current socio-technical system. Therefore, the research question guiding this study is: How can sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) be developed within the EU, specifically considering technologies that incorporate direct air capture (DAC)?
The socio-technical analysis began with a literature review to identify SAF technologies and their components, guiding an actor analysis using the Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework to link stakeholders with technological and regulatory roles. An institutional analysis followed, identified key policies, formal rules, and regulatory hurdles shaping the SAF innovation system, while subsequent network analyses examined system support structures. Together with the problem statement, these analyses guided the development of technical criteria to assess the feasibility of the outlined technologies as well as non-technical criteria addressing broader factors necessary for successful short-term deployment within the EU. Using techno-economic data from the literature review, along with up-to-date direct air capture data provided by the internship provider, Skytree, the best-assessed technologies from the socio-technical analysis were compared based on the levelized cost of fuel. The analysis transitions from an overall cost comparison to a detailed examination of specific cost components, using CAPEX degression curves to average future estimates from literature and comparing cost breakdowns in 2024, 2035, and 2050 to highlight structural shifts as technologies mature. A concluding sensitivity analysis varies key assumptions to identify critical cost drivers influencing the economic viability of SAF technologies.
This study selected fossil, biogenic, and direct air capture (DAC) carbon sources coupled with proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM), solid oxide electrolysis (SOE), reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reactor, and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis for further analysis. Socio-technical analyses emphasized collaboration among airlines, knowledge institutes, and supporting organizations, alongside strong connections with energy providers, feedstock suppliers, and infrastructure providers to address supply chain complexities. IATA (International Air Transport Association) was identified as a potential coordinator for collective investments to overcome high costs, low initial demand, and narrow profit margins, particularly in EU states with SAF regulations. Production sites near renewable energy sources and fueling infrastructure were recommended to reduce logistical costs and grid congestion, with regions like Iceland or Norway offering short-term potential despite higher costs. Locating facilities in areas without alternative carbon sources strengthened the case for DAC by reducing reliance on limited carbon infrastructure. Policy analysis highlighted the need to phase out or reevaluate free EU ETS allowances for fossil CO₂ to ensure fair competition and support DAC and biogenic CO₂ adoption.
Techno-economic analysis identified proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM) coupled with a reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reactor, Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis and biogenic (BIO) CO₂ as the most cost-effective current option due to its lower CAPEX compared to solid oxide electrolysis (SOE), though it remains 4 to 5 times more expensive than fossil kerosene. DAC-based pathways, while initially more costly, are projected to become competitive by 2028 with rising EU ETS carbon prices and to surpass fossil-based CO₂ in cost-effectiveness across all scenarios by 2036, highlighting the need to revise transitional fossil CO₂ timelines and phase out free allowances. High-concentration biogenic CO₂ can meet demand but is currently underutilized due to limited economic incentives for capture and insufficient carbon infrastructure. By 2050, all studied sustainable aviation fuel pathways are expected to cost between €1.80 and €2.00/liter, with proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM) technology emerging as the most economical and SAF prices ranging from 1 to 2 times the cost of fossil kerosene. Solid oxide electrolysis (SOE) technology demonstrates strong potential with improved efficiency, extended lifetimes, and the ability to co-electrolyze CO₂ and water to produce syngas, making it particularly promising for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production. High CAPEX and low operational hours, particularly for direct air capture, drive up costs, necessitating strategies such as electricity storage development and nuclear energy expansion to ensure affordable power and meet the EU’s increasing electricity demand for aviation decarbonization. The OPEX-heavy nature of sustainable aviation fuel production underscores the urgency for cost-effective electricity, raising concerns about whether renewable energy could be better utilized in sectors with greater decarbonization potential.
However, a single solution dominating the market is unlikely due to continuous innovation and the limitations of individual battery systems for prosumers and Distribution System Operators (DSOs). Community energy storage (CES) emerges as a promising alternative but lacks a defined business model, particularly for Dutch residential communities.
This study delves into the implementation of centralized community energy storage systems to boost prosumer profitability and mitigate grid congestion in the Dutch solar residential market, in the wake of the NEM scheme phase-out. Community energy storage applications are identified, along with their respective potential business models. The optimal application, in terms of prosumer profitability and grid relief, is selected, and its associated business model is developed using the Morphological business model designed for energy communities. Furthermore, a practical approach for integration is proposed, based on regulatory and market constraints, to enhance the potential for large-scale emergence. This approach includes defining key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders within the community and the corresponding allocation of value. Subsequently, a technical system design topology is outlined for each defined community. This system design delves into engineering details to analyze the energy interaction possibilities between consumers and the grid, along with the corresponding financial implications. Accordingly, the CES application’s performance is simulated and evaluated both technically and financially. The potential is presented by simulating the interactions between the community, the grid, and the optimal battery system. This optimal interaction arises from an optimization problem formulated to provide the optimal battery size and its corresponding energy profiles that minimize the total community cost. Finally, an energy distribution mechanism is carried out through conditional decision making to evaluate the cost and profitability allocation among consumers within the community.
The findings highlights the optimal application of CES, combining energy sharing with energy arbitrage, which significantly enhances the value of prosumers’ surplus PV energy, outperforming standard tariffs and avoiding grid feedback charges. This approach also provides consumers with access to more affordable shared community energy, while aiding DSOs in alleviating grid congestion and improving infrastructure capacity. The study suggests that the most effective strategy for widespread CES adoption involves collaboration between housing cooperatives and Energy Service Companies (ESCOs). Financially, this model entails
community managers overseeing initial investments, complemented by household contributions via usagebased or fixed service fees. The business model’s success is influenced by the type of grid connection, with Behind-The-Meter (BTM) offering flexibility but lacking standardization, and Front-of-The-Meter (FTM) encountering challenges related to community energy taxation. Modelling the optimal operation for both BTM and FTM connections demonstrates a significant decrease of energy costs and contribution to grid relief, highlighting load smoothing and peak shaving as key benefits. The research concludes that centralized CES systems can substantially elevate prosumer profitability and reduce grid congestion, leading to considerable energy savings and enhanced grid performance in the Dutch solar residential market.
To support the expansion of Community Energy Storage (CES) systems and energy communities, policymakers are advised to revise energy taxation policies and create frameworks aiding community grid formation, including simplifying regulations and offering incentives for residential initiatives. Researchers should adopt a multidisciplinary approach to explore regulatory, technical, economic, social, and environmental impacts on CES, focusing on regulatory effects, grid dynamics, cost-benefit models, community engagement, and environmental benefits. Industry stakeholders, such as Distribution System Operators, energy providers, Energy Service Companies, and housing cooperatives, should apply these research insights to develop and implement CES systems, fostering partnerships to address challenges and innovate in energy solutions, particularly in the evolving landscape post-Net Energy Metering, to enhance the role of community storage in sustainable energy systems. ...
However, a single solution dominating the market is unlikely due to continuous innovation and the limitations of individual battery systems for prosumers and Distribution System Operators (DSOs). Community energy storage (CES) emerges as a promising alternative but lacks a defined business model, particularly for Dutch residential communities.
This study delves into the implementation of centralized community energy storage systems to boost prosumer profitability and mitigate grid congestion in the Dutch solar residential market, in the wake of the NEM scheme phase-out. Community energy storage applications are identified, along with their respective potential business models. The optimal application, in terms of prosumer profitability and grid relief, is selected, and its associated business model is developed using the Morphological business model designed for energy communities. Furthermore, a practical approach for integration is proposed, based on regulatory and market constraints, to enhance the potential for large-scale emergence. This approach includes defining key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders within the community and the corresponding allocation of value. Subsequently, a technical system design topology is outlined for each defined community. This system design delves into engineering details to analyze the energy interaction possibilities between consumers and the grid, along with the corresponding financial implications. Accordingly, the CES application’s performance is simulated and evaluated both technically and financially. The potential is presented by simulating the interactions between the community, the grid, and the optimal battery system. This optimal interaction arises from an optimization problem formulated to provide the optimal battery size and its corresponding energy profiles that minimize the total community cost. Finally, an energy distribution mechanism is carried out through conditional decision making to evaluate the cost and profitability allocation among consumers within the community.
The findings highlights the optimal application of CES, combining energy sharing with energy arbitrage, which significantly enhances the value of prosumers’ surplus PV energy, outperforming standard tariffs and avoiding grid feedback charges. This approach also provides consumers with access to more affordable shared community energy, while aiding DSOs in alleviating grid congestion and improving infrastructure capacity. The study suggests that the most effective strategy for widespread CES adoption involves collaboration between housing cooperatives and Energy Service Companies (ESCOs). Financially, this model entails
community managers overseeing initial investments, complemented by household contributions via usagebased or fixed service fees. The business model’s success is influenced by the type of grid connection, with Behind-The-Meter (BTM) offering flexibility but lacking standardization, and Front-of-The-Meter (FTM) encountering challenges related to community energy taxation. Modelling the optimal operation for both BTM and FTM connections demonstrates a significant decrease of energy costs and contribution to grid relief, highlighting load smoothing and peak shaving as key benefits. The research concludes that centralized CES systems can substantially elevate prosumer profitability and reduce grid congestion, leading to considerable energy savings and enhanced grid performance in the Dutch solar residential market.
To support the expansion of Community Energy Storage (CES) systems and energy communities, policymakers are advised to revise energy taxation policies and create frameworks aiding community grid formation, including simplifying regulations and offering incentives for residential initiatives. Researchers should adopt a multidisciplinary approach to explore regulatory, technical, economic, social, and environmental impacts on CES, focusing on regulatory effects, grid dynamics, cost-benefit models, community engagement, and environmental benefits. Industry stakeholders, such as Distribution System Operators, energy providers, Energy Service Companies, and housing cooperatives, should apply these research insights to develop and implement CES systems, fostering partnerships to address challenges and innovate in energy solutions, particularly in the evolving landscape post-Net Energy Metering, to enhance the role of community storage in sustainable energy systems.
The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining theoretical analysis, stakeholder interviews, SWOT analysis, and case studies. Through a comprehensive literature review, a holistic understanding of energy hubs is established, providing a foundation for further analysis. Stakeholder interviews offer insights into the perspectives and interests of various actors in the energy sector, shedding light on the roles they play and the potential benefits of energy hubs.
The thesis analyses the theoretical and practical value of energy hubs, considering their potential to optimise network capacity, enhance renewable energy integration, and improve system flexibility. SWOT analysis allows for a thorough examination of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with energy hubs. The analysis of case study projects further enriches the findings by providing real-world examples and highlighting their applicability in practice.
The results demonstrate that energy hubs have the potential to contribute significantly to network management, offering benefits such as reduced grid congestion, increased renewable energy utilisation, and enhanced collaboration among stakeholders. However, limitations exist, including the need for a clear definition, standardised legal procedures, and a comprehensive understanding of the specific conditions under which energy hubs are most suitable.
This thesis contributes to the existing knowledge on energy hubs and their impact on network management. It offers a comprehensive analysis of their key components, stakeholder dynamics, policy implications, and practical considerations. The research findings provide valuable insights for both academia and industry, informing future research directions and aiding DSOs in harnessing the full potential of energy hubs to facilitate the transition towards a sustainable and resilient energy system. ...
The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining theoretical analysis, stakeholder interviews, SWOT analysis, and case studies. Through a comprehensive literature review, a holistic understanding of energy hubs is established, providing a foundation for further analysis. Stakeholder interviews offer insights into the perspectives and interests of various actors in the energy sector, shedding light on the roles they play and the potential benefits of energy hubs.
The thesis analyses the theoretical and practical value of energy hubs, considering their potential to optimise network capacity, enhance renewable energy integration, and improve system flexibility. SWOT analysis allows for a thorough examination of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with energy hubs. The analysis of case study projects further enriches the findings by providing real-world examples and highlighting their applicability in practice.
The results demonstrate that energy hubs have the potential to contribute significantly to network management, offering benefits such as reduced grid congestion, increased renewable energy utilisation, and enhanced collaboration among stakeholders. However, limitations exist, including the need for a clear definition, standardised legal procedures, and a comprehensive understanding of the specific conditions under which energy hubs are most suitable.
This thesis contributes to the existing knowledge on energy hubs and their impact on network management. It offers a comprehensive analysis of their key components, stakeholder dynamics, policy implications, and practical considerations. The research findings provide valuable insights for both academia and industry, informing future research directions and aiding DSOs in harnessing the full potential of energy hubs to facilitate the transition towards a sustainable and resilient energy system.
This thesis study aims to fill this gap by developing decision support for the selection of a sustainability assessment method during technology development. Coming from a comprehensive set of sustainability aspects (social, environmental and economic), during the thesis the focus was put on the environmental aspect exclusively. A literature study is used to identify a set of the possible sustainability assessment method. The identified methods are compared to a set of selection criteria based on the method's acceptance, type of assessment, and sustainability pillar covered. Four methods/method groups are identified as suitable for the defined criteria and the study scope. The selected methods are analyzed in more detail to gain a deeper understanding. Based on the knowledge acquired, a flow chart is developed to support selecting the most suitable sustainability assessment method. In order to be able to compare the selected assessment method with other available method, a ranking is developed. The ranking is based on a qualitative comparison and data obtained from the literature. The ranking is displayed in two ways, by a set of spiderweb diagrams and a ranking with numbers. A partial validation of the developed ranking is done by applying two methods to a use case and comparing the practical results with the theoretical ones. Here a mismatch between the ranking obtained from the theoretical data and the one from practical experience can be identified.
The result of the study is the development of decision support consisting of a flowchart and method ranking. Once both steps are followed, it should be possible to provide a fast and easy method selection for non-experts. Furthermore, the common practice of using only one sustainability assessment method (Life Cycle Assessment) is looked into. It can be seen that no sustainability assessment method is best in all criteria and application cases. Therefore, it is impossible to define one most suitable method in all cases. Choosing the right method depends on the scope (substance, product, or material) and the intended outcome. Thus, relying solely or predominantly on Life Cycle Assessment cannot be recommended. Alternative methods should be adopted and applied, also within the case company.
...
This thesis study aims to fill this gap by developing decision support for the selection of a sustainability assessment method during technology development. Coming from a comprehensive set of sustainability aspects (social, environmental and economic), during the thesis the focus was put on the environmental aspect exclusively. A literature study is used to identify a set of the possible sustainability assessment method. The identified methods are compared to a set of selection criteria based on the method's acceptance, type of assessment, and sustainability pillar covered. Four methods/method groups are identified as suitable for the defined criteria and the study scope. The selected methods are analyzed in more detail to gain a deeper understanding. Based on the knowledge acquired, a flow chart is developed to support selecting the most suitable sustainability assessment method. In order to be able to compare the selected assessment method with other available method, a ranking is developed. The ranking is based on a qualitative comparison and data obtained from the literature. The ranking is displayed in two ways, by a set of spiderweb diagrams and a ranking with numbers. A partial validation of the developed ranking is done by applying two methods to a use case and comparing the practical results with the theoretical ones. Here a mismatch between the ranking obtained from the theoretical data and the one from practical experience can be identified.
The result of the study is the development of decision support consisting of a flowchart and method ranking. Once both steps are followed, it should be possible to provide a fast and easy method selection for non-experts. Furthermore, the common practice of using only one sustainability assessment method (Life Cycle Assessment) is looked into. It can be seen that no sustainability assessment method is best in all criteria and application cases. Therefore, it is impossible to define one most suitable method in all cases. Choosing the right method depends on the scope (substance, product, or material) and the intended outcome. Thus, relying solely or predominantly on Life Cycle Assessment cannot be recommended. Alternative methods should be adopted and applied, also within the case company.
In order to study the topic, a specific case study was chosen to study, which is the Port of Moerdijk industrial cluster. Using publicly available data, three are chemical manufacturing companies and the one is a glass packaging manufacturing company, which is taken into account. The cluster analysis, results that companies are already strongly interlinked by exchanging material streams and utilities, which is an example of existing industrial symbiosis. The main raw material is naphtha, while energy is produced mainly by burning natural gas. This explains the high emissions of the cluster, around 2.8 Mt CO2/y, while the biggest emitter is the steam cracker unit (55% of the total emissions). Based on the cluster analysis, various options for decarbonisation are studied, such as alternatives for feedstock, energy carriers and the alternative processes itself.
The proposed scenario for the cluster of Moerdijk is, investing in the partial substitution of fossil-based naphtha feedstock with 10% co-feed of bionaphtha and 10% co-feed of waste plastic oil. Implementation of the electrification of the steam cracker, the steam boilers and the glass production processes and finally, Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) technology is recommended. By implementing the recommended combination of decarbonisation options, it is estimated that by 2035 this will result in reduction of 45% of cluster emissions.
After the proposal of the final scenario for the case study, an attempt is made to generalise this analysis, and thus a way towards a decision framework is presented. Essentially, a list of actions is presented, which someone could follow to find the appropriate solution for another chemical industrial cluster. In this framework, all the social, environmental, economic and technical sectors are taken into account. This leads to a rather complex topic that should be solved or at least simplified. This study can be used by decision makers of a chemical manufacturing company, which is a part of an industrial cluster, as a tool in order to follow the right steps to conclude the most suitable option for decarbonisation. The advantage of studying this topic from an industrial cluster perspective is the decrease of individual investment costs by investing in a common solution with shared infrastructure.
...
In order to study the topic, a specific case study was chosen to study, which is the Port of Moerdijk industrial cluster. Using publicly available data, three are chemical manufacturing companies and the one is a glass packaging manufacturing company, which is taken into account. The cluster analysis, results that companies are already strongly interlinked by exchanging material streams and utilities, which is an example of existing industrial symbiosis. The main raw material is naphtha, while energy is produced mainly by burning natural gas. This explains the high emissions of the cluster, around 2.8 Mt CO2/y, while the biggest emitter is the steam cracker unit (55% of the total emissions). Based on the cluster analysis, various options for decarbonisation are studied, such as alternatives for feedstock, energy carriers and the alternative processes itself.
The proposed scenario for the cluster of Moerdijk is, investing in the partial substitution of fossil-based naphtha feedstock with 10% co-feed of bionaphtha and 10% co-feed of waste plastic oil. Implementation of the electrification of the steam cracker, the steam boilers and the glass production processes and finally, Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) technology is recommended. By implementing the recommended combination of decarbonisation options, it is estimated that by 2035 this will result in reduction of 45% of cluster emissions.
After the proposal of the final scenario for the case study, an attempt is made to generalise this analysis, and thus a way towards a decision framework is presented. Essentially, a list of actions is presented, which someone could follow to find the appropriate solution for another chemical industrial cluster. In this framework, all the social, environmental, economic and technical sectors are taken into account. This leads to a rather complex topic that should be solved or at least simplified. This study can be used by decision makers of a chemical manufacturing company, which is a part of an industrial cluster, as a tool in order to follow the right steps to conclude the most suitable option for decarbonisation. The advantage of studying this topic from an industrial cluster perspective is the decrease of individual investment costs by investing in a common solution with shared infrastructure.
Hydrogen based ironmaking in 2030
A Tata Steel case study to assess the performance of direct iron ore reduction in the Netherlands
...
The effect of residential batteries on medium voltage substations
A socio-technical analysis of the emergence of residential batteries in the Netherlands
The economic competitiveness of green hydrogen based on its alternatives for the Dutch industry
A comprehensive overview of the cost development of green hydrogen alternatives in the Dutch process industry from 2021 to 2050
Towards an integrated offshore transmission system
A scenario-based modelling approach to assess mitigation schemes for hybrid offshore wind projects
Facilitating large-scale EV penetration in Iceland
Coordination of charging load with demand response to increase distribution grid utilisation
2030. Thus, it relies on onshore wind energy as a source. This industry has experienced a significant turmoil from 2017 to 2019 as the newly installed capacity dropped by 80 % within these two years. The public discussion sees an increase in lawsuits caused by low public acceptance as the reason for this behaviour. Action is demanded in form of a simplification of the permitting process of the wind energy projects and an increase in public support mainly by involvement of the community adjacent to the planned wind park or increased distance between projects and habitants. Even though these are noble requests, calling public acceptance as the only reason for the decrease in installed capacity does not seem plausible. Interestingly, 2017 coincides with the adoption of a new subsidization scheme which includes a bidding process. Since wind energy projects are private investment projects, their finances are key to success. The aim of this study is to gain understanding about the reasons of the slump and develop an alternative hypothesis. A literature review summarizes the legal, political, social, and technological landscape for onshore wind energy. A detailed synthesis of public acceptance literature is performed and understanding of the financial dependencies and influences related to wind energy projects is gained. To support the reasoning, a model is constructed which simulates the income and expenses of wind energy projects. A participation in the bidding process is simulated including a detailed calculation of interest rates, an approximation of the impact of an increasing wind turbine population and an estimation of the development of the turbine maintenance sector. The findings of this study are threefold. First, it summarizes in detail all financial aspects of onshore
wind energy projects. As a result, it is concluded that the maximum bid is set too low and the subsidization scheme is not adapted to the financial needs of a project. As a consequence, not enough sites are built even though they could technically be available, resulting in the slump. Secondly, with the current constrains of the bidding process, the onshore wind energy sector will remain in a slump and the 2030 goal set by the German government cannot be reached as projected technological advancements have a small effect. The slump also forces the wind energy sector into a recession. Since any scenario of technological development cannot be relied on to counteract the slump, an adjustment of the subsidization scheme is needed. The most effective way to reach the objectives
is to increase the maximum bid. Thirdly, it is argued that the public acceptance
would have limited to no effect on the situation. The German government has three options. Either, (I) the maximum bid is raised or (II) reversed to the old subsidization both implying higher costs than desired or (III) other renewable energy sources have to be supported and the onshore wind energy sector will undergo major restructuring including possible job losses. ...
2030. Thus, it relies on onshore wind energy as a source. This industry has experienced a significant turmoil from 2017 to 2019 as the newly installed capacity dropped by 80 % within these two years. The public discussion sees an increase in lawsuits caused by low public acceptance as the reason for this behaviour. Action is demanded in form of a simplification of the permitting process of the wind energy projects and an increase in public support mainly by involvement of the community adjacent to the planned wind park or increased distance between projects and habitants. Even though these are noble requests, calling public acceptance as the only reason for the decrease in installed capacity does not seem plausible. Interestingly, 2017 coincides with the adoption of a new subsidization scheme which includes a bidding process. Since wind energy projects are private investment projects, their finances are key to success. The aim of this study is to gain understanding about the reasons of the slump and develop an alternative hypothesis. A literature review summarizes the legal, political, social, and technological landscape for onshore wind energy. A detailed synthesis of public acceptance literature is performed and understanding of the financial dependencies and influences related to wind energy projects is gained. To support the reasoning, a model is constructed which simulates the income and expenses of wind energy projects. A participation in the bidding process is simulated including a detailed calculation of interest rates, an approximation of the impact of an increasing wind turbine population and an estimation of the development of the turbine maintenance sector. The findings of this study are threefold. First, it summarizes in detail all financial aspects of onshore
wind energy projects. As a result, it is concluded that the maximum bid is set too low and the subsidization scheme is not adapted to the financial needs of a project. As a consequence, not enough sites are built even though they could technically be available, resulting in the slump. Secondly, with the current constrains of the bidding process, the onshore wind energy sector will remain in a slump and the 2030 goal set by the German government cannot be reached as projected technological advancements have a small effect. The slump also forces the wind energy sector into a recession. Since any scenario of technological development cannot be relied on to counteract the slump, an adjustment of the subsidization scheme is needed. The most effective way to reach the objectives
is to increase the maximum bid. Thirdly, it is argued that the public acceptance
would have limited to no effect on the situation. The German government has three options. Either, (I) the maximum bid is raised or (II) reversed to the old subsidization both implying higher costs than desired or (III) other renewable energy sources have to be supported and the onshore wind energy sector will undergo major restructuring including possible job losses.